TOPIC: Explain in depth one of Frankl’s primary ideas, and discuss in detail how the idea you’ve chosen might be used to change or influence your life. The Meaning of Life Frankl does not use the word “meaning” in the general broad sense such as in “What is the meaning of life? ” but rather in a more specific way of “what is the meaning of your life”. In Frankl’s words, asking the meaning of life is akin to asking the chess champion: “Tell me, Master, what is the best move in the world? ” (pg 131) There is no “correct” answer to this question, as the best move is dependent on your opponent, the moves already made, and the moves to be made….
Much the same as saying there is no correct answer to the question “What is the meaning of life? ” as the meaning of life changes from person to person and from moment to moment. Frankl demonstrates how his meaning of life changed as noted that one morning as he marched to work he came to a sudden realization that “The salvation of man is through love and in love. ” (pg 57) I think that Frankl’s realization is meant to illustrate how even in the darkest of times, meaning can be found in suffering and that “… verything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms-to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way. ” (pg 86) Frankl chose to focus on his love – his love for his wife, his love for life which brought meaning to the torture he was enduring. Frankl does not preach what he believes the meaning of life is, but instead tries to help us to see the truth for ourselves through his illustrations of human suffering and triumph. The analogy of the Painter vs. the Ophthalmologist on page 132 reflects Frankl’s core discipline. A painter tries to convey to us a picture of the world as he sees it; and ophthalmologist tries to enable us to see the world as it really is. ” Frankl tries to help us to see with our own eyes; he cannot show us the truth but can only try and help us discover it for ourselves. In Frankl’s own case, he was able to find his purpose which was to document what he had learned about mankind while suffering in a concentration camp. He did so as to help others understand their responsibility in defining their life; and how by being responsible, we can define life’s meaning every day.
Frankl illustrates man taking responsibility for his own life in his account of fellow inmates. “We who lived in concentration camps can remember the men who walked through the huts comforting others, giving away their last piece of bread. They may have been few in number, but they offer sufficient proof that everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms — to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way. ” (pg 86)These men chose to give meaning to their life by improving the lives of those around them, even in the face of certain death if discovered.
They chose even while surrounded by unimaginable horror to place the wellbeing of their fellow inmates above their own. Frankl defines this behavior as “The self-transcendence of human existence”. (pg 133) It means that being human is about going beyond you own self needs. He says “The more one forgets himself – by giving himself to a cause to serve, or another person to love – the more human he is and the more he actualizes himself. “(pg 133) His illustrations of the inmates who gave the last of their bread or tried to comfort those around him are surely examples of self-transcendence.
I can relate to this line of thinking as I reflect on those people in my life I most respect; they are those friends and family whom I consider selfless – individuals who give of themselves. This philosophy can even be translated to business. The most successful business men I know are individual who learned at an early stage that giving of themselves, through writing, speaking, or being involved in their community ultimately reaped the greatest rewards, closed the most business, etc… While these individual have an agenda (vs. eing truly selfless), I still believe they are practicing self-transcendence. They are, as Frankl states, discovering that “The true meaning of life is to be discovered in the world rather than within man or his own psyche, as though it were a closed system. ” (pg 133) They choose to interact with the people and the world around them rather than retreat into themselves. Frankl compares a closed system to an open system as a way of explaining how human interaction leads to self-transcendence, while self-actualization is a false way of finding meaning.
A closed system cannot change or grow; it by definition must maintain equilibrium. An open system on the other hand exists such that we interact with each other and the outside world. Through our interactions with one another, growth is stimulated within ourselves and those around us. In a closed system we would retreat from the world and isolate ourselves. While doing this might bring a certain amount of inner peace, it does not stimulate growth. We cannot improve ourselves and the world around us in this way because it is too self-serving.
That’s not to say that self reflection is a bad thing, but rather that self-reflection loses its meaning unless you have something to reflect against – another philosophy, the meaning of an event in your life, etc… Self-reflection for the sake of self-reflection would produce no personal growth in Frankl’s view. In conclusion, I think that Frankl’s life experiences helped shape someone who at his core was a realist. You cannot always change the situation, so if you want a different outcome, you must change your reaction.
Sometimes horrible things happen to a person; that is life. How you choose to respond to the circumstances surrounding you is your most basic privilege as an intelligent human being. I love the fact that Frankl offers no real answers, just a framework for figuring it out for yourself. I hope to learn more about Frankl and try to apply more of his “take responsibility” attitude to my everyday life. I have already started by going back to school to finish my degree.
Dcrawford Assignment
Lei did not like this practice and instantaneously observed this as a control problem. After examining the employee handbook which had been in effect since she and Dolman were vigorously supervising the single location, she revealed that this practice was not protected. She also recognized that several of the obligations that employees were anticipated to do and were in fact, assessed on were also not plainly addressed. Now, let speak on the bureaucratic control systems (Bateman & Snell, 2013).
According to the chapter text, control is any method that guides the actions of individuals near the accomplishment of organizational goals. Bureaucratic control is the usage of guidelines, rules, and power to guide performance and bureaucratic (or formal) control systems are intended to measure growth toward set performance objectives and, if obligatory, to apply counteractive measures to guarantee that performance accomplishes managers’ goals. Control systems notice and fix substantial discrepancies, or inconsistencies, in the outcomes of planned activities. As
Exhibit 14. 1 of the chapter texts demonstrations, a usual control system has four major steps. These steps include setting performance standards, measuring performance, comparing performance against the standards and determining deviations and taking action to correct problems and reinforce successes (Bateman & Snell, 2013). Now, let’s discuss each of the four steps in the formal control process as it relates to the scenario. Lei can apply all of the four control processes in simple ways. The performance standard can be set for attaining organizational goals.
Standards can be set on departmental stages such as sponsoring, functional, legal, etc. Performance standards are set to associate it with the authentic performance and take curative action. After setting performance standards for Sandwich Blitz, Inc. , associate it with the authentic performance. In this circumstance, the number of units created and the number of working hours reported in the time sheet can be measured. After calculating the tangible performance by employees, it must be associated with the set performance standard.
If the abnormality exists decide the cause of deviation. In this circumstance, if the number of units created is less than standard then decide the reason for deviation by enquiring administrators. After equating and determining the deviation, curative actions must be taken instantaneously by management. In this circumstance, Lei should take corrective action by immediately amending or altering the employee handbook so that this issue will not arise again. Lei needs to do research with other companies and see how their standards and practices are compared to Sandwich Blitz, Inc.
She needs to inaugurate goals for each worker and ways that offers them an incentive to o better at their job knowing there may be a pay advance or job progression in their future. Lei also needs to be sure that their time on the job is well consumed. This employee cost the company not only money but time out of her busy agenda to lever this dilemma. Lei must take some accountability as not knowing how out-of-date her employee handbook is. By setting goals for the employees she also is setting up price equivalent measures and time management which will save the corporation money in the long run.
She also needs to understand hat whatsoever standards she sets now has to relate to all workers going forward, not just the circumstance at hand. Administration needs to evaluate statistics and examine which segments of the department are on track and which are tumbling behind. They also need to compensation those who are on track or ahead of schedule and those beneath quota need to be told that they need to make quota. It is conceivable they need extra equipment or personnel to achieve this. Maybe an incentive at the end of the week will be enough to get them back on track or a bonus at quarters end if they meet quota every week.
Chicago Housing Authority Research Paper Chicagos
The Chicago Housing Authority ( CHA ) was organized in 1937 to supply impermanent lodging for those people whose incomes were deficient to obtain nice, safe and healthful homes in the private market ( Basics 1 ). Over clip, the impression of “impermanent” lodging became lost, and coevalss upon coevalss of low-income households came to depend upon this authorities safety cyberspace as a lasting manner of life. From at that place, life in public lodging degenerated into warehouses for the hapless, plagued by offense, drugs, and public assistance dependence ( Reingold 470 ).
Residents of Chicago’ s public lodging plans represent approximately approximately 5% of the metropolis’s population ( Bezalel & A; Ferrera ). Because of their limited income, these occupants look to CHA for a nice topographic point to populate and a rent they can afford. Chicago Housing Authority besides provides installations and other resources to public and private bureaus offering occupants supportive services in wellness attention, instruction, diversion, kid development, employment, public aid and guidance.
The job with Chicago’s public lodging plans nevertheless lies in the fact that they merely house hapless and nonworking households. More than 80 per centum of Cabrini Green’s occupants for illustration, earn less than $ 8,000 annually ( Venkatesh 1 ). With these high concentrations of hapless household, crimes become portion of life.
In 1998 entirely, there were more than 5000 offenses committed in CHA belongings by CHA abode. The CHA owns some 28,000 flats, a really big ball of which are physically damage and frequently plagued with offenses and drugs ( Problems 1 ).
But even with their limited capital finances, inordinate operating expense costs, and public misconception, the CHA is binding their best to better the state of affairs for their abode. A $ 315 million dollars program is afoot for renovation of Cabrini Green,
CHA most celebrated of all lodging undertakings. The country is schedule for mixed-income use, with row lodging, semidetached houses, and mid-rise edifices aboard rehabilitated high-rise constructions.
A new town centre with shopping installations, new schools, a territory constabulary station, and a library has been promised. Dominick’s, a big food market shop concatenation, has already committed itself to going portion of this small town of chance.
Since 1995, the CHA has spent about $ 50 million on renovation activities, including the destruction of 1,190 units of public lodging, the rehabilitation of 2,178 units, and the building of 455 new units. In all, more than 1,300 of old and harm Cabrini Green’s lodging units will be demolished and an estimated 2,000 to 2,300 new lodging units will be constructed ( Ranney and Wright ).
The solution to public lodging jobs is merely up to the CHA entirely. The people who live in public lodging must be permitted and must take the enterprise to acquire involved. And all of us have to care about the job sufficiency to be willing to pass the clip and money to supply and keep lodging for the hapless and to? acquire involved to guarantee that public lodging is operated in the best involvements of all of us? ( Venkatesh 1 ).
References
- Basicss of Public Housing. 14 March 1996 p1.
- David Ranney & A; Pat Wright. “Plan for Transformation.” Tribune column. 14 January 2000
- Marlo Roache. Public lodging: Large jobs for little metropoliss Sun Washington agency. July 28, 1997
- Reingold, David. Inner City Public Housing? Journal of Urban Affairs. v.19 n.4, pp.469-486.
- Ronit Bezalel & A; Antonio Ferrera. Voices of Carbini. 1995.
- Problems confronting public lodging 1998. p1.
- Sudhir Alladi Venkatesh. An Invisible Community: Inside Chicago’s Public Housing? p1. The speaking Drum 21 February 2000.