Analysis Of Martin Luther King’s Why Can’t We Wait Sample Essay

Life was poor in every direction for Africa an Americans. They had little chance for success in life and acceptance among whites was no t even fathomable. In the excerpt King uses emotive imagery, rhetorical questions, and historical allusion to persuade the audience to accept his point of view and to take action instead o f waiting aimlessly for someone else to take initiative, hints the title Why Can’t We Wait.

King effectively utilizes emotive imagery to appeal to the audiences emotion, while at the same time, creating a vivid picture of the grim circumstances that haunted African A Americans in the sass’s. He starts out with the brief but insightful summary of the life of a you Eng ‘negro’ boy. King states “The stench of garbage is in the halls. The drunk, jobless, the junkie sees are shadow figures of his everyday world. ” He uses this to appeal to the audiences emotion n by astutely pointing out how his life was of poor quality. This makes the reader more undo restarting and agreeable for when he gets into his main point.

Martin, in a refrained manner, uses rhetorical questions to bring his main poi NT to light. He says “why does misery constantly haunt the Negro? … Had the forebears done some e tragic injury to the nation”. This shows how unfortunate the ‘negro’ population was, and for what ? King despite the fact that he knows the answer, asks what was so wrong about African America NAS that they deserved this type of treatment. This also uses logos, because the audiences will think that King’s argument did nothing wrong. This, in turn, further persuades the audio once to accept his point of view and be more amenable to persuasion.

King Cleverly uses historical allusion to prove his point further and to persuade e. The subject matter which he presents to achieve his rhetorical purpose of persuasion by depicting the ‘negro’ situation is historical in nature. He references periods in history where African Americans have helped the United States in a way that few have. He states “for two hundred y ears, without wages … To commanding influence in domestic commerce and world trade. ” This illus trees the helpful lives of ‘Negroes’ that have been dedicated to the betterment of the US, and y et are treated poorly ND unfairly among whites.

This shows that people cannot sit idly by and wait for action that needs to be taken immediately. He persuades them into this with his sympathy ethic historical allusions. King also alludes to Other significant ‘negro’ figures and their coma placements, such as Crisps Attacks. He uses historical allusion as a tool to accomplish his ret original purpose.

Romeo And Juliet Literary Analysis (Archetypes)

While both Mercuric and Table can be considered the competitor archetype, Benevolent acts as a foil through the peacekeeper, or editor archetype. In this tragedy, Shakespeare uses the comparison of Mercuric, Table, and Benevolent to prove that, though honor seems like a worthy cause to, the safety and interests of oneself and one’s loved ones must take first priority. Americium’s fiery temper and quick tongue shows that protecting honor isn’t better than protecting the interests of friends, but rather, quite the opposite.

While Mercuric is putting his quick tongue to work devising puns at the beginning of Act Ill, Romeo marries his love Juliet in secret at Friar Laurence chamber. As Juliet is of Romeos household’s rival, Romeo is now kin to Gullet’s family and is determined to show them due respect. So when Table, Gullet’s irate cousin, challenges Romeo to a duel, he refuses. Romeo says to Table, “I do protest never injured thee, but love thee better than thou cants devise” (Shakespeare 1 19). Upon hearing this, Americium’s temper ignites.

He cries, “O calm, dishonorable, vile submission!… Come sir, your passed” (Shakespeare 121 Mercuric bristles at Romeos lost honor and lack of bravado, thus taking upon himself the protection of Romeos dignity, asking for Table’s “passed”, fencing move. And thus, Mercuric perishes. Peugeot states, “As he is dying Mercuric says, ‘A plague o’ both your houses! Am sped… ‘ He repeats this phrase twice more before succumbing to death. It is after Americium’s death that Romeo realizes what will be the consequences of his love affair” (n. Page).

Mercuric fights for the behalf of Romeo, who doesn’t want to fight in the first place, and dies, creating trouble for most if not all of the main characters. Mercuric is slain, and the irony is that he was killed dishonorable while protecting another’s honor. Table, being more similar to Mercuric than he himself realizes, reaches the same fate through similar actions. When Romeo, a Montague, appears at a Caplet party, Table, the ever- vigilant predator, swears to uphold his family honor and slay Romeo, eventually meeting the same fate as Mercuric, again demonstrating the theme of elevating interest over honor.

He cries, “Now, by the stock and honor of my kin, to strike him [Romeo] dead I hold it not a sin” (Shakespeare 55). Table sees Romeo at the party and decides to kill him for supposedly dishonoring the Caplet family. Table spots Romeo at the gathering and is enraged by Romeos actions. In this, Table is past the point of wanting just to protect the Capsules and their dignity, he wants to kill Romeo, even though Lord Caplet himself is not that upset by the fact that Romeo is at the party’ (Gulled n. Page). Table ignores Lord Caplet’s interests of keeping the peace and proceeds to plot to kill Romeo to protect his family’s “reputation”.

He confronts Romeo at during Act 3 scene 1, but is stopped by Mercuric. Table, in his rage, dispatches Mercuric. Romeo, furious upon his friend’s death, kills Table. Wise Benevolent, the peacekeeper, quickly takes Romeos safety as priority and urges him to run away, saying, “Romeo, away, be gone! The citizens are up, and Table slain (Shakespeare 125). Both Tables and Americium’s archetype of the Competitor, along with their mistaken loyalty to their friends and family, causes them to make the same fatal decisions. The complete opposite of the former two characters, Benevolent wisely protects the safety and interests of his loved ones.

In the beginning of the play, there is a huge brawl between the Montague and the Capsules. Benevolent appears in the midst of the fray and attempts to break up the fight while it is still young. “Unlike the Servants, or even the fathers, Benevolent appears not to want to fight, on the contrary, he strives to quell the servants” (Bloom n. Page). Instead of joining in the bloodshed, Benevolent hurriedly tries to disperse the fight, roaring, “Part fools! Put up your swords. You know not what you do… I do but keep the peace. Put up thy sword, or manage to part these men with me” (Shakespeare 15).

Later in Act Ill, Benevolent attempts once more to keep the peace. He suggests that Mercuric go to a tavern with him in order to avoid the Capsules in the heat of the day. ‘ ‘We talk here in the public haunt of men. Wither withdraw unto some private place and reason coldly of your grievances, or else depart. Here all eyes gaze on us” (Shakespeare 1 19). When Table arrives in his swaggering manner, he again suggest that the two quick-tempered foes should go into a private place to reason with words instead of the encouraged blows, thinking of the safety of both the opponents and the oncoming bystanders. He fails.

However, while Mercuric and Table all prey to death because of their stubborn decision to protect honor rather than safety and interests, Benevolent does the opposite, thus creating more good than harm and staying alive at the same time. Shakespearean use of these three character’s archetypes demonstrates that even though protecting a loved one’s honor can seem like true loyalty, real loyalty is about protecting safety of the person over their dignity or reputation. Mercuric is a competitor that fights for honor. Table is the same, and they both end of losing their lives. Benevolent, on the other hand, is a peacekeeper.

Romeo And Juliet Literary Analysis

Not until the end of the play did they decide to end the feud and come together and that was because children from both sides were dead. At the end Caplet said, “As rich shall Romeos by his lady’s lie, Poor sacrifices of our enmity ‘ 307-308). When this was said you could tell that it had to come to the death of their children to finally end an immature feud. In the play it wasn’t just the immaturity of the feud that contributed to the outcome, Romeo and Juliet had a big part in it themselves. When Juliet found out that

Romeo was banished she was really upset and said, “But I, a maid, die maiden-widowed. Come, cords, come, Nurse, I’ll to my wedding bed, and death, not Romeo take my maidenhead” (111. 11. 135-1 37). In this quote you could configure that Juliet was saying that she was going to kill herself which is not a mature or stable decision by any means. Romeo made immature decisions and had just as much fault as Juliet. When Table killed Mercuric in a very immature fight Romeo got very mad and decided to kill Table.

When Romeo finds Table he says, Alive, in triumph, ND Mercuric slain. Away to heaven respective lenient, And fire-eyed fury be my conduct now! Now Table, take the Villain’ back again That late thou agave’s me, for Americium’s soul Is but a little way above our heads, Staying for thin to keep him company. Either thou, or l, or both must go with him. (111. 1. 118-125) By reading this quote from the play, you know that Romeo is thinking that the only way to solve this problem is for him, Table, or both of them to die which isn’t true.

But, it was also immature for Table to provoke the fight between myself and Romeo in the beginning. Throughout the play Juliet seems to believe that the only way to solve her problems is to kill herself. When the nurse tries to convince Juliet to marry Paris Juliet says, “If all else fail, myself have power to die” (Ill. V. 242), and if she would just tell her parents that she is already married she wouldn’t have to kill herself. Another resolution would have been to have the nurse help her to tell her parents because even the nurse wasn’t making the most mature decisions.

Nurse wanted to Juliet to marry Paris when she was already married to Romeo and wasn’t thinking about informing Caplet about it. Not just from the two main characters, but the nurse, Caplet, Lady Caplet, Montague, Mercuric, Table, and Friar Lawrence immature actions all had a part in the outcome . Even though some actions weren’t meant to draw Romeo and Juliet to their choice to kill themselves, it was a group fault. In the play of Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, the cause of the deaths of Romeo and Juliet was based on pure immaturity.

error: Content is protected !!