Advantages And Disadvantages Studying Abroad Writing Sample

In the modern world we live,knowing foreign languages and obtaining qualitative studies is a representative index of welfare for future specialist in any field. I will be a student in a couple of days and if I have to a make a choice between studying here in Moldova and abroad surely i would choose abroad. There are many reasons which lead me to do this. It cannot be denied that a large number of students now choose to attend universities outside their home country, and this tendency leads to opposing opinions about whether this is advantageous or not.

Many argue that studying at a foreign university may offer some benefits, whereas others claim that it obviously brings certain difficulties and challenges. It is true to say that studying abroad often offers a better education for students. For instance, accessing to modern facilities such as: fully-equipped laboratories, well-stocked libraries, comfortable classrooms and other facilities.

Additionally, they can also work with highly-skilled professors; especially increasing chance for a good career after graduation owing to a diploma granted by a prestigious university is attractive to employers. Naturally, it is really a chance for a student’s personal development, this is because they must be self-reliant, responsible for their deed as well as budget time and money themselves. Moreover, it is considered as an opportunity for a student to experience a different culture.

Nevertheless, some people believe that going overseas to study brings inevitable disadvantages. Needless to say, culture shock is an obsession for most of students. The explanation for this is that they have to face something that seems totally strange to them like: food, weather or language barrier. Of course, studying abroad costs them a large amount of money, apart from students who win scholarships. Furthermore, homesickness is another detriment due to being far away from their home.

In brief, although studying abroad will certainly bring benefits as well as difficulties, it is undeniable that this will help students have a better life in the future because they are educated in a good studying environment. Therefore, I suppose the difficulties and challenges of studying abroad are completely dominated by its advantages. Finally I would add that each of us would like to have the opportunity to experience something extraordinary,we just need to learn to make it right and to take conclusive decisions.

Carroll Edward Cole


Carroll Cole, born in Sioux City, Iowa on May 9th, 1938, had his first kill at the age of nine. Out of the numerous serial killers studied throughout history, two distinctive factors make me focus on him: his status as one of the youngest serial killers ever and his representation of the profound failures within the legal system that affect both society and individuals. Cole harbored a strong animosity towards women, making him a prolific example.

The animosity between Cole and his mother originated from her involving him in her extramarital relationships while his father served in World War II. Even after his father returned, Cole suffered physical abuse and demeaning treatment from his mother. Additionally, she forced him to wear feminine clothing like frilly skirts and petticoats for the amusement of her friends. At the age of nine, he accidentally drowned a friend who mocked him and called him weak. However, authorities deemed it an unintentional occurrence and he escaped punishment. During adolescence, Cole accumulated multiple arrests related to alcohol and minor theft.

He enlisted in the US Navy after leaving high school but was released from duty for stealing pistols, which he used to shoot at vehicles on the highways of San Diego. Returning to Richmond, California in 1960, he assaulted two couples in their car with a hammer while parked in a dimly lit lover’s lane. Eventually, disturbed by persistent violent thoughts, Cole stopped a police car in Richmond and admitted his urges to the authorities. Carroll surrendered willingly and spent the following three years in institutions where he was deemed to “not present a threat to others”.

After being discharged in 1963, he moved to Dallas, Texas, and married a prostitute who struggled with alcoholism. In 1970, he surrendered again, this time in Reno, Nevada, confessing his disturbing desires to rape and strangle women. He was then transferred to a state hospital where Dr. Felix Peebles diagnosed him as having a poor prognosis and noted that his condition upon admission remained unchanged. The recommended treatment was a bus ticket to San Diego, California.

On May 7th, 1971, in San Diego, he committed his first murder as an adult by killing Essie Buck in his car. Just two weeks later, he repeated the crime with another woman referred to as “Wilma.” Another week passed before the third female victim was killed.

In June 1971, Cole was interviewed by San Diego Homicide Detective Robert Ring wherein he confessed to sleeping with Essie Buck. However, Cole claimed that he woke up the next morning to find her dead and in a state of panic, he disposed of her body. Detective Ring accepted his account and no charges were brought against Cole. (Newton, Michael. The Encyclopedia of Serial Killers. New York: Infobase Publishing, 2006. Print.) Moving to the eastern side, Cole claimed another victim in August 1975 in Casper, Wyoming. Subsequently, he resurfaced in Las Vegas in 1977 where he spent enough time to kill a prostitute before being arrested on an auto theft charge, which was later dropped.

A few weeks later, Cole woke up in Oklahoma City to find another woman’s remains in his bathtub, with bloody slices of her buttocks in a skillet on the stove (“Murder in Dallas” truTV. Turner Entertainment Digital, n. d. Web. 7 Aug 2012). After returning to San Diego, Cole got remarried and sought counseling to help him stop drinking. However, this attempt was unsuccessful, and in August 1979, he strangled Bonnie Stewart at his workplace and dumped her naked body in an alley next to the store.

Several weeks later, specifically on September 17, 1979, the husband’s long-standing threats to kill his wife finally came to fruition. Strangely, even though these threats had been reported to a parole officer responsible for overseeing his supervision, the authorities refused to declare her death as a murder. Instead, they attributed her untimely demise to natural causes, presumably due to her own excessive drinking. This decision was made despite the shocking discovery of her body wrapped in a blanket and hidden in a closet within Cole’s residence. Furthermore, Cole himself was arrested while intoxicated and in the process of digging a grave beneath a nearby neighbor’s house.

Cole left San Diego and traveled to Las Vegas, where he targeted another victim. He then went to Dallas, Texas and killed three more victims in 1980. Despite these actions, he managed to avoid capture. During his final murder, he was discovered with the victim lying at his feet, but detectives only considered him a “casual suspect.” At 42 years old, Cole grew tired of his actions and confessed to a series of unsolved homicides without any provocation. Despite clearly exhibiting psychopathic traits, psychologists and psychoanalysts in six different states dismissed him as a harmless lowlife who posed no threat to society. In San Diego, he was caught twice attempting murder, but each time his excuse of a lover’s quarrel was accepted. Investigators even disregarded Cole’s own confession and treated two homicides as accidents caused by drunkenness while dismissing others as the work of angry pimps.

It is highly probable that he would have evaded capture again in Texas if he had not chosen to admit his guilt in a situation where investigators perceived the murders as “accidental deaths”.

Works Cited

  • Freed, David. “Nevada Executes Killer of Five: 25 View Death of Carroll E. Cole by Lethal Injection”.
  • Los Angeles Times 7 Dec 1985: Web.
  • Newton, Michael. The Encyclopedia of Serial Killers. New York: Infobase Publishing, 2006. Print.
  • “Murder in Dallas” truTV. Turner Entertainment Digital, n. d. Web. 7 Aug 2012
  • Philbin, Michael, and Tom Philbin. The Killer Book of Serial Killers. Naperville: Sourcebooks, Inc., 2009. Print.

A Differente Perspective Of Grendel, From Beowulf

Have you ever wondered about the alternative perspective on Grendel in Beowulf and his reasons for killing so many people? The epic poem describes him as a malevolent and vicious creature with an insatiable thirst for human blood. However, John Gardner’s novel Grendel presents a contrasting portrayal of the character. In this book, Grendel is depicted as the only individual capable of clear thinking and reasoning. Consequently, readers are presented with a distinct outlook on Grendel across the two texts.

In the epic poem Beowulf, the author discusses personal opinions and explores different ideas and themes such as humans’ tendency to judge prematurely, men’s violence, and humans’ gullibility. Grendel, a powerful and malevolent monster, is portrayed as a cruel creature who has been tormenting the Danes for nine consecutive winters. He constantly seeks to kill and has an insatiable appetite for blood.

Both the novel and Beowulf illustrate the monster as a threat to humanity. In the novel, it is referred to as the “bane of the race of men” (p. 49) and the “God-cursed monster” (p. 49), emphasizing its destructive nature. Similarly, in Beowulf, Grendel is portrayed as an adversary with a strong desire to eliminate humans. The poem describes Grendel as a formidable and powerful being. It mentions that every Dane would safeguard their homes at night due to fear of Grendel’s potential harm.

Despite not being as powerful as the epic hero, Grendel’s ability to cause significant devastation in Daneland before Beowulf’s arrival suggests that he still possessed enough strength to eliminate a considerable portion of the community. These portrayals of Grendel contribute to the depiction of an epic hero who embodies the values and beliefs of the Anglo-Saxons. As the antagonist of the poem, this malevolent creature necessitates a stronger hero who can defeat it in combat. Beowulf, driven by his desire for pride and fame, fulfills this crucial role.

The text emphasizes how Beowulf represents the cultural values of the Anglo-Saxons. He seeks fame and wealth when he kills Grendel. Furthermore, Beowulf acts on instinct rather than deep thought, as seen in his choice to confront the Dragon alone despite knowing the possible outcomes. The poem also highlights a clear contrast between good and evil, with Grendel representing cruelty and evil, while Beowulf embodies goodness and righteousness.

The author’s purpose in the novel Grendel is to depict Grendel as a dark character, contrasting with the peaceful and intelligent outcast portrayed in Beowulf. In this version of Grendel, he desires acceptance and socialization with people, unlike the violent and dangerous depiction in Beowulf. Additionally, the character is shown to possess intelligence.

Contrary to the portrayal in the epic poem, Grendel is not shown as a mindless monster solely driven by a desire to devour humans; instead, he is depicted as an intellectual thinker who approaches situations with depth and contemplation. Additionally, Grendel is the only one who recognizes how Hrothgar and the Shaper influence the thoughts of the men in Daneland, showcasing his unique ability to think critically and resist being deceived by the charming poet.

In addition, “Grendel” presents Grendel as experiencing feelings of sadness and loneliness, while “Beowulf” offers no exploration of his emotional state and portrays him as a thoughtless creature.

Despite his lack of social interaction, Grendel in Gardner’s novel experiences emotions like sadness and loneliness, leading to his strong desire to belong to the human community. These feelings highlight his uniqueness as a character embodying goodness. John Gardner deliberately presents an alternative depiction of Grendel in order to delve into various ideas and themes, which include showcasing men’s inclination towards violence and their tendency to pass judgments based on initial impressions.

The main message of this book is that humans often judge others based solely on their outward appearance, without taking the time to understand their true nature. This idea is shown in Gardner’s novel when Grendel tries to interact with people in the mead-hall. Despite his intention to socialize and start a conversation, the humans immediately see him as a dangerous creature. This proves that humans tend to make judgments about others based on initial impressions instead of uncovering their true emotions and personalities.

Gardner wants readers to see that humans possess a natural inclination towards violence. When people perceive Grendel as a malevolent monster, their immediate instinct is to launch an attack. They hurl spears at him and would have ended his life had he not managed to flee. Furthermore, the author demonstrates human aggression through Grendel’s discovery of a lifeless body in the forest. Grendel correctly deduces that the human’s demise resulted from their own violent tendencies. Additionally, Gardner illustrates how certain individuals are susceptible to manipulation.

The text highlights how all the Danes are deceived by the songs of the Shaper, while only Grendel can perceive the truth. Gardner’s rendition of Grendel serves to convey his ideas and expose certain human shortcomings. Consequently, Beowulf offers readers an authorial perspective on Grendel as a monstrous creature driven by violence and irrationality, eagerly anticipating the opportunity to harm others and willing to go to any lengths to achieve his goals.

In Gardner’s novel Grendel, Grendel is portrayed as being more intelligent than the majority of the Danes. Additionally, he is depicted as a peaceful creature whose main objective is to socialize with people. Gardner’s intention in presenting this different characterization is to highlight certain ideas that are often overlooked after reading Beowulf. Through Grendel, the author demonstrates that humans tend to judge based on first impressions and that we possess a propensity for violence. Furthermore, Gardner suggests that humans are easily manipulated. Ultimately, these contrasting depictions of the same character by two different authors serve the purpose of conveying a variety of ideas and themes.

error: Content is protected !!