Elon Musk’s And Jeff Bezos’ Leadership Styles Free Writing Sample

One should initially note the fundamental difference in the dynamics of development of the two space companies chosen by its leaders, Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos. Despite the fact that this information is in the public domain, few people know that Bezos began investing in the development of space programs two years before Musk. His company Blue Origin, which embodies dreams of conquering space, was founded in parallel with maintaining control over Amazon, which is still Bezos’ main source of income.

Jeff Bezos has a strategy where taking things slowly equals doing quality work. The company tends to avoid major breakthroughs; however, in this way, it is insured against failures. Bezos’ conservative approach is symbolized by the Aesopian turtle that is painted on Blue Origin rockets after every successful flight. This expresses the whole concept of Bezos as a successful entrepreneur. For Bezos, if going slowly means smoothly and accurately, then there is an opportunity to outperform faster and more unstable competitors in the overall large-scale race (Grădinaru et al., 2020). Elon Musk, the leader of the competitive SpaceX program, is investing more than Bezos and attracting third-party funding from a number of global investors (Fernholz, 2019). A lot of Musk’s space projects may fail to launch, but their number and level of journalistic coverage draw attention to them. This accordingly requires SpaceX to keep its activities up to date and attract the attention of the public and investors.

However, the excessive and chaotic activity of Musk’s company slows down his plans, particularly the project of sending a man to the moon. Bezos controls financial investments on his own, investing in the space program from his own pocket, which gives him the opportunity to more accurately track the development of projects. This and the absence of the need to attract public attention is the advantage of Bezos’ business strategy.


Fernholz, T. (2019). Rocket billionaires: Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and the new space race. First Mariner Books.

Grădinaru, C., Toma, S.-G., Catana, S., & Andrisan, G. (2020). A view on transformational leadership: The case of Jeff Bezos. Manager, 31, 93-100.

Will The Revolution Be Tweeted Or Facebooked?

In their article, Harlow and Guo (2014) explore how the meanings of “activism” and “activist” are changing due to the use of digital media. Technology is often utilized for communication and information sharing during protests, marches, and other forms of activism. For instance, in 2006, a march was held in the United States to defend the rights of immigrants, where activists used the Internet to promote collective action (Harlow & Guo, 2014). To examine the use of technology among activists, Harlow and Guo (2014) questioned two focus groups of 10 persons with prior experience working in immigrant organizations. The participants were invited to respond to open-ended questions to elicit their opinions. The research found that activists use digital tools to increase awareness among the public. However, digital instruments are less effective for inspiring individuals to engage in offline activism. Technology serves more as a logistical tool for interacting with other activists or supporters than it does with actual immigrants. To spread their messages, activists rely on the mainstream media. Social network may advance the cause by drawing more media attention, but it might also work against it by calling focus away from the problem toward the digital spectacles. The primary drawbacks of adopting digital tools are that they are less accessible to immigrants and restrict activism to mouse clicks. In addition, the focus group’s size imposes restrictions on the investigation. Other elements, such as the environment, could have been considered in further studies. Overall, digital advances may benefit activism by calling attention to the issue and creating space for communication. However, social media may harm by distracting media’s attention.


Harlow, S., & Guo, L. (2014). Will the revolution be tweeted or Facebooked? Using digital communication tools in immigrant activism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 463–478. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12062

“Manifest Destiny” By John O’Sullivan

O’Sullivan was the one who first used the term “manifest destiny,” and it referred to his belief that the young nation of the United States possessed a divine privilege and mandate to broaden and grow bigger. The term was an idea that the US had the right to expand its democratic and capitalistic values throughout the North American continent (Boczkowska, 2017). The United States of America was unique and needed to grow to share its magnificent principles with more people.

The phrase “manifest destiny” has taken on a more pessimistic connotation in recent decades, reflecting a shift in perception of its original significance. For example, President Jackson, in particular, used the phrase to justify removing the Indians from their lands since the US still has a “manifest destiny” to march westward (Boczkowska, 2017). Thus, this entailed eliminating the natives to create space for US settlement in the West.

People were driven to go westward due to the phrase, which helped them feel pride in their nation and motivated them to move westward. People had a strong desire to share the “manifest destiny” of the US, a distinctive mix of democratic principles and capitalist practices that made the nation unique. People yearned to go to the West because they felt immense pride in their nation and were aware of the vast opportunities that existed in the country.

The need and will to find land was a driving force for the migration of settlers to the West. The Homestead Act of 1862, a government initiative, assisted the settlers at low expense (Khomina, 2020). The settlers wanted to start their enterprises and provide for their families. Since the majority of the land in the nation had not been claimed, there was a significant amount of untapped potential.


Boczkowska, K. (2017). Spaceflight as the (Trans)National Spectacle: Transforming technological sublime and panoramic realism in early IMAX space films. Second Language Learning and Teaching, 123–137.

Khomina, A. (2020). The Homestead Act of 1862. US history scene.

error: Content is protected !!