High-Performance Team: How It Can Be Achieved Free Writing Sample

Empowered teams are also known as high-performance teams. Alternatively, they are called self-directed work teams (SDWT). It has been noticed that work teams that control the day-to-day production, quality, and administrative duties of SDWT have been known to get results since times immemorial.

Innovation tends to make team members feel curious. They are also enthusiastic about their challenges for a break. The success of a team is based on building an individual’s strength, decisions are reached by consensus and finally, the team gets operated by a shared vision. A team that is high in performance prefers communicating with its members on a regular basis and is also responsive when the need arises. The main objective of the team should be aligned on purpose. The inspiration, guidance should be given from the manager to his members of the team from time to time.

Direction integrates the efforts of employees. Management should motivate individuals by providing incentives so that they can work effectively in an organization and can be the goal–directed. The teaming agreement defines the job, capacity, and limitations within which the group will work. Managerial leaders or individual groups can produce the team agreement. A leadership-oriented approach should be used to develop the team charter.

There could be two or more persons, a joint group objective, and the essential funds, equipment, space, and cash required to achieve and maintain the objective. In most organizations, special teams are formed which are responsible for decision making. A decision-making team is based on highly experienced individuals having extraordinary career backgrounds.

Trust, respect, and support are considered as the building blocks of the high-performance team. Some persuasive measures to improve the performance of the team:

  • Trust;
  • Purpose;
  • Communication;
  • Involvement;
  • Continuous Improvement.

Drugs And Drug Related Crimes


It is appalling to know that drug manifestation starts at a very stage and our children are exposed to them. Children are naïve and had impressionable minds thus when they tend to get attracted to everything that goes around them. In today’s society where children enroll in schools, an atmosphere of intense competitiveness is created which pressurizes the students to work extra hard. In a place that should help them become prepared for adolescence, they are oftentimes exposed to many negative things as well. Due to poverty and lack and due to being in a world where many parents don’t value their children like they are supposed to, children may begin to look for various ways to escape their rejection and fears. One of the worst and horrifying ways elementary students are escaping those fears and rejections is through the use and sell drugs. Some students don’t even have a choice because they are being recruited by gangs. The children are manipulated and controlled by these gangs and enter into drug wars causing them to be a menace to our society. And these children grow up to be drug dealers and ‘junkies’ for lives however short that life would be. (Dixon, 1998)

Drugs, Society, and Crime

It’s a common practice for teenagers to drink and go clubbing where they do drugs. Most of them are as young as 12 where they are just in their school. Their parents are completely unaware of their children’s practice. They get influenced by their elders or movies and do it to show off or to fit in the society where the majority of the people are involved in this behavior. Most teenagers use their elder friends to get themselves a supply of alcohol and drugs. They even make fake ids to get themselves a legal supply of drugs and alcohol. (Abadinsky, 1996)

It is known for a fact that people who consume drugs and alcohol at a young age encounter a high rate of traffic accidents. They lose their senses and their and their care most of the time goes out of control which results in severe disasters. These accidents may result in permanent disabilities or even cause deaths. They also engage themselves in many serious crimes like stealing, rape, violence, and get dependent on drugs and alcohol at a very young age. Later this dependency becomes very high and they lose their sense. To get drugs they cross all their limits and get as brutal as they can be. (Nissl, 2008)

People using drugs or alcohol become sexually active at a very young age as compared to those who don’t. They later face STD (sexually transfer diseases), hepatitis C, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). (Dixon, 1998)

One of the many astonishing findings is that many of the drug abusers have tried many rehabilitation programs but nothing seems to work as they return to their usual routine once they mingle with their friends. This means that these bad habits are so ingrained in society that staying away from them is becoming quite impossible. (Dixon, 1998)

Many teenagers adopt these perilous habits under society’s influences. Children do it in school to be a part of the hip-hop society while professionals do it to associate themselves as bold and extroverts. They ignore the fact that this habit can be life-taking. Every human being in this society should individually take care of themselves. Children should be educated from a young age about the effects and consequences of these habits. Parents should avoid having alcohol or doing drugs especially in front of their children. (Dixon, 1998)

Drugs in Sports

Doping is the hot issue that’s gaining worldwide attention of policymakers, legal agencies, regulatory bodies, medical associations, sports bugs, and everyone associated with sports of any kind at any level. Be it the World Cup, The Olympics, Tour de France, or any other globally celebrated sporting event, ‘genetically transformed athletes’ have been stirring up storms in the media for quite a past few years now.

A North Korean shooter along with a Vietnamese gymnast was caught for doping at the recent Beijing Olympics. International Olympic Committee spokeswoman Giselle Davies says the North Korean shooter Kim Jong-Su who won a silver and bronze medal, tested positive for beta-blockers which help steady athletes’ hands. “In testing, he came forward with a positive test for Propanolol and as a result of this has been excluded from the Games, disqualified….his medals and diplomas will be withdrawn and his Olympic identity and accreditation also immediately withdrawn and canceled” (ABC International, 2008)

Legalize Drugs

After such dire consequences relating to society preservation and protection, there have many critical arguments about whether to legalize the war against isn’t working. The famous Drug Wars have led to the death of many under-aged young people. By locking these young offenders in jails, effectively the government is rotting these children to death. Furthermore, by recruiting these young children into drug wars, authorities are keeping them in contact with drugs while it should be their job to keep these children away. Children who try to resist the temptation of drugs are pushed into these programs where they start using drugs.

People have compared the legalization of drugs to the legal sales of tobacco and alcohol (Greiff, n.d). Now people argue that legalizing drugs would increase drug intake. That is not necessarily true. Most people in a society are fascinated by the “illegal” nature of drugs, and hence want to try it out. If these drugs are legal, then this excitement for the topic is bound to finish. The more you stop a person from doing something, the more he is inclined towards it; it is a simple human psyche that proves that drugs should be legal. (Greiff, n.d)

People commit crimes to obtain these drugs because they are so expensive, due to their illegal nature. If these drugs are transported and distributed in the market, legally and monitored with limits on the quantities and prices, then they will be affordable by most people. Thus reducing the criminal activities associated with obtaining these drugs. Hence, at the end of the day, there will be a lower crime rate in society.

Also, by imposing a tax on the drug business, the government will be able to generate more funds. This together with the money which is used excessively to stop the use of drugs can then be utilized in other areas for the benefit of society, such as education and health. (Greiff, n.d)

Ban, Protect, and Preserve against Drugs

The consensus, however, is to keep the ban imposed on drugs even though legalizing it may be a good option too. An article by Robert Maginnis reflecting eight common myths regarding the benefits of legalizing drugs, and how in reality they are all false; that it is a very bad idea.

In a society, if the drugs are easily available, it would be similar to welcoming someone into your home and giving them a glass of drink. You are simply giving the addicts what they want in their hands, without them having to make any effort. Not only that, now that the drugs are so easily available, there won’t be a black market, which means they will also be cheaper and hence easily affordable by all. This is bound to increase the use of substances. Hence, in the long run, the number of addicts will greatly increase. Also, now that everyone can get their hands on drugs; drug-related criminal activities such as accidents, rapes, problems during pregnancy, robberies, etc. are also bound to rise. (Males, n.d)


The current strategy of the government isn’t working and it is backfiring. The government needs to do something new. Legalizing drugs might not be the most popular activities, it however has certain benefits compared to no benefits from the current strategy. The government should strictly monitor the business, ensuring that drugs are not available to minors. That there are no black markets, and the transport and distribution is done by all fair means. This will surely reduce the problems associated with the banning of drugs in a society, which may include robberies, murders, black markets, cheating, bribes, and so forth. It may be hard to believe but legalizing drugs might protect us from crimes and make our world a tad safer.


Abadinsky, H. (1996). Drug Abuse: An Introduction. Nelson Hall Publishers ABC International (2008). Two athletes caught for doping at Beijing Olympics. Radio Australia. Web.

Dixon, P. (1998). The Truth about drugs. Hodder & Stoughton. Drug war doesn’t protect children. (n.d.). USA Today. Web.

Greiff, G. (n.d) Drug Legalization.

Males, M. A. (n.d.). The Danger of Legalizing Marijuana. Web.

Nissl, J. (2008). Alcohol and Drug Problems. Web.

Moral Imperatives In M. L. King’s “Letter From A Birmingham Jail”


In 1963, Martin Luther King Jr., the head of the Civil Rights Movement in the South, wrote a letter to eight ministers in Birmingham, Alabama from the jail cell he was sitting in. In hiIntroductions letter, now known as “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”, King was responding to the other ministers’ public appeal to King and others to stop their peaceful demonstrations against the unjust laws of segregation. More than simply trying to justify his actions, though, King’s letter makes a strong appeal for more nonviolent demonstrations such as those he had just held. He says this is necessary to gain white people’s attention, is morally necessary, and is essential to release growing tensions between the races. King closes his letter by criticizing his fellow ministers for not recognizing the desperate condition of their people. Instead of arguing, Martin Luther King Jr. suggests in his “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” that the ministers join together in nonviolent protest by arguing that something needed to be done to get attention regarding the injustice and to relieve the tension in the black community and that this was a moral imperative.

Main body

The first argument King makes is that many white people were not even aware of the plight of the black people following the Emancipation Proclamation. He pointed out that they were unaware of the unfair practices and policies that kept black people in the south from attaining any degree of success outside of their community and wouldn’t put up with it if they did know. King realized that staging nonviolent protests could force the nation’s attention, particularly the white population’s attention, on the situation in the South. He explained, “Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue” (King, 10). He reasoned correctly that if the rest of the nation was forced to realize the escalating nature of the situation in the South, the pressure would be placed on the politicians to take definite action regarding the unconstitutional laws that had been devised to continue black oppression or repeal those laws that continued segregation. Within this argument, King also makes a direct appeal to the politicians by reminding them of several recent promises that have been broken by the politicians and merchants of Birmingham. He suggests now is the time to fulfill the natural right of all people to be treated equally by rising in peaceful protest and they will receive the support of the free-loving nation.

Making his case about the relative correctness of disobeying laws designed to keep the black people from demonstrating, King called on the basic codes of morality that had been discussed by some of the world’s most respected historical moralists: “one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that, an unjust law is no law at all” (King, 15). It was clear that the segregation laws of the south were in direct contradiction to the Supreme Court ruling that granted equal rights to people of color. As such, King did not feel peaceful demonstration could be considered breaking the law. He defined moral law as laws designed to protect the rights of the people and the community. The segregation laws were used only as a means of subjugation, oppression, and degradation. Because these laws were not applied equally among the population, they were deemed both immoral and unjust. King reasoned that to break an unjust and immoral law is acting in a moral and just manner for the good of the community, especially if this can be completed in a peaceful, kindly manner.

One of King’s final arguments was that the community required a positive course of action to release the negative emotion that accumulated as a result of segregation. He knew that violence was likely to erupt if something wasn’t done soon to channel the energy. He states, “the Negro has many pent-up resentments and latent frustrations, and he must release them. So let him March” (King, 29). Again appealing to basic morality, King suggests it is better to organize a peaceful demonstration that siphons some of the negative energy from the black community while gaining support from the previously ill-informed white community rather than to blindly allow the eruption of a racial war. King relates the extremist label that had been pinned on him to numerous religious and humanitarian leaders. He asks, “so the question is not whether we will be extremists, but what kind of extremists we be. Will we be extremists for hate or love? Will we be extremists for the preservation of injustice or the extension of justice? … Perhaps the South, the nation, and the world are in dire need of creative extremists” (King, 30).

King closes his letter by expressing his disappointment with his community’s church leaders who have failed to recognize not only the injustice being suffered by their people. He acknowledges the church’s success in keeping violence from exploding in the streets but also points out the need for more positive action. He says, “in deep disappointment, I have wept over the laxity of the church. There can be no deep disappointment where there in not deep love” (King, 38). Because he loves the church so much, he cannot but feel bitterly disappointed that they have failed their people by hiding behind the “anesthetizing security of stained-glass windows” (King, 34). He ends the letter by appealing to his fellow ministers to join him in his cause.

Through every stage of his argument, King appeals to the principles of basic morality to try to make his fellow ministers see reason. He points out that it is only through peaceful actions that the morality of the white people will finally recognize the deplorable conditions that existed in the south for the blacks. He also convincingly argues that people should not uphold immoral laws and should not be encouraged by their moral leaders to do so. One of his strongest arguments is the morality of preventing violence by channeling negative energy into positive progress and action. Through these arguments, he can shame the church leaders for their lack of responsibility and begs them to help find solutions that will allow their congregations to live truly equal lives with equal opportunity for the future.

Works Cited

King, Martin Luther. “Letter from Birmingham Jail.” (1963). Nobel Prizes.

error: Content is protected !!