Case Study Assignment. Marvin Verses Marvin Case Sample Paper

Marvin verses Marvin case was a milestone case ruled by the US courts in the year 1976 (Ihara & Hertz, 2008). The plaintiff Michele Triola brought the case to court after the dissolution of their relationship with Marvin Lee. Before the case was brought to court, Triola together with her partner Lee had been cohabiting for six years. During their stay, Lee supported Triola financially until November in the year 1971. From then on, Lee refused to support the plaintiff resulting in her filing a suit to verify her property rights. During the court hearings, the plaintiff told the court that they had entered into an oral agreement with Lee that any property accrued during their cohabitation period was going to be shared between the two individuals. Triola told the court that she had given up her job as an entertainer in order to support Lee as a homemaker. After reviewing Triola’s case, the court ruled a judgment in favor of the defendant. The court stated that Triola was not entitled to any property because Lee was legally married to another woman.

Living together contracts

Living together contracts is an agreement signed by unmarried couples on how they will divide their property, raise their children, and meet expenses while living together. Through this agreement, couples can reduce the problems that are usually encountered after relationship breakups. Unmarried couples might encounter challenges because of living together. Usually, financial needs and parenting roles present serious challenges to unmarried couples living together. To reduce these challenges a legal agreement should be made by the couples to outline how they will take care of their children and meet other household expenses. As such, a living together contract should be comprehensive to cover every facet of the couples’ relationship. With a living together contract, couples can outline their needs, rights, and expectations. Similarly, through these agreement couples can enhance peaceful coexistence before and after their relationship ends. With a well-crafted living together contract, couples can settle misunderstandings with ease and can serve as a will in case a partner dies without writing a will. In the above case, the court acknowledged that the two individuals made an oral agreement. Although the court ruled the cases in favor the defendant, It should be noted that it emphasized the need of such matters to be solved in the court of law.

Gay marriages

In the USA, several states enforce living together contracts between same sex partners. Unlike in the past, same sex marriages are now becoming very common (Clifford & Curry, 2007). In California, married gay couples can register as domestic partners. This implies that married gay couples enjoy equal rights and responsibilities enjoyed by heterosexual married couples under the state law. In contrast, the federal law does not entitle married gay couples with the same rights and responsibilities enjoyed by the heterosexual married couples. With these disparities, uncertainties have been created for these couples.

As compared to the Marvin verses Marvin case, same sex marriages are not subject to similar laws overseeing the married couples’ property rights. To avoid ambiguities that may arise when breakups occur, same sex couples are encouraged to come up with a legal document that will oversee how their property will be divided (Clifford & Curry, 2007). In Marvin verses Marvin case, the court asserted that cohabiting partners should file their property division cases under express and implied contracts. Similarly, the court emphasized that couples should also follow the same procedure in filing their property division cases. Equally, gay couples should follow this procedure to ease issues related to property division.

Marriage affects gay couples in several ways (Wolfson, 2004). Through marriage, gay couples can authorize emergency medical treatment just like heterosexual sex couples. Similarly, through marriage gay couples can be able to inherit property with ease. Usually, when one of the gay couples dies the surviving partner has to provide appropriate documents to explain the relationship they had with the deceased. This implies that it would be easy to settle such issues if the couples were legally married. Like heterosexual married couples, gay couples can be able to access cheap health insurance cover. Equally, through marriage gay couples can be recognized as a family unit leading to the reduction of discrimination against these couples. In general, marriage will enable gay couples to enjoy several rights enjoyed by heterosexual married couples.

If gay marriage is prohibited, other areas of law will be affected (Roleff, 2009). Notably, prohibition of gay marriages should be considered as a violation of civil rights. Given the fact that marriages are legal civil status in the community, prohibition of gay marriages would be an infringement of individuals’ civil rights. Similarly, prohibiting gay marriage would result in discrimination of gay couples. In this regard, cases of discrimination against gay couples would increase in our courts. Therefore, gay couples should be permitted to marry just as the heterosexual couples (Clifford & Curry, 2007).

References

Clifford, D.,& Curry, H. (2007). A legal guide for lesbian and gay couples (14th ed.). Berkeley, Calif.: Nolo.

Ihara, T. L., & Hertz, F. (2008). Living together: a legal guide for unmarried couples (14th ed.). Berkeley, CA: Nolo.

Roleff, T. L. (2009). Gay marriage. San Diego, Calif.: Greenhaven Press.

Wolfson, E. (2004). Why marriage matters: America, equality, and gay people’s right to marry . New York: Simon & Schuster.

Ideal Tragic Hero: “Oedipus The King” By Sophocles

Introduction

The tale of King Oedipus has become one of the best-known Greek tragedies, mostly due to the controversial nature of the fate that Oedipus meets. However, stepping away from the specified controversy and considering character development, one will have to point out that Oedipus is the perfect tragic hero. Due to the presence of an error of judgment in the plot, the fate of King Oedipus derails in the way that aligns with six main characteristics of a tragic hero, thus making him an ideal representation of it.

Analysis

Oedipus the King incorporates the six essential characteristics of a tragic character, namely, hubris (pride), hamartia (error of judgment), peripeteia (challenges caused by the said error), anagnorisis (recognition of the error), nemesis (downfall), and catharsis (emotional response in the audience). Specifically, the error of judgment, which hurts Oedipus’ hubris, namely, his image of himself as the ideal king of Thebes. The described change is portrayed in the following line: “For how unaided could I track it far/Without a clue?” (Sophocles). The observed shift in Oedipus’ perception of himself is followed by multiple peripeteia, which completely destroy his confidence.

The anagnorisis, which comes at the moment of Oedipus’ realization of the tragedy of his situation also aligns with the main characteristics of the tragic hero. Namely, the following line emphasizes the denouement of his character development: “Of insolence is bred/The tyrant” (Sophocles).

Eventually, the character arc of the ideal tragic hero is completed after Oedipus faces his nemesis and, ultimately, the catharsis of the situation being revealed to him: “To learn my lineage, be it ne’er so low” (Sophocles). Combined into a single tragic misconception, caused by hubris, the described characteristics make Oedipus’ character align with every element of an ideal tragic hero description.

Conclusion

Oedipus the King introduces a unique narrative allowing for the character development that meets the six main criteria of an ideal tragic hero. Therefore, Oedipus can be considered the exact representation of such, with his fate having ben predetermined by his hubris. As Oedipus witnesses his own downfall, he recognizes the role that his pride played in this tragedy, which cements his image as the ultimate tragic hero.

Work Cited

Sophocles. Oedipus the King. Classics.MIT. Web.

Sports And Race: The Road Towards The “Transracial Ideal”

Racial attitudes have always played a significant part in the way sports events are discussed and athletes are perceived in society. For the last decade, these perceptions have been gradually changing, and the concept of “transracial ideal” has emerged, which refers to people who are regarded as role models equally appealing to members of all races (Newman 72). As modern American society is moving towards equality, more media channels are striving to provide unbiased sports coverage, and athletes are perceived largely based on their personal qualities rather than race. The “transracial ideal” is attainable in 21st-century American sports because unbiased sports coverage and the perception of athletes based on their personality are becoming more widespread, as shown by the analysis of the media.

There is a wide range of evidence from the real-life examples in modern sports practices which support the idea of the “transracial ideal” in the global arena and which generated a positive result in the sportsmen’s career in the global environment. Widener (15) outlines several examples of people who have succeeded in the international sports environment based on their traits and, at the same time, ignoring their demographic characteristics. This idea supports the globalization tendency where individuals are evaluated primarily based on their professional and personal characteristics rather than cultural or racial ones. For instance, the success of athletes like Bryant, Woods, and the Williams sisters is the result of the globalization approach which leads to promotion of “transracial ideal” (Widener, 15). Another example can be found among the European football and soccer teams which now have a mixed international membership.

The concept of “transracial ideal” was introduced by Roberta Newman in relation to marketing and advertising, with Derek Jeter being cited as the most prominent example of this trend. She defines the “transracial ideal” as an all-American marketing icon who does not represent any particular race and “can relate to everyone” (Newman 72). Derek Jeter was the first player of color to make a career in advertising, which emphasized his personal qualities and his image of a philanthropist, leader, and athlete. While focusing on marketing, Newman suggests that the concept of the “transracial ideal” can be expanded into politics and social life (77). In a broader sense, it can be defined as a public figure whose personal characteristics surpass the common racial prejudice and are equally appealing to people of all ethnic groups.

The road towards the transracial ideal in modern society has just begun, and the idea of race is still connected with a lot of prejudice. According to Alexander, although racial attitudes are no longer the norm in sports and are not tolerated, they still often “influence how sportswriters discuss issues involving race and ethnicity” (81). In the 2000s, the quarterbacks Michael Vick and Ben Roethlisberger were both implicated in violent criminal activity. In his analysis of the media portrayal of the two players, Coogan states that Michael Vick “received greater scrutiny and more unfavorable content” than Ben Roethlisberger because the former is black (129). However, this issue could also be explained by the personal characteristics of the two players, with Vick possessing the qualities that reinforced racial stereotypes (Coogan 138). Overall, the case illustrates that even in sports, the stories of race and crime are presented with a certain degree of bias, with greater emphasis placed on individuals who confirm stereotypes.

Referring to the case of Michael Vick, it is assumed that public reaction to the new record was predetermined by the publicly available information sources, primarily through the mass media such as television or radio. Coogan (129) state that public opinion is highly affected by social values and believes shared in the community. Wrongly accepted mutual association of race and criminal aspect was shared in the population during 1990’s that has significantly harmed the professional career of sportsmen who were differentiated from the majority based on the demographic characteristics. The evidence proposed by Coogan in the case analysis supports the assumption that people are strongly influenced by the mass communication channels which shape their mind and integrate particular ideas including the racial stereotypes.

The past years’ studies identify a wide range of demonstrations of racial diversification actively used by the sports media, referring to the sports commentators, journalists, and other social media workers. The majority of comments were based on the stereotypes and criticism of black sportsmen in comparison to the white ones due to the existing judgments and associations shared within the community. Coogan (132) highlights that these social attitudes regarding the demographic differences resulted in the noticeable active discrimination of professional sportsmen despite their traits and characteristics. Society used to give biological superiority depending on skin color and nationality, which now sounds ridiculous due to the globalization and internationalization approaches as well as the movements for equality in modern American society.

According to some resources, people tend to believe that racially distributed genetic ability for sports and further personal achievements depends on the racial identification of that individual. This summary is considered as the part of the established sociological believes shared by people based on the social division referring to both cultural and national criteria. Widener (16) proposes the assumption based on the academic opinion of other scholars that racial differentiation in sports can be eliminated with the help of acceptance and treatment of the race as a “social” contrast that does not identify the personality of an individual. However, since the mind of the population still exists under the influence of the external environment, the racial barrier can be supported by the wrongful social media influence, which affects social perception in any sector, including sports.

Similarly, the public perception of athletes is partially shaped by the attitudes towards their race together with the evaluation of their personal qualities. When Barry Bonds broke the all-time home run record, sportswriters and fans did not embrace it, and the media response ranged from indifference to outright hostility (Alexander 80). As explained by Alexander, this was partially attributed to race prejudices and partially explained by his personality (87). Bonds was described by sports journalists as “a genuinely unpleasant human being, who reserves special hostility for the reporters charged with covering his exploits” (qtd. in Alexander 82). It can be concluded that for a person to become a “transracial ideal,” they need to both possess an appealing personality and overcome negative racial attitudes, which are still widespread in society.

In the analyzed video on the subject of racial bias, the Super Bowl matchup between quarterbacks Tom Brady and Patrick Mahomes is discussed and compared to Michael Jordan playing against LeBron in the NBA finals. Throughout the video, no racial framing devices are used, and, although players of different races are compared against each other, they are all presented in an equal manner. The reasons the commentators provide for comparison are not associated with race and refer exclusively to the facts, such as the age of players, number of awards won, career statistics, and the style of play (“The Brady vs. Mahomes Super Bowl”). Brady is compared to Michael Jordan, “the all-time great,” and Mahomes to LeBron James, “the heir to Jordan’s throne” (“The Brady vs. Mahomes Super Bowl” 00:00:18-00:00:21). Jordan and James are used as a transracial idea that younger players are compared to based on the similarities in their talent, popularity, and personal qualities rather than race. The video shows how equal coverage can be achieved on TV, with players being presented and judged equally and unbiasedly by commentators representing different racial groups.

Based on the analysis of the readings and the sports commentary racial bias observations, it can be concluded that 21st-century American sports are moving towards the “transracial ideal.” Although athletes are still often perceived based on racial stereotypes, and issues related to race and ethnicity are sometimes covered with a certain degree of bias, the situation is gradually changing towards equality. With TV channels striving towards unbiased coverage, athletes are more often perceived based on their personal qualities and professional achievements rather than race. Individual characteristics of a player become increasingly important, as only people who have an appealing personality and can overcome negative racial attitudes can be seen as a “transracial ideal.”

References

Alexander, Lisa Doris. “I’m the King of the World?: Barry Bonds and the ‘Race’ for the Record.” NINE: A Journal of Baseball History and Culture, vol. 17, no. 2, 2009, pp. 80–89.

Coogan, Dan. “Race and Crime in Sports Media: Content Analysis on the Michael Vick and Ben Roethlisberger Cases.” Journal of Sports Media, vol. 7, no. 2, 2012, pp. 129–151.

Newman, Roberta. “Driven: Branding Derek Jeter, Redefining Race.” NINE: A Journal of Baseball History and Culture, vol. 17, no. 2, 2009, pp. 70–79.

“The Brady vs. Mahomes Super Bowl is Like Jordan vs. Lebron in the NBA Finals – Greeny | Get Up.” YouTube. 2021. Web.

Widener, Daniel. “Race and Sport”. The Oxford Handbook of Sports History. Edited by Robert Edelman and Wayne Wilson. Oxford University Press, 2017.

error: Content is protected !!