Is Socio-Economic Justice Possible In Capitalist Societies? Sample Paper

The concept of socio-economic justice is critical to any society, and it is an especially important issue in capitalist societies. In a capitalist system, an individual’s ability to generate wealth depends heavily on accessing and utilizing existing resources. This means that those with less financial and social capital are often left behind and unable to achieve their potential. Thus, to create a just and equitable society, it is essential to ensure that all members of the community have access to the same opportunities and resources.

Socio-economic justice, as defined by the United Nations, is the fair and equitable distribution of resources, opportunities, and rewards among all members of society, regardless of their economic or social backgrounds. In capitalist societies, socio-economic justice is often overshadowed by the pursuit of economic growth and market efficiency. The question of whether socio-economic justice is possible in capitalist societies is complex and requires an in-depth analysis of various aspects of the economic system, as well as the political, social, and cultural contexts in which it operates.

The idea of socio-economic justice in capitalist societies is a complex one. On the one hand, capitalism is often associated with competition and inequality, as the most successful members of society are the ones who can maximize their resources and take advantage of economic opportunities. However, it is also possible for capitalism to be used as a tool for social and economic justice, as it can provide individuals with the opportunity to create wealth and build their own economic security.

At the same time, some argue that capitalism is inherently unjust, as it allows for the accumulation of wealth by a select few and fails to provide an equitable distribution of resources. This is especially true when looking at the income inequality that exists in many capitalist societies. There exit overwhelming evidence the inequality destroys the society as highlighted from the growing wage inequality, class inequality where some individuals get to live in their parent trust funds while others have to work hard to live by, and “as if it wasn’t amazing enough, this parade actually understates the true inequality in U.S. society”. It measured annual income, not total accumulated wealth, which is significantly more unequal. The consequences are yet seen from the broken social fabric, metal illness, homicides and teenage pregnancies. Moreover, when individuals are unable to access resources, they may be unable to take advantage of the wealth-generating potential of the system.

On the one hand, capitalist societies strive to maximize economic efficiency, which may lead to increased wealth inequality and the concentration of resources and power in the hands of a small number of the population. From Miliband’s opinion, capitalists work with the government as representatives who are accorded warm reception and they manage to blend their economic and political views inclined for a mutual goal. Patriquin argues that the state in capitalism does not intervene in economic issues but only play a role in protecting the rights to private property, thus allowing capitalist to have great economic and political strength. This often translates into unequal access to resources, opportunities, and rewards for certain members of society. In addition, the lack of legitimate political representation in capitalist societies can further contribute to unequal access to social services, such as healthcare and education.

On the other hand, capitalist societies have also seen positive developments in terms of socio-economic justice. For example, due to the increasing number of democratic governments, certain groups such as women, minorities, and the disabled have become more empowered and have greater access to resources and opportunities. The capitalists lobby government to fund public relation campaigns, daily newspaper and championing for democracy at the superficial level while they focus on controlling the economy. Through taxation and revenue collection, capitalists provide amenities such as healthcare, schools and other infrastructure. In addition, the expansion of social welfare programs has also helped to reduce poverty and provide basic necessities to those in need.

Despite these positive developments, it is important to remember that economic growth and market efficiency are not the only objectives of capitalist societies. It is also important to recognize that these societies are built upon a set of values, which include justice, equality, and human dignity. The reason to support high taxation is justice according to Thad Williamson who points out that “if US redistributed only 30 percent of the wealth of the top 1 percent, we could ensure that every household would have at least $100,000 in assets.” He believed that, for the sake of efficiency and justice, markets could not be left to capitalists but needed to be regulated by the state. As such, it is possible to create more equitable and just socio-economic systems in capitalist societies if certain conditions are met. These conditions include a strong commitment to democracy, clear regulations on the free market, and effective social welfare programs.

Socio-economic justice is a concept that has been debated since the rise of capitalism. The idea is that all people in a capitalist economy should have access to the same economic opportunities, regardless of their social and economic status. For example, there are two outcomes to expect from redistributive taxation at a high level. It will help level the playing field and eliminate existing inequalities. Also, it will “cover the costs associated with establishing a society where impoverished children have the same access to resources as children from affluent families.” Inexpensive child care, tuition-free higher education, quality public schools, paid family leave, free national healthcare, and so on may all be paid for by raising taxes. That is to say, the system needs to ensure that all participants in a race have access to the same types of vehicles and that the winners share some of their spoils with those who compete while using skateboards. It is important to remember that a more radical economic restructuring is what make these positive changes possible. Every person should have equal access to the resources necessary for their full human potential, and for that, we must work to build a society of genuine opportunity. In other words, everyone should have the same opportunities to obtain wealth, regardless of their background or wealth status.

In a capitalist society, there are several factors that can impact the level of economic justice. These include income inequality, unequal access to education, unequal access to healthcare, and unequal access to financial institutions. Income inequality is one of the most important factors in determining socio-economic justice. This is because income inequality can lead to a lack of economic opportunities for certain groups of people. Nobody actually amasses their wealth only via their own efforts. The source of our money is our society; one may consider it a form of social inheritance. From the article “Income in Western Europe doubled every eighteen years between 1950 and 1973, when GDP rose by an average of 3.9% per year”. Employment levels have stabilized at or near full capacity, with unemployment consistently below 2%. When prosperity was distributed more evenly, inequality fell dramatically. Those with higher incomes can take advantage of better access to education, financial institutions, and healthcare, while those with lower incomes may find themselves unable to access these resources.

The idea of socio-economic justice is further complicated by the fact that the capitalist system is designed to reward those individuals and businesses that are the most efficient in their respective fields. The executives and managers are paid ten times in a capitalist company are hierarchical, but not because they are inherently bad people. To varying degrees, yes. They follow a strict hierarchy because that is how most jobs are organized in modern society. This means that those with more resources and capital can often take advantage of better access to resources, while those with fewer resources are left behind. This can create an unequal distribution of wealth and resources, which further limits the opportunities available to those with lower incomes.

Overall, the concept of socio-economic justice in capitalist societies is a complex and multifaceted one. While it is possible to use capitalism as a tool to create a more equitable society, it is also true that many people are left behind and unable to participate in the system. This led to a huge gap in income and wealth between the richest and poorest people in the world. The capitalist system, which is largely based on the idea of maximizing profit, is one that has no room for anyone who is not able to contribute to it. Today, many people are being left behind due to globalization and technology. This system is the driving force of modern society and has been the most influential economic and social system in the world for centuries. However, there are many people who are unable to participate in this system due to the lack of resources or because they cannot afford to buy the products that are being sold. For example, the United States has food stamps and unemployment benefits that help people get out of poverty. Ultimately, if we are to create a just and equitable society, we must ensure that all individuals have access to the same opportunities and resources. Only then can we create true socio-economic justice.

In summing up, it is challenging to argue that socio-economic justice is attainable in a society that is dominated by capitalism. Although income inequality is one element that might limit access to resources and opportunities, the capitalism system is essentially constructed to reward those who have more resources and capital. This is true even though income disparity is one of the factors that can limit access. This can result in fewer economic prospects for individuals who already have fewer resources. In order to generate a more equitable distribution of resources and opportunities, it is essential to give serious consideration to the possibility of implementing measures such as tougher laws and worker safeguards, in addition to expenditures in education and health care. It is possible to achieve socio-economic justice in capitalist societies, although doing so requires a strong commitment to democratic values and active social policies that promote equality, justice, and human dignity. This goal can be accomplished, however, and it is something that should be pursued.

Bibliography

Bapuji, Hari, and Snehanjali Chrispal. “Understanding economic inequality through the lens of caste.” Journal of Business Ethics 162, no. 3 (2020): 533-551.

Bapuji, Hari, and Snehanjali Chrispal. “Understanding economic inequality through the lens of caste.” Journal of Business Ethics 162, no. 3 (2020): 533-551.

Barney, Jay B. “Why resource‐based theory’s model of profit appropriation must incorporate a stakeholder perspective.” Strategic Management Journal 39, no. 13 (2018): 3305-3325.

Cox, Natalie, Peter Ganong, Pascal Noel, Joseph Vavra, Arlene Wong, Diana Farrell, Fiona Greig, and Erica Deadman. “Initial impacts of the pandemic on consumer behavior: Evidence from linked income, spending, and savings data.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2020, no. 2 (2020): 35-82.

Dument, James. “Justice and native peoples.” In Native Americans, crime, and justice, pp. 20-33. Routledge, 2019.

Eide, Stephen. “Private colleges in peril: Financial pressures and declining enrollment may lead to more closures.” Education Next 18, no. 4 (2018): 34-42.

Hyden, Goran. “Problems and prospects of state coherence.” In State Versus Ethnic Claims: African Policy Dilemmas, pp. 67-84. Routledge, 2019.

Larry Patriquin. “Inventing Tax Rage.” pp.15-20. Halifax: Fernwood, 2004. [190pp.]

Mazzucato, Mariana. “Capitalism after the pandemic: getting the recovery right.” Foreign Aff. 99 (2020): 50.

Ranaldi, Marco, and Branko Milanović. “Capitalist systems and income inequality.” Journal of Comparative Economics 50, no. 1 (2022): 20-32.

Steinert, Heinz. “Participation and social exclusion: a conceptual framework.” In Welfare Policy from Below, pp. 45-59. Routledge, 2021.

Zanoni, Patrizia. “Labor market inclusion through predatory capitalism? The “sharing economy,” diversity, and the crisis of social reproduction in the Belgian coordinated market economy.” In Work and labor in the digital age. Emerald Publishing Limited, 2019.

Lego’s Strategic Change Sample Essay

Executive Summary and Introduction

Executive summary.

LEGO is among the world’s largest producers of children’s toys today. This report aims to show the challenges the company is encountering from the environment, both in the market and around the company itself. Kirk Ole formed this company in the year 1932. The main product that is produced by LEGO company is LEGO brick.

In the rankings in the past years, this company has been the number one toy producer of the century, beating the rivals in various factors and market supply and customer service provision. LEGO, as a company which has been in existence, is facing some external threats from the environment, and also the market of its products has been struggling in the current times due to different factors, among them being the COVID-19 influence which heats it just like it happened to any other company.

Also, there has come up many existing companies that produce the same products hence competition in the market for the same products. These factors have been made aware to the company board, and there should be a need and application of immediate strategies which can help revive the market for its products and also other environmental facts affecting the company, be they internal or external, should be well resolved to increase the efficiency of the company.

Though the company is affected by numerous factors, LEGO remains among the selling toy companies worldwide. If not, it’s still the leading toy producer and supplier on the globe by today. Implementing the necessary actions that address the challenges, it is facing today shall imply that the company is still a leading producer and supplier of toys since it shall boost its market entirely and steadily.

Introduction

Strategic management in business is vital as it plays a very important role in deciding the longevity and profitability of the company. It is taken the activities that the business which is not limited to setting the business objectives, analyzing the business environment, how the business competes in the business world, digging deep into the internal elements of the company, and also taking the idea of those strategies which are essential for strategically supporting the business growth.

This company is on the foundation of toy making for children; if not, it is the leading manufacturer of toys around the globe. This implies that the company implements management strategies that bring about decision-making, hence analyzing its environment in terms of business, which is very important in identifying the challenges it goes through in business.

Going by the problems identified, the most recent strategic management ideas bring about some suggestions which require immediate strategic changes and also have to provide an implementation plan. Therefore, a redesign in the organization structure is suggested as a proposal for the betterment of the strategic management in the organization, which is relevant for enhancing and mitigating the performance and challenges faced by the company, respectively (Hitt, M. and Duane Ireland, 2017).

Current Financial position of Lego

For many years, LEGO has always been the leading producer of toys, and its revenue has increasingly been noticed to be over 7.2 billion dollars in the year 2020. By then, the summation of the entire toy market in the world was anticipated to be around 94.7 billion dollars. Hence, this is a clear implication that Lego alone had a market share of 7.6%, putting them in the number one position in market value among the companies producing toys for children and adults worldwide. Among the top toy producers in the world are Mattel, with an estimation of around 4.48 billion dollars; Hasbro, with an estimation of 5.47 billion dollars; Bandai and Lego, with an estimation of 6.57 and 7.2 billion dollars, respectively.

Going by the statistical figures published in march of 2022, there was an increase in the revenue of Lego by about 27% in the previous year, 2021, which is estimated to be around 8.06 billion dollars of revenue increase collected by Lego alone. Having opened more than 165 new stores around the world in the year 2022, Lego now has by today 832 stores around the world, which means that the revenue is by far going to increase by the end of this year.

Among the new stores, 95 opened in China, which has the biggest population in the world, implying the revenue, by all means, has to increase. The total number of stores in China has now risen to 340; China is the leading buyer of Lego as it stands and continues to champion the market of Lego products (LIGHTAILING, 2016).

Figure 1Lego Networth
Figure 1. Lego Networth (Source: Lates Usage and Revenue Statistics, 2022. Link: https://www.lightailing.com/blogs/news/lego-latest-usage-and-revenue-statistics#:~:text=Lego’smarketshareis7.6,isanincreasefromkr43.)

Focus on the relationships between strategy, stakeholder expectations, and organizational performance, choosing a strategic management theory to explain those relationships and expectations. Justify to the Board why you settled on this approach rather than another one.

Description of strategy

Strategic management assignment includes setting goals and planning to achieve them without failure in mobilizing resources, which are vital in action execution. The term strategy is mentioned to mean the proper ways to attain goals, and this can be attained through setting and going through a set of activities like strategic planning and strategic thinking.

Also, business strategy is a collection of strategic statements. This is the summary of how the goals can be attained while meeting all the client’s expectations while sustaining the competitive market advantage in the workplace. The statement provided by Lego about its domestic strategy has been considered to be original brand as a modern way which comprises stronger and well experiential content which is rich in content, and it is classified to be omnichannel, which is also called Targeting the ideal retailer concerning the make for working with.

However, Lego organization examined the existing strategic management assignment; strategy can mean to be the action plan which is vital in achieving the goals containing some of the limited resources which are used in identifying the challenges in implementing as to overcome the ultimate goal progress (Kuo, T. and Tsai, 2022).

Relationships between strategies

Going by the current strategic management assignment, it is demonstrated that organizational strategy always contains an action plan which is very important in bringing out specific goals and remaining in the best stead with some of the vendors and the customers of the Lego organization. There is a positive affiliation between the structure and strategy of an organization. Mostly, the structure is taken to be the procedure in which the pieces of the organization can have fitness in its internal structure.

Strategy and organizational structure are understood to be interrelated as a major organizational strategy that can help structural building in various organizations. This always presents a clear focus, which helps the organization achieve too much of its goals aligning with the organization structure in some way that is best for achieving.

Stakeholders and diagram

The stakeholders are affected by several objectives and actions for the organization in line with the policy changes. Following the concerned organizations, the stakeholders have always been the major organization’s clients; supply chain; HMRC; Pension Legislators; Lenders, and Trade unions. The Pension Protection Fund, however, has been the major/ key stakeholder.

The reason for the establishment of PPF is to play a part in compensating the former workers who retire from the organization’s work after reaching the age limit. The fund mentioned in the respective strategic management assignment is subsidized in levies for appropriate schemes.

Figure 2Stakeholder Chart
Figure 2. Stakeholder Chart (Source: Developed by Nilesh Kamble)

Stakeholder expectations, along with the strategy impacting organizational performance

In strategic management, the sole procedure of managing the stakeholders’ prospects has been a communications movement that deals with the stakeholders’ expectations in line with concerns about the importance of meeting the stakeholders when addressing and resolving issues for attaining the project goals. Evidence shows that the key participant of the PPF in strategic management opposed the organization’s voluntary management since it has no pension scheme, which can be averaged over 25 million.

Lego, having failed in the market by 2003, went back to a brick metra which they used for revival, and all the customers and stakeholders were happy about it. By 2003, Leg had started making losses of millions daily, and this meant that the company could collapse if it didn’t try to revive its ways of running the business. In this strategy, the company innovated the commodities they produced, increasing the market.

The downfall of Lego started at the end of the 90s. The challenge occurred when the firm experienced extreme growth in only some of its products at specific times of the year. Lego had made associations with some significant movie franchises and later began manufacturing kits that portrayed the fame of the Harry Potter films and the Star Wars robots.

The company made various profits when the movies were released, but when they were complete and were no longer showing, Lego had many volumes. Thus, it became hard for it to control the costs incurred. By 2003, Lego was making losses equivalent to millions daily because of the high manufacturing costs and fewer sales since the products made then were not known to the customers. However, Lego bricks were still selling, although other toys like Jack Stone action man, Galidor, and the robot range produced still needed to market.

The strategy that Lego used to become profitable again was the “back to brick” strategy. The company was to return to the initial core products that made it Lego which was the brick. The bricks were standardized so that they could be used to manufacture various products, and thus 30% of the production lines were closed. It was realized that the bricks that were simple to make were not easy to sell, and thus Lego had to make more complex products. Lego had to be very innovative since it is vital for any firm and needs a turnaround. Firms need to balance between concentrating on the core products and innovation, and Lego showed that both were possible.

The Lego movie that was produced in 2014 was so fundamental in increasing the popularity of the products. The respective strategy outlined in this strategic management assignment included some principles for guidance, for example, the easy, expert, and fair. In this, the organization found it easy to manage the expectations of its customers by easily getting the solutions that had fear prices attached for the babies and adult toys that were produced at that time.

Implementation of theories

The stakeholder expectations can easily be managed by following and implementing the Resource Based theory and the game of strategic management, being the most relevant. Resource-based theory in strategic management is all about resource management of resources towards providing a golden opportunity in the organization for a competitive advantage with its rivals in the market. Competition brings about the advantage of making the company enjoy bigger profits within a limited period. On the other side, this resource-based theory came along with the strategic management assignment depiction, which leads to utilization confusion of the resources, which is mostly done in several ways daily in a common language. These strategic resources of the company come along with various games and toys online, which keeps the organization more valuable.

Figure 3. Resource Based Theory
Figure 3. Resource Based Theory (Source: Developed by Author)

This mentioned theory is implemented in strategic management, enabling communication in the organization at all levels. It also plays a vital role in making the organization reduce the risks which can come along in the business analysis, hence bettering the internal alignment (Posch, A. and Garaus, 2019).

Figure 4. Game theory of Strategic management (Source: Ozkan-Canbolatet, 2016)
Figure 4. Game theory of Strategic management (Source: Ozkan-Canbolatet, 2016)

Justification of the Board to settle the approach

Like any manufacturing company, the two theories above are vital in strategic management assignments. Lego, they are taken as the better solution to benefit both the clients and the organization when compared to the rest of the approaches. Taking an assumption, the theory, like that of the resource-based, ensures that the resources used provides capabilities for the developmental foundation, which then leads to the superior performance of the organization.

Identify the major external factors affecting the organization and discuss their impact in an international context. Use a Passport and add relevant data and figures to validate your conclusions.

The factors that affect the organization in the international context are always political, environmental, social, technological, legal, and economical, and PESTLE can analyze them. These factors can be looked at through the table below, as they play a big part in impacting the Lego organization as below (ABDUL MOMIN, 2021) ;

Factors Analysis
Political In 2015, there were works submitted by Maia Weinstock showing female supreme court justices for international women’s day. Her work couldn’t be taken as it consisted of a political view, yet Lego doesn’t allow such a political stance in its organization’s support. They then faced a backlash that year since the element of women’s day celebration is a concern that is not political.

Also, there was a story of AI Weiwei, a Chinese artist, 2015 who was to have an exhibition in Melbourne of his work made from Legos. He is one artist known to speak against the governments entirely in the world though he is always doing works that are often courageous and bold about the brink of controversy.

Lego never went on back to support his project hence making his exhibition, meaning it was not colorful as it could have been if Lego had supported him through the fans still supported him. This controversy impacted a big change, and Lego 2016 only asked clients about buying in bulk if they didn’t promise to include Lego in political works.

Economic Lego firm has a range of border product that is the major contributor to the income/cash flows of the entire organization. Analysis of how the company is performing is always done on the branches and departments of the firm. After, the judgment about the financial performance is always made by considering the Operating earnings, Net sales, and Gross margin. The company has over 800 stores around the globe, and among these, 49 are in the USA, which is among the top economies in the world, 817 chain stores, and 257 stores are licensed are located across 38 countries in the world.
Social Lego paid a partnership with UNICEF in 2015 for 3years so that children’s rights could be protected entirely worldwide. The fundamental aim of this partnership is to let other big business organizations copy from Lego so that children are only sometimes exploited. Some of the best practices for safeguarding children from exploitation and abuse is letting big business companies promote good cultures fighting for children.

Because Lego is a global brand, it has to take responsibility since it can easily be included in several identities. However, not just fighting for children’s rights and all that; at Lego, there is no existence of sexual abuse, racial discrimination, culture, etc. Lego continues to hire people from different communities to work for them to show the community and the world how the business world has to run, mostly when operating a big brand. This, however, increases its trust and love for its products in people of various communities and backgrounds. Hence, it has been among the reasons Lego has remained on top of the toy manufacturing companies in the world till today.

Also, outside the business world of Lego in terms of toys, Lego as a firm has a very big impact on the entertainment industry. Several movies have been premiered and supported by Lego right away, from Harry Porter, Lego Batman, and so many others. This has been so good and attracted attention and support to its business.

Technology Lego has been among the companies participating in developing technology for developing children; it has played a big role in investing in research to help increase the number of children who would develop a lot from toys.

In 2017, Lego came up with the Lego Boost, which was a robotic kit designed for young children who are seven and less. This helps improve children’s engineering and thinking abilities and coding skills. Lego, just like other companies, was affected by the corona pandemic. However, it is recovering at a faster rate and also, and it is working on a 10-year program of having an online ecosystem which is to look just like the physical one. Improvement in technology still shall see the revenue raised, hence growing the organization’s income.

Legal There is a company called ZURU which is also a manufacturing company. ZURU was affected by the fire, having existed for only two years. This company afterward grew so fast and caught the attention of many people in the year 2018, which attracted the attention of Lego. ZURU’s action figures became similar to that of Lego in that it reached a time when Lego filed a lawsuit against ZURU under copyright infringement.

However, ZURU company had to go for a hearing and defend, and during its defense, it presented its figures which were aesthetically different hence not posing a threat to Lego.

However, Lego had also stated, on the other hand, that whatever products ZURU was producing were of poor quality, and it was tarnishing its name. Lego also insisted that the products produced by the ZURU company were similar to that of Lego. The court ruling favored ZURU since Lego didn’t produce similar products as ZURU.

Environmental . Because of this partnership, they have worked endlessly on reducing their environmental impact while inspiring others to do the same.

For a long time, company of Lego has been a partner of WWF, which still happens now. With these combined efforts, these two had set goals which are to be attained by the year 2020 before the corona pandemic became a disaster in the entire world, and among these was reducing the levels of CO2 emission in the globe by around 10%. This is a good strategy for environmental conservation.

Also, Lego always works hand in hand with its suppliers so to identify how it impacts the environment in terms of reducing the carbon emission, and Lego still has a plan that it is working towards achieving by the year 2030, the plan being to become 100%sustainable however much they depend on plastics.

Formulation of a New Strategy for facing the challenges and objectives of the organization

The management scientist from Canada Mintzberg 1987 came up with a theory aiming at the strategic development of a firm, and this was called the 5p strategy of Mintzberg. The strategy focuses on planning, ploy, pattern, and position. These perspectives are important in the company’s objective identification process (WenJun, 2019).

Going to Lego, planning the supply chain management is key and helps evaluate the major challenges. Poly, the next step, is where the competitive strategy is built in the strategic management assignment. Here, the company aims to reduce the prices of the products to maximize sales and outcompete the competitors in the market. In the next step of the pattern, Lego needs to focus on and analyze past failures so that it can be guided on which direction it is right to take in the future for strategic operation. The selling strategy should always be unique, and this should be aimed in the position phase, hence ensuring customer enhancement. And lastly is the perspective phase. Here, culture must be focused on and analyzed to enhance the company’s position in the environment.

Critical Analysis of the Strategy Based on Justification.

Going by the above strategy, it is evidenced that 5p is vital in enhancing the viable advantage of other organizations in the market. This is based on past experiences; hence the business’s position would be enhanced with new ideas. In SWOT analysis, it is important to effectively consider strategies to overcome the issues of high prices of the products and the safety of all that is produced; hence this defines why the 5P strategy is the best.

Explain how your business strategy encourages and supports innovation and change and evaluate your strategy against competing strategies based on its contribution to the success of your organization

Change in the organization is critical since it helps enhance its competitive advantage, attainable through efficiency improvement at management levels. It is significant always to emphasize the changes in management other than supply chain management since this benefits the company, is less expensive, and doesn’t consume time. Under critical moments, the primary focus always has to be organization changes, which enhances the great relationship with all the company suppliers, making the business run smoothly. This helps the company to increase member cohesiveness, enhance productivity, bringing about cultural changes.

This business strategy encourages the practices of coaching and progressive disciplines, which are essential to innovation and change in the organization. These practices lead to giving employees new skills and also eliminating behaviors that are not job-oriented in the organizational performance standards. The sole purpose of progressive discipline is to let the employees know the need for performance improvement and equip them with the necessary skills they require to attain the necessary improvement in performance. There must be a commitment that enables one to get moving forward, hence attaining innovation. The necessary steps which are taken towards attaining discipline are coaching the employees, giving them written warnings in case they go wrong, giving them final warnings in case they don’t adjust, suspension, and finally separating in terms of termination of their contracts.

Innovation comes through identifying new investment areas to raise the organization’s performance. Also, cultural changes are key when it comes to the enhancement of stakeholders’ relationships. Based on the 5P strategy, it is observed that innovation in culture is considered to enhance supplier relationships (Narayanan, V. and Adams, 2017).

Develop an implementation plan for your chosen strategy and document how your plan will fulfill major stakeholder expectations.

Implementation plan for the strategy

The implementation plan here is called the 5P strategy having the phases of the plan, position, poly, and perspective as discussed above. The organization can implement effective implementation of effective strategy by implementing respective components. The implementation plan takes the following strategy in the table below;

Figure 6 Timeline of activities
Figure 5. Timeline of activities (Source: Author)

The implementation plan follows a particular sequence when attaining it. The sequence should be attained following a particular time frame set to avoid delays. The above table describes each activity, which one comes first, and for how long. It can be noticed that evaluation and communication of the strategic plan come first in the first week, followed by implementation of the development structure in week two, formulation of the structure there comes in, making the budget for accountability then comes in, and allocation of the resources follow in the next week and then lastly is letting the plan flow in the discharging stage.

The strategy implementation is best when it takes the cascade model, which is very vital in structuring the business, which is illustrated by the following framework (Vuorinen, L. and Martinsuo, 2021);

Figure 7Cascade Model Source Source: (de Oliveira et al., 2019, p. 131)
Figure 6. Cascade Model Source (Source: de Oliveira et al., 2019, p. 131)

Recommendations and Conclusion

Recommendations

Going by all the many strategic management Lego organization has used. Plans to use; it has to look at how to better its relationship with its stakeholders, both the internal and external stakeholders of the organization. It is always important to have a better structural change which is essential in strengthening the organization’s business strategy, and so should be done by Lego. Ultimately, this shall enhance production and quality, and market diversification shall be attained to make the organization more profitable.

Conclusion

The conducted studies about the strategic management of Lego shows the organization faces challenges that are both financial and management aspect in line with its business. Here the internal stakeholders are the experts, the sales team, the manufacturers, the marketers, and the designing team. Two major theories, the resource-based view and the game for strategic management, can best be used to improve the Lego business strategy. Among them should be international strategic management which enhances the company’s performance. Also, PESTLE analysis has been so important in classifying different features that still have impacted the organization’s company growth businesswise.

References

ABDUL MOMIN, 2021. Lego PESTLE Analysis: Tiny Pieces, Global Reach. Available at:

https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500293276.

Hitt, M. and Duane Ireland, R., 2017. The intersection of entrepreneurship and strategic

management research. The Blackwell handbook of entrepreneurship, p. pp.45-63. Available at: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/248175#what_does_a_malpractice_case_involve.

Kuo, T. and Tsai, G.., 2022. The effects of employee perceived organizational culture on

performance: the moderating effects of management maturity. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, pp. 30(3–4), pp.267-283. Available at: https://www.lightailing.com/blogs/news/lego-latest-usage-and-revenue-statistics#:~:text=Lego’s market share is 7.6, which is an increase from kr43.

LIGHTAILING, 2016 Lego: Latest Usage and Revenue Statistics. LIGHTAILING. Available

at: https://www.lightailing.com/blogs/news/lego-latest-usage-and-revenue-statistics#:~:text=Lego’s market share is 7.6, which is an increase from kr43.

Narayanan, V. and Adams, C.., 2017. Transformative change towards sustainability: the

interaction between organizational discourses and organizational practices. Accounting and Business Research, p. 7(3), pp.344-368. Available at: https://myesc.com/the-five-steps-of-coaching-progressive-discipline/.

Posch, A. and Garaus, C., 2019. Boon or curse?A contingent view on the relationship

between strategic planning and organizational ambidexterity.Long Range Planning, p. p.101878.

Vuorinen, L. and Martinsuo, M., 2021 Value-oriented stakeholder influence on infrastructure

projects. International Journal of Project Management, p. 37(5), pp.750-766.

WenJun, J., 2019. Reinterpretation of the Strategic Concept Based on Mintzberg’s Strategic

5p Model, the Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, (January), pp. 1(6).pp.31-32. Available at: https://hbr.org/2021/09/who-is-driving-the-great-resignation.

LGBTQ Social (in)Justice University Essay Example

Introduction

This essay aims to analyze the various forms of social injustice that members of the LGBTQ community encounter. This essay will examine the effects of discrimination on LGBTQ people in various contexts, including housing, employment, healthcare, and education. The paper will address possible tactics to lessen discrimination against the LGBTQ population. Gender expression discrimination, queer visibility, cisnormativity, gender binary, forced heteronormativity, intersectionality, gender spectrum, and minority groups are the concepts to be covered (Sensoy & DiAngelo, 2017).

The man in the picture is a bartender from a gay club. Gender expression discrimination refers to the unfair treatment of people who express themselves in ways that do not adhere to conventional gender norms. In the context of social injustice, the picture depicts this notion. This kind of prejudice can manifest itself in various ways, from verbal abuse based on someone’s appearance and demeanor to the denial of service or employment due to gender-expressive conduct. Our research indicates that the individual experienced insults because of his hairdo when working in a typical pub before switching to a homosexual club. Gender expression discrimination, in whatever form it manifests, is a form of prejudice that can harm members of the LGBTQ+ community.

Social justice claims that there is queer visibility: On the LGBTQ+ spectrum, it is crucial to acknowledge that queer people come from varied backgrounds and have different experiences (Monro, 2005). It is critical to foster an atmosphere that fosters safety and acceptance for gay individuals. This entails addressing prejudice and injustice, establishing secure spaces for LGBT people, and promoting accurate portrayals of gay people in the media. According to our research, the photo was taken at a beach event that promoted the visibility of LGBT people and provided advice on fostering an accepting and understanding atmosphere. The book explores how LGBT people’s visibility is impacted by the obstacles to achieving full acceptance and equal rights. It examines how politics, the media, and society impact how the general public feels about and accepts LGBT identities. It also looks at how LGBT people may promote their visibility and build a more just society.

Cisnormativity, as defined by social injustice, is a theory that holds that everyone is cisgender, meaning their gender identity corresponds to the sex they were given at birth. By dismissing their identities and experiences, this idea marginalizes persons who identify as transgender and gender nonconforming. University students were present at the city function where the photo was taken. Cisnormativity can be observed in the terminology used to discuss gender, such as when we describe cisgender people as “normal.” It also shows how people are treated differently depending on their gender in settings like the workplace or public areas. Ensuring everyone is treated with respect and dignity regardless of gender identity is one way to combat cisnormativity. A more inclusive workplace can also be achieved by employing gender-neutral terminology when discussing gender.

The photograph was taken at a park gathering. According to social injustice concepts, the image depicts the gender binary, which separates gender into two distinct categories: male and female (Tilsen et al., 2007). It is a socially built system that assigns gender depending on a person’s sex. This binary gender framework frequently excludes non-binary, gender fluid, and transgender individuals. This gender system permeates all aspects of society, including language, institutions, and the law. This oppressive system encourages gender roles and stereotypes, as evidenced by how gender is portrayed in the media, the workplace, and elsewhere. There is a growing effort to question the gender binary and establish a more inclusive and equal society, even though gender is frequently viewed as a binary. The increased acceptance of gender fluidity and LGBTQ+ people evidence this movement. By challenging the gender binary, we may establish a more equal and accepting society of various gender identities.

The image was captured in a gay pub. The image depicts the social injustice concept of compulsory heteronormativity, which is the notion that heterosexuality is the only acceptable form of sexuality and gender expression. It is a sort of institutionalized oppression that fosters the notion that heterosexuality is the “normal” or “natural” way of being and that all other sexual and gender expressions are aberrant or deviant. Even in the LGBTQ+ community, where people frequently feel pressure to conform to heteronormative ideals to be accepted, this concept is ubiquitous. Compulsory heteronormativity can result in the marginalization and discrimination of LGBTQ+ individuals and have grave consequences for their mental and physical health.

The image was captured during a pride parade. The image exemplifies the social injustice concept of intersectionality, which describes how many oppressive and discriminatory practices overlap and intersect, giving people afflicted a distinctive experience. The idea explains how black lesbians experience particular difficulties influenced by racism and homophobia. Similar discrimination affects transgender people because of their gender identity and race. Overall, the book examines how intersectionality affects the experiences of persons who identify as LGBTQ+ and makes a case for using intersectional strategies to handle better the special requirements and difficulties faced by this group.

The image was captured during a pride parade. The image depicts the social justice Gender Spectrum concept. This idea indicates that gender is not binary and should be viewed as a continuum. This spectrum has numerous dimensions, including gender identity, gender expression, and biological sex. Each person has unique features and experiences that fall somewhere on a continuum. The concept of a gender spectrum recognizes that gender is varied and diverse and that a person’s gender identification is flexible and subject to change. It also permits individuals to develop gender identities that defy standard gender norms and assumptions. Regardless of their gender identification, the Gender Spectrum notion contributes to a more inclusive and affirming environment for all people. This notion gives a framework for comprehending the complexity of gender and permits individuals to express their gender authentically. In the end, by recognizing and affirming the multiplicity of gender identities, the Gender Spectrum notion can help us establish a more equal and just society.

The image was captured during a pride parade. According to principles of social injustice, the image shows a marginalized group; minority status is fundamental to the LGBTQ community. The book also examines the various circumstances in which LGBTQ folks experience privilege and persecution. Some LGBTQ individuals may experience greater privilege in specific contexts based on ethnicity or socioeconomic standing. In contrast, others may face greater oppression based on their transgender status or gender identity. Further, the book explores how the lives of LGBTQ people are frequently affected by intersecting oppression based on race, class, gender, and other identities. Ultimately, the book reveals how LGBTQ individuals’ minority status may shape and be shaped by their experiences.

Conclusion

These pictures have demonstrated how social injustices against the LGBTQ community appear and the harm they produce. Social injustice against the LGBTQ community still exists in many parts of the world. The LGBTQ community regularly experiences unfair discrimination, from criminalizing same-sex relationships to workplace bias. Fighting for equality and acceptance for all, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity, is the only way to stop this injustice. We can build a more just society that respects the rights and dignity of LGBTQ people via lobbying, activism, and education.

References

Monro, S. (2005). Beyond male and female: Poststructuralism and the spectrum of gender. International journal of transgenderism8(1), 3-22.

Sensoy, O., & DiAngelo, R. (2017). Is everyone really equal?: An introduction to key concepts in social justice education. Teachers College Press.

Tilsen, J., Nylund, D., & Grieves, L. (2007). The gender binary: Theory and lived experience. International Journal of Narrative Therapy & Community Work2007(3), 47-54.