Benefits, Safety, Health, And Global Security Issues Sample College Essay

Across many countries, more than 50% of employees are working in the informal sector, where they lack access to social protection and regulatory oversight of work health & safety requirements (Material al., 2020). Workers’ health is necessary for family income, productivity, and economic progress. As a result, rehabilitating and sustaining functional ability is a critical role of health care. National security has been defined as a state’s capacity to provide safety and defense for its citizens. On the other hand, global security emerged out of the requirement imposed on nations by nature and a variety of different activities, most notably globalization, according to Kalyayev et al. (2019). There are several security challenges that the world’s global society will have to address, ranging from drug trafficking to border conflicts, but the most apparent and most discussed is terrorism. Additionally, primary issues of workers or employees should be examined internationally, including job benefits, safety, healthcare, and security.

Several problems relating to the concerns mentioned above include the following. The primary concern for benefits is financial well-being, development and advancement, general employee perks, family benefits, and other previously disregarded advantages. Concerns about employer-sponsored health insurance and retirement benefits. Even though many workers are content with their health benefits, the poll discovered that some are prepared to make concessions. Concerning safety, the issues that should be addressed include biohazards on the job, slipping and tripping, and safe contractions and construction ( Materia et al., 2020). One of the fundamental issues confronting global security is the idea of the security complex, a scenario in which nations’ security concerns are so inextricably linked that one state’s security requirements cannot be evaluated in isolation from the security needs of other states.

Delivering benefits on schedule and in the manner in which they should be without hesitation and specified in the employment agreement. Health insurance premiums must be paid before their expiration or due dates. The solution to the safety risk would be to notify personnel in advance of any potential biohazards or probable contractions in work. Materia et al. (2020) argue that the solution to such competition is collaboration, which can only be found via state-led global security efforts.

The methods outlined above would be successful since they directly address the problems mentioned. Workers develop faith in their employers; similarly, when employees are made aware of potentially hazardous components or chemicals around and inside, they feel cared for. Employees would feel more secure working for a firm that prioritizes their health by paying health insurance premiums on time and has no trouble discharging an ill employee. Finally, when countries unite, their collaboration will assist in materializing global security since there will be no border disputes or inter-state wars.

Global leadership is described as the ability to lead individuals spread throughout many parts. They must mobilize varied and dispersed stakeholders and coworkers to accomplish tasks. Global executives must also navigate five additional impediments: distance, cultures, time zones, technology communication, and negotiating complicated organizational structures such as matrix or network organizations (Kalyayev et al., 2019). They are in charge of employees who work in highly scattered virtual teams. The team will include personnel from various cultures, each with its own set of expectations and methods of operation. Global teams work across time zones and are primarily reliant on communication technologies, introducing additional coordination and communication issues. Global teams are often organized in an international organizational structure resembling a matrix (Kalyayev et al., 2019). Global leaders must foster an awareness of when globalization brings value and when it is preferable to stay local. They need the stylistic flexibility necessary to lead individuals with wildly divergent expectations of leadership and the required resilience and honesty to stand for something.

The worldwide audience’s requirements include health, benefits, safety, and security. Governments must see citizen safety and security holistically in this new world and collaborate across borders. With cooperation is ingrained in four interconnected domains: benefits, safety, health, and global security. We invite executives to review their current practices and recommend improvements to increase their capacity to provide a more secure future for their employees. Regardless of cultural variations, personnel would be taught using various methods, including virtual training, seminars, and in-person conferences. To determine the effectiveness of employee training, I would adopt a cross-check technique, in which I would allow workers to voice their problems, shortcomings, strengths, and future expectations.


Kalyayev, A., Efimov, G., Motornyy, V., Dzianyy, R., &Akimova, L. (2019). Global Security Governance: Conceptual Approaches and Practical Imperatives. Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020, 4484-4495.

Materia, F. T., Faasse, K., & Smyth, J. M. (2020).Understanding and preventing health concerns about emerging mobile health technologies. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(5), e14375.

Betty Hart Cancel Culture University Essay Example

Canceling the cancel culture is a talk delivered by betty hart. Betty Hart’s aim as a performer, director, facilitator, and woman of religion is to create a safe space for people to engage in difficult conversations with one another and themselves. In these discussions, she draws on her theater experience to concentrate on the individual’s identity, the community’s goals, and how we could change our long-held habits to achieve better success. The video about cancelling cancel culture by betty hart is available on TEDx talks youtube page. In this video, the speaker, An actress who is well-known for her role in the film, spoke at TED in December 2020 on cancel culture. On the contrary, she hopes to persuade her audience that the phrase “cancel culture” refers to more than just celebrities who have been chastised for making insensitive remarks or degrading others because they are gay. When confronted with opposing viewpoints and those they consider being mistaken, individuals are sometimes prepared to condemn and exclude them. To live harmoniously with others, people are encouraged to accept and embrace those who hold various points of view. Betty adds compassion to the table, a valuable asset (Tedx talks, 2020).

The speaker did well in articulating her views on the topic’s contents. First, Hart addresses cancelled culture and how she came to have such a tight bond with her father. They had a good friendship and were close to one another. However, the discovery that they had ideological disputes higher than their tolerance level thwarted their intentions. Their love was ruined, and as a result, they lost ten years of their lives. She offers contemporary examples of famous people of renown who have fallen from grace due to their public remarks and choices of sides or phrases that were unpopular with the general public. This is a circumstance that is all too common, considering the number of high-profile public leaders who have fallen out of favor with the public due to utterances that the latter regarded morally abhorrent or conflicting with their convictions. She further gives a different side of the divide by encouraging compassion, terming it loving people unconditionally by containing the different beliefs. It is also crucial to understand and tolerate people’s opinions. She, however, does not give an extent to which people can be tolerated. Cases o violence in relationships should not be tolerated as they are more detrimental and sensitive (Tedx talks, 2020).

Heat utilizes emotions and relations with the current audience. She recalls the days when she differed from her father. By utilizing emotion, the audience can have an imagination of the speaker’s feelings, enhancing persuasion and accep0tance of the concept presented. Further, she presents the topic at a strategic time when there were controversies on the stand of Donald trump on racism and war. To better her delivery, she should have given other examples to support her topic, besides her own experiences (Tedx talks, 2020).

To conclude, the delivery of the content on canceling cancel culture was effective as she used examples and devices which resonated with her audience. These enhance delivery and understanding. The examples and rhetoric devices came in handy, and the audience must have been swayed into the other different narratives (Tedx talks, 2020).


TEDx talks, 2020. Canceling cancel culture with compassion.

Available at: <> [Accessed 18 March 2022].

Bias And Bigotry In The Criminal Justice System Sample College Essay

The criminal justice system encompasses all the aspects of law enforcement that are directly involved in the arrest, prosecution, defense, sentencing, and punishment of individuals convicted of crimes or suspected of doing them. In recent years, the advocates of criminal justice system reforms have called for the correction of various structural issues in the system that impede fairness and justice, such as racial profiling, mass incarceration, overcriminalization, and police brutality. However, bias and bigotry continue to impede the reforms. Notably, bias is inclination or prejudice against a person or group. On the other hand, bigotry comprises unreasonable attachment to one’s beliefs or opinion to the point of intolerance. Bias and bigotry impede criminal justice system reforms by impairing decision-making at all levels of the criminal justice system, from arrests to incarcerations and release.


Studies show patterns of racial bias in police arrests in the United States. Specifically, colored minority groups, especially African Americans, tend to be investigated and arrested more frequently than white people. Chaney (2015) reports that in 2013, 92% of the arrest warrants issued by the Ferguson Municipal Court were for African Americans. This staggering statistic illustrates the Ferguson police force’s bias against African Americans. Additionally, police tend to use more force when arresting African Americans than white suspects. According to 2015 data from the US Police-Shooting Database (USPSD), police are 3.49 times more likely to shoot an unarmed, black suspect compared to an unarmed white one (Ross, 2015). Overall, the fact that American police are more likely to investigate, arrest, and use more force on African American suspects than white ones indicates implicit bias. In addition, it implies that many police officers are bigots because they are unwilling to question the stereotypes that black people are more involved in crimes than white ones.

Incarceration and Prosecution

Incarceration in the United States is also made unfair by high levels of bias and bigotry. For example, the criminal justice system incarcerates African American women more than two times white women. This fact is evident from incarceration records across the country. For instance, in 2013, the justice department reported that the imprisonment rate for black females was 113 per 100,000 women, whereas that of white females was only 51 per 100,000 women (Carson, 2014). According to these statistics, the incarceration rate of African American women more than doubled that of white ones in 2013, demonstrating incarceration bias against women of color.

According to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), black people account for 5% of the drug user population in America. Nonetheless, they comprise 29% of those arrested and 33% of those prosecuted and incarcerated for drug-related crimes (Balko, 2020). This disproportionality demonstrates bias against black people when it comes to incarcerations and prosecutions.


Studies also show a significant amount of bias and bigotry in the suspect and convict release statistics of the US criminal justice system. According to the Supreme Court, suspects at the bond stage are presumed innocent; hence, they have “fundamental rights to liberty and a presumption,” which in turn give them the option of pretrial release (Assefa, 2018). However, some places, such as Cook County, Illinois, tend to use monetary bonds to prevent the release of suspects (Assefa, 2018). Adding this restrictive measure creates a biased system since the bond only benefits the wealthy.

According to Assefa (2018), in cases where monetary bonds are assigned, black suspects often receive amounts almost $10,000 more than white defendants charged with committing the same offenses. Furthermore, black suspects are 2% less likely to be released on their suggestion of a bond and 1.6% more likely to be denied bond with conditions than white suspects (Assefa, 2018). Correspondingly, the white suspects are 2.4% less likely to be detained before their trial than black individuals (Assefa, 2018). These trends are bizarre and indicate prejudice, especially since white defendants granted bond are more likely to be arrested than their black counterparts (Assefa, 2018). These statistics demonstrate that the US criminal justice system shows racial bias in the release of defendants.

Bigotry as a Source of Bias

Fundamentally, most of the racial biases seen in the US criminal justice system stem from bigotry. Studies show that many white people, including those in law enforcement, obstinately believe in certain negative stereotypes about African Americans, which lead to implicit bias when dealing with black people. According to a study on cognitive psychology, often, when white judges make bond decisions, they have limited information about a defendant, causing them to subconsciously rely on racial stereotypes when making their decision (Assefa, 2018).

In conclusion, bias and bigotry are pervasive throughout the criminal justice system, leading to injustice. There exist traces of prejudice, especially of a racial nature, in arrests, incarceration, and release. For example, police officers tend to arrest and use more deadly force on black individuals than white people. Additionally, black individuals have a greater predisposition to the risk of being arrested and denied release than their white counterparts. The reforms of the criminal justice system must address these biases and bigotry to facilitate more justice for those it serves.


Assefa, L. S. (2018). Assessing dangerousness amidst racial stereotypes: An analysis of the role of racial bias in bond decisions and ideas for reform. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 108(4), 653-678.

Balko, R. (2020). There’s overwhelming evidence that the criminal justice system is racist. Here’s the proof. The Washington Post.

Carson, E. A. (2014). Prisoners in 2013. Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ247282, 1-31.

Chaney, C. (2015). Institutional racism: Perspectives on the department of justice’s investigation of the Ferguson police department. Western Journal of Black Studies, 39(4), 311-329.

Ross, C. T. (2015). A multi-level Bayesian analysis of racial bias in police shootings at the county-level in the United States, 2011–2014. PLoS One, 10(11)