An Organizer Mug For Traveling And Hiking Free Writing Sample

  • Organizer for cosmetics + Mug = Travel mug
  • Smaller weight – more expensive product
  • Organizer mug for traveling + hiking = three full-fledged travel cups

Necessary skills:

  • designer skills
  • knowledge of ecology

External expertise:

  • marketing
  • advertising
  • pricing
  • search for sales channels
  • development of product positioning

Market gap:

  1. Multifunctional tourist tableware
  2. Unique and innovative product
  3. Useful for tourists, fishers, or hunters
  4. Convenient to take on a trip or to the hospital

Market size: large

Competitors: manufacturers of compact mugs with folding handles.

Competitive advantage: less weight, multifunctionality.

Businesses offering similar products: MSR Insulated, Snow Peak, Tatonka Handle Mug.


  • absence of reputation
  • more profitable to buy a whole set of dishes

Target customers: people fond of active recreation.

The expected growth of customer base: people with any travel- or nature-related hobbies.

Willingness and capacity to pay the price:

  • cheap
  • eco-friendly

Investment needed for:

  • design
  • materials
  • advertising

Acquiring the resources:

  • search for sponsors;
  • partnership.


Acharya, S., & Chakrabart, A. (2019). ‘Concepte’: Supporting environmentally benign design decision-making at conceptual stage. Research into Design for a Connected World, 48(2), 335-344.

Cameron, A., Colbert, S. D., Macleod, A., & Gill, H. S. (2021). Managing the risk from children’s travel cups. Emergency Medicine Journal, 38(5), 345-348.

Cameron, A., Gill, R., & Colbert, S. (2020). An innovative and alternative design of travel mug lid to negate the risks to paediatric tongues and airways. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 58(10), 213-215.

Maglio, S. J., & Reich, T. (2019). Feeling certain: Gut choice, the true self, and attitude certainty. Emotion, 19(5), 876-888.

Sharma, N. (2021). The effects of matching empty ad space color to featured product’s color on consumer buying impulse. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 38(3), 262-271.

A Best Practice Strategy For Professional Development


When I was writing my first project, I tended to invent new technical ideas for the aspect that I was studying. In most cases, I thought I was very clever and had made some of the best decisions while handling the project. I was determined to finish the project within the shortest time as well as challenge my lecturer and colleagues. In my opinion, I thought that my mastery of the content was a little notch higher.

When my instructor called me for the first time, I thought that my brilliance was not being recognized. His first analysis of the idea changed almost everything. In my opinion, I thought the instructor was not ready to accept new ideas. In my myopic analysis, I believed that the instructor was not ready to accept discoveries as well as challenges in the nursing field. In totality, I felt that the lecturer was an enemy of progress in the project. Nevertheless, it took me a couple of weeks to understand the clear perspective of the instructor from my perspective.


However, after giving it a thorough thought, I noted that even if my ideas were right, they were not meeting the intention of the project. Instead, they continued to create confusion and diversion from the main objectives of the study. Even though I liked most of them, I had to acknowledge that my instructor’s perspective was accurate. I recognized that there was no need to win the argument as it would have resulted in needless conversation. I realized that such a move would not only result in the delay of the project but also damage the relationship between the supervisor and me. Furthermore, it had no positive impact on building the overall progress of the project.

I noted that communication is central in the life of a nurse student. Proper communication is the hallmark that helps in the establishment of a common understanding between two parties (Schuster, 2020). Learning to effectively with high-level competency marks the main reason for communicating. That is, the ability to be sensitive in every situation and understand the position of the other team makes the entire process very simple. In other words, being open, clear, and precise to the point makes the team members open and articulate in their reasoning.


I can perfectly relate the incident with how the self-concept evolves in the life of a person. In most cases, the self-concept is perfectly filtered through the perception that people think they possess (Schuster, 2020). I noted that concepts such as values, attitudes, and beliefs are enhanced when people take care of the other member’s perception. In most cases, the development of these ideas provides an individual with the opportunity to master some of the most critical ideas of their lives. Furthermore, the entire incident may have a far-reaching effect I the life of a nurse as well as clients. Therefore, by accepting the instructor’s perspective, I was able to deliver one of the best results in the project. The entire guidelines provided me with a completely divergent view f the incident that later proved to be one of the best results.


In my response, I noted the need to be sensitive to other people‘s ideas. By opening to other people’s perspectives, one can conform to other forms of different realities that exist as well as appreciate the other opinions that are different from their own. By agreeing to my master’s instructions, I realized that I had managed to master a high level of communication competency. As a nurse, I accepted that working with other people’s perceptions is one of the most powerful means that would help to promote my overall operations in the hospital. By complying with other members’ notions, nurses can plan some of the most powerful interventions that are highly valued and meaningful to the patient. The move further has the opportunity to create one of the powerful working relationships as well as a greater perception of the desired objectives.

Concepts Utilized


There were several concepts that I perfectly utilized to help me achieve the best results during the incident. One of the concepts is sensitivity to other people’s perspectives. Being sensitive provides one with an opportunity to use logic and reason to perfectly guide one interaction with others (Schuster, 2020). This aspect allowed me to understand the boundaries and respect my seniors. It allowed me to keep my emotions at the lowest levels and remain focused on the course of the communication. As one continues to question the need to be sensitive, I realized that it is the most powerful aspect of building the comfort that is required in communication. By being sensitive, I was able to analyze the overall effect of the instructor’s perspective and work within his limits. This approach enabled me to achieve the best results in the long run.

Trust and Rapport

Trust and rapport form one of the hallmarks of communication. In most cases, it makes the parties involved work together and have confidence in the entire process of communication. Having a strong trust and rapport also provides the parties involved in the communication with the opportunity to expose their ideas to one another. I realized that the strong rapport provided me with the opportunity to have the best quality time with the instructor and achieve the maximum benefits from him. In most cases, he was ready to open up and guide me in the best direction during the project. Further, the element allowed me to work comfortably with the new ideas as well as to make the right changes that were required during the project.


In a nutshell, I noted that proper reflection, relation, and response in every situation form the basis of perfect communication in an institution. When these elements are perfectly utilized, they can improve the overall communication capacity of the players who are involved. In most cases, they act as the right pillars to make self-discovery as well as progress in every situation. Despite the challenges that I had at first, I noted that being sensitive and having the right rapport was critical element in achieving my best results. Today, I can attest that these virtues worked together for the good of both me and my relationship with the instructor. Through working together and having the right communication channel, we have managed to achieve more. We have managed to build a strong relationship as well as deliver the best results in the project. As a student, I have mastered the art of working together with my superiors as well as junior members of the nursing community.


Schuster, P. M. (2020). Concept Mapping: A Clinical Judgement Approach to Patient Care. FA Davis.

Erasmus And Machiavelli On A Renaissance Prince

The revitalization of political thought during the Renaissance concerned many questions, including the one of what constitutes a good government. Both Erasmus and Machiavelli discuss this question in their respective writings, trying to synthesize the image of an ideal ruler. While they agree that the government should demonstrate at least some concern for the subjects, Erasmus posits that the ruler should be an example of Christian virtue, while Machiavelli argues in favor of sheer practicality.

Both authors differ in their respective definitions of a successful prince. According to Erasmus (1936), a good prince is one who does not put oneself too much above one’s subjects. He gives an example of Augustus, the Roman Emperor, who detested being called a master because that would imply that his subjects were slaves (Erasmus, 1936). Machiavelli (1906), on the other hand, posits that a successful prince is the one to achieve wealth, prominence, and, above all, secured political power. His example of choice is Alexander VI, who managed to gain power over most of Italy through war and intrigue (Machiavelli, 1906). Thus, Erasmus (1936) measures success by virtue, while Machiavelli focuses on practical results.

In their vision of a Renaissance state, the two philosophers surprisingly agree that rulers should demonstrate concern for their subjects. Erasmus (1936) points out that a good ruler should only exercise power “to the great advantage” of his subjects (p. 175). In a similar manner, Machiavelli (1906) criticizes the rulers of Romagna, who plundered their subjects instead of ruling them wisely and with some restraint. Granted, Erasmus (1936) views effective government that promotes prosperity and stability as an end in itself, and Machiavelli (1906) only considers it a means to a secure reign. Still, the authors agree that a renaissance state should take care to govern its population reasonably rather than tyrannically.

Unsurprisingly, though, the philosophers disagree on what is necessary for a well-functioning government. From Erasmus’s (1936) perspective, a good government requires a ruler trained in Christian virtue and avoiding any corrupting influences. Conversely, Machiavelli (1906) insists that a well-functioning government requires the ruler to be ruthless, shrewd, and ready to deceive people because they will otherwise deceive him. Once again, it illustrates the difference between the two writers’ respective concerns of virtue and practicality.

When comparing the hypothetical princes constructed by both authors, it would probably be the wiser option to opt for a Machiavellian one. Undoubtedly, Erasmus (1936) offers a laudable image of the pursuit of virtue, but the foremost concern of a ruler is efficient government rather than moral self-perfection. The ruler can be an excellent example of mercy, kindness, generosity, and other Christian virtues, but it would do the people little good if he is not competent enough. A Machiavellian prince, concerned with the realm’s long-term stability over morality – if only for the sake of securing his own power against popular uprisings – is ultimately a better option for the population/

As one can see, Erasmus and Machiavelli offer widely different versions of an ideal Renaissance prince. The only thing they have in common is the agreement that a good ruler should be concerned about the subjects’ well-being – but for profoundly different reasons. For Erasmus, this concern is the manifestation of Christian virtue, which is the main prerequisite of good government and the ultimate criterion of princely success. For Machiavelli, this concern is merely the means to secure political power because his ideal prince is a ruthless schemer who puts efficiency and practicality above all.


Erasmus, D. (1936). The Education of a Christian Prince (L. K. Born, Trans.). Columbia UP.

Machiavelli, N. (1906). The Prince (N. H. Thomson, Trans.). In J. H. Robinson (Ed.) Readings in European History, vol. 2, pp. 10-13. Ginn.

error: Content is protected !!