Essay- Allen Iverson Biography Sample College Essay

He has led a troubled life. He has been convicted of mob assault, which he doesnt even believe he did . He has gotten a full scholarship to Georgetown University. He left college in hopes of making the NBA (national basketball association) so he could pay for his sisters pricey medical condition. He won NBA 1996-1997 Rookie of the Year while playing for the Philadelphia 76ers. He is Allen Iverson. Iverson is a six-foot, 200-pound, gangster looking, hated, loved, and just plain rebellious person . Because of his troubled past, how he looks out for others, and his current basketball stardom, Allen Iverson will continue to change the way we look at the professional athlete now and in the future.

The thing that defines Iverson in most sports experts minds is his troubled past. He was born in Hampton, Virginia to a mother who was only fifteen and without a boyfriend or husband . He had just his mother to support him and two sisters . She had to work two or sometimes even three jobs at a time to make sure she could pay the water and electricity bills, which still were not always paid. Regardless of the financial troubles, she made sure that Iverson stayed out of gangs and always went to school. He had incredible athletic ability, and excelled in football. Originally, he refused to play basketball. Iverson considered it to be to soft for a tough guy like him. However, it didnt take long for him to fall in love with the game .

He attended Bethel High School where he was immediately placed on the varsity football and basketball teams. It seemed like every game went well when Iverson played in them. He led his two teams to two state championships in which he was voted MVP for both . However, in the summer of 1993, everything went from glorious and perfect to rock bottom.

On a boring summer night, Iverson and some African-American friends decided to go bowling in an alley that was in a predominately white neighborhood. He found that his group was the only blacks in the alley. Not really taking any notice of it, they just started playing. Eventually, his group got into a heated dispute with an equally sized group of white people. Then it turned physical. An all-out brawl erupted and many people were injured. Eventually police arrived and cleared the place out. Iverson as well as some other people there claim that he left the second punches were thrown. However, he was still forced to stand trial as an adult along with everyone else there . The entire lower Virginia area was outraged when he, along with three other men (all black), were charged with mob assault . He was sentenced to five years at a prison in the area. This led all newspapers in the area to rant on and on for weeks on end on the possibility of race being involved. The papers also wondered why Iverson was sent to jail despite the fact many witnesses claimed he left within seconds of the first punch. After five months, he was freed by the governer who reviewed the case. This is still the most famous and horrible incident in Iversons life, and it still plagues him to this day .

Another incident that occurred recently, although much less severe, is still damaging. In 1997, Iverson was riding in a car that included three of his close friends. It was pulled over for speeding, and then the police smelled marijuana. He removed all of them from the car and searched it. The officer discovered a marijuana cigarette, later found to belong to the driver, and a gun, which was Iversons. He did have a license for it, but not the proper permit. He just received probation and random drug tests (he has passed all six he has taken so far). Although this wasnt too terrible in itself, it brought the old mob story back up which Iverson just wanted to leave behind him .

On the other side of the coin, Iverson has been known for being extremely self-sacrificing and he often looks out for others ahead of himself. The prime example of this is why he entered the NBA early, sacrificing the final two years of his scholarship at Georgetown. One of his younger sisters, Ieasha, suffered from severe seizures, and needed constant special medical treatment. Although his mother always found a way to squeeze in the treatments, it usually left her next to broke. Iverson felt he owed it to his mother as much as his sister to try to get big money quick to support them. Also in need of support was the rest of his family as well as his one-year-old daughter, Tiaura. He announced on May 1, 1996, his intentions to apply for the NBA draft in July. Quickly after his announcement, he signed with David Falk, a sports agent, which made him unable to reverse his decision. However, he still planned to pursue his degree .

The third and most well known aspect of Allen Iversons life is his professional basketball stardom. He was selected number one by the Philadelphia 76ers in the 1996-1997 NBA draft. He was instantly put into the starting point guard position and expected to contribute . Well, he did just that. In his first game he scored thirty points and ended a lot of doubt some of his critics had . However, as the season rolled on, so did the problems. Although he was explosive, a scoring machine, and exciting to watch, he was having problems as a team player. He was leading the league in turnovers per game by a large margin, and his assists (passing to a teammate who scores) were drastically lower than what was expected of a point guard. His amazing dunks and no-look passes were starting to wear thin with coaches and teammates. He needed something to cool him down. He decided he should start with the all-star game . Although he wasnt in the big game, he was a team captain in the all rookie game. Everyone expected him to come out shooting since this game didnt count for anything. But he surprised everyone by only scoring four points, but he had eight passes that led to scores for his teammates. This came as a wonderful gift to just about anyone who was a critic of Iversons. Although in the second half he reverted back to his scoring ways, he still managed to pass the ball. He finished the game with nineteen points and nine assists, which earned him the rookie game MVP award .

Despite his overall success in his first year in the league, he was still not treated like the other players. His baggy clothes and wild styles earned him the honor of being selected the worst dressed by various league figures. He was one of the three players to have cornrows (the other two, Rasheed Wallace and Latrell Sprewell, also suffer from the same dislikes as Iverson). Being only twenty at the time, he didnt understand why others wanted him to walk around in suits and ties .

In conclusion, Allen Iverson has had a major impact on just about every pro basketball fan in the world. Struggling through a difficult childhood, he managed to always rise to the occasion and make it through the difficult times. His younger sister owes him her life, and the rest of his family owes him almost as much since he started supporting them all on his own. And last but not least, the entire basketball world owes him for being such an electrifying player and keeping the rest of the NBA on its toes. He has and always will change the way we look at the professional athlete now and in the future.

The Mystery Of Edwin Drood By Analysis

“It has often been remarked that woman have a curious power of divining the characters of men”(75). This quotation from The Mystery of Edwin Drood by Charles Dickens reflects the opposite of what a typical Dickensian society is supposedly based upon. In this standard society, the plot would be based around the life of a dominant male. Although the title reflects a male name, the movement in the novel is directly related to the exploits of a particular character, Rosa Bud. Fondly called Rosebud by her peers, she is the apple of every man’s eye and the envy of every woman’s. She takes control in the plot not because she evidences forceful or masculine qualities, but because the powerful characters in Cloisterham, males, are all in love or feel a kinship to Rosebud. The power is therefore transferred into her hands as a result of her ability to influence these characters through their love and admiration for her. Attending school at a nunnery, Rosa’s female friends rarely have any contact with men. Through her betrothal to Edwin Drood, Rosa is the only woman within the nunnery that has a man to court her. She is the only woman mentioned, in the nunnery, that is going to be married off to a man, not God. Rosa capitalizes on this situation by leading the other girls in the nunnery to be her “poor pets”(118). She realizes that the girls as well as the head of the school, Miss Twinkleton, who describes Rosa as her “pet pupil”(14), look at her to be the embodiment of romance because of her prospective marriage. Miss Twinkleton and the girls live their love lives through Rosa, “over her shoulder”(51). Rosa feeds into the situation by making sure that the girls are watching her and letting Edwin know that they “must get married . . . the poor girls would be so dreadfully disappointed” (17). She uses her power over Edwin, which is given through love and devotion to her and both of their parent’s wishes for them to be married, as a way to stay in control at the nunnery. She is the object of the gaze to all of the girls and Miss Twinkleton, “nothing escapes their notice”(18). Realizing that she is the object of their gaze, she remains in control by showing the girls what she has with Edwin from afar. The girls are under the impression that Edwin and Rosa are in a perfect relationship when, in actuality Rosa decides that they have to “pretend that you (Edwin) are engaged to somebody else, and I’ll (Rosa) pretend that I am not engaged to anybody, and then we shan’t quarrel (17). The two have to pretend that they are not engaged to avoid arguments, which, combined with the constant eye of the nunnery girls fixed upon them, implies that one of the only reasons that they remain engaged is to put on show for the girls. Rosa hopes that they will continue to think that she is the emblem of romance and continue to envy as well as adore her. It can also be proven, by the way Rosa is overly aware of the girl’s watchful eyes, that she keeps her engagement to Edwin until much later in the book to preserve the power in the nunnery. She does not tell anyone in the nun’s house of her trouble’s concerning the engagement to accomplish this sense of having something the girls will never have. Thus, causing her to be held in high regard. Edwin Drood comes to Cloisterham somewhat to see his uncle, Jasper, but mostly to see Rosebud, whom he is engaged to. The tension between Jasper and Edwin concerning Rosa is evident from the beginning of the book. The tension comes wholly from Jasper’s side because Edwin acts as if he is oblivious to it. It begins when Jasper questions Drood on “when she (Rosa)”(10) spoke of him and “how she (Rosa) phrased”(10) these comments that she had told Drood. This high level of interest implies that Jasper is interested in Rosa as more than just a music student or his nephew’s fiance. This situation between Rosa and Jasper is magnified when Rosa begins to cry while singing to the piano. Jasper “followed her lips most attentively”(49), which makes Rosa most uncomfortable. She breaks into a “burst of tears”(51) and runs from the room. Edwin is still unaware of what is wrong and concludes that Rosa “is not used to an audience”(51). This situation may imply that Jasper is controlling Rosa with fright and therefore taking charge of the book, but it is necessary to look at how the situation, how Rosa ended up at Jasper’s home, came about. Jasper had this particular group of people over as a way to meet the Landless twins, Helena and Neville. He wanted to introduce them to his friends and nephew. More likely it was a way to be closer to Rosa, because of his affection for her. Since Rosa lives in a nunnery, there is very little time for opportunity outside of her peers also living there. Jasper has fallen in love with Rosa through the time that he has spent with her during her music lessons, which he is providing for her. To have more contact with her Jasper devises a situation where it would seem natural for him to invite Rosa.

Jasper’s feelings are confirmed toward the end of the novel when he confesses that he “loves her madly”(173). This is something that Rosa has always known or felt since the times of her music lessons. Rosa does not put an abrupt stop to his feelings. Instead of telling him point blank that she does not return his feelings, she remains quiet and just “moves her hand”(175) as if to keep the door open on whether or not she returns his strong emotions. The piano scene, where Rosa runs crying, provides Rosa with another confidant, Helena. When Rosa begins to weep, Helena is the one that comforts her. Rosa builds a confidence with Helena through flattery. She states that Helena is so “womanly and handsome”(52) while she is such a “mite of a thing”(52). This sets up Helena to reveal her “fascination”(52) with Rosa, thus giving the power in the friendship to Rosa. The compliments toward Helena stop as soon as Rosa is given her desired reaction, showing the reader that the adoration from Rosa to Helena is not genuine. The scene, again, could seem that Helena is comforting Rosa, implying that Helena is the strong one that guides Rosa, but it is evident by the end of their conversation that Rosa is the one who is admired.

A further example of how Rosa takes control of the characters in Cloisterham is that she does not tell one other character in the novel exactly what is going on in each aspect of her life. When she is speaking to the girls at the nunnery, she leaves out the details about her and Edwin relationship. As stated earlier, she makes it seem that her and Edwin’s relationship is perfect and leaves out the details that they have to pretend that they are in love when both of them know that their relationship has reached a platonic plateau. It can be proven that they are not interesting in each other romantically by the conversation that takes place where they both have to pretend that they are “not engaged”(17). Addition to leaving important facts out of her story to the nunnery girls, Rosa also leaves out relevant details when speaking to Helena. After Rosa runs off from singing by the piano, she confides to Helena that she was “feeling frightened”(53) when Jasper watched her “lips so closely”(53), but she fails to give Helena the details of her relationship with Edwin. So, in short, the nunnery girls know nothing about Rosa’s love life, although they think that they do, and although Helena is not as gullible as the girls at the nunnery she most certainly feels that she knows what is going on with Rosa and Edwin as well as Rosa and Jasper. She states that Edwin must “love her with all of his heart”(53), which proves that she is kept in the dark about Rosa and Edwin’s true feelings for each other. This proves that no one knows exactly what is going on with Rosa and all of her admirers. It can be said from the information gathered that Rosa tries to keep bits of information from people so that she is the only one that has all of the control. The squabble that occurs between Neville and Edwin is a result that Neville feels that Edwin does not appreciate Rosa and his “good fortune that is not by any means necessarily a result of his good merits”(60). Neville has affection for Rosa after just meeting her a few nights ago. The argument results in Neville flinging his “dregs of wine at Edwin Drood”(61). This scene reflects Rosa’s ability to take new people that come to Cloisterham and get them to instantly feel a kinship to her. She has the capacity to force Neville into “rising in a fury”(61), after just recently meeting him.

The plot line in The Mystery of Edwin Drood, although written in the 19th century, reflects the life of Rose Bud. Though she does not appear to be the main character in the novel, the plot revolves around her actions and opinions. Her secrecy about certain things to different characters enables her to accomplish this. Every other character’s fascination with her makes it easy for her to make allies and create confidant, all working in her favor.

Canterbury Tales By Geoffrey Chaucer

Are there many ways that themes and symbols can be shown in stories? GeoffreyChaucer uses many different themes, symbols and styles in writing all of talesin The Canterbury Tales. By using these things, Geoffrey utilizes severalspecific symbols to illustrate various central themes. The characters in thetales make the same mistakes that ordinary people would make, and they receivethe same or even worse consequences. One message that is portrayed is greed canmake people to evil actions. An example of this is in “The Pardoner’sTale,” when the three friends wind up killing each other because of theirgreed for the money.

The second message that is displayed is that one should becareful when meeting strangers and to be cautious of the sincerity of falseflattery from those that one does not know. For example, in “The Nun’sPriest’s Tale,” Chanticleer falls for false flattery from Sir Russell Fox,but then he gets even with him when he to uses it to trick Sir Russell Fox. Thethird and last message that is shown is that reformation in a person can occurbecause of some type of punishment. This theme occurs in ” The Wife ofBath,” in that the lady that the knight has to marry is old and ugly, butbecause of this punishment of having to marry her, he eventually starts to likeher. As shown with the three friends in “The Pardoner’s Tale”, greedstabs friends in the back and deceives them into doing wrong.

There are twooccasions in which the three friends plot against each other so one may receivemore money than the others may. First of all, the three friends find acollection of gold coins under a tree, which they decide should be theirs andthey choose to try to take it. They realize that they can not take the coinsduring the day because people will assume they are robbers. After figuring out aplan, one friend goes to town to get supplies for the others. While he is gonethe two other friends talk and plot actions to occur when he returns. The onefriend says to the other, ” You see that we are two, And two are twice aspowerful as one. Now look; when he comes back, get up in fun To have a wrestle;then, as you attack, I’ll up and put my dagger through his back While you and heare struggling, as in game; Then draw your dagger too and do the same. Then allthis money will be ours to spend, Divided equally of course, dear friend.”(Page 163 line 166-174) By them both agreeing to this, they believe that theywill have more money to split between the two of them by killing the other one.

This is proof that they are greedy because all three of them found the money andeach one deserves their share of the money. Plus they are all friends witheachother and should be splitting the money, not trying to stab each other inthe back in order for them to get more money. The next example showing how greedcan deceive friends is portrayed when the friend goes into town. As the othertwo were plotting a plan, so was the friend that went to town. However, none ofthem thought that the other friend would also be plotting kill them. He slylysays to himself, ” And so the Fiend, our common enemy, Was given power toput it in his thought That there was always poison to be bought, And that withpoison he could kill his friends. To men in such a state the Devil sends Thoughts of this kind, and has a full permission To lure then on to sorrow andperdition, For this young man was utterly content To kill them both and never torepent.” (Page 164 line 186-195) Although this plan may seem to beerrorless because he is the only one to know, greed is the power that drives himinto trying to complete this task.

Unfortunately both the plans that the friendsthought of both backfire because neither of them thought the other friend wouldbe planning to kill them. When he gets back from town, they start to wrestlewith him. While wrestling, they stab and kill him. Then to celebrate theirvictory, they drink the wine, which is really poison. Next both of them die andno one gets the money. These killings would not have taken place had it not beenthe greed of all the friends because of the newfound money. In conclusionneither of the friends would have died if the money they found didn’t turn theirfriendship into greed. One should be careful when false flattery comes fromthose that one does not know well or at all. By using false flattery, one canget himself or herself into or out of trouble when meeting a new character whichis shown in “The Nun’s Priest’s Tale”. There are two instances inwhich false flattery gets Chanticleer into and out of trouble. The first of thetwo occasions that Chanticleer is able to get into trouble and escape it is whenSir Russell Fox tries to coax him into singing. During the day, Chanticleerdreams that while singing a fox grabs him and runs into the woods to eat him. Hebelieved that the dream was just nothing because he knew that gas or an upsetstomach would cause bad dreams. So Chanticleer took no note of the dream anddidn’t believe it would happen to him. As Chanticleer was standing in thegarden, something started to head towards him. It was Sir Russell Fox trying toenter the garden. Once the roaster sees Sir Russell Fox coming over, Sir Russell Fox says “Truly I came to do no other thing Than just to lie and listen toyou sing. You have as merry a voice as God has given To any angel in the courtsof Heaven; To that you add a musical sense as strong As had Boethius who wasskilled in song.

There never was a singer I would rather Have heard at dawn thanyour respected father. All that he sang came welling from his soul And how heput his voice under control! The pains he took to keep his eyes tight shut Inconcentration – then the tip-toe strut, The slender necks stretched out, thedelicate beak! No singer could approach him in technique I’ve read the story inBurnel the Ass.” (Page 153 lines 484-494) With the fox using someimpressive words toward Chanticleer and his singing abilities, Chanticleerdecides to sing for him. While singing the fox has a chance to seize Chanticleerwhen he sings, because whiling singing he closes his eyes like his father did.

As the fox uses more and more false flattery towards Chanticleer, he is lesssacred and concentrates more on singing for Sir Russell Fox. While singing thefox snatches Chanticleer and runs away with him into the woods. Everyone panicsand chases after the fox to try and get back Chanticleer. Another example offalse flattery in ” The Nun’s Priest’s Tale” is when Chanticleer usesit to free himself from danger. The fox takes him into the forest so he can eathim. But before that happens, Chanticleer starts to convince Sir Russell Foxinto doing something. Chanticleer declares, ” Sir Fox, if I were you, asGod’s My witness, I would round upon these clods And shout, ‘ Turn back, yousaucy bumpkins all! A very pestilence upon you falls! Now that I have in safetyreached the wood Do what you like, the cook is mine for good; I’ll eat him therein spite of every one.” (Page 156 lines 593 -600)

Now this time Chanticleeris able to use false flattery to get him out of the trouble. He tells the fox,he should mock the others by calling them names to make them even madder and tolike rubbing it in their face. By the fox believing this, he tries to talk andin trying to talk he opens his mouth. As Sir Russell Fox opens his mouth,Chanticleer quickly falls to the ground and runs to safety. If the fox had neveropened his mouth, he would still have Chanticleer for his meal. Overall, falseflattery can be used in two ways. It can be used as in Sir Russell Foxoutsmarting Chanticleer into singing or as Chanticleer manipulating Sir RussellFox into opening his mouth so Chanticleer can run away. Sometimes a punishmentcan lead to a result in a person improving him or herself. The reformation orrehabilitation of a man can change from bad to good, as in ” The Wife ofBath.” Through out the story the knight changes from bad when he firstmeets his wife until he changes into good when he lets her choice what she wantsto be. As the story begins, the knight rapes a young lady and in doing so issentenced to die or life in jail. But in order to let him live, the Queen tellshim that he has one year to find what women desire the most and if he finds outhe can have his life back. In trying to accomplish this task, many women tellhim many different things that they want most. When he comes to an old lady shepromises to tell him what women want most as long as he does her a favor if itis in his power. The answer that she gives him is that women desire dominationover their husbands. When the knight visits the Queen his answer is correct andthe old lady asks for them to get married.

The knight is in shock and does notbelieve what has just happened. In reply he sadly says, “Alas and woe isme! I know quite well that such was my promise. For the love of God ask forsomething else; take all my property and let my body go. No, my damnations!Alas, that any of my birth should ever be so foully disgraced! But it was allfor nothing; the end was this, that he was forced to accept the fact that hemust needs wed her; and he took his old wife and went to bed.” (Page 231)By the lady asking him to marry her he gets extremely upset and doesn’t want tofulfill her wish. His reasons are that she was old, ugly, and poor. The knightis the total opposite because none of these characteristics belong to him.

However, no matter how much he dislikes her he still has to marry her. To theknight, marrying her would be a huge punishment. Next, even though it wasagainst his will, they still got married and after a while a problem comes upbetween them. She sees how unhappy he is and decides to give him two choices ofwhat he wishes her to be. They are for her to be young, beautiful, andunfaithful or old, ugly, and honest.

To these choices he replies, “My ladyand my love, and wife so dear, I put myself under your wise control; youyourself choose which may be most pleasurable and most honorable to you and tome also. I don’t care which of the two I get; for whatever pleases you sufficesfor me.” (Page 239) By now his personality values have changed because hehas been with her for sometime now and has had really no choice in what hewants. But now she has given him the chance for her to become what ever hewants. Since he told her to pick which one she would rather be, he gave her whatwomen desire most as in the domination over their husbands. He has gotten overthe fact that she may not be the prettiest or the youngest but he still can loveher. Since he has changed from when he has first meet her, he tells her that itis her decision because no matter what she may be or look like, he still canlove her.

With him saying this, she decides to be a little of both. She will behonest, young, and beautiful. This makes the both of them very pleased to bewith each other. In The Canterbury Tales, several themes are portrayed to showdifferent themes, which Geoffrey tries to demonstrate. The theme and symbol from”The Pardoner’s Tale,” is that greed may convince people to do wrong,while at the same time, and be stabbing a friend in the back. Next, in “TheNun’s Priest’s Tale,” the theme is to be cautious and careful of thesincerity of flattery from those that one does not know. Lastly, in “TheWife of Bath,” punishment can result in a person improving and redeeminghimself or herself. Or they can also change from bad to good because of acertain punishment they have received. By using all these different types ofwriting in his stories, Chaucer tries to demonstrate themes and symbols, which aperson may encounter in one’s life. Stories are used to show that symbols areways to represent or show various themes in literature. Finally, throughout allthese tales there are consequences for peoples actions, which means that no taskshall ever get over looked. Are there many ways that themes and symbols can beshown in stories? Geoffrey Chaucer uses many different themes, symbols andstyles in writing all of tales in The Canterbury Tales. By using these things,Geoffrey utilizes several specific symbols to illustrate various central themes.

The characters in the tales make the same mistakes that ordinary people wouldmake, and they receive the same or even worse consequences. One message that isportrayed is greed can make people to evil actions. An example of this is in”The Pardoner’s Tale,” when the three friends wind up killing eachother because of their greed for the money. The second message that is displayedis that one should be careful when meeting strangers and to be cautious of thesincerity of false flattery from those that one does not know. For example, in”The Nun’s Priest’s Tale,” Chanticleer falls for false flattery fromSir Russell Fox, but then he gets even with him when he to uses it to trick SirRussell Fox. The third and last message that is shown is that reformation in aperson can occur because of some type of punishment. This theme occurs in “The Wife of Bath,” in that the lady that the knight has to marry is old andugly, but because of this punishment of having to marry her, he eventuallystarts to like her. As shown with the three friends in “The Pardoner’sTale”, greed stabs friends in the back and deceives them into doing wrong.

There are two occasions in which the three friends plot against each other soone may receive more money than the others may. First of all, the three friendsfind a collection of gold coins under a tree, which they decide should be theirsand they choose to try to take it. They realize that they can not take the coinsduring the day because people will assume they are robbers. After figuring out aplan, one friend goes to town to get supplies for the others. While he is gonethe two other friends talk and plot actions to occur when he returns. The onefriend says to the other, ” You see that we are two, And two are twice aspowerful as one. Now look; when he comes back, get up in fun To have a wrestle;then, as you attack, I’ll up and put my dagger through his back While you and heare struggling, as in game; Then draw your dagger too and do the same. Then allthis money will be ours to spend, Divided equally of course, dear friend.”(Page 163 line 166-174) By them both agreeing to this, they believe that theywill have more money to split between the two of them by killing the other one.

This is proof that they are greedy because all three of them found the money andeach one deserves their share of the money. Plus they are all friends witheachother and should be splitting the money, not trying to stab each other inthe back in order for them to get more money. The next example showing how greedcan deceive friends is portrayed when the friend goes into town. As the othertwo were plotting a plan, so was the friend that went to town. However, none ofthem thought that the other friend would also be plotting kill them. He slylysays to himself, ” And so the Fiend, our common enemy, Was given power toput it in his thought That there was always poison to be bought, And that withpoison he could kill his friends. To men in such a state the Devil sendsThoughts of this kind, and has a full permission To lure then on to sorrow andperdition, For this young man was utterly content To kill them both and never torepent.” (Page 164 line 186-195) Although this plan may seem to beerrorless because he is the only one to know, greed is the power that drives himinto trying to complete this task. Unfortunately both the plans that the friendsthought of both backfire because neither of them thought the other friend wouldbe planning to kill them.

When he gets back from town, they start to wrestlewith him. While wrestling, they stab and kill him. Then to celebrate theirvictory, they drink the wine, which is really poison. Next both of them die andno one gets the money. These killings would not have taken place had it not beenthe greed of all the friends because of the newfound money. In conclusionneither of the friends would have died if the money they found didn’t turn theirfriendship into greed. One should be careful when false flattery comes fromthose that one does not know well or at all. By using false flattery, one canget himself or herself into or out of trouble when meeting a new character whichis shown in “The Nun’s Priest’s Tale”. There are two instances inwhich false flattery gets Chanticleer into and out of trouble. The first of thetwo occasions that Chanticleer is able to get into trouble and escape it is whenSir Russell Fox tries to coax him into singing. During the day, Chanticleerdreams that while singing a fox grabs him and runs into the woods to eat him.

Hebelieved that the dream was just nothing because he knew that gas or an upsetstomach would cause bad dreams. So Chanticleer took no note of the dream anddidn’t believe it would happen to him. As Chanticleer was standing in thegarden, something started to head towards him. It was Sir Russell Fox trying toenter the garden. Once the roaster sees Sir Russell Fox coming over, Sir RussellFox says “Truly I came to do no other thing Than just to lie and listen toyou sing. You have as merry a voice as God has given To any angel in the courtsof Heaven; To that you add a musical sense as strong As had Boethius who wasskilled in song. There never was a singer I would rather Have heard at dawn thanyour respected father. All that he sang came welling from his soul And how heput his voice under control! The pains he took to keep his eyes tight shut Inconcentration – then the tip-toe strut, The slender necks stretched out, thedelicate beak! No singer could approach him in technique I’ve read the story inBurnel the Ass.” (Page 153 lines 484-494) With the fox using someimpressive words toward Chanticleer and his singing abilities, Chanticleerdecides to sing for him. While singing the fox has a chance to seize Chanticleerwhen he sings, because whiling singing he closes his eyes like his father did.

As the fox uses more and more false flattery towards Chanticleer, he is lesssacred and concentrates more on singing for Sir Russell Fox. While singing thefox snatches Chanticleer and runs away with him into the woods. Everyone panicsand chases after the fox to try and get back Chanticleer. Another example offalse flattery in ” The Nun’s Priest’s Tale” is when Chanticleer usesit to free himself from danger. The fox takes him into the forest so he can eathim. But before that happens, Chanticleer starts to convince Sir Russell Foxinto doing something. Chanticleer declares, ” Sir Fox, if I were you, asGod’s My witness, I would round upon these clods And shout, ‘ Turn back, yousaucy bumpkins all! A very pestilence upon you falls! Now that I have in safetyreached the wood Do what you like, the cook is mine for good; I’ll eat him therein spite of every one.” (Page 156 lines 593 -600)

Now this time Chanticleeris able to use false flattery to get him out of the trouble. He tells the fox,he should mock the others by calling them names to make them even madder and tolike rubbing it in their face. By the fox believing this, he tries to talk andin trying to talk he opens his mouth. As Sir Russell Fox opens his mouth,Chanticleer quickly falls to the ground and runs to safety. If the fox had neveropened his mouth, he would still have Chanticleer for his meal. Overall, falseflattery can be used in two ways. It can be used as in Sir Russell Foxoutsmarting Chanticleer into singing or as Chanticleer manipulating Sir RussellFox into opening his mouth so Chanticleer can run away. Sometimes a punishmentcan lead to a result in a person improving him or herself. The reformation orrehabilitation of a man can change from bad to good, as in ” The Wife ofBath.” Through out the story the knight changes from bad when he firstmeets his wife until he changes into good when he lets her choice what she wantsto be. As the story begins, the knight rapes a young lady and in doing so issentenced to die or life in jail. But in order to let him live, the Queen tellshim that he has one year to find what women desire the most and if he finds outhe can have his life back. In trying to accomplish this task, many women tellhim many different things that they want most. When he comes to an old lady shepromises to tell him what women want most as long as he does her a favor if itis in his power. The answer that she gives him is that women desire dominationover their husbands.

When the knight visits the Queen his answer is correct andthe old lady asks for them to get married. The knight is in shock and does notbelieve what has just happened. In reply he sadly says, “Alas and woe isme! I know quite well that such was my promise. For the love of God ask forsomething else; take all my property and let my body go. No, my damnations!Alas, that any of my birth should ever be so foully disgraced! But it was allfor nothing; the end was this, that he was forced to accept the fact that hemust needs wed her; and he took his old wife and went to bed.” (Page 231)By the lady asking him to marry her he gets extremely upset and doesn’t want tofulfill her wish. His reasons are that she was old, ugly, and poor. The knightis the total opposite because none of these characteristics belong to him.

However, no matter how much he dislikes her he still has to marry her. To theknight, marrying her would be a huge punishment. Next, even though it wasagainst his will, they still got married and after a while a problem comes upbetween them. She sees how unhappy he is and decides to give him two choices ofwhat he wishes her to be. They are for her to be young, beautiful, andunfaithful or old, ugly, and honest. To these choices he replies, “My ladyand my love, and wife so dear, I put myself under your wise control; youyourself choose which may be most pleasurable and most honorable to you and tome also. I don’t care which of the two I get; for whatever pleases you sufficesfor me.” (Page 239) By now his personality values have changed because hehas been with her for sometime now and has had really no choice in what hewants. But now she has given him the chance for her to become what ever hewants.

Since he told her to pick which one she would rather be, he gave her whatwomen desire most as in the domination over their husbands. He has gotten overthe fact that she may not be the prettiest or the youngest but he still can loveher. Since he has changed from when he has first meet her, he tells her that itis her decision because no matter what she may be or look like, he still canlove her. With him saying this, she decides to be a little of both. She will behonest, young, and beautiful. This makes the both of them very pleased to bewith each other. In The Canterbury Tales, several themes are portrayed to showdifferent themes, which Geoffrey tries to demonstrate. The theme and symbol from”The Pardoner’s Tale,” is that greed may convince people to do wrong,while at the same time, and be stabbing a friend in the back. Next, in “TheNun’s Priest’s Tale,” the theme is to be cautious and careful of thesincerity of flattery from those that one does not know.

Lastly, in “TheWife of Bath,” punishment can result in a person improving and redeeminghimself or herself. Or they can also change from bad to good because of acertain punishment they have received. By using all these different types ofwriting in his stories, Chaucer tries to demonstrate themes and symbols, which aperson may encounter in one’s life. Stories are used to show that symbols areways to represent or show various themes in literature. Finally, throughout allthese tales there are consequences for peoples actions, which means that no taskshall ever get over looked. Are there many ways that themes and symbols can beshown in stories? Geoffrey Chaucer uses many different themes, symbols andstyles in writing all of tales in The Canterbury Tales. By using these things,Geoffrey utilizes several specific symbols to illustrate various central themes.

The characters in the tales make the same mistakes that ordinary people wouldmake, and they receive the same or even worse consequences. One message that isportrayed is greed can make people to evil actions. An example of this is in”The Pardoner’s Tale,” when the three friends wind up killing eachother because of their greed for the money. The second message that is displayedis that one should be careful when meeting strangers and to be cautious of thesincerity of false flattery from those that one does not know. For example, in”The Nun’s Priest’s Tale,” Chanticleer falls for false flattery fromSir Russell Fox, but then he gets even with him when he to uses it to trick SirRussell Fox. The third and last message that is shown is that reformation in aperson can occur because of some type of punishment. This theme occurs in “The Wife of Bath,” in that the lady that the knight has to marry is old andugly, but because of this punishment of having to marry her, he eventuallystarts to like her. As shown with the three friends in “The Pardoner’sTale”, greed stabs friends in the back and deceives them into doing wrong.

There are two occasions in which the three friends plot against each other soone may receive more money than the others may. First of all, the three friendsfind a collection of gold coins under a tree, which they decide should be theirsand they choose to try to take it. They realize that they can not take the coinsduring the day because people will assume they are robbers. After figuring out aplan, one friend goes to town to get supplies for the others. While he is gonethe two other friends talk and plot actions to occur when he returns. The onefriend says to the other, ” You see that we are two, And two are twice aspowerful as one. Now look; when he comes back, get up in fun To have a wrestle;then, as you attack, I’ll up and put my dagger through his back While you and heare struggling, as in game; Then draw your dagger too and do the same. Then allthis money will be ours to spend, Divided equally of course, dear friend.”(Page 163 line 166-174) By them both agreeing to this, they believe that theywill have more money to split between the two of them by killing the other one.

This is proof that they are greedy because all three of them found the money andeach one deserves their share of the money. Plus they are all friends witheachother and should be splitting the money, not trying to stab each other inthe back in order for them to get more money. The next example showing how greedcan deceive friends is portrayed when the friend goes into town. As the othertwo were plotting a plan, so was the friend that went to town. However, none ofthem thought that the other friend would also be plotting kill them. He slylysays to himself, ” And so the Fiend, our common enemy, Was given power toput it in his thought That there was always poison to be bought, And that withpoison he could kill his friends. To men in such a state the Devil sendsThoughts of this kind, and has a full permission To lure then on to sorrow andperdition, For this young man was utterly content To kill them both and never torepent.” (Page 164 line 186-195) Although this plan may seem to beerrorless because he is the only one to know, greed is the power that drives himinto trying to complete this task. Unfortunately both the plans that the friendsthought of both backfire because neither of them thought the other friend wouldbe planning to kill them. When he gets back from town, they start to wrestlewith him. While wrestling, they stab and kill him. Then to celebrate theirvictory, they drink the wine, which is really poison. Next both of them die andno one gets the money. These killings would not have taken place had it not beenthe greed of all the friends because of the newfound money.

In conclusionneither of the friends would have died if the money they found didn’t turn theirfriendship into greed. One should be careful when false flattery comes fromthose that one does not know well or at all. By using false flattery, one canget himself or herself into or out of trouble when meeting a new character whichis shown in “The Nun’s Priest’s Tale”. There are two instances inwhich false flattery gets Chanticleer into and out of trouble. The first of thetwo occasions that Chanticleer is able to get into trouble and escape it is whenSir Russell Fox tries to coax him into singing. During the day, Chanticleerdreams that while singing a fox grabs him and runs into the woods to eat him. Hebelieved that the dream was just nothing because he knew that gas or an upsetstomach would cause bad dreams. So Chanticleer took no note of the dream anddidn’t believe it would happen to him. As Chanticleer was standing in thegarden, something started to head towards him. It was Sir Russell Fox trying toenter the garden. Once the roaster sees Sir Russell Fox coming over, Sir RussellFox says “Truly I came to do no other thing Than just to lie and listen toyou sing.

You have as merry a voice as God has given To any angel in the courtsof Heaven; To that you add a musical sense as strong As had Boethius who wasskilled in song. There never was a singer I would rather Have heard at dawn thanyour respected father. All that he sang came welling from his soul And how heput his voice under control! The pains he took to keep his eyes tight shut Inconcentration – then the tip-toe strut, The slender necks stretched out, thedelicate beak! No singer could approach him in technique I’ve read the story inBurnel the Ass.” (Page 153 lines 484-494) With the fox using someimpressive words toward Chanticleer and his singing abilities, Chanticleerdecides to sing for him. While singing the fox has a chance to seize Chanticleerwhen he sings, because whiling singing he closes his eyes like his father did.

As the fox uses more and more false flattery towards Chanticleer, he is lesssacred and concentrates more on singing for Sir Russell Fox. While singing thefox snatches Chanticleer and runs away with him into the woods. Everyone panicsand chases after the fox to try and get back Chanticleer. Another example offalse flattery in ” The Nun’s Priest’s Tale” is when Chanticleer usesit to free himself from danger. The fox takes him into the forest so he can eathim. But before that happens, Chanticleer starts to convince Sir Russell Foxinto doing something. Chanticleer declares, ” Sir Fox, if I were you, asGod’s My witness, I would round upon these clods And shout, ‘ Turn back, yousaucy bumpkins all! A very pestilence upon you falls! Now that I have in safetyreached the wood Do what you like, the cook is mine for good; I’ll eat him therein spite of every one.” (Page 156 lines 593 -600)

Now this time Chanticleeris able to use false flattery to get him out of the trouble. He tells the fox,he should mock the others by calling them names to make them even madder and tolike rubbing it in their face. By the fox believing this, he tries to talk andin trying to talk he opens his mouth. As Sir Russell Fox opens his mouth,Chanticleer quickly falls to the ground and runs to safety. If the fox had neveropened his mouth, he would still have Chanticleer for his meal. Overall, falseflattery can be used in two ways. It can be used as in Sir Russell Foxoutsmarting Chanticleer into singing or as Chanticleer manipulating Sir RussellFox into opening his mouth so Chanticleer can run away. Sometimes a punishmentcan lead to a result in a person improving him or herself. The reformation orrehabilitation of a man can change from bad to good, as in ” The Wife ofBath.” Through out the story the knight changes from bad when he firstmeets his wife until he changes into good when he lets her choice what she wantsto be. As the story begins, the knight rapes a young lady and in doing so issentenced to die or life in jail. But in order to let him live, the Queen tellshim that he has one year to find what women desire the most and if he finds outhe can have his life back. In trying to accomplish this task, many women tellhim many different things that they want most.

When he comes to an old lady shepromises to tell him what women want most as long as he does her a favor if itis in his power. The answer that she gives him is that women desire dominationover their husbands. When the knight visits the Queen his answer is correct andthe old lady asks for them to get married. The knight is in shock and does notbelieve what has just happened. In reply he sadly says, “Alas and woe isme! I know quite well that such was my promise. For the love of God ask forsomething else; take all my property and let my body go. No, my damnations!Alas, that any of my birth should ever be so foully disgraced! But it was allfor nothing; the end was this, that he was forced to accept the fact that hemust needs wed her; and he took his old wife and went to bed.” (Page 231)By the lady asking him to marry her he gets extremely upset and doesn’t want tofulfill her wish. His reasons are that she was old, ugly, and poor. The knightis the total opposite because none of these characteristics belong to him.

However, no matter how much he dislikes her he still has to marry her. To theknight, marrying her would be a huge punishment. Next, even though it wasagainst his will, they still got married and after a while a problem comes upbetween them. She sees how unhappy he is and decides to give him two choices ofwhat he wishes her to be. They are for her to be young, beautiful, andunfaithful or old, ugly, and honest. To these choices he replies, “My ladyand my love, and wife so dear, I put myself under your wise control; youyourself choose which may be most pleasurable and most honorable to you and tome also. I don’t care which of the two I get; for whatever pleases you sufficesfor me.” (Page 239) By now his personality values have changed because hehas been with her for sometime now and has had really no choice in what hewants. But now she has given him the chance for her to become what ever hewants. Since he told her to pick which one she would rather be, he gave her whatwomen desire most as in the domination over their husbands. He has gotten overthe fact that she may not be the prettiest or the youngest but he still can loveher. Since he has changed from when he has first meet her, he tells her that itis her decision because no matter what she may be or look like, he still canlove her. With him saying this, she decides to be a little of both. She will behonest, young, and beautiful. This makes the both of them very pleased to bewith each other.

In The Canterbury Tales, several themes are portrayed to showdifferent themes, which Geoffrey tries to demonstrate. The theme and symbol from”The Pardoner’s Tale,” is that greed may convince people to do wrong,while at the same time, and be stabbing a friend in the back. Next, in “TheNun’s Priest’s Tale,” the theme is to be cautious and careful of thesincerity of flattery from those that one does not know. Lastly, in “TheWife of Bath,” punishment can result in a person improving and redeeminghimself or herself. Or they can also change from bad to good because of acertain punishment they have received. By using all these different types ofwriting in his stories, Chaucer tries to demonstrate themes and symbols, which aperson may encounter in one’s life. Stories are used to show that symbols areways to represent or show various themes in literature.

Finally, throughout allthese tales there are consequences for peoples actions, which means that no taskshall ever get over looked.

 

 

error: Content is protected !!