ESPN Brand Case Study Free Writing Sample

1. ESPN brand to consumers is quality sports content media that is available to sports fans giving them what they want anytime, wherever they are; is a brand that is brash, tech savvy, creative, and innovative. Its mission is to reach and make sports fan happy. 2. ESPN is selling an all-sports network, a multiplatform brand with high quality content of sporting events that are on demand. The core benefits for ESPN channel alone is currently more than 96 million homes, it is only one piece of a bigger brand puzzle in the cable network that has become Bodenheimer’s $ 6 billion sports empire.

An actual product is SportsCenter ESPN’s first program has as many as 93 million viewers each month; it’s the only nightly, full-hour sports news program, for such reason it remains the network’s flagship studio show; as well as ESPN Radio, ESPN The Magazine, ESPN. com, and Mobile ESPN. ESPN augmented product offer consumer services such as college and major league sports events, sports talk shows, fans can access content carried by EPSN’s other networks, sports video games.

In addition to that, ESPN is exploring the limits of the internet and provides sports content via branded ESPN video player in AOL’s portal, and on top of that Mobile ESPN was designed as ESPN’s own cell phone network putting content into sports into fan’s pockets 24/7. 3. Yes, ESPN have a strong brand equity because it is one of the biggest franchises in sports, and is one of the most successful and envied brands in the entertainment world. During any seven-day period, 120 million people ages 12 to 64 interact with some ESPN medium.

As a cable network, ESPN commands $2. 91 from cable operators for each subscriber every month. Its brand equity relates to its brand value for that reason, it became the first cable network to land the coveted TV contract for Monday Night Football, which went on to become the highest rated cable series ever. Since obtaining ESPN in 1995 as part of the ABC acquisition this brand has delivered on the numbers and it according to Disney’s then CEO is worth substantially more than what they paid for the entire acquisition. . Co-branding efforts involving the ESPN brand are when ESPN content was integrated into its sibling network ABC, which allows ESPN on ABC to be home for the NBA finals, NASCAR, NCAA football, NCAA basketball, World Cup Soccer, British Open, and the IndyCar Series. It is exploring the limits of the internet through AOL, its phone network is available with premium content through Verizon Wireless and Qualcomm; and it is part of the Walt Disney Company.

The possible benefits are to be able to reach a broader consumer appeal, and greater brand equity; it also allows the company to expand its existing brand into a category that otherwise would be very difficult to be part of. The possible risks are if one of the partners fails to follow the legal contracts and licenses or if one of the co-branding goes into bankruptcy. That’s why each partner must take good care of its brand or it can hurt not only the one brand, but all the co-brand partners as well. . ESPN have been taking quality sports content across the wildest possible collection of media assets, to reach sports fan wherever they may be, employing a hands-off management style. Their only rules have been that every new idea must focus on fulfilling the network’s mission of reaching sports fan and making them happy. It have build a good brand equity, and have co-branded with other meganetworks in order to reach categories that otherwise would have been difficult to reach.

The Nazi Part Was No More Than A Fringe Irritant In German Domestic Politics

A ‘fringe irritant’ in German domestic politics must be a term widely used for many minority parties in a struggling Weimar Germany, whilst designed to lower the thought of their actual influence and reputation amongst the readers of historical sources it also shows the significance of their effects on the population. In the case of the DAP (later NSDAP) it was minute, and at even said by Hitler himself: “at a low club level form”.

Germany, being a new country which had gained experience of defeat and humiliation at the hands of the allies, was still primarily made up of states run under a somewhat ‘federal’ system of government and this would have led to a very authoritarian regime given the times, thus altering the scope of power parties such as the NSDAP could originally achieve. As extremism and inflation sharply increased and tolerance decreased, the appearance of new, fluid political thought was becoming all the more noticeable with events such as the Kapp Putsch and the Spartacist Uprising being echoed all around Germany.

Did the NSDAP stay as a minority for the duration of the 1920’s or was it a wave of success and failure following each other? Whether it had been the German Workers Party or any other form of minority political group, towards the beginning of the 1920’s, all of these ‘political factions’ put together would be an irritant to majority state leadership, and in the case of ‘the German Worker’s Party’: Minister President Kommissar Gustav von Kahr was the opposition.

With the harshly reformed German army taking charge of reporting on these fringe parties, Hitler had gained his opportunity to make himself heard and succeeded. However, under Anton Drexler’s leadership, the DAP were very much a fringe irritant contained to a beer hall, designed to air nationalist views and calls for Bavarian Independence but it wasn’t really until Adolf Hitler made himself known that the party’s reputation mirrored his own.

This can be seen in the party’s membership figures which shot from 55 in 1920 to 108,000 in 1928. The party had many limitations holding it back and these included the presence of the army and V-Men (even when Hitler left the army in 1920), the Public Speaking bans placed on Adolf Hitler all around Germany from 1925-1927 and even the success and consequent boom of the economy because of American loans being handed over to the Weimar Republic.

These all led to short term effects on the NSDAP and it hindered the rise of the party to a national level to a little extent. However the biggest limitations to power were probably the exclusion from Von Kahr’s plans and this possibly led to the term fringe irritant being associated with the NSDAP – this exclusion can be seen as the main drive behind the failed Beer Hall Putsch but even this had its limitations as it resulted in Hitler being imprisoned for 5 years (parole after 6 months) thus halting the progress of the Nazi Party at 20. 00 members in Bavaria for most of 1924. The definitive factor which classes the Beer Hall Putsch as something created by a fringe irritant party was the fact that this was just another Putsch, confined to a small region/province and with only a handful of support thus emphasising the fact that the party was still working at a low level in comparison to the rest of the Weimar republic’s political system whilst holding very little strength on the whole.

Also the fact there was a mere 25 point plan with views of anti-Marxism and anti-Capitalism but also internal divide just showed that there was no real backbone to the organisation and there was no formal manifesto – just a collective of ideas and theories as opposed to fundamental policy framework, which was economically justified to work.

The internal divide in 1924-25 also led to a brief stammer in how influential and strong the party became, it was seen to have lost its steam mid flow and the fact Hitler had to serve a prison sentence didn’t help the matter, leaving amateurs such as Dr Joseph Goebbels (up and coming Nazi) to pick up the pieces. Not only was this bad for the image of the party committee (now looking for coalition with other right wing factions) but it also didn’t look good to the public who now saw the Nazi party as a finished cause by 1925.

Whilst numbers still rose, they weren’t as steep in increase right up to the Wall Street crash and also the economic death spiral of the Weimar Republic for a second time in its history. This all however mostly changed after Hitler left prison, bans were lifted as the party was no longer seen as a threat, and the re-structure and organisation of the internal workings of the party proved most popular to the party membership, this of course leading to sharp rises towards the end of the decade.

The structure and creation of sub-organisations such as the German Nazi Lawyers league and others set a basis for national expansion which would come in very useful towards the end of the decade with federal Reich elections. All of this strengthening the overall strength of the party nationally and theoretically moving it away from the status of a fringe irritant and more along a mainstream route, albeit very unorthodox. The final case for the NSDAP being a strong party and not fringe irritant was the fact that the party was finally on course to win seats in the Reichstag.

This jump from regional to national influence is surely a sign that this political machine was building up steam even if it only won 12 seats. The votes gained were also limited to rural land owners in Bavaria and surrounding regions. This showed the Nazi’s to be representative of one specific group in society but the catch-all theory behind the DAP’s change to the NSDAP was to incorporate a wider spectrum and this became apparent where a large proportion of membership was driven by the working class, this subliminal propaganda of National Socialism seemed to be working.

To conclude, The NSDAP was a fringe irritant party in German politics towards the beginning of the decade where they were only heard by those in Bavarian beer halls, but grew vastly in size and force towards the end, media influence such as the Beer Hall Putsch of 1923 and the policy of Legality really strengthened the party and transformed it from a regional to a national power.

Things didn’t really kick off until the Wall Street Crash of 1929 but even before then, the strength of the party was apparent as one by one, federal authorities and states within the Weimar Republic began to ban Hitler from Public Speaking and banned Party activity but also recognised the small (at the time) membership as a threat.

Difficulties Of Working And Studying

Studying is a crucial stage in life, especially for acquiring a university education. It is necessary for ensuring a successful future. However, studying can be expensive even though education is free. Because of financial limitations, some students find themselves needing to work and earn money on their own. This circumstance can be difficult as it adversely affects their education, leading to stress and leaving them with minimal leisure time. Mainly, working while studying may impede academic advancement since the main goal of studying is to gain scientific knowledge that will enhance future job opportunities.

To receive sufficient education, a student must dedicate all their time to studying. Working for several hours a day not only consumes time and energy but also hinders the ability to fully focus on acquiring new knowledge. The limited time and exhaustion after work prevent effective assimilation of required knowledge for subsequent classes, leaving rest as the top priority. Restricting study time can result in poor grades and failure in crucial exams, negatively impacting the student’s future.

Students face difficulty concentrating on learning during classes due to fatigue. Inattentiveness and dozing off in the back seats are common occurrences. Additionally, some students prioritize earning money over attending their classes. This dual commitment elevates their stress levels, potentially negatively impacting their mental well-being. Striking a balance between work responsibilities and class preparation poses a challenge for these individuals.

Managing a busy schedule, which includes waking up early, attending classes, working after school, completing homework, and preparing for upcoming classes can be challenging. As time passes by, exhaustion becomes more noticeable and there is an increasing concern about finishing all tasks within the allotted timeframe. The stress starts to impact students as they find it difficult to concentrate in class due to insufficient preparation. Occasionally, they may need to skip classes either to avoid negative job-related outcomes or simply because they are too fatigued to actively engage.

Sometimes, work can demand more energy than individuals are capable of. The excessive stress can result in severe problems such as neurosis or insomnia. Insufficient sleep can have a detrimental impact on students’ physical development, primarily due to the need to juggle work and studies simultaneously. Additionally, students with both professional and academic obligations find themselves with limited leisure time. They rarely have opportunities to unwind and engage in activities they enjoy, such as watching their preferred TV programs or browsing the internet. Consequently, their partners may experience frustration due to insufficient quality time spent together.

Your community life and socializing are negatively impacted as you lack time to meet friends or participate in parties. Furthermore, there is insufficient time for after-school activities such as improving foreign language skills. Balancing work and study leaves little time to adequately prepare for tests or exams. In summary, trying to excel in both work and study simultaneously is unattainable. Students should prioritize acquiring knowledge to succeed in their future careers.

error: Content is protected !!