Analysis Of Ek Ruka Hua Faisla 1 Sample Essay

Team has powerful influence in effecting the change in the mindsets (values, belief, system, attitude, etc. ) of its members. Explain giving suitable illustrations from the film.

A team can be divided as a group of people having a common vision, carrying out a specific task by following specific rules and protocols to achieve a common goal/mission/objective. In this movie 12 jury members are appointed by the court to discuss the case and reach to a consensus about the final decision of the case.

Systems theorists have long believed that when individuals “merge into a group” something new is created. This called the GESTALT effect which says whole is much more powerful and effective than a part. This new entity, although comprised of individuals, is believed to be “greater than the sum of its parts” and thus the dynamic that is created within the group is not directly attributed to any one individual but rather the unique interrelationship between those individuals and the force that this interrelationship has on group functioning.

Written below are the various benefits of teams, observed:- There were many instances when many of the jury members contradict each other and heated arguments usually followed these conflicts. But at the end everyone came out with a unanimous decision by accepting their differences and acknowledging to the facts.

Describe the major attributes, style and approach of the main protagonist in the film. Illustrate your response with examples.

The major attributes, style and approach are discussed below: All that Juror 8 wants is to give the accused a fair chance by structurally going forward with the process of scrutinizing every fact and detail. He is the first to question the evidence that is brought forward. He went to lengths to prove his point and to convince people of his opinions. For example, the knife which was the weapon of crime was supposed to be unique and rare to find. He proved this wrong by buying the same kind of knife from a local shop.

He approaches the trial in a very logical and organized manner. He stood out due to his ethics, motives, passion for fair and just hearing, and rational approach. Finally, this character proves to be a go-getter, and an initiator who actively seeks truth while maintaining a calm, peaceful and pleasant demeanor throughout the procedure despite of being provoked a number of times. Being an achiever and a confident man he actively listens to his fellow jurors’ opinions and point of views, and encourages them to think and rationalize.

Outline the lessons learnt from the movie particularly with reference to the role of group processes and process facilitation in making team an effective medium of change.

The central route is the process by which a person carefully ponders upon a communication and is eventually influenced by the power of argument. Juror #8 and Juror #4, both follow this approach towards attitudinal change. Juror #8 appeals for the accused’s innocence in a well-thought, organized and elucidated manner.

He stipulates his points through empirical evidence and eventually sways the other jurors. The central route to persuasion characterized Fonda’s approach. Likewise, the businessman uses his curt, stoic and inductive nature to create a strong, convincing argument based on facts. Lastly, Juror #11 applies the central route to persuasion when he advocates, “going deeper,” in reference to an examination of the facts. The peripheral route of persuasion is characterized by superficial cues surrounding the argument rather than validity of the facts presented in the argument.

Juror #10 and 7 display this kind of an approach. Where on one hand Juror #10 very inappropriately urges other jurors to construe an attitude based on peripheral ethnic and racial cues, Juror #7 asks them to get away with the decision as soon as possible since there is no use in discussing the facts as maximum number of them were convinced the boy was guilty. Through the use of non-factual, environmental cues, the sick gentlemen utilizes the peripheral route to persuasion. Route selection is another component of relevance in the movie.

The jurors who care deeply about the fate of the accused boy, are concerned with justice, take pride in their intellect regardless of social status, and are involved in discussion susceptible to the central route. Those who are not able to understand the complexity of the trial, are distracted and pressed for time tend to take the peripheral route. This phenomenon is exemplified by the Juror #10 who complains about his business being interrupted and speaks English poorly, Juror #7 who urgently wants to make it to the movie theatre and finally by Juror #3 who is distracted by his own personal rage, brought forth by the young accused boy.

So it can be seen that the way a group works can highly influence the working capacity and the effectiveness of the decisions made by them. Juror #8’s adherence and conviction to evaluating the case is an example of social compensation. This character believes in the justice and morality implied within the constitutional guarantee afforded by the jury process.

Hence it becomes emperative for any team to give there team members the following: Equal and fair chance to voice their opinions good space for Self-Observation. A welcoming and supporting environment i. e. a condusive environment for Self-Disclosure. Experience trust, acceptance and understanding within the team. Vicarious learning i. e. a chance to pick up skills and attitudes from others. Good insight to expand self-knowledge. Share other people’s experiences- concerns, difficulties and hopes. This will indeed make the team an effective medium of change.

Malcolm X: Informative Speech

Malcolm X in the asses-ass preached about how African Americans were treated differently and view unequal and unworthy in the eyes of others and his beliefs are still relevant in today’s news. Ill. My cousin Lance was killed by white supremacists and crooked cops in Birmingham before was even born. Malcolm Ax’s preaching along with the other Civil Rights Movement leaders were to prevent events like this from happening. IV. There are many African American individuals who were killed by white supremacists in the wake of blacks trying o fight for their individuality and equality to confront segregation. V.

First will provide you info about Malcolm Ax’s early life, Nation of Islam teachings and then his assassination. Body I. Malcolm X was born May 19, 1925. He had a very rough early life. A According to interrelationships. Com, that found on today, his family moved around frequently because of racial threats from the UK Klux Klan. His father, who was a Baptist minister and a follower of Marcus Graver was murdered when Malcolm was 16. B. Malcolm turned to crime as his way of relieving stress. According to a biography posted on Malcolm. Mom found today Malcolm and his bestrides were jailed for a burglary in 1946.

He was sentenced to 10 years in prison were he reformed his life and read books on philosophy. He took the letter “X” to refer to his lost identity and represented his slave name as being raised in a mainly white nation. C. According to intolerableness. Com, Malcolm while serving jail time, met Elijah Muhammad of the Lost Nation of Islam in which he taught Little. Little then began practicing his teachings and the religion faithfully. His new found religion expressed ideas of “separating blacks from Western, white violation-culturally, politically, physically, and psychologically. Transition: Now that I have informed you of Malcolm early life and when he began his transition of crime into philosophy, I will now inform you of how he incorporated his ideas into the Civil Rights Movement. II. The Civil Rights Movement was a huge movement especially in the south to remove the idea of inequality of blacks and move towards acceptance and peace. Malcolm X had a huge impact in it and his voice was provided a large number of blacks. A. According to biography. Com that I researched today, Malcolm Ax’s ideas for he course of blacks equality states that his plan was to achieve just that “by any means necessary”‘ B.

Malcolm Ax’s ideas involved using lethal force with guns and his voice and ideas proved to be what the nation was the nation needed. His ideas after returning from the Middle East included Anita global- colonial struggle, pan-Africans, and embracing socialism according to biography. Com C. His cultural embrace of the Nation of Salami’s principles, allowed Malcolm to see that segregation, and the overall attitude that whites showed towards blacks at the time, needed to be removed. D. According to story. Com, Malcolm Ax’s ideas gave rise to Black Nationalism.

He hit the nail on the head with ideas of removing segregation but his physical actions of his group The Black Panthers proved unsuccessful because they promoted violence instead of nonviolence like Martin Luther King who’s actions proved more successful. Transition: I provided you with info on his involvement in the Civil Rights Movement and now I will educate you in Ax’s assassination and the legacy he left behind. Ill. Malcolm X was on the verge of politically succeeding in his goal but was stopped ever so close A. Malcolm X was ginning to perform a speech on the evening of February 21 ,1965.

According to biography. Com, three gunman rushed the stage and shot him point blank IS times in the chest. X was pronounced dead at the arrival of Columbian Presbyterian Hospital shortly after. B. The three gunman convicted of the murder were Talladega Harder, Norman XX Butler and Thomas Johnson all were members of the Nation of Islam. The motive was thought to be revenge for Elijah Muhammad who taught Malcolm the philosophy he delivered the United States. C. The legacy Malcolm X left behind a legacy in which he and his ideas will never be forgotten.

He fathered 6 children and his principles let to many successful people today citing his leadership skills as means to lead their current teams. In conclusion, Malcolm X was a highly motivated figure in African American struggles and a person who even though suffered a lot in his early life, tried to make world a better place alongside Martin Luther King who was also assassinated 3 years later. Conclusion: A lot of you, the general audience and also the nation in general thought his ideas were radical and that may be so but his vision was clear and even though his actions proved as a failure.

Pierre Elliot Trudeau

Pierre Elliot Trudeau, the fifteenth prime minister of Canada, accomplished several beneficial achievements for the country. Among them are passing the official language act of Canada, which declared French and English as official languages, establishing the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom, and implementing reforms on matters such as abortion, homosexuality, and lotteries. These examples illustrate Pierre Trudeau’s contributions to Canada during his time in Parliament.

In 1969, the official language act of Canada was implemented by Pierre Trudeau. This act aimed to establish French and English as the country’s two official languages. It granted civil servants the choice to use either English or French while on duty and safeguarded the language rights of Francophones across Canada.

The act guarantees that federal departments and the Crown Corporation provide services in both official languages, allowing French and English politicians to communicate without language barriers. It also grants Canadians the option to have their hearing or attend a hearing in either official language within the court system. Additionally, parliament is obligated to publish laws in both languages, ensuring equality between them and no favoritism towards either one.

Pierre Trudeau achieved two significant achievements for Canada: the official language act and the establishment of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982. This charter encompasses the essential principles concerning the powers of federal, provincial, and territorial governments.

The Charter sets boundaries on the government’s power to create unjust laws, ensuring that everyone is protected and has equal rights regardless of their characteristics. It also expands fundamental human rights that were previously restricted by various governmental rules.

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees several rights, including freedom of speech, religion, and association. In 1968, Pierre Trudeau played a crucial role in advancing Canada by passing laws that legalized abortion, homosexuality, and lotteries.

Trudeau’s famous quote, “there’s no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation”#, stems from the legalization of homosexuality. Trudeau believes that individuals should have personal freedom in their lives, including their decisions about sexual activities, relationships, or marrying someone of their preferred gender. This law specifically helps Canada’s gay and lesbian community by allowing them to be with their chosen partners without facing punishment for being homosexual.

Pierre Trudeau introduced multiple provisions under the Omnibus Bill, encompassing actions such as the legalization of abortions and the requirement for three doctors to assess potential negative effects on a woman’s emotional, physical, or mental well-being. Furthermore, Trudeau sanctioned lotteries and gambling, allowing individuals to purchase lottery tickets. The bill also conferred police officers with the power to administer breathalyzer tests on individuals suspected of driving under the influence and set forth regulations for owning firearms.

Undoubtedly, Pierre Trudeau’s impact on Canada is immense. His implementation of the Official Language Act, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom, as well as his efforts in liberalizing laws on abortion, homosexuality, and legalizing lotteries have had a transformative effect on the nation. These accomplishments have not only made French an official language but also established fundamental human rights and decriminalized homosexuality, abortion, and gambling. As a result, Pierre Elliot Trudeau rightfully holds a place among the greatest and most influential Prime Ministers in Canadian history.

error: Content is protected !!