Portrayal Of King Arthur Sample Assignment

King Arthur is a heroic British king who was responsible for preventing Saxon’s invasion into Britain in the late 5th and early 6th centuries, according to medieval romances and histories (Proctor, 2017). Arthur’s historical background is sparse and gleaned from various sources, including the writings of Gilda, the Historia Brittonum, and the Annales Cambriae, each presenting a different concept of him, his reign, and his army. Some of these sources portray him as a god-like hero who won many battles for Camelot. However, some describe him as not the hero he seemed to be but might have been a helpless and weak king. Due to this contradicting information and lack of enough evidence, it is impossible to narrate the actual history of king Arthur and determine if he was a great warrior or just a king occupying a throne.

People need to believe in legends even if there is little evidence to corroborate them, such as King Arthur. These legends can convey realistic lessons that may help guide people of all eras. Legends stories teach universal, timeless, and genuine (Farzana, 2016). This implies that although there is small pieces of evidence to back up the tales, the lessons that can and are gained from the actions of legends such as King Arthur prove to be of so much value in in different situations and eras. Despite Arthur’s short-lived leadership, he archived many accomplishments which seemed impossible. The Saxons had invaded Camelot, but through his leadership, they were routed. He also conquered the Scots and Irish, among others. His bravely is also seen when he defeated and killed 960 of his enemies through a single charge. These accomplishments were indeed impossible, and by achieving them, Arthur set an excellent example to his subjects and today’s modern society. Although the story may not be true, his achievement motivates individuals faced with challenges to preserver and be brave. It gives them hope of overcoming their daily challenges. Legendary stories like this are inspiring, and thus they should not be dismissed even if they are uncredible. The moral lessons present in them may be useful in shaping the lives of those reading it and society in general. Although King Arthur died ages ago, his accomplishments are still known to date and contributed a lot in shaping England into the noble country it is today. The legend is part of England’s history and culture, and thus it is a crucial part of its society (Proctor, 2017). Due to this, people should focus not only on the contradictions or unpredictability of a legend but also on what theme is being portrayed through it. Readers should be open-minded when reading legends and be keen to understand their deeper meaning and use their understanding to contribute to society and make it a better place.

Therefore, people need to believe in legends like king Arthur even if the evidence supporting them is contestable and scarce. This is because these legends can teach realistic lessons helpful in guiding people from different generations. As seen in king Arthur’s story and achievements, legends instill universal, timeless, and genuine lessons. They inspire people struggling in their lives. Legends help shape society, and thus, they are important and should not be dismissed.

Reference

Farzana U, F. (2016). LITERARY QUEST An Analysis of Select Adaptations of the Legend of King Arthur: The Fact behind Fictionalized Biographies [Ebook]. Sri S.Ramasamy Naidu Memorial College. Retrieved 14 February 2022, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313227692_LITERARY_QUEST_An_Analysis_of_Select_Adaptations_of_the_Legend_of_King_Arthur_The_Fact_behind_Fictionalized_Biographies

Proctor, E. (2017). The Legendary King: How the Figure of King Arthur Shaped a National Identity and the Field of Archaeology in Britain. DigitalCommons@UMaine. Retrieved 14 February 2022, from https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors/268/.

Positive Effects Of Colonialism In Africa Free Essay

The term “colonialism” refers to the act of gaining governmental control over another nation, whether fully or partially, by settling there and exploiting its economy. When a nation extends and maintains its dominance over the other population or area, it is called colonialism. During the nineteenth century, major powers like the United Kingdom and Germany held control over countries in the Third World.

The improvement of one’s physical and intellectual well-being. Individuals who were colonised by colonial regimes gained access to advanced education and health treatment, which had a good impact on their lives(Matasci et al., n.d.). Most governments concentrated on low-level public service jobs. It was the missionaries’ primary goal to educate the people of colonized Africa. Most post-colonial leaders were educated in colonial administration and missionary institutions, despite the fact that less than half of the children for most territories went to school. Through the use of immunizations and other methods of disease prevention, early colonizers significantly lowered infant mortality.

Politics of discord Until the conquering powers established centralized governments, these governments were non-existent (Colonial Government, n.d.). It was the colonists that drew the political boundaries instead of considering the territorial divisions that existed at the time. Obliged to work together, several ethnic groups that had never functioned together have been forced to do so.. As a result of political boundaries dividing some traditional domains, links between extended families as well as kinsmen were severed.

Colonization by Europeans also brought farming techniques that were more technologically advanced. It wasn’t until the industrialization age that large-scale farming was introduced to the third world that most farming methods were local. More over a quarter of the GDP in most African countries came from agriculture in 2004, according to the World Bank. Africa’s staple foods include maize, millet, sorghum, cassava, and bananas. Coffee, horticulture ventures, tea, and fruits & vegetables are the most commonly exported goods. The colonialists introduced these products to the country, which fostered large-scale cultivation. The farms also provided work for Africans, enhancing their economic well-being in the process.

The European colonizers, however, brought a strong influence on religion on the continent. Religion changed greatly how people lived with each other(Facing History and Ourselves, 2000). It also changed their norms, values, and also their morals. Religion taught society the difference between what is right and what is wrong and this affected the decisions that everyone made in the community. After the introduction of religion, the Europeans established religious institutions such as schools and hospitals which brought a lot of influence in the society. The dominant religious groups had the power to influence the laws and punish those who did wrong in society.

Among the most important contributions of the Europeans was education. Educated Africans were able to better their own country by learning and developing new abilities. Education also given Africans the ability to improve their situation by themselves. Kwame Nkrumah, for example, graduated from the University of Pennsylvania and then set out to free Ghana from colonial rule after returning home. Africans gained a variety of abilities as a result of their education, including the ability to develop their own jobs and to compete on the global market.

The European masters’ language was absorbed by the Africans, and this contributed much to the formation of national unity. In Nigeria, for example, there are over 500 different languages. A lack of cohesiveness resulted from each tribe’s belief that their own language was superior. Colonialism in Nigeria led to the adoption of English as a common language throughout the country’s various ethnic groups. Specifically, the economy of a nation begins by unifying its residents, allowing them to work together to build their country. That’s why African nations were able to communicate with each other and develop their nation thanks to the adoption of one common language by colonists.

General modernization and technological improvement were more important contributions of the colonial overlords. The colonisation of Africa had a significant impact on the development of previously undeveloped regions. Ineffective farming methods were replaced with more efficient ones as an example. African countries have benefited greatly from modern healthcare technology, which has reduced mortality rates. Sophisticated railways and roads have been built throughout Africa as a result of colonization.

In conclusion, there is no doubt that colonization played a very important role in bringing development to the African nations. As a result of colonialism, education was established in many African countries which played a major role in developing the African continent. It has also enhanced unity among various tribes and nations enabling them to work together in building their countries and the whole continent at large.

References

Colonial Government – an overview | ScienceDirect Topics. (n.d.). Www.sciencedirect.com. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/colonial-government

Facing History and Ourselves. (2000). Religion in colonial america: Trends, regulations, and beliefs. Facing History and Ourselves. https://www.facinghistory.org/nobigotry/religion-colonial-america-trends-regulations-and-beliefs

Matasci, D., Bandeira, M., Hugo, J., & Dores, G. (n.d.). Education and Development in Colonial and Postcolonial Africa. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/31bff8ef-d42b-4ebd-aee0-ff03fd0a438b/1007147.pdf

STATE OF THE WORLD’S FORESTS. (2016). https://www.fao.org/3/i5588e/i5588e.pdf

The PPACA Legislation And Healthcare Delivery Essay Example

The PPACA legislation, also fondly known as Obamacare, expanded healthcare coverage. It raised the number of people covered by insurance and introduced restrictions on insurance companies in their service delivery. This legislation was one of the biggest campaign promises by President Obama. He promised to ensure more people were insured to increase access to healthcare. The legislation covered an additional twenty to twenty-four million previously uninsured people.[1]. The Act was primarily impactful in the respective insurance field. Some of the changes that the Act brought about include:

Insurance regulations for personal covers. Insurance companies had free reign before parliament passed the Act. They were allowed to limit coverage for whatever reason and even refused to cover specific conditions. The Act came to cure this lacuna for insurance targeted towards families and individuals. The Act prohibited companies from refusing to insure individuals with preexisting conditions. insurance companies could define them as anything and excuse themselves from paying. These conditions meant that many people could not access coverage because the companies wanted to pay as little as possible. Many people with preexisting conditions were forced into debt or forewent medical care because they could not afford it.

The Act also provided preventative care for women. [2] For a long time, women have been uninsured or left out of insurance policies because of gender. It was challenging to get routine care to prevent future long-term illnesses. Some of these care includes cancer screenings, pap smears, birth control and sterilization for women who wanted to, and mammograms that would detect cancer earlier. Prevention is essential to all women’s care, but insurance denies it. This provision is unreasonable because preventing these illnesses would cost the companies less later, but they did not want to cover women’s health.

These provisions, among others, were a game-changer for most insured individuals. The Act expanded the scope of insurance and who it covers. To ensure that they were fully covered. Growing insurance was a positive first step for the individuals who would receive value for their insurance. However, the Act did not solve the main problem of healthcare for all. These provisions offered protection only to individuals who had the means to insure themselves. Healthcare is a systematic issue that should be handled publicly, like roads and libraries.

For the government to put the burden of healthcare on private companies is dangerous onto itself. Healthcare is crucial, and it should not depend on private actors’ hands. All people deserve healthcare no matter how much money they have. Individuals should be able to walk into a hospital to receive medical care without worrying about going into debt or being denied service. Healthcare is a fundamental human right, and its access should not be proportional to the number of finances a person has. Systematic issues should be handled systematically and allocated funds to provide healthcare for all.

The Act also had an individual requirement that all people be insured or face a penalty.[3] All eligible individuals were to register for insurance to spread the risk. Insurance works because they pool risk and share the burden among many individuals. This provision tries to cure the restrictions placed on the insurers. If many people can have coverage by insurance, it will spread the risk, and those who tend to get sick easily can be appropriately insured. Increasing insured individuals is a good initiative, and it takes to consider the companies. However, this is still delegating a systematic issue to individuals. Some individuals cannot afford to be covered, while others are straight-up left out like illegal immigrants. Healthcare is a right and not a preserve of citizens and legal immigrants. As suggested above, the government could quickly solve this problem by free healthcare.

The Act also expanded Medicaid. This insurance program is available for people living below the poverty line who cannot afford insurance. All adults who came up to one hundred and thirty-three percent of the poverty line would receive coverage by Medicaid.[4] expanding Medicaid is an outstanding initiative for people living below the poverty line. It ensures that they are covered, and they can access healthcare. This provision is a double-edged sword. It covers healthcare for only people living below the poverty line but forgets the average individuals who cannot afford insurance. It is vital to remember that most people are one paycheck away from poverty. Thus covering only the impoverished people still leaves another vulnerable group needing coverage and insurance.

Congress enacted the Act in a good spirit, but it has a couple of blind spots, failing to overhaul the system. The problem with the healthcare system is not that people are not insured, but there is a need for insurance in the first place. The Act wants to increase the scope of insured persons instead of providing healthcare to everyone. The Act would be more in tune with reality it took into consideration the problems that healthcare workers face. The first step would be solving the barriers to accessing health as a whole, not merely increasing people who are not barred.

Hospitals need more equipment and more personnel. The first step is to reduce bars to entering the medical field. The expensive tuition and the long process are not feasible for many who lack an income to support them before they graduate. Medical education should be accessible and even free to increase the number of professionals who can attend to patients. Increasing the number of personnel would reduce the hospital’s long lines and atrocious wait times. Hospitals also need funding and updated machinery to take care of their patients. Funding will enable hospitals to hire more doctors, and machinery would ensure that the patients offer modern and excellent care.

The Act was an excellent first step for healthcare for all, but it did not make the healthcare system better. The Act primarily focuses on individual efforts instead of overhauling the system as a whole. Many improvements the government can make include all the stakeholders in the industry. This Act saw many doctors go to private practice and some public hospitals closed because they could not handle the volume after the Act. The quality of patient care also went down because the same doctors are with more patients without improving their situation. It is crucial to look at all angles when overhauling healthcare. The Act was a good initiative, but it is only a first step. There needs to be a complete and systematic change to make healthcare better.

References

Health insurance coverage and the affordable care Act, 2010 -2016, U.S department of health and human services. PPACA, 273, (a) (4)

Minimum coverage provision (individual mandate) American public health association (APHA)

Medicaid expansion, American public health association

[1] Health insurance coverage and the affordable care Act, 2010 -2016, U.S department of health and human services.

[2] PPACA, 273,(a)(4)

[3] Minimum coverage provision (individual mandate) American public health association(APHA)

[4] Medicaid expansion, American public health association(APHA)