Comparative Analysis Of “A Life Apart” And “Growing Up Amish”

The Plain people, with their old ways holding strong since the 1500s, still fascinate outsiders with their simple lives built on community. Two articles from different times share a look at the Amish, from Immy Humes in “A Life Apart” and Richard A. Stevick in “Growing Up Amish: Building an Amish Identity.” While both tell of Amish life, they tell it uniquely. Immy Humes and Richard A. Stevick got some pretty valuable details about the Amish, but they looked at it differently. Humes’s essay told more personal stories about her time with them, while Stevick’s essay was more about facts and breaking them down. In the end, though, both pieces help folks understand what it’s like to live as Amish better.

For her study “Living Apart,” Humes, someone from elsewhere, sees the Amish network from a distance. She paints a clear photo of their everyday lives, from their essential clothing and horse-pulled carts to their one-room schools and straightforward homes. Humes is hit by the Amish’s solid sense of the local area and the promise of their unique way of life. She also notes the troubles they experience as they seek to maintain their traditions in a rapidly changing world. The writer tells about the Amish faith’s values, beliefs, and strict rules. He also reflects on what it was like growing up with a way of life so different from most. Stevick shares his journey in the book “Growing Up Amish: Building an Amish Identity.” By writing from the inside, he looks at what it means to come of age among the Amish. The faith’s religious views and demanding standards of conduct are addressed. He considers the challenges of developing personally in a culture so removed from mainstream society.

Despite taking diverse routes, the documentary “Living Apart” and the autobiography “Growing Up Old Faith” offer critical understandings of the Amish way of living. Hume’s external point of view lends a broad overview of standard Amish customs. In contrast, Stevick’s internal viewpoint provides a more intricate and personal glimpse at the struggles and pleasures of youth among the Plain Folk. Many featured in the stories told similar accounts of those Amish being welcomed with smiles. The other story’s writer said the same thing, noting that those Amish handled others with care, giving what they had and making visiting feel at home with their hospitality that knew no bounds. Both showed those Amish caring for others, thinking of guests’ comfort in their community with kindness without end.

The two articles mentioned similar struggles that the Amish community faces. Humes pointed out how the Amish folks have it tough with everybody constantly trying to get them to drop their old ways. Stevick also talked about how hard it is growing up when your culture is not like most people’s. No matter what the Amish do to hang on to their history, outsiders always push for change. Even though they try sticking to their traditions, having your life different from almost everyone can’t be simple. Both writers touched on how it’s difficult to keep living one way when the world around you goes another. While the Amish folks face challenges, Humes and Stevick teach us a lot about values, community, and keeping things simple. Humes says the Amish “shows us there’s more than just our stuff, and easy fun can feel good too.” Stevick ends by saying those Amish “believe in their faith, their families, and each other, and they offer the world plenty.”

Martha’s story provided a first-hand look at what it was like growing up Amish. She told about her family and life on the farm and why she left to join our world. Martha filled her tale with vivid images that showed what it was like. She described Amish life’s hard work and tight rules, but also how close the people were. Martha’s story helped me understand their culture better since she was there herself. Eliot wrote about the Amish, too, but in a more book-smart way. He talked about where the Amish come from and the stuff they believe. Eliot also went over how they act and what ties them together. His essay showed he knew a lot about the Amish from research. Eliot discussed their challenges with keeping’ their ways while surrounded by changes. Whether severe or from life, Martha and Eliot agreed on some essential things. They stressed family and community in Amish life, along with deep faith. They also mentioned pressures to blend in with what’s around them today.

In conclusion, “A Life Apart” and “Growing Up Amish” provide two perspectives on the Amish experience. The outside take from Humes offers an overview of Amish living, while Stevick’s within view provides a more detailed and personal look at the trials and rewards of growing up Amish. Even though they took different routes, both articles offer valuable understandings of the Amish way and their struggles in a rapidly transforming world.

Works Cited

Stevick, Richard A. Growing up Amish: the Rumspringa years. JHU Press, 2014.

Khaitan, Prabha. A Life Apart: An Autobiography. Zubaan, 2014.

Comparative Analysis Of Stress Management Strategies: Empirical Research Vs. Pop Psychology Perspectives

Regarding stress management techniques, when compared with an empirical research article by Mendagudli et al. (2021) from the International Journal of Nursing Education and Research and a pop psychology guide article, “How Stress Impacts Your Health Guide” by Elizabeth Scott, Ph.D.. However, the empirical article provides a detailed and more complete viewpoint on stress management. It considers an array of stress triggers in addition to evidence-based methods. However, the pop-psych article focuses on the effects of stress but does not apply the same holistic and evidence-based approach as in the empirical study. This is because the Empirical Article considers different stressors and is built on strong scientific bases that form a solid foundation for stress management.

Whole-to-Whole Comparison

Main Issue, Problem, or Intention

Mendagudli et al.’s (2021) study focuses on defining specific stress management techniques for nurses. On the contrary, Scott’s (2023) study considers broad stress and health perspectives and is not limited to any particular context. Mendagudli et al. address directed approaches directed at nursing, while Scott discusses stress in different situations. This involves specialized understanding regarding a particular topic, focusing on the effect of stress on a person’s body. In contrast, the latter focuses on addressing stress as a broad topic covering all aspects of wellness and health. Their scope is different about the depth of specificity and breadth of inclusiveness.

Investigation of Various Points of View and Assumptions

Mendagudli et al. (2021). The role of stress, stressors, kinds, origins, signs, and scientific methods. Scott (2023) outlines how stress affects people, typical stressors, and general stress relief guidelines. A comprehensive approach by Mendagudli et al. (2021) includes stress and empirical proof strategies. In comparison, Scott (2023) provides a broader perspective without touching on the empirical research.

Supporting Issue with Evidence Given posture

Mendagudli et al. (2021). Supports the information using references, definitions, and examples.Scott (2023 ): Expert opinions, general information. Mendagudli et al. (2021) use citations and case-in-point to substantiate it, whereas Scott (2023) relies on experts’ opinions and facts.

Discussion of Consequences and Implications

Mendagudli et al. 2021. Implications of un-mitigated stress in nursing practice – physical and psychosocial impacts. The health impacts of stress. – Scott (2023). Mendagudli et al., 2021 talk about consequences in the context of nursing, and Scott, 2023 is specific to health consequences.

Information’s Decision-Making Utility

Mendagudli et al. (2021) provide evidence-based stress management strategies directed toward nurses, unlike Scott (2023), who provides general stress management strategies for different people. Mendagudli and others conducted an empirical study that provided specific interventions for nursing stressors and needs. However, Scott’s advice can be applied generally, although it is not specifically tailored for nurses. Mendagudli et al.’s work is specific to nursing-oriented strategies, which makes it relevant for healthcare personnel facing other sources of pressure.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Empirical Research Article on Stress Management in the Nursing Context presents a more detailed and evidence-based approach than the Pop Psychology Article. An in-depth and detailed empirical study is appropriate for nursing practice because it offers guidelines on dealing with these stressors. On the contrary, the pop psychology article is informative but needs to elaborate more on personalized stress management techniques professionally. A broader lens on stress effects could favor those searching for generic knowledge about the issue. However, they are inadequate for educating nurses with actionable and evidence‐based advice. The two articles must be carefully judged, considering their intended context and the necessary clarity to successfully implement appropriate stress management methods in a healthy work setting.

References

Mendagudli, V. G., Sarawad, S. S., & Mahajani, V. S. (2021). Stress Management-Strategies. International Journal of Nursing Education and Research, 9(2), 238-241. https://shorturl.at/dhQ78

Scott, E. (2023, September 13). How Stress Impacts Your Health Guide: 18 Effective Stress Relief Strategies. Verywell Mind. https://shorturl.at/opsL7

Cremation And Beliefs Concerning Death: A Case Study Of Ancient Roman

The recurrent cultural practice of cremation, the act of burning a body into ashes as a funeral rite, offers a lens to explore death beliefs across diverse cultures. For instance, in the ancient Roman civilization, cremation was a part of the funeral during specific periods. Cremation was the primary way of burying the dead in ancient Rome in the early centuries of the republic. Roman religious beliefs, social organization, and views on the afterlife were also strongly related to this practice. In this case, archaeological evidence from Roman burial sites and literary sources creates a vivid picture of the cultural value of cremation.

Beliefs Surrounding Death in Ancient Rome

Death was not perceived as a complete stop in the intricate fabric of Roman ideas but as a transition. Cremation was seen as a way to transform the essence of the deceased from the physical body through which it would move to the afterlife. Burning the body symbolizes the freeing of the soul from the earthly prison, demonstrating the character of death. Besides, in Roman religion, fire possessed purifying powers, and cremation was a rite of purification. In this ritual, the departed soul was cleansed and prepared to start the journey to the underworld. This purification ritual was emphasized by the elaborate funeral ceremonies that accompanied cremation (Edwards, 2007). The processions, eulogies, and sacrifices to honor the dead reflect their symbolic, religious and cultural significance. Various socio-cultural aspects can be deducted from the fact that the decision to be cremated was not universal among the classes in ancient Rome. Cremation, which was associated with extravagant funeral rituals emphasizing the performative aspects of death commemoration, was usually chosen by the elite. Cremation is an important marker of social status and identity in Roman society; as such, it was common for lower classes to perform inhumation. This shows how belief in death was both spiritually and socially differentiated.

The Cremation Process

The dead were burnt on funeral pyres when they arrived at the necropolis. To burn the corpses, people used pyres made of wood that ensured efficient but controlled burning. The burning of the body was significant and pointed to the soul’s movement from this world to beyond (Pearce & Weekes, 2017). Then, the body was placed on the funeral pyre, which was then lit. The fire burned the body, leaving only a few bone and tooth fragments. It was a deliberate and respectful change of one’s bodily form, signifying life’s transience and that the soul leaves its mortal body. The ashes and the other remaining bone fragments were collected after the cremation and meticulously collected and preserved in a funeral urn. The dead had their final home in the urn, and their earthly remains were placed into the container, which usually was decorated or symbolic (Edwards, 2007). The funerary urn was an emblem of the retention of the essence of the deceased and aided the transition of the soul to the hereafter. This is the final step in the ritual, which involves placing the urn in a particular place within the necropolis and completing the dead person’s journey to the underworld.

Archaeological and Anthropological Perspectives

The material proof of excavated Roman burial sites only strengthens our knowledge about the Roman cremation rites. Items such as urns for cremated remains, tombs, and inscriptions are of great importance when we talk about the ways of mourning, the funeral ritual, and the attitude to death. The elaborate grave goods and personalized inscriptions show that one believed in the afterlife and the need to honor the dead. In anthropological terms, the example of the ancient Roman culture compares to other cultures that practiced cremation (Pearce & Weekes, 2017). This comparison can reveal universal human perceptions about death that go beyond cultures and ages. The unknown aspect of death is repeatedly addressed; fire becomes a symbol, the ritual significance, and aspects related to the social culture, which opens a large window of how different civilizations tackle the enigma of death.

According to Pearce and Weekes (2017), Roman cremation rituals were not just burial practices but a dance between memory, soul, and fire. An ancient funerary practice included practical consideration and the symbolism of death and the afterlife. This began with the ritualistic “laying out” of the dead. The body was first washed and anointed to be changed by fire—practical preparations combined with acts that symbolized the earthly life to the ones of the after smoothly blended. The dead body procession led to the gates of a city, to a pyre. Its relevance derived from the fact that it faced both the land of the living and the land of the dead. To the ancient Greeks, this was deemed a sacred place for the fires of transformation. This was a space within the bounds of the dead person that existed outside the city. Pyre, however, was not only fuel but as an instrument of transformation. It was believed that the spirits of the departed were freeing their immortal souls, and the wood was a stage for a symbolic

Further argument by Edwards contends that Roman cremation rituals meant more than eating meat, as he puts it. According to Edwards, the flames had a different effect purifying the body, freeing the immortal soul, and the final separation from the world of the living to the kingdom of the dead. This transformation did not only occur internally but was publicly portrayed by a spectacle of cremation (Edwards,2007). A physical barrier between the living and the deceased was created by setting the pyre outside city walls, and the dancing flames were symbolic of the soul’s journey into the unknown. Release.

To Edwards, cremation was anything but an inactive undertaking. It actively formed social narratives and fortified reputations. Cremation honored dignified and stoic deaths, particularly among emperors and philosophers (Edwards,2007). Facing the fire with calmness and the last words became legendary, reinforcing virtues and securing a place in history. On the contrary, a perceived “bad” death involving fear or weakness could be condemned through cremation, which would have become a public spectacle of moral failure that would have tarnished an individual’s legacy.

In conclusion, Funerary practices through cremation are the cultural and symbolic expressions of beliefs about death. Burning of the deceased’s body is a sign of high honor in many cultures. Furthermore, it symbolizes purification, which refers to the immortal soul separating from the mortal remains. This is where the transformative power of fire supports the belief that the soul transcends the physical body. Cremation also portrays a perspective towards the temporary nature of life in a particular culture. This is demonstrated by the ashes, representing the remaining elements, a symbolic return to the elements, and the cyclic nature of life. Some belief systems impart additional significance to scattering the ashes in certain places or keeping them in urns, such as linking the deceased to sacred spaces or providing a tangible link between the living and the dead.

References

Pearce, J., & Weekes, J. (2017). Death as a process: the archaeology of the Roman funeral. Oxbow Books. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1pk86q7

Edwards, C. (2007). Death in ancient Rome. Yale University Press. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300217278/death-in-ancient-rome/