Improved success rates, higher efficiency, and reduced costs are advantages of using AI technology for genetic selection in vitro fertilization. Pregnancy outcomes may be improved by employing machine learning algorithms to sift through massive genetic data sets in search of patterns and connections. Because of this, doctors may take a more individualized approach to select embryos, opting for those with favourable genetic characteristics. Using AI technology to improve the efficiency of IVF genetic selection can reduce associated expenses. The analysis of massive genetic data sets by medical professionals dramatically facilitates the identification of embryos with desired genetic features. The surgery cost may be reduced, and the likelihood of multiple pregnancies may be eliminated if fewer embryos are implanted. IVF genetic selection with AI technology brings both exciting opportunities and severe limitations. Lack of regulatory manipulation is crucial because this technological know-how is in its infancy and has yet to be utilized notably. Using AI technological know-how in assisted copy raises privacy and moral problems, such as the opportunity for genetic discrimination and the loss of autonomy for patients. Technology Overview
Artificial intelligence can enhance IVF genetic selection in several ways, including success rates, efficiency, cost, and individualization of embryo selection. Artificial intelligence (AI) may help doctors rapidly and correctly identify embryos with favourable genetic features by analyzing enormous databases of genetic information. Because of this, the possibility of multiple pregnancies is decreased, and the expense of the surgery is reduced as well (Chow, Darren JX, et al., n.p. ).
IVF genetic selection with AI technology has several promising applications and some severe caveats. Among them include worries about privacy and ethics, uncertainty about outcomes, and a lack of regulatory control. There may be unforeseen repercussions if we utilize AI to select certain genetic features, such as overexpressing undesirable genes. Inaccurate forecasts regarding the success percentages of specific embryos are also possible due to the possibility of biases in the algorithms used to assess genetic data.
Further, there are worries regarding genetic prejudice and the security of sensitive medical data due to the usage of AI technology in IVF genetic selection. Using technology to select desirable genetic features raises ethical questions since it might lead to eugenics (Fernandez, Eleonora Inácio, et al., n.p.). In addition, there is a lack of standardization and the possibility of harmful practices in using AI technology in vitro fertilization (IVF) genetic selection since no such regulation exists. Finally, although IVF genetic selection using AI technology may have some promising applications, some particular valid worries and precautions must be considered. Further study and regulation are needed to guarantee the safe and ethical use of the technology.
Using Artificial Intelligence for Selective Parenthood in IVF
Results Have Gotten Better
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been used to affect IVF genetic selection significantly, and the results have been revolutionary. Doctors can pinpoint genetic features linked to healthy pregnancies by examining massive genomic data sets. Selecting embryos with these characteristics may improve their chances of having a healthy baby (Louis, Claudio Michael, et al., n.p.). Patients who have had infertility may benefit significantly from the enhanced success rate of IVF therapies that have resulted from the capacity to recognize these features.
Patients also benefit financially from the accelerated success fees completed using AI science for genetic decisions in vitro fertilization. The cost of the cure and the opportunity of a couple of pregnancies may also be decreased, and the success price expanded by implanting fewer embryos. As a result, extra humans who would no longer have been capable of obtaining the money for IVF earlier can also do so.
Increased success rates may also positively affect a patient’s mental health. Patients may experience psychological and physical exhaustion after IVF procedures and the disappointment of unsuccessful attempts (Schnabel, Jim Schnabel, Jim, n.p.). Patients may feel more hopeful about their prospects of success when using AI technology in IVF genetic selection due to the higher success rates connected with this method.
Option to Pick Specific Embryos
IVF genetic selection utilizing AI technology is a significant step forward in assisted reproductive technology since it allows for individualized embryo selection. Medical professionals may better tailor their treatment plans for each patient by evaluating massive genomic data sets (patient Tamir, Sivan., 4). This individualized method of embryo selection may improve reproductive success rates and lower the danger of passing on harmful genetic mutations.
Individualized criteria for embryo selection may also help patients who have had previous IVF attempts fail. Artificial intelligence (AI) may help doctors study genetic data and find patterns explaining why prior treatments haven’t worked. This allows for a more specific strategy throughout therapy, which improves outcomes.
Patients with cultural or religious inclinations may also benefit from the option to pick embryos based on personal choices. Some individuals may want to avoid having a specific gene variant because of its increased risk of sickness or impairment (Tamir, Sivan.,8). IVF genetic selection utilizing AI technology allows doctors to guide patients in making decisions regarding embryo selection that align with the patient’s values and priorities. Finally, improving the odds of a healthy pregnancy, decreasing the danger of genetic abnormalities, and providing a more individualized approach to treatment are all possible thanks to the capacity to modify embryo selection using IVF genetic selection with AI technology.
Enhanced Productivity and Lower Expenditures
Possible monetary and time-saving gains from combining AI with IVF genetic selection. Artificial intelligence (AI) permits the fast and specific evaluation of extensive genomic information sets. This may also limit the total price of the surgical operation by decreasing the range of embryos that want to be implanted. Both sufferers and physicians are worried about having more than one baby at a time, and this science may help alleviate that fear (Tsai, Ni-Chin et al., 1386). Patients may lessen IVF failure’s mental and physical toll by limiting the number of embryos implanted. Artificial intelligence can improve the efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and patient-friendliness of the IVF genetic selection process.
Challenges of IVF Genetic Selection with AI Technology
Lack of Regulatory Oversight
In the case of IVF genetic selection using AI technology, the absence of regulatory control is a significant obstacle. Inconsistent standards in the usage of this technology might be harmful to patients if they are not regulated clearly. Healthcare providers may need more uniformity to appropriately evaluate the risks and advantages of the operation and give enough counselling and assistance to patients. Unsafe or immoral behaviour, such as employing unproven or unapproved technologies, may result from a lack of monitoring (Weill Cornell Medicine, n.p.). Moreover, with clear direction and regulation, the procedure may be more effortless for patients to comprehend and manage, thus leading to understanding and disinformation. Therefore, ensuring the safe and ethical use of IVF genetic selection using AI technology is complicated by the need for regulatory monitoring.
Privacy and Ethical Concerns
The term “privacy” describes an individual’s entitlement to pick out who has to get the right of entry to their non-public data. There are privacy troubles with using AI for genetic choice in vitro fertilization due to the touchy nature of genetic information. The opportunity for genetic discrimination and unethical services of this information is raised.
Ethical troubles surrounding the decision of positive genetic features, which may lead to eugenics, are also introduced by using AI technological know-how to consider genetic data. The period “eugenics” describes the method of favouring one type of breeding over any other to elevate the typical genetic trend of a population. This offers an upward push to issues about the opportunity of discrimination in opposition to human beings with undesirable genetic features, as nicely as the emergence of a hereditary underclass.
Using these privateness and ethical considerations highlights the need for moral and accountable use of IVF genetic determination and AI technological know-how. Protecting the confidentiality of their patients’ fitness files is a pinnacle of precedence for healthcare practitioners, as is stopping the misuse of genetic checking out and other applied sciences to improve eugenics or prejudice. For this reason, weighing the execs and downsides of using such technological know-how and setting up splendid moral standards for its use is essential. Potential for Unintended Consequences
The term “potential” describes the chance of something occurring in the future. The term “unintended consequences” describes the unintended results of a choice or action. Using technology to choose certain genetic qualities might lead to unintended effects, such as the manifestation of unwanted traits, in the context of in vitro fertilization (IVF) genetic selection. As an example, choosing a particular characteristic may result in the unintended manifestation of a less desired one.
Using artificial intelligence in IVF genetic selection may also have unforeseen implications. Inaccurate forecasts regarding the success percentages of specific embryos may result from biases in the algorithms used to assess genetic data (Allahbadia, Gautam et al., Swati, n.p.). For instance, if the algorithms used to determine the genetic data are unreliable or missing essential information, unhealthy embryos may be mistakenly labelled as “normal.”
IVF genetic selection using AI technology should be carefully considered and evaluated because of the possibility of unforeseen outcomes. If healthcare professionals want to get the advantages of new technology without incurring hazards, they must do their research. The dangers and benefits of using AI for IVF genetic selection should be communicated to patients, and funding should be allocated to study the technology in depth to implement appropriate protections.
In conclusion, it’s crucial to think about the possibility of unexpected outcomes while engaging in genetic selection via IVF using AI technology. The dangers and advantages of using this technology must be thoroughly weighed before making any hasty decisions. There has to be an investment in learning more about the technology, installing safeguards to reduce bias, and disseminating correct information to patients about the potential advantages and drawbacks of using AI for IVF genetic selection.
Ethics of IVF Selection & AI Technology
Respect for Autonomy and Privacy
To respect someone is to consider and value their thoughts, actions, and values. The term “autonomy” describes an individual’s freedom to make choices regarding their life and health care. The word “privacy” is often used to describe people’s desire for anonymity online.
Respect for autonomy and privacy is a crucial ethical value that should be considered while making decisions with IVF selection and artificial intelligence technologies. Assisted reproduction is a medical procedure, and patients can make educated choices about their treatment (Buldo-Licciardi, Julia et al., n.p.). For patients to make educated choices regarding their health, doctors must explain the potential advantages and drawbacks of IVF genetic selection using AI technology.
Patients have the same right to confidentiality as any other individual regarding their health information and personal details. Healthcare professionals must protect patients’ privacy by preventing illegal access to personal information and medical data.
Trust between patients and healthcare professionals can only be sustained by treating them with autonomy and privacy. Without worrying about being judged or having their privacy invaded, patients may open up about their healthcare problems and make educated choices. Healthcare providers are responsible for empowering patients to make choices that are in their best interests by providing them with all relevant information and necessary resources.
In conclusion, the ethical value of autonomy and privacy must be considered while making decisions involving IVF selection and artificial intelligence. Healthcare practitioners are responsible for empowering patients by giving them access to reliable information and backing their choices when it comes to their treatment. Healthcare professionals are responsible for protecting their patients’ privacy by keeping their patients’ personal information and medical data private.
Discrimination and Social Justice: Some Thoughts
When making a choice or establishing an opinion, thinking about several elements is essential. Critical discrimination and social justice issues arise in the context of IVF selection and AI technology. Discrimination is when someone is treated differently because of who they are or what they look like racially, ethnically, sexually, or physically. There is a risk of prejudice from using technology to select certain genetic features. Individuals may be subject to discrimination in various settings, including educational and occupational opportunities, if society determines that certain hereditary features are superior to others.
We mean by “social justice” is the equitable allocation of society’s resources and opportunities. Existing socioeconomic disparities may be exacerbated by the application of artificial intelligence in vitro fertilization (IVF) genetic selection (Buldo-Licciardi, Julia et al., n.p.). If, for example, this technology is only available to individuals from affluent backgrounds, it might exacerbate existing inequalities in healthcare and economic opportunity.
Therefore, it is essential to consider how IVF selection and artificial intelligence technologies could affect inequality and societal fairness. The ethical implications of these technologies must be carefully considered to prevent the perpetuation of current prejudice and inequality. This necessitates a thorough assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of these innovations, as well as concerted efforts to ensure that people from all walks of life and financial circumstances have equal access to them. Thus, the ethics of IVF selection and AI technologies must consider the concerns of prejudice and social fairness. It is essential to consider the possible ramifications of these technologies to prevent prejudice and the exacerbation of existing socioeconomic disparities.
Compliance with Ethical and Legal Expectations
The term “adherence” describes strictly adhering to a predetermined set of guidelines. “Professional standards” refers to the code of conduct required of those who call themselves professionals. When using IVF, doctors and scientists must follow ethical guidelines and the law when deciding which embryos to implant.
The combination of IVF selection with artificial intelligence technologies prompts ethical questions concerning patient safety and the credibility of the medical establishment. Therefore, doctors and scientists are morally obligated to use these tools ethically and by applicable laws and regulations.
Patients undergoing assisted reproductive treatments, including those using IVF selection and AI technologies, must be adequately informed of all potential outcomes. (Chow, Darren JX, et al. The patient’s right to confidentiality and freedom of choice must always be upheld. Therefore, following professional and legal requirements to safeguard patients and provide them with the finest treatment possible is crucial. IVF selection and AI technologies must be used for professional and legal requirements. It protects the credibility of the medical community by guaranteeing that patients are given accurate information and that their rights are protected.
When combined with artificial intelligence (AI), IVF genetic selection has the potential to transform the assisted reproduction industry completely. Success rates, efficiency, and cost reductions may all benefit from the technology’s ability to provide more individualized and accurate embryo selection. The use of AI technology in IVF genetic selection has many promising applications. Still, it also faces considerable hurdles, such as a lack of regulatory control, privacy and ethical issues, and the possibility of unforeseen effects. To guarantee the technology is used in a way that is safe, ethical and respects patients’ rights and autonomy, it is crucial that these issues be addressed via continuing study and regulation.
Allahbadia, Gautam N., Swati G. Allahbadia, and Akanksha Gupta. “In Contemporary Reproductive Medicine Human Beings are Not Yet Dispensable.” The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (2023): 1-6.
Buldo-Licciardi, Julia, et al. “Utilization of standardized preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) via artificial intelligence (AI) technology is correlated with improved pregnancy outcomes in single thawed euploid embryo transfer (STEET) cycles.” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics (2023): 1-11.
Chow, Darren JX, et al. “Does artificial intelligence have a role in the IVF clinic?.” Reproduction & Fertility 2.3 (2021): C29.
Cimadomo, Danilo, et al. “Towards Automation in IVF: Pre-Clinical Validation of a Deep Learning-Based Embryo Grading System during PGT-A Cycles.” Journal of Clinical Medicine 12.5 (2023): 1806.
Fernandez, Eleonora Inácio, et al. “Artificial intelligence in the IVF laboratory: overview through the application of different types of algorithms for the classification of reproductive data.” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 37 (2020): 2359-2376.
Louis, Claudio Michael, et al. “Review of computer vision application in in vitro fertilization: the application of deep learning-based computer vision technology in the world of IVF.” Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 38.7 (2021): 1627-1639.
Schnabel, Jim. “Harnessing AI Technology for IVF Embryo Selection.” Cornell Chronicle, 21 Dec. 2022, news.cornell.edu/stories/2022/12/harnessing-ai-technology-ivf-embryo-selection.
Tamir, Sivan. “Artificial intelligence in human reproduction: charting the ethical debate over AI in IVF.” AI and Ethics (2022): 1-15.
Tsai, Ni-Chin, et al. “Validation of Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Screening Using a Routine IVF Laboratory Workflow.” Biomedicines 10.6 (2022): 1386.
Weill Cornell Medicine. “Harnessing Artificial Intelligence Technology for IVF Embryo Selection.” WCM Newsroom, 19 Dec. 2022, news.weill.cornell.edu/news/2022/12/harnessing-artificial-intelligence-technology-for-ivf-embryo-selection.
Zaninovic, Nikica, and Zev Rosenwaks. “Artificial intelligence in human in vitro fertilization and embryology.” Fertility and Sterility 114.5 (2020): 914-920.
John Coltrane Quartet’s “Alabama” And Robert Glasper Trio’s “So Beautiful” Free Sample
The John Coltrane Quartet’s “Alabama” and the Robert Glasper Trio’s “So Beautiful” are two great jazz works that differ in instrumentation, speed, and style but share enough stylistic traits to be considered related. John Coltrane’s “Alabama” is a classic example of his excellent jazz. This work features Coltrane on tenor saxophone, McCoy Tyner on piano, Jimmy Garrison on bass, and Elvin Jones on drums (Roger, 2013). Coltrane’s chordal, melodic, and improvisational language shines in this modal, mid-tempo ballad. Coltrane and the quartet demonstrate their remarkable ability in ensemble parts and solos throughout the composition.
The Robert Glasper Trio’s “So Beautiful” is unusual jazz. Glasper plays piano, Maxhamm bass, and Fonville drums. Jazz music’s interplay is still in tune but faster and more energetic. A piano trio dominates the instrumentation. Glasper’s solo is noteworthy because he uses electronic effects to sound like two pianos (Robert Glasper – so Beautiful (Live at Capitol Studios) (Official Video) | Amara, 2015). Glasper’s lyrical material is likewise unusual, incorporating jazz elements like syncopation, call and response, and improvisation with groove and funk. Despite their differences, the two compositions share improvisation and solo trade-off. Each quartet member performs improvisational and extended solos in Coltrane’s “Alabama.” The trio solos extensively on Glasper’s “So Beautiful,” with Glasper shining out with his distinct melodic and harmonic idea.
Despite their similarities in improvisation and soloing, each work has its distinct purpose and motivation. After four African-American girls were killed in the 1963 Birmingham church bombing, Coltrane penned “Alabama.” Coltrane wanted his composition to be a musical requiem to honor the tragedy and show his support for the civil rights movement. Glasper’s “So Beautiful” is a tribute to jazz music and players (Roger, 2013). John Coltrane Quartet’s “Alabama” and Robert Glasper Trio’s “So Beautiful” are great jazz songs with distinct styles and messages. They demonstrate jazz’s ability to stir, inspire, and heal listeners, despite their instrumentation, tempo, and style differences. No matter your preference, the compositions’ improvisational roots and reverence for jazz music give them force.
“Alabama” and “So Beautiful” reflect various feelings throughout the song despite their comparable improvisational and soloing styles. “Alabama” begins with a bluesy melody that depicts Birmingham’s sadness (Roger, 2013). The song’s improvisations become more joyful and hopeful, reflecting Coltrane’s confidence in the civil rights struggle. “So Beautiful” begins with a soft piano riff and rises to a more powerful beat as Glasper solos. This beautifully shows jazz’s emotional richness by taking the listener through happy and gloomy feelings. Coltrane and Glasper’s improvisation styles are diverse but show their common admiration for jazz. Coltrane used upper-range extended chords and elaborate melodic arcs in his free-flowing, lyrical improvisation. Glasper’s style is groove-oriented and funk-influenced, and he often uses electronic effects to simulate two pianos. Both approaches show Jazz improvisation’s limitless potential.
Unlike “So Beautiful,” Coltrane’s “Alabama” is freer, allowing players to interpret it naturally. Both pieces use musical spontaneity and improvisation to connect musicians on a deeper level. The distinctions between John Coltrane Quartet’s “Alabama” and Robert Glasper Trio’s “So Beautiful” are many and subtle. From instrumentation to tempo to soloing and improvisation, both pieces offer much to learn and appreciate( Robert Glasper – so Beautiful (Live at Capitol Studios) (Official Video) | Amara, 2015). However, the similarities between these two jazz performances cannot be overlooked, and Coltrane and Glasper’s mutual respect and appreciation are evident. No matter your preference, the compositions’ improvisational roots and reverence for jazz music give them force.
In conclusion, John Coltrane Quartet’s “Alabama” and Robert Glasper Trio’s “So Beautiful” are distinct jazz pieces with stylistic and improvisational roots. Coltrane’s is melancholy and reflective of the civil rights movement, whereas Glasper’s grooves and funks. Each composition shows the incredible range of jazz and the generations of musicians like Coltrane and Glasper who have kept it alive.
B, Roger. (2013). JOHN COLTRANE Alabama [YouTube Video]. In YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saN1BwlxJxA
Robert Glasper – so Beautiful (Live at Capitol Studios) (Official Video) | Amara. (2015). Robert Glasper – So Beautiful (Live At Capitol Studios) (Official Video) | Amara. Amara.org. https://amara.org/videos/QFzJU7hrOn6E/info/robert-glasper-so-beautiful-live-at-capitol-/
Exploring Graduate School Options: What Should My Resume Include? Essay Example For College
As a lifelong learner passionate about supporting relationships and mental health, I aim to pursue a master’s degree in marriage and family therapy. To gain acceptance into the University of Central Florida’s renowned program, I must craft a compelling graduate school resume showcasing my experience, skills, and dedication to this field. What qualifications, experiences, and attributes should I highlight in my resume to make a compelling case for admission into UCF’s master’s program in marriage, couple, and family therapy? To answer that question and build the most robust application possible, I interviewed an alumnus of the program, reviewed admissions criteria, and studied recommendations from career experts.
To gain insights into this question, I interviewed the program coordinator for UCF’s marriage and family therapy master’s program. She suggested emphasizing relevant work or volunteer experiences, especially those involving counseling or therapy. For example, I have over two years of experience volunteering as a crisis counselor for the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, facilitating around 600 calls. This hands-on experience, even if not directly in this field, demonstrates my ability to support clients coping with depression, suicidal thoughts, relationship struggles, and more. She also recommended including any courses I have taken relevant to psychology, social work, counseling, or a related field. These courses will show my interest in and aptitude for the academic study of relationships and mental health. She as well highlighted the number of credit hours I would undertake during my study and the major subjects that are of higher importance and significance to the course practice. In that session, I also happened to understand what is the difference between a therapist and a counselor, which was important in affirming my decision to enroll in the field of my interest. Besides, we discussed the contemporary benefits of the career, its benefits to the modern world, and how I could become the best if I enrolled in the same in terms of research and joining key movements. This information bits were important in understanding what was expected of me as a marriage counselor and knowing what to include in my application so that I could gain an edge using my personal statement.
Apart from interviews, I also reviewed admissions information on the university’s website (University of Central Florida, n.d.) and general graduate school advice from careers websites. For example, Peterson’s emphasized that a strong statement of purpose or personal statement is essential for demonstrating research interests, experience, and fit for the program (Peterson’s, n.d.). The career experts concur that a strong statement of purpose or personal statement is important for demonstrating passion and fit for the program. Therefore, my resume and statement of purpose must express my motivation for this career path, the strengths I could contribute to the field, and the goals I hope to achieve through this degree. Through it, I can express how my family has shaped my choice for the career, among other earlier influences as well as offering the ability to highlight the major attributes that I can bring along in the same field I am applying. It as well provides the ability to outline my personal and key long-term goals, a philosophy that I believe in, and how volunteer and other extra curricula activities have influenced my decision to pursue the career.
Research also highlights the importance of statements regarding diversity, inclusion, social justice, and advocacy, which are core values of counseling programs. My statement should convey a commitment to these principles, along with providing culturally competent care and serving diverse groups, including racial/ethnic minorities, older adults, and those with disabilities. Publications, presentations, teaching experience, research interests, awards, honors, and affiliations with professional organizations such as the American Counseling Association can also strengthen an application.
Overall, to make a compelling case for admission to this master’s program, my graduate school resume should highlight any relevant experiences, relevant coursework, research interests, commitment to counseling values, and my purpose and goals. With a tailored and persuasive resume, I will be well-positioned to apply and argue for acceptance into UCF’s master’s program in marriage and family therapy. While the path to graduate school has yet to be made clear, crafting an impactful resume is an essential first step.
In summary, a graduate school resume should demonstrate passion, preparation, and potential for success in a master’s program. With a compelling resume, I will take one step closer to the career I hope to build as a marriage and family therapist. Ultimately, this process of exploring recommendations and crafting the most robust application possible has reaffirmed my motivation and dedication to this profession. I have gained insights into how to effectively convey my fit, qualifications, and career goals to schools evaluating my application.
Peterson’s (n.d.). Guide to graduate & professional schools. Retrieved from https://www.petersonspublishing.com/
The Balance Careers. (n.d.). How to write a strong graduate school resume. Retrieved from https://www.thebalancecareers.com/how-to-write-a-strong-graduate-school-resume-2063685
The University of Central Florida. (n.d.). Graduate admissions. Retrieved from https://www.ucf.edu/graduate-admissions