Healing Hospitals: The Holistic Medicine Principles Writing Sample

Healing Hospital: A Daring Paradigm


Healing Hospitals are institutions that support the principles of the holistic medicine. This type of medical care is base on the combination of the physical treatment with the belief in the spirituality as an important part of the treatment process. In the modern framework of medical care, healing hospitals face many challenges. This paper’s objective is to define components of a healing hospital and their relationship to spirituality, analyze challenges of creating a healing environment in hospitals and reflect on the biblical aspects supporting the concept of a healing hospital.

Components of a healing hospital and their relationship to spirituality

Healing hospitals may seem unconventional in terms of principles on which they operate. First of all, the prevailing concept in holistic health care is hospitality. The atmosphere is more relaxed and friendly rather than strict. The patients are nursed in loving relationships based on attention and communication. In this case, the communication between the patient and medical professionals is not only about attending the basic needs of the patients but also creating a bound and providing spiritual and psychological support (Jackson, 2010).

The objective is to provide the patient with comfort, including the ability to wear the patient’s own clothes, rather than the standard hospital garment. Thus, creating the comfortable environment is the first component of a healing hospital (Chapman, 2003).

Also, healing hospitals are supposed to look into the broader context of treating illness, rather than focus on the biological component. Therefore, the main component is the spirituality of the healing hospital.

Challenges of creating a healing environment

One of the challenges in healing hospitals concerns the lack of oriented and trained personnel. The medical professionals practicing holistic medicine are supposed to have certain personality traits, including hospitality, openness, and profound sense of empathy to other people. It might be challenging for some people, to create a spiritual bond and pay a great deal of attention to each patient (Chapman, 2003, p. 67).

There are also various attitudes towards the effectiveness of the holistic medicine. Occasionally, the patient’s uncertainty can be an obstacle to ensure genuine contact with him or her and provide psychological support. However, even those who deny the value of the holistic medicine believe in the positive effect of the relationship-based medical care (Jackson, 2010).

Biblical aspects supporting the concept of a healing hospital

Spirituality as one of the main components of a healing hospital can obtain different forms. It includes the psychological, moral, mental, and, of course, religious aspects. Nowadays, the involvement and importance of religious aspect in medical care are constantly reviewed, and many support the idea that religion can play an important role in psychotherapy for bonding with the patient (Hawkins, Siang-Yang, Turk, 1999).

The initiative of a healing hospital complies with the Christian understanding of care about fellow human beings. It is based on empathy and spiritual experiences. The healing hospital also supports the idea that the illness of the body is connected with the soul or mind. Therefore, creating an environment for spiritual treatment reflects on the well-being of the body. It correlates with the Biblical understanding of the superiority of the soul over the body.


Although healing hospitals face many challenges, some ideas of holistic medicine are recognized by scientists for their positive effect, and the spirituality of healing hospitals provides patients with all-important psychological comfort.

Case Study on Moral Status

Theories that determine the moral status of the fetus

Two main approaches to understanding the moral status of a fetus can be recognized. In the scientific picture of the world, abortion during the first trimester is considered purely a decision of a pregnant woman in question. The moral view is that a fetus is not an entirely developed person yet (Warren, 1973). Dr. Wilson in the case study supports this idea. Both Dr. Wilson and Marco are not sure that Marco and Jessica will be able economically to provide for a child with a medical condition. Aunt Maria supports another theory, according to which a fetus from the moment of conceiving is a person and a responsibility of the parents.

Recommendations for action according to different theories

First theory presupposes high social responsibility for the future child in terms of providing conditions for the upbringing and economic status of parents if they make a decision to keep it. Jessica and Marco are not confident in their financial well-being. From this point of view, it would be morally inacceptable not to give a vulnerable child appropriate care.

However, from the perspective of Aunt Maria, the recommendation is to keep a child because its life has a purpose, and even if the life of a child is difficult, it is a result of a divine will and it is how it is supposed to be.

Theories’ analysis and conclusion

In my opinion, in this particular case, Jessica and Marco should only keep their child if they are determined enough to dedicate their lives to taking care of their child. A disable child can have a good-quality life, despite Dr. Wilson’s words, but it is up to the parents to provide it.


Chapman, E. (2003). Radical loving care: building the healing hospital in America. Nashville, TN: Baptist Healing Hospital Trust.

Hawkins, R. S., Siang-Yang, T., & Turk, A. A. (1999). Secular versus Christian inpatient cognitive-behavioral therapy programs: Impact on depression and spiritual well-being. Journal of Psychology and Theology,27(4), 309.

Jackson, C. (2010). Using Loving Relationships to Transform Health Care: A Practical Approach. Holistic nursing practice, 24(4), 181-186.

Warren, M. A. (1973). On the moral and legal status of abortion. The Monist, 57(1), 43-61.

Literature Studies: “Blue Winds Dancing” By Tom Whitecloud

Conflict in the attitude of the narrator

Tom Whitecloud presents his work by using conflict in the attitude of the narrator. Conflict is the primary element that drives the plot of this short story. It shows how the narrator struggles with both the inner self and outside forces of societies, which arouse curiosity and interests among readers.

The narrator faces a dilemma because he must deal with his conflict. Internal conflict results from the narrator’s struggle for self-identity while external conflict comes from the society in which he must struggle to cope and fit. The narrator’s diverse views on both white and native Indian cultures drive conflicts in him.

Attitude towards civilization

The narrator has received education, which has made him civilized. Moreover, he has stayed in the city for a long time to understand the differences between city life and native life. However, the narrator has not embraced civilization. The narrator notes that he has lost the peace of a calm life because of the everyday activities of the big city. The narrator demonstrates his dissatisfaction with the civilized white society as he states, “I am tired.

I am weary of trying to keep up this bluff of being civilized” (Whitecloud 1). The narrator claims that being civilized in the way of the white implies doing the opposite and not caring about neighbors. Civilization means dissatisfaction. This sense of discontent with civilization has resulted in conflict within the narrator.

The Antagonist

The narrator is the protagonist. The antagonist in the short story is a set of opposing values, which the narrator must understand to understand his own identity. The ancient Native Indian beliefs and modern civilization lead to an internal struggle within the narrator.

The narrator wants to be a part of the native society and at the same time, be a part of the white society (Roberts and Jacobs 119). However, at the end of the story, the narrator identifies with his native Indian culture.

“I am alone; alone but not nearly so lonely as I was back at the campus at school” (Whitecloud 3)

The narrator is alone but not lonely. He is approaching the end of the journey. The narrator has run away from school. On his way back to the native land, the narrator notes that he has been lonely. The narrator has been away from his heritage, upbringing, people, beliefs, and attitude.

The narrator walks alone, but he is not lonely because of the snow and pines. He understands the native life better than he does the city life. While the narrator lacks another companion during his journey, he finds companionship in the natural world of snow, pines, plants, and mountains (Toupin 1).

Blue Winds Dancing – what kind of wisdom?

The narrator finally finds wisdom at the reservation where he had failed to look earlier. While the narrator is on the reservation, he struggles with the idea of whether he is Indian or white. The narrator also wonders whether natives would still recognize and accept him. However, his father and his people accept him without questions. The wisdom comes only after the narrator has experienced white society.

This experience makes him appreciate his native society and its richness. To the narrator, the wisdom is in coming together, being with nature, feeling happy, and the beauty of nature (Villarreal 1). Wisdom allows the narrator to resolve the inner conflict of identity crisis and conflict with cultures.

Works Cited

Roberts, Edgar and Henry Jacobs. Literature: An Introduction to Reading and Writing. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1995. Print.

Toupin, Philip. Alone among the Pines. 1997. Web. 

Villarreal, Jose. Blue Winds Dancing: The Whitecloud Collection of Native American Art. 2007. Web. 

Whitecloud, Thomas. Blue Winds Dancing. 1938. Web. 

“Come Alive” And “Shitty First Drafts” Comparative Literature


Derrick Brown’s poem, “Come Alive” dwells on designing arguments when describing an item. Besides, Anne Lamott the passage “Shitty First Drafts” discusses arguments in terms of the ethos, pathos, and logos. Thus, this reflective treatise attempts to identify critical writing issues that these authors identify in relation to the item Narnia.

Shitty First Drafts: Creating draft in writing

Argument construction is a systematic and dynamic process. The main objective, sub-objectives, and environment influence its process of dissemination. Specifically, Lamott states that this process of evaluation is as a result of the perception of the ideal learning logic and prior experience as guided by planning rubric. Reflectively, basis of the argument construction’s “planning and execution” (Lunsford 29) is due to the need for inclusive interactive process and simplification of concepts in line with the level of interaction (Lamott 94).

Lamott opines that having a well-prepared argument logic plan will ensure that a person is adequately prepared with all the materials that are needed to deliver a properly constructed and easy to interpret sentence (Lamott 94). For instance, “a speaker persuades an audience by the use of stylistic identifications” (Lunsford 31). Thus, the allocation of time for task completion should be adequate to ensure that smooth transition from simple to complex concepts are intact while maintaining flow and sense (Lamott 95).

Reflectively, Lamott’s arguments summarize persuasive ethos, logos, and pathos that decorate a piece of argument to “convince” the audience reading or listening to the premises. Thus, the inclusion of minor and major premises that are artistically incorporated in an argument minimize rhetoric and underrepresented sentence structure components. The main issues identified in this article are a reaction and justification pathos in writing the first draft before aligning the arguments to fit in the final copy. These “argument coloration” (Lamott 95) devises maintain logic and indicate beyond doubt proof of persuasiveness. Moreover, the author triggers a mixed chain of reaction on the strength of an argument and identifies product writing as a result of process writing.

What is Narnia

Language symbols within persuasive elements mentioned in the poem “Come Alive” are shown as the regulator of “emotions and facts” (Brown 40). Brown is categorical on perception and achieving the primary goal of effective communication in his description of Narnia. In writing, ‘the power of language’ should function in relating experience to reality. A positive attitude creates a consistent flow in the argument. For instance, the phrase “Narnia” incorporates the persuasive reasoning of a hypothetical town. The incorporation of positive persuasive language in the description of Narnia is primary in ensuring final understanding and acceptance of the passion of the author about Narnia town (Brown 38).

Since the ability to create distinct emotions in an argument is essential in the final persuasiveness, argument construction is a continuous process that climax upon understanding the underlying premises about the town Narnia (Brown 39). As a result, the reader is placed in an effective and flexible environment that creates room for objective reflection and proactive thinking about reality and imagination of the image Narnia.

In the description of Narnia, the main components of an argument are presented as a message, analytical thinking, deductive reasoning, definition, proper use of phrases, and credibility (ethos). Reflectively, the collaboration of these tools creates an assertive argument that is nonbiased and very objective in the use of rhetoric to present a cognitive expression in the mind of the poet about Narnia.

Works Cited

Brown, Derrick. “Come Alive.” Born in the year of the butterfly knife. Austin: Right Bloody, 2012:38-40. Print.

Lamott, Anne. “Shitty First Drafts.” Language awareness: readings for college writers. Ed. by Paul Eschholz, Alfred Rosa, and Virginia Clark. 9th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2005: 93-96. Print.

Lunsford, Andrea. The everyday writer, New York, NY: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2009. Print.

error: Content is protected !!