According to Lawanda (2019), humans must have access to a wide range of natural resources to thrive. We cannot survive without clean air, fresh food, and pure water. Natural resources are required to build and heat dwellings. For us to live and flourish, we rely on them. Plants, fish, fungus, water, soil, and minerals are all examples of natural assets. Exhaustion risk is a popular approach to think about natural resources: do they recover, and if so, how quickly? Specific resources can be replenished fast, such as trees and plants, which are considered regenerative.
Growth and capital investment are typically attributed to the use of environmental assets. There was an increase in resource use due to industrialization. There have been various instances when resource extraction has exceeded the natural regeneration rate of the resource. Endangering the well-being of those who rely on these resources while also threatening the health of ecosystems is the ultimate goal of such overexploitation (James et al., 2021). It is clear that to protect natural resources and ecosystems, we must control how they are used, and one way this may be done is via fisheries collapses.
Natural capital (which includes stocks of environmental assets, territory, and habitats) is essential to economic operations, yet it is often underestimated and mishandled. This has a significant impact on the economy and society, slashing multiple digits off a country’s yearly GDP growth rate. Natural and physical capital cannot always be substituted, and the quality of natural capital might vary quickly, which creates bottlenecks that can slow expansion (Lawanda, 2019). Sustainable renewable resources are all about ensuring the long-term viability of the stock and quality of the resources and ensuring a consistent flow of resources for an indeterminate length of time. Countries that employ non-renewable resources may achieve long-term sustainability by investing the earnings earned from these resources in other types of capital.
Two fundamental elements determine the economic value of natural resources; present revenue flows and prospective future income flows. Natural capital reserves and strategic planning have a significant role in deciding which is more critical: production costs or market demand. The actual value of natural resources can only be appreciated if present and future revenue flows are considered (Svensson et al., 2018). As natural capital is depleted, the former may be a misleading estimate of how environmental issues will contribute to economic growth in time. Renewable and non-renewable resources can be managed responsibly to provide the groundwork for long-term economic growth and poverty reduction in nations with abundant natural resources.
Cultural beliefs of natural resources are becoming essential for local resource extraction protection and utilization in and outside of parks worldwide. As a result, people prefer to concentrate on the immediate consumption of natural resources rather than on their cultural significance and worth (Zaidi et al., 2019). Conservationists need to understand better the cultural values associated with natural assets (explicitly or implicitly exploited) to protect them better.
Nature-society interactions were represented by the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment’s definition of cultural ecosystem services as the recreational, aesthetic and spiritual advantages individuals get from ecosystems. However, it is plausible to assume that this element may be more relevant in circumstances where individuals have more time to appreciate a picturesque panorama or engage in nature-based activities such as hiking or fishing (James et al., 2021). Does this feature of nature-society ties matter to those who depend more on natural resources or ecosystem services to provide their livelihood? Ecosystem services that provide cultural ecosystem services—such as scenic beauty, biodiversity, and outdoor recreation space—were found to be very important for people in natural resource-dependent communities to their well-being, according to scientists and researchers who used qualitative and quantitative field research techniques to analyze how people in natural resource-dependent cultures regarded the values of various ecological systems.
Even though natural resources play an essential role economically and culturally, their utilization may lead to conflict. In many cases, community-based natural resource disputes go beyond the borders of a single area or country (Zaidi et al., 2019). Disputes over land usage might arise between local men and women, between groups fighting for ownership of woodlands, or between fishers arguing on the fishing gear they employ. Conflict may include federal agencies, local and multinational corporations, politicians and international development agencies, and non-governmental groups (NGOs) at the community level.
Disagreements may also occur at many levels of authority. Access to and control over the resources people rely on might be the most pressing problem. Alternatively, the disagreement might be over more fundamental concerns like acknowledgement, rights and identity or participation. Conflict may be as mild as misunderstandings over poorly articulated development programs or as severe as violent battles over natural resource possession, rights, and responsibility. Extracting, processing, and exploiting natural resources may generate environmental issues such as air, land, and water pollution, ecosystem disturbance or extinction, and biodiversity loss. Carbon dioxide, generated by the combustion of coal, oil, and natural gas (fossil fuels), is an important greenhouse gas that may cause a rise in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere may induce global climate change (a rise in the average global temperature near Earth’s surface), according to experts.
People ought to comprehend that over-exploitation of environmental assets adversely affects the health of ecosystems and the well-being of people in order to answer the question of whether or not to extract and consume the resource for the greater good or whether it is better to leave that resource in place, unchanged, and unused (Svensson et al., 2018). It is imperative to take action, such as ensuring that green public procurement is assured, encouraging technological innovation that promotes material recycling, and embracing judgement call procedures that incorporate and respect indigenous peoples and their cultures in the face of environmental crises.
In my reflection, I favour the usage of natural resources. We can have a healthy ecosystem by adequately managing natural resources. Resource recovery ensures sustainable resource usage and regeneration. Resource recovery conserves natural resources by recovering waste materials (including paper, glass, aluminium, and steel) and recycling them or utilizing them to generate energy. Companies are increasingly creating novel recycling solutions.
James, B., Teuber, S., Miera, J., Downey, S., Henkner, J., Knopf, T., … & Scholten, T. (2021). Soils, landscapes, and cultural concepts of favour and disfavour within complex adaptive systems and ResourceCultures: human-land interactions during the Holocene. Ecology and Society, 26(1).
Lawanda, I. I. (2019). The importance of information access of cultural values to the principles of sustainable development in climate change. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.
Svensson, G., Ferro, C., Høgevold, N., Padin, C., Varela, J. C. S., & Sarstedt, M. (2018). Framing the triple bottom line approach: Direct and mediation effects between economic, social and environmental elements. Journal of cleaner production, 197, 972-991.
Zaidi, S. A. H., Wei, Z., Gedikli, A., Zafar, M. W., Hou, F., & Iftikhar, Y. (2019). The impact of globalization, natural resources abundance, and human capital on financial development: Evidence from thirty-one OECD countries. Resources policy, 64, 101476.
Margaret Thatcher’s Biographical Story University Essay Example
Margaret Thatcher was the first female British Prime Minister and a leader of the Conservative Party. Thatcher’s administration lasted between 1979 and 1990. She remains the longest-serving British Prime Minister of the twentieth century. She established herself as a formidable statesman who was variously feared, respected, hated, and admired (Daddow et al., 2019). Margaret Thatcher is the only British Prime Minister who won three consecutive terms in the twentieth century. Her achievements made her the most renowned British leader after Sir Winston Churchill. Margaret Thatcher led the Conservative Party to a landslide victory in 1979 following a series of strikes in the Winter of Discontent. As the first female Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, representing the Conservative Party’s new vibrant right-wing, Thatcher advocated for removing excessive government interference in economic matters and the privatization of state-owned corporations. She equally advocated for the greater independence of citizens from the government. Margaret Thatcher inherited a weak economy from the previous regime but built it by eliminating excessive government regulations and subsidies. This paper provides Margaret Thatcher’s biographical story, how she became the first female British Prime Minister, whether her leadership style was good or bad, and lessons learned from her leadership.
Margaret Thatcher’s Biographical Story
Margaret Thatcher remains one of the most polarizing politicians in the history of the United Kingdom (Kelly, 2021). She was the daughter of Alfred Roberts, a grocer and Grantham mayor, and Beatrice Ethen Stephenson. She developed the desire to be a political leader early and honed it at Oxford University after being elected the first woman president of the Conservative Association of Oxford University. After graduating from the university in 1947, Thatcher worked as a researcher while studying law in her spare time. She practiced law from 1964, specializing in tax law. She got married to Denis Thatcher, a wealthy industrialist, in 1951. The couple was blessed with twins in 1953. Thatcher is remembered as a conviction politician with an insatiable appetite for hard work (Kelly, 2021). In her attempts to win an elective position on the Conservative Party ticket, the perception that a woman’s place is in the home caused Thatcher to lose to her opponent. However, politics held an overwhelming position in her heart. This enabled her to enter parliament in the 1959 general election under the Conservative Party.
Margaret Thatcher made her way rapidly after being elected to the House of Commons. In her first session, she won the right to introduce a private member’s bill and pursued it to become a law. In 1961, Thatcher began her career in government as a junior minister at the pensions and national insurance ministry. Before joining parliament, she was a skillful defender of policies, marshaling arguments with statistics. In some respects, Thatcher found her gender a political advantage. Initially, politics remained overwhelmingly a preserve of men. However, major political parties started to require at least one prominent woman to lead. This caused her to be the first female prime minister and the first woman to lead a major political party in the United Kingdom (Kelly, 2021). Thatcher was understood as the most talented Conservative woman in the commons who skillfully used her opportunities for the benefit of the majority as well as her political career development.
Margaret Thatcher served for three consecutive terms as the British Prime Minister, a unique achievement of the twentieth century. She was the longest-standing party leader and British prime minister in the twentieth century. She led the Conservative Party for nearly fifteen years and served as Prime Minister for eleven years between 1979 and 1990 (Kelly, 2021). As the British Prime Minister, she overturned several policies that had dominated the public life of the United Kingdom since the end of the Second World War. Equally, Thatcher moved economic policies to the right, helping the British government set in motion international trends of the 1980s. She also progressively slimmed the large state sector through privatization. The primary consideration in Thatcher’s economic policies was to reduce inflation that was threatening to move the British economy to the south.
Margaret Thatcher also influenced a culture shift that enabled businesses and entrepreneurs to receive high recognition and value. She reduced the power of trade unions through a protracted series of legislation, opening them up to civil actions. Over the eleven years of Thatcher’s administration, there were remarkable improvements in key economic sectors, influenced by the improved business environment. Consequently, Britain became a favored investment destination in Europe. However, not everything went as Thatcher had wished. Unemployment peaked, reaching more than three million in 1981, threatening her 1983 re-election bid. Her re-election was influenced by the development in foreign affairs. The Falklands War and the Argentine invasion dramatically altered the national mood, and Thatcher, as the war leader, impressed the electorate.
In the years that followed, Margaret Thatcher developed a close relationship with Ronald Reagan, the United States President 1980-1989. This placed her at the center of resolving the Cold War. As an experienced political leader, Margaret Thatcher played a critical role in creating a new era with the Soviet Union based on how she dealt with Mikhail Gorbachev. This was another potent opportunity that propelled her higher as a British political leader with impeccable anti-Soviet credentials. Thatcher played a critical role in the European-Soviet dialogue and pushed for a dialogue between Reagan and Gorbachev (Marsili, 2021). As a leader whose determination was to integrate the United Kingdom, Margaret Thatcher launched an open assault to the threats to her nation’s interest through her Bruges speech of 1988. In many ways, Thatcher’s achievements as the Conservative Party’s leader and the country’s longest-serving prime minister were exceptional. For instance, she introduced a dynamic leadership and governance style unfamiliar to many. She also achieved significant international standing and remains one of the most talked-about leaders on the planet.
How Margaret Thatcher Became Prime Minister
Margaret Thatcher developed an interest in political leadership while still young. She was elected as the leader of the Conservative Association while at the University of Oxford. She pursued her post-graduate studies in law and became a barrister specializing in tax law. She attempted to win an elective position in the politics of the United Kingdom but lost because of the perception that a woman’s place is at home. However, politics was deeply engraved in her DNA, and she never lost hope. She joined parliament through the Conservative Party in 1959 and went ahead to be a junior minister. Her luck came calling when major political parties sought influential women to take up leadership positions. As a result, Thatcher climbed the ladder rapidly to become the leader of the Conservative Party in the House of Commons.
In 1979, Thatcher led the Conservatives to a decisive electoral victory following a protracted series of strikes under James Callaghan’s administration. As the first female prime minister, Thatcher represented a new energetic right-wing of Conservative leaders opposed to the old ways of leadership. Thatcher led the Conservative Party for fifteen years and served as British Prime Minister for eleven years (Kelly, 2021). Thatcher’s position was rarely strong as the leader of opposition between 1975 and 1979. Consequently, she had no choice except to keep several of Heath’s closest allies in her cabinet. During her stint as the opposition’s leader, Thatcherism was defined provocatively as an antidote to the failure of the Labor government. However, following the many years’ stalemate on essential policies, fortune favored Thatcher between 1978 and 1979. Strikes damaged the credibility of the Labor government. This paved the way for Margaret Thatcher to win the elections and become the first female prime minister in the history of the United Kingdom.
Margaret Thatcher’s Leadership Style and Whether It Is Good or Bad
Margaret Thatcher was the first female Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and the first female leader of the Conservative Party. She is also one of the most controversial political figures in twentieth-century British political history (Kelly, 2021). Her leadership style made her acquire saint-like qualities and attracted the label of an egotistical narcissist political leader devoid of social conscience. Thatcher introduced a dynamic leadership and governance style that was unfamiliar to many. Thatcher was a political icon, whether loved or loathed (Kelly, 2021). She was a great leader kin on elevating the British image in international history while ensuring that the welfare of her nation remained at the forefront. As a result, she publicly attacked her distracters through the Bruges speech.
Thatcher’s dynamic leadership and governance style enabled her to be recognized as a formidable statesman who influenced the future direction of British-European economic policies. Her Bruges speech dramatically impacted the United Kingdom and European politics in several ways (Daddow et al., 2019). As the prime minister, Thatcher made significant changes that put the United Kingdom on an upward trajectory. For example, through her leadership style, she removed many government policies that were ineffective or outdated. No other British prime minister had focused on privatizing state-owned enterprises and limited government interference in business activities. Aware that she inherited a weak economy, Thatcher reduced governmental regulations to revive the ailing economy. More importantly, she worked with other world leaders such as Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev to end the Cold War between the United States and USSR.
It is undeniable that Margaret Thatcher’s leadership style was reasonable based on the many positive effects on the people she led. Thatcher realized the necessity and urgency of reviving the economy of the United Kingdom. Hence, through the Bruges address, she launched a Europe Open for Business campaign to increase business awareness (Smedley, 2021). Thatcher launched the Europe Open for Business campaign and highlighted the several opportunities the market would create. This was a milestone in the fight against employment. Elsewhere, through her leadership style, security remained the single most important public policy with regard to conflicts in Northern Ireland (Kelly, 2021). Thatcher was fixated on security matters in Northern Ireland but showed a remarkable capacity to adapt and modify her Northern Ireland policy. More importantly, Thatcher was concerned about international relationships and forged a close relationship with Reagan to resolve the Cold War.
Margaret Thatcher’s leadership attracted love and loathe in equal measure. Her leadership style is discredited for how she handled the Northern Ireland conflicts. As such, her legacy continues to cast a shadow (Kelly, 2021). She is remembered by many as a British Prime Minister who, through her war policy, subverted human rights, caused entrenched divisions, and undermined Northern Ireland’s constitutional integrity. Her attitude towards Northern Ireland is a powerful blend of reactionary policies and personal indifferences. Thatcher’s choice of policy and attitude towards Northern Ireland had severe damage that became apparent when she chose to go to war with Argentina (Rogstad, 2019). Her Northern Ireland legacy is associated with personal experiences of loss, violence, and hopelessness. Thus, one can easily conclude that Thatcher’s leadership style was not good because it subjected innocent people to suffering.
Lessons Learned From Margaret Thatcher
Margaret Thatcher arguably remains one of the most polarizing political leaders of the twentieth century United Kingdom. Her leadership style caused her to be loved and loathed in equal measures. Margaret Thatcher divided the opinion squarely down the middle. Her ruthlessness, strong belief, and personal responsibility defined her political career. Thatcher’s rise to fame followed a series of protracted strikes of 1978-1979. She remains one of the most talked-about political figures of the twentieth century. Be that as it may, everyone can learn several significant lessons from this iconic leader.
One of the most important lessons a person can learn from Margaret Thatcher’s leadership is conviction. Thatcher is remembered as a conviction politician with an insatiable appetite for hard work (Kelly, 2021). Many commentaries and political challenges Thatcher faced and decisions she made as the first female British Prime minister prove that she was a great leader who knew what she stood for. Thatcher removed ineffective policies that had dominated Britain since the end of the Second World War and privatized state-owned enterprises. Hence, present leaders equally need to be convicted of bringing about lasting changes in their countries.
Another important lesson to draw from Margaret Thatcher is the need for a strong personal political, and moral compass. Thatcher was surrounded by a team of highly experienced political leaders she could turn to whenever she needed direction. All leaders need to have a room full of powerful men and women to share views of critical policy issues and find the best way to execute them. Also, leaders need to build teams and set clear, well-articulated, and consistent principles that their team members can adapt and perfect in case they prove problematic. Everyone needs a moral compass to point in the right direction and an objective standard.
Daddow, O., Gifford, C., & Wellings, B. (2019). The battle of Bruges: Margaret Thatcher, the foreign office and the unraveling of British European policy. Political Research Exchange, 1(1), 1-24. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/2474736X.2019.1643681?needAccess=true
Kelly, S. (2021). Margaret Thatcher the Conservative Party and the Northern Ireland conflicts. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC: NY, United States.
Marsili, M. (2021). The fall of the Berlin Wall, the collapse of the USSR, and the end of Cold War: A chain of surprises ‘too big’ to be predicted. Political Reflection, 7(1). https://politicalreflectionmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/PR_Issue26_A5.pdf
Rogstad, M. (2019). Ten downing street and the Northern Irish problem 1968-1985: Do personalities matter? Norwegian University of Science and Technology: Faculty of Humanities Department of Historical Studies. https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2613057/no.ntnuinspera2263947.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Smedley, S. (2021). A Matter of public importance? The ‘Europe Open for Business’ campaign, British public opinion, and the single market. Journal of Common Market Studies, 59(4), pp. 929-944. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.13161
Marijuana Legalization: Why Marijuana Should Be Legitimized? University Essay Example
Cannabis should be legalized since the rising prevalence of medication marijuana concerns a socially acceptable way to alleviate signs of diseases like arthritis and an approach to mitigate the complexity(“Gallup politics”) of chemotherapy.
Marijuana is a plant possessing uses regarding medicinal and recreational drugs. Cannabis-established products originate from the scorched seeds, leaves, flowering tops, and stems of the Marijuana Sativa (hemp) shrub.
The purpose I promote cannabis legalization is for the medicinal properties it contains. However, I approach this topic from whatever I perceive are the sensible avenues of therapeutic goals, congested prisons, and misused government cash. Using reasonable correlation and statistics, a person can easily decide that, as alcohol was eventually rescued from the restrictions of banning, the war opposed to illegal drug utilization in the state has continued. At the same time, a review of research would show that the drug problem has risen dramatically. In reaction, the previous twenty years came to be marked by the expanding emphasis on stern drug strategies by the United States government and the criminal fairness system to remove or minimize the outbreak of illicit drug trafficking and use in American society. Additionally, the attempt to decriminalize drugs in America has been proposed by a few as an answer to the political ills and mounting social linked with drugs.
Economic reasons for legalizing marijuana – The advantages of legitimizing marijuana are evident as top states have proceeded to alter their legitimate arrangements. Overall, legitimate Cannabis can signify significant support to state wealth and large rallies for the state and federal administration and the state. United States law administration opposing the possession sale of weed is approximated to about $8 billion yearly in offender fairness resources. The current implementation is explained when it gives gains larger than substitutes like a regulated, legit market for Cannabis. Previous research indicates that present enforcement may hike nondrug offenses using hard drugs. Community property crime rates, nonmarijuana drug ownership, and homicide, with noncannabis drug ownership, are approximated as an economic conditions’ function, enforcement efficacy, and seizure for ownership or cannabis’ sale. Therefore, Cannabis can improve a state economically.
This study was a probability-established online survey in the United States, 2017 on The reaction toll was 55.3% (n = 9003). Around 14.6% of United.States. Grown-ups described utilizing weed in the previous year. About 81% of United.States. Grown-ups trust Cannabis has t 1 advantage, while 17% trust it doesn’t have benefit, therefore, should not be legalized.
Reasons as to why the state should legalize marijuana .The most common reason stated was pain management (66%s is where the medical benefits of marijuana come in as a reason why we should legalize cannabis-There are several chemical components within marijuana, most of which are cannabinoids. Cannabinoids are connected to giving relaxation of severe hurt because of the chemical composition. That is why weed’s by-product like medicinal marijuana is regularly used for intense pain relaxation. Followed by therapy of diseases, like multiple sclerosis and epilepsy (48%), Cannabis maintains diabetes– With its insulin impact, it is reasonable that marijuana can assist in preventing and regulating diabetes. The American Alliance for Medical Cannabis (AAMC) study has connected marijuana to maintain sugar levels, reduce blood pressure, and enhance blood circulation.
The significant medical advantage of weed is the connection to battling cancer. A reasonable proof indicates that marijuana can aid battle cancer or specific types. Weed relieves depression, stress, and anxiety (47%) – Depression is widespread without many people even understanding they got it. The endocannabinoid components in marijuana can assist in managing moods which ease depression. Another medical reason is; Mend bones – Cannabidiol is connected to helping cure broken bones and aiding the process. It also helps strengthen the bone in the healing process, proving it harder to crack after that. Cannabis dealswith arthritis linked to pain– now, marijuana is commonly established as balms and creams used by persons with arthritis. Both CBD and THC help the sick manage the pain. Marijuana cures inflaming bowel sickness– people with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis can get some relief through cannabis’ use. Cannabidiol and THC are recognized to boost immune reactions while linking with cells that play an essential role in gut functioning. Cannabis aids block off other compounds and bacteria that result in intestine inflammation.
Marijuana’s Impact on tax revenue is another reason the state should legalize it. Promising than anticipated trade of Cannabis at Washington and in Colorado through the many previous years have an outcome in hefty revenue taxes. In 2019, collection in Colorado was over $302 million on fees on recreational and medical marijuana and taxes. Sales within the country rose above $1.7 billion—78 selling in United States were $12.2 billion as of 2019 and estimated to grow at $31.1 billion through 2024. As data from BDS Analytics and ArcView Research Market states, community study supports the view the detail from the university state of Colorado – Cannabis Research Institute- Pueblo. Later, legit cannabis production devoted an extra $80.8 million through community economy during 2017, basically through other fees and taxes. Should weed be legitimate on the government extent, advantages to this economy can be unusual: A reveal from the cannabis analytics industry, new border proposes that nationally honest pot can cause an extra $105.6 billion on mass federal tax income by 2025. This is the allure before most countries. On 2019 December, from 2018 January, Cannabis of California sales had produced 411.3 million in tax for exercise, $98.9 million in tax for cultivation, and $335.1 million in tax for sales. The Massachusetts marijuana management Commission revealed in 2019 November, in the early year of beginning, cannabis retailers, $393.7 million was made in total trade.
Jobs and Income -putting on cannabis dispensaries and nurseries will be an early move for a government that signed in the proposal of Medical Cannabis. They will create job opportunities and set the ball moving for the venture in an economy in the casserole department in this place. In the state instances such as Nevada and California, where these frameworks already are, the productive effect is further mensurable as the area has grown.
Investment chances- Legit Cannabis provides the probability of immense advantages to productions on a national and local scale. Also, it can aid in safely maintaining the capitalization valise of capitalists all over the state and more afield. As weed remains illegitimate on the administration level, it is hard for capitalists to invest in the company’s expansion. The digit of Cannabis- related industries selling on general capital exchanges is microminiature, as capitalists have the choice of working by direct exchanges, most of the many successful enterprises in thefirst legitimate marijuana space have been established in Canada as well as other states.
Given the connections between common marijuana use and adverse outcomes among people, repercussion of the research are that there should be a consistent and strong message on the risks of cannabis use and a regular health sensitization centred on people that give clear data concerning the policies . however, parent-child discussions on cannabis legitimization might aid mitigate potential rise in people’s marijuana use; research indicates that caution is required to avoid highlighting disciplinary consequences and rules over different topics of talk, such as harm,benefits, and beliefs.
There is enough pushback opposed to the idea of legitimizing weed all over the states. Critics quote the possibility for confusion between law upholding officers purposing to maintain with changing rules. A concern on rising homelessness or people who use Cannabis, the possibility for reduced property morals, and more others are against to altering the regulatory position of Cannabis because this indicates a swap to the state of affairs. All of the many purposes connect to reduce the possibility that Cannabis be legitimate at astate level any moment. Nevertheless, as more countries change to personally decriminalize Cannabis utilized in several ways, as economic advantages of a legitimate weed company impact, there are so many captivating reasons to take to consideration for a countrywide legalization.therefore, with the reasons indicated above , marijuana should be made legal nationwide.
Swift, Art. “For first time, Americans favor legalizing marijuana.” Gallup Politics (2013): 2019-02.
Shepard, Edward M., and Paul R. Blackley. “The impact of marijuana law enforcement in an economic model of crime.” Journal of Drug Issues 37.2 (2007): 403-424.
Joy, Janet E., S. J. Watson, and J. A. Benson. “Marijuana and medicine.” Assessing the Science Base 1999 (1999).
Cohn, Amy M., et al. “Support for marijuana legalization and predictors of intentions to use marijuana more often in response to legalization among US young adults.” Substance use & misuse 52.2 (2017): 203-213.