Compact Fluorescent Light Bulbs Vs. Incandescent Light Bulbs Free Writing Sample

One of the greatest inventions that we use everyday in our lives, and cannot imagine life without it is the light bulb. Thomas Alva Edison invented the light bulb in the year 1879. With the advancement in technology, today we have different types of light bulbs such as Incandescent, Halogen, Fluorescent, Compact Fluorescent Lamps, High-Intensity Discharge Lamps, Low-Pressure Sodium Lamps, LED (Light Emitting Diodes). The most common light bulbs that are generally used for household purposes are compact fluorescent and incandescent light bulbs. Incandescent lighting is very well studied since it has an extensive history.

There is no question as to its reliability, as its existence has spanned nearly two decades. Humphry Davy is credited with inventing the first electric light, which ran off an electric battery. Early incandescent bulbs focused on finding a material for the filament that burned long enough, while providing efficient lighting as well. Thomas Edison eventually invented a light that could last for 1,500 hours, which was continually improved throughout the 20th century. Incandescent lighting is the most common form of lighting. It is also the oldest type of lighting, having maintained its popularity for nearly two centuries.

Although there are numerous issues with incandescent lighting, such as giving close to 95 percent of its energy to the production of heat rather than lighting. It still has many advantages that can be useful for people. Incandescent lightings are extremely common. The bulbs are readily available and easily replaceable in most areas that might not even use more modern types of lighting. Some incandescent lights last up to 4,000 hours and are used both indoors and outdoors. Unlike some other light bulbs, Incandescent bulbs light up instantly when turned on and work very efficiently.

Incandescent light bulbs provide a warm, inviting light by offering an excellent color rendition. This type of lighting can easily be dimmed to the level of you choice, which is a feature that many homeowners use to add elegance to their rooms. They are also available in the majority of colors in the visible spectrum. Compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) are a more efficient alternative to traditional incandescent light bulbs. They use gases, such as mercury, to send electricity and produce light instead of the filaments used in incandescent bulbs.

Compact fluorescent light bulbs use up to 80 percent less energy and can last up to 10 times longer; the electronic ballasts have a longer life than any filament available in an incandescent light bulb. CFLs can produce the same amount of light with one fifth of the wattage used by incandescent bulbs. Your electricity bill will be comparatively less, since CFLs use less energy. Each compact fluorescent bulb that replaces an incandescent bulb can save $30 to $45 over its lifetime, which more than pays for the up-front costs of CFLs. Newer CFLs produce a more natural lighting than older CFLs and incandescent bulbs.

Full-spectrum compact fluorescent bulbs produce light that is similar to that of natural sunlight. Incandescent bulbs are inefficient; up to 95 percent of the energy used produces heat, not light. CFLs produce little to no heat, making them not only more efficient, but also safer to handle. Normally people prefer to have bright lighting, with less light bulkiness of extra light bulbs in their houses, so they choose to use compact fluorescent light bulbs. When choosing what kind of light bubs to use for your house, it is very important that we consider the pros and cons of compact florescent and incandescent light bulbs.

It will be wise to use incandescent light bulbs if you’re going to be away from your house for a while, since there will be less use of light, why pay more for CFLs. Although the operating cost of incandescent bulbs has been shown to be more expensive over a long period of time compared to compact fluorescent light bulbs, incandescent light bulbs have a much cheaper initial cost. These bulbs are readily available with different wattages and can be purchased for very low prices. Whereas compact fluorescent light bulbs use up to 80 percent less energy and can last up to 10 times longer.

Bullying And Suicide Relation

Bullying is any type of verbal, physical or psychological abuse upon someone which causes mental distress, social problems or physical pain. How common is it to hear this word from a 10 year old child in the course of a day at school? Bullying is a harmful practice that is pervasive from the elementary up to the university level of schooling (Morrison, 2002). Bullying behaviour is found throughout society, whether it be in at school, home, or even in the workplace (Elovainio, et al. , 2003). Wherever the environment, the effects of such intimidation can lead to physical injury as well as mental and emotional stress (Hay, & Meldrum, 2010).

Certain personality factors can make people more prone to being victimized by bullying. Being exposed to such abuse, victims can undergo drastic personality changes which according to recent studies, presents them with a greater risk of committing suicide. Bullying victims may suffer from depression, low self-esteem- and even physiological disorders such as heart disease (Elovainio, et al. , 2003). Such a source of stress tends to greatly diminish the value victims place in their selves which can culminate in attempts against their own lives.

Suicidal ideations stemming from bullying has been an intensely researched and debated topic, but the role of personality as a catalyst in such harmful actions has not been fundamentally addressed. My thesis states that Raymond Cattell’s Five-Factor Model of Personality can be used to predict which personality traits are predisposed to be victimized by bullying behaviour and also demonstrate how people with such personality traits may present a greater risk of suicide. The relation between suicide and bullying is not just an assumption but also a statistical fact.

Dysfunctional, volatile relationships with family members can play a big role in increasing a bullying victims’ susceptibility to attempt suicide (Herba et al. , 2008). Such volatility can result from hostility and rejection experienced at home and can give rise to victims who are slightly more prone to victimization from bullying than others. Familial psychopathology also has a direct link to increased suicide levels among bullying victims (Herba et al. , 2008). Studies have linked a negative home environment and victimization by bullying to increased suicide ideation (Herba et al. 2008). Outside of the immediate home environment, social acceptance and relations with peers also plays a role in suicidal behaviour; an individual who displays personality traits that promotes social disengagement is more likely to consider suicide than someone who is socially-receptive (Herba et al. , 2008). A recent study in the United Kingdom showed that many gay or lesbian students discriminated for their sexual orientation showed signs of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in latter life stages (Rivers, 2004).

The detrimental physical and emotional effects of PTSD stemming from bullying behaviour are reasons identified in cases of completed and attempted suicide (Rivers, 2004). Depression is almost always co-morbid in such individuals and can manifest from the effects of rejection shown during bullying (Hay, & Meldrum, 2010). Biologically, people are more predisposed to suffer from depression than others, with studies recently demonstrating a link between genetics and an increased risk of being bully victims (Klomek et al. 2009). In Cattell’s language it would be that someone who scores high on the Neuroticism scale and low on the Extraversion scale as compared to peers would be much more prone to committing suicide. If we put in the social factors of bullying into the picture, such forces can very well lead to cases of clinical depression in victims (Klomek et al. , 2009). People scoring higher on the Neuroticism scale find it hard to control their emotions and manage them.

When faced with unstable interactions with peers as is the case in bullying, the insecurity such victims express leads to depression, which as demonstrated serves as a channel toward suicide (Velting, 1999). These findings are not to conclude that every depressed victim will attempt suicide but shows that such factors create a causal link between suicide and bullying. The Five Factor model can be used to identify people who are more likely to be bullied and also eventually more likely to attempt suicide as a result of their ordeal (Velting, 1999).

The overarching aim discussed in this paper is to identify and classify patients into distinct categories. Misinterpretation of patient types can lead to a dysfunctional theory. Individual characteristics like impulsivity, low self esteem and anxiety levels have been shown to contribute to suicidal thoughts (Klomek et al. , 2009). In collectivist cultures where the common expectation is to be especially sensitive to understanding the social norms of the culture and withhold on individualistic tendencies for the good of the group, individuals who do not conform to the norms of the group might be targeted to bullying (Abe, & Henly, 2010).

A perfect example would be given by a saying in Japan- a statistically collectivist culture, that ‘The nail that sticks out gets hammered down’. Now depending on the person who stands out from the established norm, they can either excel by standing out of the pack in a desired social goal or be shunned and discriminated against due to perceived personal deficiencies. Again in this case, it depends on what the individual personality of the patient is. Certain personalities have been linked to a higher suicide rate or suicide ideation.

People who score low on the Extroversion scale in the Five Factor Model are usually socially avoidant and have poor social support because of this. These individuals are at a higher risk of committing suicide (Velting, 1999). In addition, people who are high on the neuroticism scale have more severe effects when depressed and tend to have pervasive negative thoughts that they have difficulty resolving. These individuals have also been linked with high suicide ideation (Velting, 1999).

It has also been hypothesised that people low on openness, if going through a severe period of depression are at greater risk for committing suicide due to the fact that they are reluctant to communicate about their suicide ideation and get help (Duberstein et al. , 2000). It can be deduced that low extroversion is associated with a higher likelihood of attempted suicide, with high neuroticism and low openness controlling how lethal the attempt is (Duberstein et al. , 2000). The problem with making such connections may lie in that different personality traits may lead to suicidal ideation under different circumstances.

This is one area of personality where further research needs to be done regarding various individual traits that play roles in different points of our lives. Extraverted persons, even in the midst of a crisis might not consider suicide because they enjoy a higher amount of social support as compared to introverted peers (Duberstein et al. , 2000). So even during occasions where they are bullied, extraverted individuals can benefit from existing relationships due to their better social skills.

Conversely, people low on extraversion may try to take matters in their own hands rather than turning to someone else for help (Duberstein et al. , 2000). In an educational setting, such individuals can be screened for depression during the start of the academic year. Teachers can work to reduce the number of isolated student by taking a more active interest to ensure that such students are included in class activities. This way, pupils low on extraversion are constantly in the midst of peers and get enough attention that keeps their minds healthy, becoming targeted less by bullies.

A further step can be taken to prevent suicidal behaviour due to bullying involves peer initiated anti-bullying campaigns to whom other students can look up to. Peer groups can be restricted to get students involved in different things so that exclusive groups are not maintained which leads to a lot of bullying cases in schools. Observational learning which involves viewing informative videos or reading of stories can be very beneficial when designed to comfort victims of bullying. When witnessing a fictional account of bullying, subjects can be encouraged to speak about their insights and concerns.

Once empathy and familiarity occurs with a fictional subject that is being bullied, participants may tend to be more confident when dealing with these situations in real life. It may provide them the belief that, if the subjects I am observing can find ways to resolve such intimidating situations effectively, then why can’t I? The competitive nature of social interactions may be responsible for such a phenomenon in individual personality. Individuals tend to frequently compare themselves to others and may develop cognitive dissonance in being the one that is falling behind in a category that is being evaluated.

Changing attitudes such as being less submissive toward bullying or rejecting suicide as a valid option to deal with stresses may help at risk individuals reduce dissonance and confront bullying behaviour. However, such a form of therapy may not prove effective for all individuals, as personalities are highly variable. For example, a person low on the conscientiousness scale may not respond to such therapy because they most likely exhibit a greater handicap in relating to peers in this situation.

As discussed, the effect bullying can have upon an individual may present them with a greater risk of suicide based on their unique personality. Such characteristics may be identified using the Five Factor Model of personality to effectively designate individuals at greater risk of self harm than others. When properly understood and intervention is undertaken to give an individual the skills to cope under such stress, it may decrease an intrinsic risk of self harm.


  1. Abe, K. , & Henly, S. J. (2010). Bullying (ijime) among japanese hospital urses. Nursing Research, 59(2), 110-118.
  2. Duberstein, P. R. , Conwell, Y. , Seidlitz, L. , Denning, D. G. , Caine, E. D. , & Cox, C. (2000).
  3. Personality traits and suicidal behavior and ideation in depressed inpatients 50 years of age and older. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 55(1), 18-26.
  4. Elovainio, M. , Keltikangas-Jarvinen, L. , Vahtera, J. , Vartia, M. , & Virtanen, M. (2003).
  5. Workplace bullying and the risk of cardiovascular disease and depression. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60, 779-783. Hay, C. , & Meldrum, R. 2010).
  6. Bullying victimization and adolescent self-harm: testing hypothesis from general strain theory. Youth Adolescence, 39, 446-459.
  7. Herba, C. M. , Ferdinand, R. F. , Stijnen, T. , Veenstra, R. , Ormel, J. , Verhulst, F. C, & Oldehinkel, A. J. (2008).
  8. Victimisation and suicide ideation in the trails study: specific vulnerabilities of victims. The journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(8), 867-876.
  9. Klomek, A. B. , Sourander, A. , Niemela, S. , Kumpulainen, K. , Tamminen, T. , Almqvist, F. , Gould, M. S. , & Piha, J. (2009).
  10. Childhood bullying behaviours as a risk for suicide attempts and completed suicides: a population based cohort study. American Academy of Child Adolescent Psychiatry, 48(3). Morrison, B. (2002).
  11. Bullying and victimization in schools: a restorative justice approach. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 216, 1-6. Rivers, I. (2004).
  12. Recollections of bullying at school and their long-term implications for lesbians, gay men and bisexuals. Crisis, 25(4), 1-7. Velting, D. M. (1999).
  13. Suicidal ideation and the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 943-952.

School Uniform: Is It Compulsory To Have A Uniform In School?

A school uniform has been the influential clothing for students in many schools. There are some people who find the benefits of having a uniform in school. However, while students are under the school regulation; indeed, they find many difficulties of wearing a uniform. Many students disagree with the compulsory of a school uniform because they have a thinking that a uniform doesn’t seem to improve an educational environment. Although, school uniform can be advantageous, it’s unnecessary to be enforced in school.

Some adults believe that a school uniform is inexpensive and convenient for their children. Firstly, they think that they can save more money because their kids will only wear nothing other than a uniform. Secondly, a uniform can save time for their kids to get ready in the morning because they don’t need to worry about what to wear to school so it’s easier for parents and kids. However, they overlook the point that some families may have several children: consequently, they have to buy a set of a school uniform for each child.

Moreover, children still need other clothes for other occasions when they’re not at school. Therefore, it’s still a burdensome for family to save money. Teachers in many schools claim that a dress code can reduce prevalence of violence in their schools. It’s easy for teachers to identify their own students when they’re in danger. Also, it can stop the formation of gang members from displaying colors and symbols which can cause students to participate in prohibited activities. This can help students to feel more secure and not worrying about personal safety.

On the other hand, a uniform cannot always improve a school safety. It’s easy for an intruder to wear something similar to a uniform also, pretending to be one of those students in that school. Other than that, students can cause troubles outside school by wearing other clothes that are not a school uniform which is hard for teachers to distinguish between their own students and the opponents. Therefore, students still possibly are in a danger at anytime. Furthermore, students feel compellable and uncomfortable wearing uniforms.

There also can be a pressure to conform. Although, all students wear the same uniform still there’s a chance for mean or bullying students to make of others through the hair style, weight, height, appearance, nationality, or syndrome. For instance, one student is dressed like everybody else accepts that he’s autistic showing unusual behaviors, making other students to tease or disgust him; certainly it creates a peer pressure among students. Moreover, school uniform limits or violates students from self-expression.

Lack of freedom can cause students to feel restrained which can result in destructive behaviors; such as fighting or bullying. In addition, they will express themselves by wearing jewelry or other items that is against to school dress code. “If we allow school officials to prescribe school uniforms, then we can expect rules on hair styles, makeup, deodorant, dental hygiene, fingernail length, shoes and so on. I don’t like to let the “camel’s nose under the tent,” said George Carlin who was also against school uniforms.

According to what George Carlin said, it’s likely that forcing students to dress alike will create them to become more followers than leaders. Since students are told what to do so, they will face a problem when they are placed in environment where they have to make their own decisions. In conclusion, a school uniform brings many drawbacks; thus we should stop requiring students to wear uniforms. Besides, enforcing a school uniform into school will not make a massive change to everyone. Whether a school uniform is necessary and beneficial or not, it should depend on students’ decisions. Philawan Damee

error: Content is protected !!