Death Penalty In The UAE And France Essay Example

Death Penalty, France, UAE, United Arab Emirates

Introduction

The death sentence is a contentious issue all over the world. It is a severe form of punishment, meted out by the criminal justice system after a fair trial and enforced by governments to persons deemed to have committed heinous criminal acts that may include murder, rape, treason, and other criminal activities that are considered to be capital offenses. However, the application of the death sentence is a matter that elicits different opinions from the world citizenry, and countries have different applications of the death sentence. There are those countries that propagate its application and others that vehemently oppose it. On this issue, I will cover the comparison and contrast of the application of the death penalty in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) under Sharia Law and in France under Civil Law.

Similarities

Both the UAE and France are signatories to International Treaties that seek to ratify the abolishment of the death penalty. The two States are also signatories to Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states that everyone has a right to life, liberty, and security. Another notable treaty that both States ratified is Article 6/1 of the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights states that “every human being has an inherent right to life. This shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life. Another interesting comparison is the existence of a middle ground where in France, same-sex marriages are lawfully recognized but punishable by death; in the UAE, the sentence is never enforced. The UAE began replacing its’ legal system in the early 1960s from the traditional system of law and justice (Sharia Laws) to laws and institutions of western inspiration.

Contrasts

There are many differences in how the issue of the death sentence is viewed in these two jurisdictions. In France (a pro-abolish State), once infamous for ‘the French guillotine,’ several attempts to abolish the death sentence began as far back as 1791 and later in 1906. However, it was not until October 9th, 1981 that France was able to abolish the death sentence after a wide public debate (Hammel 118). The French society seeks to distinguish itself as a cultural signifier of the sanctity of the right to life. The last recorded execution on French soil was back in 1969 (Mitterrand, 1028). However, today as many as 50 per cent of the French population are in favor of the reinstatement of the death penalty for heinous crimes like murder and terrorism.

The UAE constitution provides for the application of Sharia Law to adjudicate criminal and family law where the death penalty is applicable to offenders, whereas the law in France does allow the use of the death penalty for any offences. The death sentence in the UAE is carried out in ways that the French society deems to be barbaric and undignified that include hanging by rope to stoning to death of the condemned. The death sentence in the UAE was meted out as recently as in 2017 when one person was hanged for killing (Abdulla, 157). It is also good to note that the death sentence under the Sharia Law in the UAE is surrounded in a lot of controversy where victims of rape stand condemned to death in disregard to their innocence. According to the French society and the western European countries at large the UAE Sharia Laws on the death penalty leave a lot to be desired and create a lot of diplomatic spats between the two when their citizens are condemned to death for issues like same-sex liaisons (especially lesbians) or extra-marital affairs that are deemed acceptable in the West but abhorred in the (Al-Muhairi, Butt Ali ,305). According to the French society, the application of the death sentence in the UAE is selective justice that mainly targeting women in a rather male-dominated world where the rights of women remain only on paper (Hoyle, 211).

Conclusion

The issue of the death sentence is a very emotive one that will not fizzle out any time soon. Society as a whole has a right to protect itself from criminals that unleash horrendous acts that include terrorism, mass murders, rapists of women and children. For these group of criminals, the society has a right to gauge the appropriate form of punishment, including the death cases for those deemed to be unhabitable.

Works Cited

Abdulla, Saleh Abdulla Murad. The use of the death penalty under the law of the United Arab Emirates. Diss. Aberystwyth University, 2013.

Al-Muhairi, Butti Sultan Butti Ali. “Islamisation and Modernisation within the UAE Penal Law: Shari’a in the Pre-modern Period.” Arab Law Quarterly 10.4 (1995): 287-309.

Hammel, Andrew. “Case Study Three—France.” Ending the Death Penalty. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2010. 116-145.).

Hoyle, Carolyn. “Capital punishment at the intersections of discrimination and disadvantage: the plight of foreign nationals.” Comparative capital punishment. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019.

Kunyk, A. M. LEGALIZATION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGES. Diss. 2018.

Mitterrand, Danielle. “Symposium: Death Penalty from an International and Human Rights Law Perspective.” Santa Clara L. Rev. 42 (2001): 1031.Mitterrand, Danielle. “Symposium: Death Penalty from an International and Human Rights Law Perspective.” Santa Clara L. Rev. 42 (2001): 1031.

Descriptive Paper Of Thomas Paine Writing Sample

Thomas Paine was an English-American political activist, philosopher, political theorist, and revolutionary. One of the Founding Fathers of the United States, he authored the two most influential pamphlets at the start of the American Revolution. He inspired the rebels in 1776 to declare independence from Britain (Dorfman et al., 1938). His ideas reflected Enlightenment-era rhetoric of transnational human rights. He is best known for his work Common Sense, which argued for independence from Great Britain, and The American Crisis, which supported the American Revolution. Thomas Paine’s economic philosophy is based on the idea of natural rights.

According to Paine, every human has a natural right to the fruits of their labor. This means that people have a right to keep the money they earn, and they have a right to use that money as they see fit. Paine believed that the government should not interfere with people’s economic activities. He believed that the government should only intervene when necessary, such as by providing public goods or services. He is best known for his pamphlet Common Sense, which argued for independence from Great Britain, and The American Crisis, which supported the American Revolution. His ideas had a significant impact on the thoughts and actions of the Founding Fathers.

Paine was a strong advocate for the rights of the individual and was critical of the institutions of government and church that he believed impeded the natural rights of man. He believed that society should be organized around natural rights and liberty principles and that government should exist only to protect those rights. Paine’s economic philosophy was based on the idea of the free market. He believed people should be free to produce and trade without government interference. He believed that government intervention in the economy only benefited the wealthy and powerful at the expense of the poor and vulnerable (Dorfman et al., 1938).

Thomas Paine was a close friend of Benjamin Franklin. The two men met in London in 1774 and quickly developed a strong friendship. They shared a passion for liberty and democracy and played important roles in the American Revolution. Paine became one of Franklin’s most trusted advisors and helped Franklin draft some of his most important speeches (Wecter et al., 1940). Paine also played a key role in persuading Franklin to declare his support for independence from Britain. After the war, Paine and Franklin remained close friends. They both helped draft the Constitution of the United States, and they continued to work together to promote liberty and democracy worldwide.

Paine helped Franklin with his work on electricity, and Franklin helped Paine with his work on political theory. They shared a mutual respect’s work and ideas. Thomas Paine and the Franklins had a close relationship. They both believed in the importance of freedom and democracy and were instrumental in helping to found the United States. Paine helped to draft the Declaration of Independence, and Franklin was one of the signers (Wecter et al., 1940). They both also played key roles in the American Revolution. Paine wrote several widely circulated pamphlets and helped rally support for the cause, while Franklin served as a diplomat and helped secure financial support from France.

Thomas Paine’s defense of welfare in Agrarian justice is significant because it is one of the first comprehensive defenses of the welfare state. Paine argues that the state must provide for the basic needs of its citizens and that this duty is especially important in agricultural societies where the majority of the population is poor (Seaman et al., 1988). Paine’s ideas would later be influential in developing social safety net programs like Social Security and Medicare in the United States. He observes that while some people are born into wealth and others into poverty, it is not fair or just for the latter to suffer from want while the former enjoy abundance. He concludes that it is the duty of those who have more to help those who have less to create a more equal and just society.

In Rights of Man, Thomas Paine argues that the government has a responsibility to provide for the welfare of its citizens. He states that the government must provide for the basic needs of its people, including food, shelter, and clothing. Paine also argues that the government should provide for the education of its citizens. In Agrarian Justice, Paine elaborates on these ideas, arguing that the government should provide financial assistance to farmers and other rural workers (Seaman et al., 1988). He states that this would help to ensure that these workers can live decent lives and that they can produce food and other goods for the benefit of society.

Thomas Paine’s Common Sense is a pamphlet to persuade the American colonists to declare independence from Great Britain. Paine argues that the case for independence is not just a matter of political ideology but a natural right of all people to be free from a tyrannical government. He also asserts that the British monarchy is an unnatural institution with no place in a free society. Thomas Paine’s Common Sense was published in 1776, arguing for independence from Britain. Paine’s main argument was that the British government was corrupt and that the American colonies should govern themselves. He also argued that the American Revolution was a just war and that the American people had a right to overthrow the British government (Seaman et al., 1988).

In his essay “Agrarian Justice,” Thomas Paine argues that property is the creature of society and that it is unjust for some members of society to own property. In contrast, others do not (Seaman et al., 1988). He believes that poverty is the result of this inequality and that it is the moral duty of those who have a property to share it with those who do not. Thomas Paine’s ideas on property, poverty, and moral equality are based on the belief that all people are equal and should have the same rights and opportunities. He believed that property should be distributed evenly so that no one person has more than another. He also believed that poverty should be eliminated because it is an unjust condition that prevents people from achieving their full potential.

In his pamphlet “Common Sense,” Thomas Paine argues that the only way to ensure liberty and equality is to have a society in which the boundaries of ownership are clear (Rosenfeld et al., 2008). He believes that the government should only own the land necessary for the common good and that all other lands should be privately owned. He also believes that the government should not interfere in the economy and that all economic activity should be left to the private sector. Thomas Paine was a political thinker who wrote during the Enlightenment period. He believed in liberty, equality, and the natural rights of man. He also believed that ownership should be limited to what one could use and not extend to unused land or resources.

Thomas Paine was a strong advocate for the influence of classical antiquity on modern thought and culture. He believed that studying the great thinkers and writers of Greece and Rome was essential to understand the principles upon which Western civilization was founded. Paine also believed the classical world could provide valuable lessons for modern people regarding politics, morality, and philosophy. He believed that studying classical antiquity could provide valuable lessons for modern society. Paine believed that classical antiquity was a model for democracy and that its principles could be applied to modern society. He also believed that classical antiquity could provide a model for social and political reform (Rosenfeld et al., 2008).

Thomas Paine’s “continental mind” refers to his belief that the American colonies should be united in their fight for independence from Britain. He believed the colonies had more in common with each other than they did with Britain, and they should therefore work together to achieve their shared goal of independence. Paine’s continental mind was instrumental in convincing many Americans to support the cause of independence, and his writings helped to rally support for the Continental Army during the Revolutionary War (Lamb et al., 2010). Thomas Paine’s continental mind was a way of thinking based on reason and natural rights. It was a way of thinking that was opposed to the monarchical and aristocratic way of thinking that was prevalent in Europe at the time.

Thomas Paine’s political theories were based on the idea that reason, not tradition or revelation, should be the basis of government. He believed that government should be based on the people’s will, not on the whims of kings or the dictates of the church. Paine also believed in natural rights and the equality of all people. He also believed that government should be based on the people’s consent. He believed that government should be limited in its power and that people should have the right to overthrow a government that was not serving them. He also believed in the equality of all people and that everyone should have the same rights and opportunities (Lamb et al., 2010).

Thomas Paine strongly advocated for the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. He believed these documents were necessary to protect man’s rights and ensure that the government was limited in its power. Paine also believed that the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were essential to the proper functioning of government (Solinger et al., 2010). Paine argues that the Constitution of the United States of America is a “natural right” document and that the government it establishes is based on natural rights principles. He also argues that human rights are not derived from the government but are inherent and inalienable.

Thomas Paine’s ideas about government were very influential in shaping the course of the American Revolution. His pamphlet “Common Sense” helped to rally support for independence from Britain, and his writings on natural rights and social contract theory helped to justify the Revolution to the American people. Paine’s ideas about government continue to be influential today, and his belief in the power of reason and the need for reform are still relevant in our own time.

References

Dorfman, J. (1938). The economic philosophy of Thomas Paine. Political Science Quarterly, 53(3), 372-386.

Wecter, D. (1940). Thomas Paine and the Franklins. American Literature, 12(3), 306-317.

Seaman, J. W. (1988). II. Thomas Paine: Ransom, Civil Peace, and the Natural Right to Welfare. Political Theory, 16(1), 120-142.

Rosenfeld, S. (2008). Tom Paine’s Common Sense and Ours. The William and Mary Quarterly, 65(4), 633-668.

Lamb, R. (2010). Liberty, Equality, and the Boundaries of Ownership: Thomas Paine’s Theory of Property Rights. The Review of politics, 72(3), 483-511.

Solinger, J. D. (2010). Thomas Paine’s continental mind. Early American Literature, 45(3), 593-617.

Designing A Customer Engagement Business Case For TVB University Essay Example


  1. Introduction

The purpose of this case is to advocate for an investment in a customer engagement program by The Vegetarian Butcher (TVB). This customer engagement program could take the form of economic rewards, symbolic rewards, or an amplified voice for customers, and would help to solve relevant problems such as customer interaction, content for each touch point in the buyer’s journey, customer satisfaction, product/service feedback, strong brand ambassadors, and a relatively high customer lifetime value.


  1. Problem Statement

TVB does not currently have a customer engagement program, and this is a problem because it is difficult to build customer loyalty and repeat business without some form of customer engagement. A customer engagement program would help solve this problem by encouraging customers to interact with TVB more regularly and providing them with incentives.


  1. Opportunity Overview

There are many potential benefits of implementing a customer engagement program. First, it could help to increase customer loyalty and repeat business. Second, it could help to increase customer satisfaction with TVB products and services. Customer engagement programs can increase customer satisfaction by fostering two-way communication between businesses and their customers (Davey et al., 2022). Customers can provide feedback, and businesses can use that feedback to improve the customer experience. Additionally, customer engagement programs can help businesses build customer relationships, leading to increased customer satisfaction. Third, it could help to generate positive word-of-mouth marketing for TVB. Fourth, with a customer engagement program in place, TVB would be able to interact with customers, get feedback on products/services, create brand ambassadors, and improve customer satisfaction.


  1. Assumptions

A few key assumptions have been made in developing this business case. First, it is assumed that TVB is willing to invest in a customer engagement program. Second, it is assumed that the customer engagement program will successfully achieve its objectives. Moreover, it is assumed that the benefits of the customer engagement program will outweigh the costs.


  1. Recommendations

A few different tactics could be used to implement a customer engagement program. One option would be to offer economic rewards to customers who interact with TVB regularly. There are a few ways that this could help the TVB. First, it could help increase customer loyalty and interaction with the brand. Second, it could help increase sales and revenues for the company. Third, it could help TVB better understand its customers and their needs. Another option would be to offer symbolic rewards, such as exclusive access to TVB events or product launches (Juanamasta et al., 2019). Symbolic rewards can help TVB by increasing brand awareness and creating a positive association with the brand. For example, if TVB offers exclusive access to events or product launches, this can help create a buzz around the brand and attract new viewers. The third option would be to amplify the voice of TVB customers through social media or other channels. This would help TVB to understand customer needs better and wants.


  1. Implementation Plan

If TVB decides to implement a customer engagement program, a few steps should be taken to do so successfully. First, TVB should decide what type of customer engagement program they would like to implement. Second, they should develop a plan for implementing the program, including a timeline, budget, and responsible parties. Thirdly, they should monitor the program’s progress and make adjustments as necessary.


  1. Conclusion

In conclusion, a customer engagement program could be a valuable investment for TVB. It could help to increase customer loyalty and repeat business, and it could also help to generate positive word-of-mouth marketing. If TVB decides to implement a customer engagement program, it should do so with a well-defined plan and clear objectives.

References

Davey, J., O’Brien, I., Ouschan, R., & Parkinson, J. (2022). Rethinking customer engagement design: Using customer-mobilized engagement (CME) to grow business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 105, 453-466.

Juanamasta, I. G., Wati, N. M. N., Hendrawati, E., Wahyuni, W., Pramudianti, M., Wisnujati, N. S., … & Umanailo, M. C. B. (2019). The role of customer service through customer relationship management (Crm) to increase customer loyalty and good image. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(10), 2004-2007.

error: Content is protected !!