Healthcare Improvement On The Example Of Toyota Homework Essay Sample

Nowadays, it is not always easy to create an approach and be sure of its effectiveness from a variety of perspectives. Professionals are eager to get a lot and achieve the best results: they provide captivating ideas, experiment, consider the opinions of many people, and evaluate their possibilities in regard to their financial opportunities. For example, Toyota Company proves that it is possible to become better in case a good approach is chosen. Fishman (2006) admits that the success of this organization is the desire to focus on the idea on how to make the cars better but not simply how to create cars.

It is very important to improve the chosen process step by step to create a leading company. The ideas offered by this company make it popular and recognizable on the automobile market, this is why it seems to be reasonable and justified to take the company’s approaches and ideas into consideration and make an attempt to apply similar methods in other spheres. In this paper, an attempt to improve the healthcare system will be made with the help of the example demonstrated by the Toyota Company.

Over the centuries the healthcare system undergoes a number of improvements, still, its main function is always to help patients meet their needs and improve health of each citizen (Coven & Moorhead, 2006). Unfortunately, not all representatives of this sphere of life know how it is better to improve the conditions under which they have to work and who have taken some steps to improve the situation. Still, such researchers like Bat, Robert, and Maher (2007) admit that there are a number of effective methods and approaches which may be used to improve the healthcare system; the only challenge is inability of people to understand a true importance of the changes.

This is why the first step that has to be taken is thoughtful encouragement of people concerning their skills and their direct involvement into the existing healthcare system. Medical staff as well as government has to realize that it is not enough to provide people with medical service. What is important is the idea of how to offer the services in a better way. In the article offered by Fisher, it is underlined that people themselves have to be problem solvers, this is why the positive outcome may be enhanced in case people understand their involvement into healthcare. Captivating and informative presentations, meetings, discussions, and other media intervention will be appropriate at the first stages of the improvement program.

Another significant factor that has to be taken into account while talking about the improvement of the healthcare system is the activities themselves. It is not enough to listen to or to participate in discussions and consider the importance of changes (Ogric & Headrick, 2008). Even some slight changes in healthcare will be noticed and appreciated: for example, it is possible to pay more attention to the patient’s age factor. People of different age may have different requests concerning their treatment, and nurses or other medical staff representative should understand the urgency of care for different aged people and use their best skills to offer appropriate services and help.

In general, the improvement of the whole system without considering such points like financial aid, background knowledge of the medical team, government participation is a complex activity. Still, one significant step has been already taken: people understand that the existing healthcare system is not perfect and some activities may promote better results. This is why the next step should be about the quality of help offered and the conditions under which the required help is more effective, and the example offered by the Toyota Company may become a good foundation to begin with.

Reference List

Bate, P., Robert, G., Maher, L. (2007). Bringing user experience to healthcare improvement: The concepts, methods, and practices of experience-based design. Oxon: Radcliffe Publishing.

Cowen, P.S. & Moorhead, S. (2006). Current issues in nursing. St. Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences.

Fishman, C. (2006). No Satisfaction at Toyota. Fast Company 11, 82-91.

Ogrinc, G.S. & Headrick, L.A. (2008). Fundamentals of health care improvement: A guide to improving your patient’s care. Oakbrook Terrace: Joint Commission Resources.

Atkins Popular Fad Diet: Analysis Of The Diet

A fad diet is a weight loss plan devised to offer quick results. These diets are not considered healthy by various health and diet associations since fad diets are not based on the guidelines provided. In most cases, fad diets do not give long-term success to the users (Rastogi 60). Atkins’s diet is a low carbohydrate diet developed by Robert Atkins to control his weight problem. Atkins’s diet restricts carbohydrates consumption but recommends the consumption of large amounts of proteins and fats that results in the body breaking down muscle and fat for energy (Mini 103).

Standardized dietary reference is the recommended diet, which includes a healthy eating guide of a variety of foods. To present the dietary recommendations clearly, the standardized dietary reference uses a food pyramid. It shows the recommended servings of proteins, dairy foods, fats, sugars, fruits, vegetables and grains. At the base, the pyramid presents foods needed more in a given day and at the narrow tip, it presents foods that should be eaten sparingly (Faiella 28).

The Atkins food diet is generally low in carbohydrates and high in proteins and fats while the standardized dietary food reference states that a healthy diet should include plenty of carbohydrates, proteins, vitamins, dairy foods and a small number of fats and oils. The Atkins diet works by burning less refined carbohydrates for more fuel and fat. To engage in the Atkins diet, it is essential to follow a series of steps that begin with cutting carbohydrates by eating vitamins and proteins. After the first stage, the Ongoing Weight Loss (OWL) stage follows where vitamins may be added to the diet in large amounts. Other foods can also be added every week for a period of nine weeks (Newman 15).

I would not recommend the Atkins Popular Fad Diet as it restricts the consumption of carbohydrates that decrease one’s appetite and induce ketosis. This may cause nausea and fatigue. Ketosis may also deteriorate a present medical condition, such as kidney disease. Low carbohydrate diets also increase the risk of osteoporosis, kidney stones, coronary heart disease, cancer, gout and high blood pressure (Marcus 183).

Atkins Diet also recommends a high-fat diet that increases cardiovascular diseases (Rolfes, Pinna, and Whitney 307). High-fat diets can cause obesity and also increase the risk of cancers, such as prostate, breast, and coronary cancer. A reduction of high-fat diets reduces the risk of diseases and offers health benefits.

Atkins fad diet promises a quick weight loss in a short term. After the program ends, it fails to give a weight maintenance strategy. A healthy diet is established by its ability to support good health and keep up a weight loss over time. It also requires lasting life style changes in activity and eating habits. The goal of a particular diet should be to give health and fitness over time and not simply weight loss. A healthy plan can be slow as it allows a variety of foods and strategies, but it yields long-term results (Rolfes, Pinna, and Whitney 306).

Atkins Fad Diet does not encourage viable lifestyle changes and behaviors, such as physical exercises. A healthy weight loss program should include behavior change programs to correct poor eating habits and physical activities that will help burn excessive fat and keep fit (Rolfes, Pinna, and Whitney 308).

Works Cited

Faiella, Graham. The Food Pyramid and Basic Nutrition: Assembling the Building Blocks of a Healthy Diet. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group, 2005. Web.

Marcus, Jacquline B. Culinary Nutrition: The Science and Practice of Healthy Cooking. Oxford: Academic Press, 2013. Web.

Mini, Sheth and Nirali Shah. Scientific Way to Managing Obesity. Sydney: Sterling Publishers, 2006. Web.

Newman, Jill. Fad Diet Fiascos: Exploring the Fad Diets that Do More Harm than Good. N.p., n.d. Web. 2015.

Rastogi, Shweta. Eat Right To Stay Bright: Manage Diet To Manage Disease. Mumbai: Popular Prakashan, 2010. Web.

Rolfes, Sharon, Kathryn Pinna, and Ellie Whitney. Understanding Normal and Clinical Nutrition. London: Cengage Learning, 2011. Web.

Analysis Of Health Care Reform

In the article “Health care reform and equality: Promise, pitfalls, and prescriptions,” Kevin Fiscella discusses the prospects of the health care system in the state. Fiscella refers to promises, pitfalls, and prescriptions when analyzing the Affordable Healthcare Act (ACA) and the Patient Protection Act (PPA). Not all healthcare disparities can be addressed through APA and PPA, and these acts do not enrich the biblical view on public and community health. Fiscella discusses six healthcare domains, and in this review, the author will analyze two: access related to insurance coverage and accountability.

The ability to receive primary care has been an issue for millions of the United States citizens who are uninsured. In terms of access, the ACA and PPA implementation promised access to the millions of these uninsured Americans. However, the pitfalls that these legislations failed to address include three different problems, such as the 23 million people who will still be unable to access services, lack of a robust primary care system, and having no public healthcare (Fiscella, 2011). Moreover, in terms of cost-sharing, the reforms promise to reduce cost barriers but fail to do so for mental health services or behavioral care. The way of overcoming these pitfalls is by expanding coverage under Medicare and working towards strengthening and improving the primary care system.

In terms of the biblical view of health and health care, access should be granted to all people, regardless of their socioeconomic status, ethnicity, or citizenship. Moreover, access should include all elements of health, as Elder (n.d.) notes that healing requires the integration of physical, emotional, and social parts. The discussed prescriptions for the disparities in this domain help address this partially, by expanding primary care access and emphasizing the importance of behavioral health and mental health services.

Accountability within the United States is a problem connected with the unavailability of data about disparities. As Fiscella (2011) notes, ACA promised to implement data collection strategies and use this information to analyze trends. However, the pitfall is that it does not automatically mean that it will be used to address the disparities. Hence, Fiscella (2011) prescribes a system that creates a loop between reporting, interventions, and followups. The biblical worldview of public or community health system’s accountability is connected to the value of human life. Fiscella’s (2011) approach reflects the value of human life, as from a Christian perspective, a proper healthcare system means “that no one’s health is jeopardized” (Sumarsono, 2020, para. 3). Hence, in both domains, the author of the article enriches the biblical worldview on health care.

Overall, this article review examines “Health care reform and equality: Promise, pitfalls, and prescriptions” by Kevin Fiscella. The author discusses the prospects of the ACA and PPA and the health care issues that should be addressed through these legislations. However, Fiscella points out the pitfalls of the legislation and offers advice on improving each of the six healthcare domains. This review focuses on two elements, which are access and accountability.

References

Elder, H. (n.d.). A biblical perspective on disease, health, and healing. 2020, Web.

Fiscella, K. (2011). Health care reform and equality: Promise, pitfalls, and prescriptions. Annals of Family Medicine, 9(1), 78-84.

Sumarsond, A. (2020). Why healthcare is a Christian issue. Relevant. Web.

error: Content is protected !!