A Rose For Emily: A Symbol Of Neglect Analysis Essay Example

“A Rose for Emily” is the astonishing tale of Emily Grierson, a woman whose death and funeral captured the town’s attention. The peculiar result is highlighted by the symbolism of the decaying house, mirroring Miss Emily’s physical decline and showcasing her eventual mental breakdown. Similar to the deteriorating house, Emily’s life is plagued by a lack of authentic affection and nurturing.

Miss Emily’s house, similar to her physical appearance, has been influenced by years of neglect. The house is situated in a neighborhood that was once prominent but has since deteriorated. Although it was originally white and adorned with the elegant style of an earlier era, the house now stands out as an unattractive sight amidst a degraded environment (177). This portrayal of her house symbolizes the coexistence of the past and present and serves as a representative depiction of Emily herself.

The house has transformed from an exquisite representation of quality to an unsightly remainder from a different era due to negligence. Similarly, Miss Emily has become an eyesore. She was initially described as a “fallen monument” (177), highlighting her former greatness and subsequent unattractiveness. She was an embodiment of past values, but her vulnerability to death and decay caused her fall from grace. According to Fetterley, there is an inherent violence in the desire to witness the downfall of a monument (194). Like the house, she has lost her beauty. A once beautiful woman now endures obesity and bloating. Both the house and its inhabitant have endured the detrimental effects of time and disregard.

The house’s interior reflects Miss Emily’s deteriorating state and the accompanying sense of sadness. Initially, only a narrow staircase in shadow, emitting the scent of “dust and disuse,” is visible (178). This darkness and smell mirror Miss Emily, who is described as a “small, fat woman in black” with a “dry and cold” voice (178). The likeness between the house’s interior and Miss Emily extends to the mantel, where her father’s portrait sits alongside her. In the picture, a young Emily appears frail and yearning for involvement in the era’s life. Following her father’s death, she resembles “angels in colored churches” (180). Both the building and Miss Emily’s body are deteriorating, akin to tarnished metal.

Both the house and Miss Emily exhibit an unyielding arrogance, as described by the townspeople. The house is stubborn and disregards the decay around it, while Miss Emily proudly ignores the deterioration of her once-grand residence. This prevalent theme is manifested in various actions: denying her father’s death, refusing to address or pay taxes, disregarding rumors of her promiscuity, and withholding the reason for purchasing arsenic from the druggist. According to Brooks, Miss Emily may be considered crazy, but she is not afraid of what others think of her. Both the house and Miss Emily become traps for Homer Barron, a laborer and confirmed bachelor who represents the spirit of the twentieth century. For Blythe, Homer is characterized as Miss Emily’s gay beau. Like the house, Emily resists progress and modernization until they both become obsolete relics.

The text highlights the parallel between the deteriorating house and Miss Emily Grierson in “A Rose for Emily.” Both the house and Miss Emily suffer from neglect and lack of love, leading to their physical and emotional decay. Over the course of forty years, the once beautiful and elegant house transforms into an ugly state, mirroring Miss Emily’s own deteriorating condition. The source for this analysis is Cleanth Brooks’ “On A Rose for Emily” in Literature for Composition, edited by Sylan Barnet, et al., 4th edition, published by HaperCollins in 1995 (190-1).

Blythe, Hal. “Faulkner’s A Rose for Emily.” Barnet. 192-3.

Fetterley, Judith. “A Rose for Emily A Rose for Emily.” Barnet. 194-96

Soccer: History Of Atletico Madrid

Espanyol capped its centenary celebrations by winning the Spanish Cup with a 2-1victory over Atletico Madrid on Saturday. One of the cheekiest goals seen inSpain all season gave the Barcelona club an ideal start after just two minutes.

Atletico goalkeeper Toni Jimenez — who moved to the club from Espanyol lastsummer — saved a shot by Toni Velamazan and was bouncing the ball in front ofhim, ready to boot it upfield. But then Raul Tamudo nipped in unseen, headed theball away from Jimenez and beat his former team mate in a sprint across the faceof the goal, turning the ball in from an narrow angle out on the left. SergioGonzalez hit Espanyol’s second goal five minutes from time to ensure the clubwon its first honor for 60 years Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink pulled one back forAtletico a minute into injury time, and Espanyol endured an anxious couple ofminutes as the clocked ticked away, but it was too little too late. Espanyolecstasy For Espanyol supporters, it brought a huge smile to their faces after adecade of despair. They were relegated twice during the 1990s and even had tosell their ground — the historic Sarria stadium — in 1997 to solve a cashcrisis. However Espanyol’s veteran defender Nando Munoz put the emotions of allthose involved with the club into words. “This might be the greatest day inthe history of Espanyol. This is for all those fans and everyone else who canremember the bad times — all those dire moments,” Nando said. Nando hadrecovered enough breath to speak to Spanish to reporters because he had beengiven his marching orders 13 minutes from time after picking up two yellow cardsin quick succession while Espanyol fought to contain a second half Atleticocomeback. Atletico attack The first half belonged to Espanyol, with Tamudo andVelamazan causing plenty of problems for the Atletico defenders and MoisesArteaga slicing through the middle, but the second period saw Atletico strivefor an equalizer. Hasselbaink was a constant threat, although Espanyol defendersdid a good job of soaking up the pressure, and his closest efforts came fromedge-of-the-area free kicks. After Nando left the field, Espanyol looked brieflyin trouble, but both teams ended the match with 10 men after former Spanishinternational defender Santi Denia lost control completely seven minutes fromtime. Denia scythed down Manuel Serrano from the rear and then headbutted ToniVelamazan. Sergio’s clincher came two minutes later. Tears He controlled a long,speculative, ball forward with his head and then blasted the half-volley pastthe hapless Jimenez, who left the field inconsolable. “Football just isn’tfair,” Jimenez wailed, with tears streaming down his face. Jimenez was notthe only Atletico player to leave the field with moist eyes. The cup finaldefeat, their second in successive years after losing 3-0 to Valencia last year,brought an end to one of the worst season’s in club history. Atletico wasrelegated and will spend next season in the Spanish second division for thefirst time since 1934. A damaging government investigation into the clubfinances also left the club badly demoralized on and off the field. The cupfinal is likely to be the last match that many players, including Hasselbaink,have in an Atletico jersey, with a massive exodus anticipated.

Sports and Games

Literature Review Of The Book “The Catcher In The Rye”

The book Catcher in the Rye is a story of Holden Caulfield’s thoughts aboutlife and the world around him. Holden tells many of his opinions aboutpeople and takes the reader on a 5-day trip into his mind. Holden,throughout the book, made other people feel inferior to his own. I canrelate to this because although I do not view people inferior to me, Ijudge others unequally. Holden and I both have similar judgements ofpeople from the way they act and behave. We also share feelings aboutmotivation as well as lack of it. After reading this book, I came to theconclusion that Holden and I are much more similar than I initiallybelieved.

Holden portrayed others to be inferior to his own kind all throughoutthe book. He made several references as to how people aren’t as perfect ashe was. “The reason Stradlater fixed himself up to look good wasbecause he was madly in love with himself.” Holden had adifficults with no being good. He was afraid of not having any special talents orabilities and and did other thi8ngs to make himself look tough.

“Boy, I sat at that goddam bar till around one o’clock or so, getting drunkas a bastard. I could hardly see straight.” Holden tried all hecould to try to be cool he was faking it just to fit in. He drank, cursed and criticized life l to make itseem he was like he knew of his habits. I myself have found me doing thisat times, also. I, at times, feel the need to fit in to a group and dothings similar to what others do in order to be accepted by others, but I do have my limitations. Ismoked a cigarratte once by myself cause I saw everybody doing that so I was like let me see how it is, I tried it andit didn’t grow on me but that was only once. Holden and I bothput people on levels higher and lower other than our own for amount of knowledge andand characteristicHolden used the term ‘phonies’ to describe more than a few people inthis book. He used the term to be what a person is if they don’t actthemselfs and follow other people’s ways. Holden didn’t likephonies, he thought of them as if they were trying to show off. He didn’tlike it when they showed off because it seemed fake and unnatural everytime they would act like it..

“At the end of the first act we went out with allthe other jerks for a cigarette. What a deal thatwas. You never saw so many phonies in all your life,everybody smoking their ears off and talking aboutthe play so that everybody could hear how sharp theywere.”

error: Content is protected !!