Economy Functions: Production, Consumption, Distribution Sample Essay

Every economy has its purpose and role in society. It is necessary to comprehend a true worth of economy to use its benefits and succeed. As a rule, there are four main functions of the economy: the identification of what should be produced, the analysis of production amount, the description of potential users, and the evaluation of the distribution resources.

What should be produced? It is the economy’s first function, to understand what is expected, available, and possible and introduce a thing for production in regards to these three factors (Study Lecture Notes, 2012). Another important function of the economy is the necessity to realize how much should be produced. The most economical way should be chosen for the production process in order to promote low costs and high profits.

The attention to the available technologies should be also paid to illuminate all possible shortages of the process and underline the most crucial benefits and outcomes. The next function is the identification of the final audience for the products. To complete this function on a high level, the needs and expectations of potential users of products/services should be analyzed.

This is why it is important to realize for whom something is produced and why this kind of audience may need a product. Finally, the distribution of resources has to be discussed. People and resources are usually distributed by means of a variety of factors such as occupations, economic needs, age, abilities, etc. A proper distribution of resources is a vital part of the economy that explains how to promote investments in different sectors (Study Lecture Notes, 2012).

In general, all these functions have to be considered to introduce a good example of how the economy should work and impact different processes within the same society. Any economic system has to be based on these four functions to be properly completed on its own stage.


Functions of economic system, scarcity and choice.” (2012). Study Lecture Notes.

What It Means To Be Successful?

What is Success? Is it directly proportional to happiness or is it simply achieving everything that you ever desired? Success is within the mind of a person and it means different things to different people (Knoch 376). It takes different definitions with different interpretations. Many hold the idea that success is having great amount of wealth or holding the most senior position in our career.

Some try to define it in terms of personal achievement such as sports awards and good grades in school. However, scholars and non-scholars argue that success is about being famous and known all over the world like president Obama. In general, success takes different forms. Gandhi is considered to be successful yet he had three sets of clothes. On the other hand, Bill Gates is also successful while he is worth over $50 billion.

Success is the act of getting or attaining a position, honors or a fortune. In fact, it is the fruitful result you obtain after an attempt. According the Oxford Dictionary, success is “the attainment of fame, wealth and or social status.” Success itself is achieving your desired goal thus having a favorable outcome. Thus, it is the attainment of an action at a specified period. The actions attained could be your career, financial or personal goals.

Knoch asserts that to be successful really mean to work on the goals you set and achieve them (382). As a result, it is not success if what you have has just been handed to you on a silver platter. An individual must have the determination to work harder and make sure that things are accomplished in the right manner.

Success has to be sought after with the desire for improvement and achievement. It should be obtained with integrity given that this creates character and defines who you are in the larger community. Such an occurrence makes success a peace of mind that will be as a result of self-satisfaction that one did his or her best. Nuckles and Renkl claim that you have to be the best you can be in what you are doing with your passion driving you in the direction of the goals (247).

Success can also imply living according to your values. From Nuckles and Renkl study, this means living the way you want and enjoying every single minute of it (253). According to Warren Buffet, success implies having what you want and wanting what you have. That is, you have the people you love, and love you just the same. It involves knowing who you are including your strengths and your weakness. This helps you to work on your strengths to better yourself. Thus, you love yourself as you are and finding joy in what you are doing and how you are doing it.

Additionally, success can also be viewed as never giving up. With each failure, you continue on without losing enthusiasm knowing that in the end you achieve your desired results. The more you become more practically and actively engaged in your goal, the more successful you will feel. Patience is of essence in success. You have to be willing to tolerate delay or suffering without being upset and with great optimism in your heart. Each delay is seen as a step forward to something better.

Success is also defined in relation to your connection with others. How you relate to others is as important in a successful life as wealth and achieving ones goals. In order to be successful you need the help of friends and family. Each person adds something to your life on your way to success. They provide love, guidance and support in making you successful. How you come to relate to this people after your achievements will determine your level of success. The inference involves showing them the respect they deserve, spending time with them and being able to give them gifts once in a while. Therefore, one must learn to treat others well just as you would like to be treated.

According Nuckles and Renkl, to live a successful life includes being able to give back to the society (243). Such level of success could be through volunteering time, and energy to do good causes in a community. For instance, one may choose to help in charities by making a donation or even starting your own charitable organization. The action will not only bring satisfaction and happiness, but will also benefit others. An individual do not have to attain an immense amount of wealth to be able to help others. If you do what is right, you will always be happy.

Finally, to be successful in life is to have self-confidence. Being in this state appears to be the backbone of all personal success. You need to trust in yourself, your abilities, judgments and qualities as well as willing to shoulder responsibilities and being accountable. Anything is achievable if you believe in yourself (Knoch 380). It makes you approach any problem as a challenge. Self-confidence makes others believe in you and gives you stability in every area of your life. Self-confidence helps an individual in believing in other people to be successful.

In conclusion, a successful life can only be obtained through self-contentment, and knowing that you have everything you need for the present situation. Success can be realized through pursing your dreams, maintaining healthy relationships with everyone around you and giving back to the society. You should be able to enjoy the little things in life. The level of success is determined by how much joy one feels and being able to laugh more often.

Works Cited

Knoch, Ute. “Diagnostic Assessment of Writing: A Comparison of two Rating Scales.” Language Testing 26.2 (2009): 275 -304. Print.

Nuckles, Matthias, and Alexander Renkl. “Expertise Reversal Effects in Writing-to-Learn.” Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences 38.3 (2010): 237–258. Print.

“Archer” By Wassily Kandinsky And “The Sick Heart” By Paul Klee Paintings

In the historical course of its development, the art of painting has witnessed cardinal changes in its techniques and objects. By the end of the nineteenth century, artists have developed a manner of painting that was often too enigmatic and obscure to the general public.

Therefore, written explications were provided by the artists themselves, concerning their vision of art, its essence, mission, and techniques. This paper focuses on tracing connections between Wassily Kandinsky’s colored woodcut on paper Archer, Paul Klee’s watercolor The Sick Heart and the theoretical ideas outlined in Kandinsky’s work “Concerning the Spiritual in the Art” and Henry Matisse’s “Notes of a Painter”.

In his contemplation of the art, Kandinsky mentions the primitives as those reflecting not the external image but the internal, hidden essence of things (87). In this sense, his Archer provides a perfect illustration of the idea: it is not exactly the outward appearance of the depicted objects (which are quite uneasy to recognize) but rather their inner message that is captured in the painting (Kandinsky). In the mass of colors, the viewer is able to discern the main object of the picture, the archer, long after the first glance is cast at the painting.

Such interpretation of painting has common grounds with Matisse’s idea that the artist should not bluntly copy the nature, but must take effort to “interpret nature and submit it to the spirit of the picture” (134).

The same phenomenon of the objects’ external shape reinterpretation is observed in Klee’s watercolor: though preserving the initial shape of the key objects in The Sick Heart, Klee transforms the rest beyond recognition so that the onlooker has to decipher their essence and consequently recognize their form (Klee). The mysteriousness of the depicted objects suggests yet another parallel with Kandinsky’s idea of elite art created by the “non-understood artist” and unavailable for understanding by the lower public (88).

The major emphasis in Kandinsky’s Archer is obviously placed on colors, and this is not accidental. In his theoretical work, Kandinsky develops a theory of color to which he ascribes two effects: physical and psychological (92). According to their impact on the onlooker, colors can be divided into bright and dull, warm and cold, soft and hard, prickly and smooth (Kandinsky 92).

Archer provides a convincing illustration of that theory, with its semantic spheres expressed by means of contrasting colors: while the archer and the castle are depicted in warm, active, and bright palette, the hostile background is represented in darker and colder colors (Kandinsky).

Supporting the idea that at the physical stage of color perception the eye seeks repose in dark color, Kandinsky provides this restful background in his picture; on the other hand, the sharp contrasts and the general state of warfare depicted in the canvas occur to the viewer only later, at the psychological state of perceiving the painting.

The importance of color in the painting is emphasized by Matisse in his “Notes of a Painter” as well. Contradicting the impressionists’ interpretation of color as the reflection of a transient moment, Matisse claims the importance of harmony and dissonance of color for the general success of the painting (132).

Colors should be carefully selected and combined so that they support and sustain each other (Matisse 134). These ideas can be discerned in The Sick Heart, featuring a whole array of warm and cold tints that let the semantically important objects stand out more or less sharply against a monochrome background (Klee). Such use of color allows perceiving the objects as more or less significant for the general arrangement.

All in all, it is apparent that despite the individual peculiarities intrinsic to each artist of the time, the overall trends in their painting style conform to the theoretical ideas laid out in the contemporary fundamental writings on art.

Works Cited

Kandinsky, Wassily. Archer. 1908-09. Serge Sabarsky Collection, New York.

—. “Concerning the Spiritual in Art.” Art in Theory, 1900 – 1990: An Anthology of Changing Ideas. Eds. Charles Harrison and Paul Wood. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1993. 86–94. Print.

Klee, Paul. The Sick Heart. 1939. Serge Sabarsky Collection, New York.

Matisse, Henry. “Notes of a Painter.” Theories of Modern Art: A Source Book by Artists and Critics. Ed. Herschel B. Chipp. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1970. 130–137. Print.

error: Content is protected !!