Louis Riel – One Of The Most Controversial Figures In Canadian History Writing Sample

Heroes and villains always contribute to all great stories. Louis Riel, one of the most controversial figures in Canadian history, is now argued as both a villain and a hero. He was hanged on November 16, 1885 for treason, but was he a real villain? Louis Riel is undoubtedly a national hero because he stood up for Metis rights, was responsible for the formation of Manitoba, and called attention to the Canadian Pacific Railway.

Some may see Louis Riel as a villain because of his initiatives taken against the government. Riel was the leader of two major rebellions.The first rebellion was the Red River Rebellion of 1869. There was a need for the rebellion when the Metis, people with half-native and half-European descent, have had enough of being taken advantage of.

Land speculators and surveyors at the time laid out square townships and disregarded the strip lots the settlers were used to have. Rupert’s Land was purchased without any consultations with the settlers in the area. The Metis called for Riel, who was the leader of the Metis in the prairies at the time. After unsuccessful deliberations, Riel commenced the rebellion at Fort Garry, where they seized munitions.

Riel created a provisional government in the area and tried to negotiate with the Canadian government as much as possible. To add to the adversity, Riel executed a person who went against his provisional government: Orange Lodge member Thomas Scott. When false news and rumors spread westward about Scott’s execution, Riel was recognized as a felon and was wanted for arrest. This particular event led the government to see Louis Riel as a national villain.

The second major rebellion that took place with Louis Riel as the leader was the Northwest Rebellion of 1885, which further aggravated the Canadian government.Leading up too the rebellion, the Metis were continued to be unjustly treated by the Canadian government. At the time, the Canadian Pacific Railway was being built, and costs were high. The government cut their budget from its Indian department, which meant that they didn’t live up to their side of the deal of the treaties they agreed on with the natives.

This action left many Metis dying from starvation. The Metis appealed to Riel, and he concluded that the predicament needed to end. In 1884, Riel returned to Canada from the United States on the pleas of his people.After realizing a harmonious resolution was impossible, he took up arms and prepared for the waves of soldiers from the Canadian government at Fort Carlton.

Louis Riel and his army of Metis didn’t fall easily—they held off the Canadian militia for some time before they were finally captured and defeated. Riel was arrested. From the government’s point of view, the end of the Northwest Rebellion had led them to capture one of the most offensive villains. Like every other hero, Riel had some things he has done that may have had people mistakenly identified him as a villain.

During Riel’s time, the 1880s, Riel wouldn’t have been seen as a powerful and influential man. Riel lived in Canada. The clash of culture between the French and the English certainly did bring up disputes over land claims, rank in society, and cultural elements. White Anglo-Saxon Protestants were present in the area.

Louis Riel was a Catholic French-Canadian in this community. Of course, the society wouldn’t regard him as a person of importance. However, Louis Riel eventually gained attention, especially that from the government.The attention wasn’t of admiration; instead, it raised awareness of Riel.

Louis Riel was seen as a threat to the Canadian government through his rebellions. On the other hand, Riel was pushed to act the way he did. Cordial negotiations were ineffective, and Riel was pushed by discrimination and racism to rebel. During the late 19th century, the Europeans and the natives lived in the same area, and shared the same land.

With their differences in cultures, disputes were inevitable. The Europeans took advantage of the native Metis group. One typical case of dispute would be over land.The English had sophisticated ways of giving title to property.

For instance, they ha ‘scrips’, which were pieces of paper that stated how much land you owned. The Metis were confused with the system, and most ended up being tricked or forced to sell and give up their land a low price, or at no cost at all to the Europeans. Another typical case of interaction would be between children. The Metis children would be sent to distant residential schools, where they would learn the basis of white culture, yet get treated in desolate conditions, where they were prone to abuse.

The deals seemed innocent, but the Europeans seldom lived up to their side of the deals. Gradually, the discontent feelings of the Metis built up, and an action needed to be taken. Louis Riel tried to negotiate with the government about the Metis’ situation, and that proved to fail. Although the rebellions may have struck Louis Riel as Canada’s national villain, all of his acts have benefited Canada in some way.

One thing that stands out about Louis Riel is that he was very passionate about preserving the Metis’ rights and culture. Undeniably, he was a true Metis leader.During the Red River Rebellion, he drew up the Metis List of Rights. Not only did he try to defend the Metis, but he also tried to defend the whole settlement under the control of the Canadian government.

In short, the List of Rights proposed that all people were to be treated equally, with equal rights to the services and aspects of society, including voting and elections, land purchases and claims, and cultural and language rights. When the List of Rights was exploited, Riel did not desist from further improving the conditions for the Metis.During the Northwest Rebellion of 1885, Louis Riel wrote up the Bill of Rights—this document further satisfied the woes of the Metis. This bill ensured, in detail, that the Metis were to have equal rights to land, a say in elections, access to their necessities, and the same standard living conditions as the whites.

Evidently, Louis Riel was a defender of Metis rights and the preserver of Metis culture. In addition to improving the lives of the Metis, Louis Riel was responsible for the formation of the province we now know as Manitoba.During the Red River rebellion, Riel formed the provisional government and wrote up the List of Rights to help the Metis. This list was later used to base the Manitoba Act—the reply from the government, an act adopted by the Parliament to settle disputes concerning the Metis.

The Manitoba Act, somewhat satisfying Metis injustice, proposed that the area of the Red River Colony was to become the province of Manitoba. This meant that roughly 1 400 000 acres in the area was to become Manitoba. The act didn’t do only that.The Manitoba Act made French and English the two official languages of the province and it gave the society two education systems: Protestant and Roman Catholic.

In addition, the act made sure the area had a responsible government, guarantee of land and property, and fair standings for the natives. In addition to being the protector of the Metis, Louis Riel was named ‘The Founding Father of Manitoba’. Also, Louis Riel called attention to the Canadian Pacific Railway. During the 19th century, the Canadian Pacific Railway was an immense project.

John A.Macdonald, together with the railway managers and investors, put in a lot of time, money and a lot of effort in the project in the hopes of connecting Canada from coast to coast with a transcontinental railway. However, the CPR was almost bankrupt in 1885, and it was yet to be finished. When Louis Riel broke out the Northwest Rebellion of 1885, this meant that troops needed to be transported quickly, preferably by rail.

Macdonald saw this as a perfect opportunity to finish up the railway. During the rebellion, Macdonald was able to send out troops in bigger proportions within 9 days instead of months.This gained attention from the public, and they viewed the money as a good investment instead of something that went to waste. The Canadian government proved that the Canadian Pacific Railway was a key element to stopping the rebellion.

The construction of the CPR continued even after the rebellion, and John A. Macdonald’s national dream was fulfilled. The railway led Canada to prosper, with many new, thriving businesses opening up As a consequence of Riel’s actions, the Canadian Pacific Railway was recognized as a crucial initiation.Undeniably, Louis Riel was a national hero, and he still is today.

Though he may have done some things that may have upset the government, all of his actions have contributed to building Canada up as a nation. It is still evident today. Canada has the province of Manitoba. Also, the Metis have been recognized, and have grown to be equal in the Canadian society.

The transcontinental Canadian Pacific Railway still runs today, thanks to Louis Riel. He is definitely one of Canada’s most important figure, and he is distinctly a hero.

Why I Want To Be An Army Officer

My motivation to become an Officer stems from two primary reasons. Firstly, I aim to have a positive influence on the training of Reserve Soldiers. Secondly, I thrive on challenges and firmly believe that taking on the position of an Officer would present me with a fresh and substantial challenge in which I am assured of my success.

Over the course of nearly a decade, I have been part of the United States Army Reserves and have gained extensive expertise as a 12N. In 2003, I was deployed to Iraq. One of the most fulfilling aspects of my role is training soldiers. Throughout my years of service, I have had valuable chances to both observe and participate in training and missions as an enlisted soldier.

As a Reserve Soldier, I have vivid memories of the struggles and obstacles encountered during missions. A mentor once advised me that the most effective approach to conquering these hardships is through advancing in rank, which has become my ultimate objective. Nevertheless, I must confess that I am not yet fully comprehending all the responsibilities entailed in becoming a Commissioned Officer.

As the person in charge of planning, I take full responsibility for the majority of tasks. With my teaching background and military experience as a soldier and Noncommissioned Officer, I possess the skills to improve the importance and worth of battle assemblies for all soldiers. I am personally aware of what soldiers find enjoyable and have many excellent ideas that will undoubtedly elevate morale in any unit where I serve. My dedication to serving in the United States Army is strongly ingrained, and I wholeheartedly uphold its values.

I take pleasure in acquiring new abilities and facing challenges. Becoming a Commissioned Officer would allow me to utilize my expertise and experience in the Army’s operations sector, ultimately benefiting the Army through my ambition and resolve. Embracing the opportunity of becoming a Commissioned Officer is a goal I aspire to achieve.

Josh Martin Case Study

According to Samson & Daft (2008), leadership is described as the capability to influence individuals in achieving organizational objectives.

In the domain of leadership, there are various ideas and writings that discuss its effectiveness. Three main factors affecting successful leadership are people, influences, and goals. In simple terms, leadership is using power to inspire individuals towards achieving desired outcomes and objectives (Samson & Daft, 2008). Effective leaders find a delicate balance between their traits/characteristics, behaviors, sources and use of power, and situational factors (Vojya, 2010). However, it should be noted that many factors contribute to achieving effective leadership (Ahmad, 2011).

Empathy, communication, respect, accountability, listening, attitude, integrity, and other qualities are vital for a leader. Empathy is crucial as it entails comprehending and connecting with the emotions, circumstances, and objectives of others. A leader should empathize with their team to foster a positive atmosphere. Sadly Saunders lacks empathy and respect towards his colleagues by not recognizing and appreciating their contributions, including Martin.

When Martin brings up the topic of raises with Saunders, Saunders dismisses the idea by saying, “Everyone here wants a raise. It’s about time people started putting in more effort and stopped complaining about money.” This also demonstrates poor communication skills, as Saunders doesn’t even attempt to resolve or explain his decision to Martin. In contrast, Martin is able to accomplish his tasks through his “participative” leadership style and earns the respect and appreciation of his teammates by actively listening and incorporating their ideas. One team member states, “Josh listens to us and tries to implement some of our ideas to make things easier around here.”

According to DeKlein & Penstone (1994), leadership is perceived as a combination of knowledge, values, skills, and behaviors. The contrasting leadership styles of Saunders and Martin result in opposing views within the work environment. While Saunders, in a position of authority, exhibits an autocratic style that creates a negative atmosphere and diminishes his likability and effectiveness, Martin’s style is different. Employees perceive Saunders as moody, inattentive, and lacking management skills.

Saunders’ leadership style is centered around his authority, which emphasizes on addressing mistakes only after they have happened, for example, he states “Martin doesn’t care about anything… I always have to ensure things are accomplished in this place.” This leadership approach proves ineffective for Saunders. On the contrary, Martin’s democratic leadership style encourages open discussion and idea-sharing among his team members. He attentively listens to the team and communicates their ideas on determining the most suitable action to take.

By employing this leadership style, Martin enables the team to develop a strong sense of belonging, while also making them feel heard and valued. He actively incorporates their ideas to simplify things for everyone (Samson & Daft, n.d.).

The book titled “Management” written by Vojya, M is the 3rd Asia Pacific edition published by Cengage Learning Australia in 2008.

(2010). Characteristics of the Effective Leader. Available at: http://www.targetyou.

com/Articles/LeadershipCharacteristics.pdf. Accessed: 12 May 2011.

Ahmad, S.

According to a source, there are five key qualities that make for effective leadership. The source can be found at the URL: http://ezinearticles.com/?5-Characteristics-of-Effective-Leadership&id=295616.

Accessed on 12 May 2011, Horton, H. W. (2009).

The webpage titled “Thirteen Traits of Effective Leaders” can be found at: http://www.au.af.

mil/au/awc/awcgate/au-24/horton.pdf. Accessed: 12 May 2011

error: Content is protected !!