Ceremonial Speech During Garret’s Visit Essay Sample For College

Garret’s Visit

I found Garret’s visit to be highly effective and advantageous for our class. His public speaking skills were outstanding. I have noticed a significant improvement in our class’s public speaking abilities since his first speech. It is truly remarkable that despite growing up with a severe stutter, he speaks so fluently and confidently. It is impressive how he rarely gets stuck while expressing himself.

I believe his job might be tedious because he has to deliver the same speeches repeatedly. Nonetheless, his story is remarkable and has likely influenced many individuals. What I appreciated was how he used his speech as a workshop, engaging with us to analyze what worked effectively and what didn’t. I admire him because he genuinely listens to our feedback and uses it to improve his future presentations. It’s interesting that he relies on writing out his speech word for word and doesn’t have much room for improvisation.

In spite of his imperfect delivery, he effectively conveyed his message to us through informal conversation. We valued his relevant gestures and remained engaged by his humor. It is probable that a larger audience would relate to his stories and speeches. His smooth voice made it effortless to listen to him for an extended period without feeling like we were being lectured, a point he also emphasized.

He emphasized the importance of engaging with our audience rather than talking at them. Although his casual voice was a bit soft, he surprised us by speaking louder in his radio announcer voice. He told stories that were suitable for all ages and effectively connected with his audience. Moreover, he made an excellent point about building suspense. Instead of revealing everything at the start, he advised giving a brief synopsis and keeping some information undisclosed. After hearing him speak, I realized the need to improve my vocal range, preparation, and hand gestures. Additionally, I should enhance my ability to vividly describe scenes for my audience, as he did for us. This skill greatly aids in maintaining the audience’s attention and interest.

I strongly support this concept, particularly for speeches that last 8 minutes. The speaker’s assistance was extremely valuable as we witnessed a live demonstration of techniques to improve our own speaking abilities. Usually, we depend on observing our peers and classmates, hoping they perform well since our speeches are likely to be similar. Remarkably, he inspires each one of us by overcoming years of ridicule due to his speech impediment and achieving success as a public speaker.

The text expresses admiration for someone’s courageous actions and the importance of learning from them. It emphasizes that allowing fear to control us hinders personal growth. The text also highlights the significance of treating everyone with respect and inclusivity, as belonging is a universal human desire. It acknowledges that certain individuals were upset due to the person’s inability to communicate verbally. Overall, the experience was highly beneficial for the class and they found it enjoyable.

Belonging- Precious Movie Poster

“Precious” – Movie Poster The aspect of belonging featured in the movie poster for the new film “Precious” is the concept of isolation within society, demonstrated through the single character depicted throughout the whole frame, as well as the other various visual techniques used. Through the visual and textual form of communication used to convey the film’s message in regards to not belonging, we are able to decipher the hidden intentions behind the irregularly constructed film advertisement.

Within the frame itself, the entire space solely includes what is possibly the main character. Through the image being faceless, it maintains a universal persona – possibly connoting the fact that the features woman is in fact a stereotype, hinting to the notion that this sense of isolation is prevalent amongst African American women. The “fat black” representation of the female depicted communicates further, that this stereotyped group of women may be victims of isolation as a whole.

As a race with a history of discrimination and victims of racial misconduct, the poster may be alluding to the possible emphasis on the movie reflecting this idea, and relaying the personal experiences of a typical overweight African American woman. An interesting feature used in creating an original movie advertisement is the way in which the visual dimensions of the frame are shared through an expressionistic form of painting; thereby adopting the use of messy brush strokes. These brush strokes may hold a deeper meaning in the analysis of the image as a whole.

Following onto the above suggestions of isolation evident through the single centrally featured character, the reason for this style may have been to convey the desired emotions of empathy and compassion towards the lonely figure through expression, rather than to depict a real life image. Alternatively, the messiness may also exhibit the outward, stereotypical image of Indigenous cultures as perhaps messy, undefined, and even unhygienic. Finally, it is apparent that after initially viewing the advertisement, there is no title pertaining to the film being portrayed. After a closer nspection it is evident that the title is located as the given name on the name necklace highlighted on the persona. The name “Precious” may hold significant resonance with the concept of isolation and disaffection that the movie expresses, for as a self titled necklace of which the likes are commonly worn today, the name may be a comment on the external un-appreciation for the lives of these women. The word precious itself conveys a sense of value and, therefore it may be an implicit cry for these women to openly express their worth, and in turn, be visibly esteemed by society.

Industrial Revolution Fashion

Debate persists over whether the challenges encountered during the Industrial Revolution were justified by its benefits. The study of fashion offers insight into the motivations, lifestyles, and productivity of that period through an examination of trends, trades, and machinery spanning from 1780 to 1860. Consequently, we can recognize the significance of the Industrial Revolution.

The Industrial Revolution had a significant impact on the fashion industry and society as a whole. It revitalized the fashion industry and influenced people, events, and inventions during that time. This revolution transformed production methods, creating numerous opportunities for manufacturing goods and offering services. Despite encountering challenges and hardships, society greatly benefited from the Industrial Revolution.

The Industrial Revolution impacted fashion in multiple ways. It influenced people’s interests and tastes, trade and trade policies, as well as the machinery and techniques used in the fashion industry. A detailed examination of the Industrial Revolution from a fashion standpoint uncovers the changes and progress made in production and lifestyle during that time, showcasing the overall success of this transformative period.

The clothing industry underwent significant transformations during the industrial revolution, which can be attributed to new inventions, enhanced productivity, and inventive designs. Mass production gained prominence in the textile sector during this era. In 1810, an American visitor witnessed various types of mills in Great Britain that encompassed carding and spinning mills, weaving mills, and specialized mills. The observer recognized the vital contributions of human labor and intelligence in these operations. The revolution commenced with cotton textiles as cotton was scarce prior to the 18th century and had to be imported, rendering large-scale cloth production impractical.

The cotton industry played a major role in the British economy during the industrial years, showing a strong connection between this industry and economic growth. This correlation was particularly noticeable from around 1780 to 1850 and also impacted the wider textile industry. To foster the expansion of the industry, there was a need for greater demand. In earlier times when resources and trade were scarce, the emergence of new manufacturing sectors took place gradually. Prior to the 18th century, spinning mules were extensively employed in thread and fabric production.

Despite the fact that it took a whole day to produce enough thread for just one hour of weaving at this production level, it often didn’t even result in a complete garment. However, industrial innovations brought about significant changes for workers, productions, and consumers. In 1764, the invention of the spinning wheel led to an abundance of yarn that surpassed the weaving capacity of available workers. As a result, there was a decrease in the production cost of yarn, while the demand for woven goods increased.

Before the revolution, thread and cloth were woven at home, a production method commonly referred to as “cottage industry.” However, advancements in production led to the creation of the water frame and cotton mill, which resulted in a shift from home-based production to factory production. These production innovations also brought about changes in the types of products being made, leading people to develop a desire for unique and novel designs.

Roller printing rapidly supplanted wood block printing, resulting in the creation of designs featuring multiple colors. This innovative method of printing significantly enhanced manufacturing output, boosting fabric production from 168 yards per day to an impressive 14,000 yards per day. Consequently, the fashion industry, among other sectors, embraced mass production to enhance accessibility of clothing and other goods for a wider audience.

The demand for intricate designs became more popular as time went on. In 1808, the invention of the bobbin-net machine enabled the use of finer fabrics like silk satin. The upper class women were the main influencers for new design ideas at that time. They required more elaborate garments for their events, which led to advancements in manufacturing. Even the working class began to desire more luxurious clothing. With improvements in manufacturing techniques and people’s growing interest in fashion, the design and fit of clothing continued to evolve.

As consumers recognized that they had more options for creating new designs, their preferences diversified, leading to a higher demand for fashionable items. Additionally, the speed of production increased, allowing fashion trends to change more rapidly. The growth of industries also resulted in an expansion of job opportunities, providing greater economic security for individuals. It is evident that culture has always had a significant influence on clothing, and this particular period is no exception. During the early eighteenth century, fashion primarily evolved from the aspirations of the aristocrats and upper class. The industrial revolution instigated a sense of class-awareness, compelling the upper class to strive for a distinct and noticeable appearance that set them apart from others.

Communicating their status through wardrobe became the most prominent method. As individuals started using clothing to display their social position, fashion became linked to social dynamics. However, towards the end of the industrial revolution, people from all social classes had more spending power but less savings. Consequently, the fashion industry shifted its focus from exclusively catering to the upper class to providing appropriate clothing for individuals from various backgrounds.

No longer was the market for luxury items limited to the upper class, as the working class’s disposable income increased. This led to the broadening of the potential market for Parisian fashion, emphasizing taste over expensive materials and catering to a wider consumer base. The revolution in multiple industries resulted in increased production efficiency and a rise in consumerism. To meet the growing demand, the fashion industry accelerated its production of new merchandise.

Before the industrial revolution, humans have always been a clothed society. However, it was during this revolutionary period that clothing transformed into fashion, defining it as a means of identification and communication. In a different view, the people of that era assigned meaning to clothing, turning it into a form of representation. Fashion has always played a crucial role in expressing consumer preferences, organizing markets, and reshaping society. It became a symbol of status, attractiveness, and identification.

The expansion of the fashion industry led to prosperity in other industries as well, such as metal and steel. These industries began producing embellishments and accessories for the fashion industry. During the industrial revolution, consumers became more creative in their clothing choices and expressed specific desires for new designs. This focus on certain markets caused them to thrive instead of decline. The industrial revolution saw an increase in production and further development driven by specific demands.

According to the analysis of consumerism during this time, the supply-demand relationship is attributed to the association of demand with culture, style, life-style, etc., serving as the analytical counterpart to technological change. The burgeoning fashion industry was greatly influenced by consumers, as the fashion press recognized their desire for variety. Designers responded by creating what they believed would be sellable. This was only made possible by the innovations and advancements brought about by the revolution. The demand for new styles, colors, and fabrics further motivated continuous improvements and innovations.

The industrial revolution brought about initial innovations and market growth in 1780. However, it was the creation of jobs and consumer preferences that sustained steady advancements. By 1860, markets became more secure as a result of the industrial revolution. Prior to this revolution, manufacturers in Great Britain faced challenges in producing desired products due to insufficient machinery and skills. As a result, consumers had to look abroad for fabric and design options.

Asian styles and fabrics were highly sought after and bought by many people. However, in the late seventeenth century, European governments became aware of the dangers that came with the massive importation of cottons, such as the negative effects on local textile industries and the social confusion caused by this fashion trend.

As a reaction, the British government implemented restrictions and bans on trade. A trade maxim stated that importing luxury goods resulted in tangible losses. Despite these restrictions, Asian fashion continued to have a significant influence on European design and production. Consequently, manufacturers began seeking new methods to produce cloth domestically.

The industrial revolution, with its advancements in technology, opened up novel avenues for domestic production, spawning new machinery, innovations, and consumer-driven designs. Europe, benefiting from superior production skills, surpassed Asia. Consequently, trade emerged as a vital component not only for the fashion industry but also for other groundbreaking sectors. Manufacturers and later the government recognized that engaging in the global market had the potential to decrease production costs.

Importing materials at a lower cost for domestic manufacturing became common practice for efficient production. Initially, trade focused on fabrics, but also included copper and metal. Even today, trade plays a crucial role in achieving efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Looking back, one striking memory is how clothing has evolved over time. Clearly, the industrial revolution revolutionized the concept of clothing.

During the industrial revolution, clothing underwent a redefinition that symbolized the importance and achievements of this era. Fashion, like one’s personal or national identity, constantly changes and is influenced by factors such as current events, social status, business, consensus, and various aspects of life. The period was characterized by a strong awareness of social class, with the upper class striving to differentiate themselves from others in society. Although the desire for distinction existed prior to 1780, what changed during the revolution was that individuals started associating their identity with how they looked – especially in terms of choosing materials and garments.

As the world progresses, individuals also undergo transformations. People continually adjust and change, mirroring the evolving world surrounding them. The rise of factories in the 18th and 19th centuries established a distinct separation between wealthy factory owners (the upper class) and the working class. This distinction emphasized the significance of appearance as a means of self-identification. Furthermore, with an abundance of job prospects, consumerism grew increasingly prevalent. The industrial revolution not only enhanced production capabilities but also amplified consumer desire.

When we examine the industrial revolution from a fashion perspective, we can see the accomplishments, challenges, and preferences of the people. Fashion has always held deeper significance than just clothing, serving as a form of communication. The industrial revolution exemplifies the profound impact that fashion can have on individuals, society, government policies, technological advancements, and more. Moreover, the fashion of this era accurately reflects the values and advancements of its time.


  1. Primary Sources: Baines, Edward. The History of the Cotton Manufacture in Great Britain. London: R. Fisher and P. Jackson, 1835.
  2. A French Traveller. Journal of a Tour and Residence in Great Britain, During the Years 1810 and 1811. Edinburgh: G. Ramsey,1815.
  3. Defoe, Daniel. The British Merchant: A Collection of Papers Relating to the Trade and Commerce of Great Britain and Ireland. Mr. Charles King, 1743 and New York: Oxford University Press, 1969.
  4. Lemire, Beverly and Giorgio Riello. East and West: Textiles and Fashion in Eurasia in the Early Modern Period. Working Papers of the Global Economic History Network. London: London School of Economics, April 2006.

error: Content is protected !!