Identify Threats And Vulnerabilities In An IT Infrastructure Sample Assignment

The purpose of the seven domains in a standard IT infrastructure is to categorize and manage risks, threats, and vulnerabilities. In this lab, your objective is to identify and organize known risks, threats, and vulnerabilities. Furthermore, you will connect these risks to the appropriate domain for risk management.

Upon completing this lab, you will be able to achieve the learning objectives.

  • Identify common risks, threats, and vulnerabilities found throughout the seven domains of a typical IT infrastructure
  • Align risks, threats, and vulnerabilities to one of the seven domains of a typical IT infrastructure
  • Given a scenario, prioritize risks, threats, and vulnerabilities based on their risk impact to the organization from a risk-assessment perspective
  • Prioritize the identified critical, major, and minor risks, threats, and software vulnerabilities found throughout the seven domains of a typical IT infrastructure.

Criteria for evaluation and rubrics for assessment are provided.

The students are required to perform Lab #1. The evaluation criteria and rubrics for this lab are outlined below:

  • Was the student able to identify common risks, threats, and vulnerabilities found throughout the seven domains of a typical IT infrastructure? – [25%]
  • Was the student able to align risks, threats, and vulnerabilities to one of the seven domains of a typical IT infrastructure? – [25%]
  • Was the student able to prioritize risks, threats, and vulnerabilities based on their risk impact to the organization from a risk-assessment perspective? – [25%]
  • Was the student able to prioritize the identified critical, major, and minor risks, threats, and software vulnerabilities found throughout the seven domains of a typical IT infrastructure? – [25%]

Dangers Of Cyclist’s On The Road

Despite efforts to raise awareness, implement regulations, and make road improvements, many cyclists still fail to follow road rules. This includes ignoring stop signs or running red lights, which poses a significant risk to drivers and pedestrians. To effectively address this issue, it is essential to introduce bicycle licenses.

Over time, an ongoing dispute between cyclists and motorists has persisted. I have personally observed this through multiple near accidents. Assigning blame in cyclist-motorist collisions is a complicated issue, as there are instances where both parties may be at fault.

While it would be unfair to solely blame one party for accidents involving motorists and cyclists, it is important to recognize the substantial evidence that supports the occurrence of these incidents. In Pittsburgh, there have been 361 documented accidents between cyclists and motorists from 2006 to 2012 (“Bicycle Accident Statistics”). This data serves as undeniable proof that cyclists face a greater risk of injury in such accidents. Statistical records also reveal an alarming total of 44,000 cyclist fatalities in traffic collisions throughout the United States since 1932 (Dangers in Terms of Cycling Safety”).

The risks of sharing the road with cyclists are evident, and some locations are implementing measures to enhance road safety. England’s government recently pledged 94 million pounds to facilitate cycling, with a focus on developing and improving bike paths (“Make Cycling Helmets Compulsory”). Encouraging cyclists to utilize dedicated paths instead of roads is just one approach to enhance the current situation.

All drivers in America must pass a driving exam before freely driving on the streets. I think cyclists should also undergo an exam before riding on the roads. By doing so, we can prevent mistakes made by cyclists and potentially save lives. If cyclists choose not to take or fail the exam, they should only ride on the sidewalk.

Cyclists who disregard road laws endanger the safety of all. To promote harmonious coexistence between cyclists and drivers, it is vital to take appropriate measures. Hence, I suggest mandating that cyclists must undergo a similar examination as motorists prior to riding on public roads. By implementing this solution, numerous lives can be spared and an essential law can be established for future guidance.

Pros And Cons Of Individual Rights

Individual Rights and Freedom V.S. National Security

National Security

Pros

Cons

National Security secures people’s safety; individual rights wouldn’t exist without a country being well protected, and Defeats the purpose of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom Only a legitimate government provides national safety, so civilians wont have to worry about corruptions. The use of millimetre wave scanner higher US’s security, but the security check is an invasive search of the body. The image from the body scan shows the private parts of a human being, which offends those who value conservative. During the security check, cells are exposed to microwaves which also pose risks in our health. Civilians submit to a government for national safety in return for a safe environment for them to speak and get individual rights

Civilians need to live in a stable life and that why they need national security. They need to sacrifice their right for the greater goods that benefits them.

Individual rights and freedom

Pros

Cons

Individuals have no protections against military if the force is used unreasonably Prolongs the investigation and process of security, and also takes away the authorities of the military even if the force is used under a reasonable condition. If individual rights are being protected than it would makes it harder for the government tyranny to take over, then peace and happiness will happen in a nation. People might get selfish and take over other people’s rights to get what they want, but that wont happen unless individual rights is being protected. The freedom of a civilian is against anything a “free” country stands for. If the rights is been taken away then this world will turn neither safe nor free.

Humanity will harm each other without the rights of individual to speak for what they think its right and protect themselves from people who are harming

them.

Thomas Jefferson said” I rather suffer trails and tribulations attending too much “freedom” than be shot by some despot because I refused to be a slave.

error: Content is protected !!