Completed the first three chapters they were pretty fast actually the story sounds interesting but I’m not having the same excitement that I had when read Lord of the Flies, but I will just keep reading to see what happens. Was actually super excited to meet Mr. Bentleys family. I found it pretty funny how everyone hates Mr. Dairy. I just want to know who Mr. Dairy is like how is he related to the family? And also predict that Mr. Bindle and Jane are probably going to fall in love and start dating.
Chapters 4-6: Just like predicted Jane is slowly falling for Mr. Bindle but it looks like he doesn’t realize it. I kind of understood that when Charlotte told Elizabeth this quote “Remember, Elise that he does not know Cane’s disposition as you do” I honestly think that there is no need to tell him he will just know that she loves him. I think that Elizabeth should give Mr. Dairy a chance and not to judge him. I predict Mr. . Bindle is going to know that Jane really loves him. Chapters 7-9: really liked this quote from Mrs.
Bennett about “with the greatest patience in the world, which is always the way with her, for she has, without exception, the sweetest temper ever met with. I often tell my other girls they are nothing to her. ” Just shows you how highly her mother thinks of her. I felt sort of sad for Mrs. Bennett she kind of made a fool out of herself in front of the Bentleys. Chapters 10-12: Just like any book that improves and gets better the more you read of it, its the same case for this book the story is just getting better and better.
I really liked this quote by Mr. Dairy “It is a rule with me that a person who can write a long letter with ease cannot write ill. ” I think what it means is that people with a free mind can write words easily, and I think that is very true when you are tresses, sick, or worried you will always have difficulty writing. I also figured out a trait about Caroline and that is reading books “l declare after all there is no enjoyment like reading! How much sooner one tires of anything than of a book! Chapters 13-15: Not much was going on in these chapters we just got introduced to a new character called Mr. Collins, I don’t really like him and I think he’s really mean. This quote by him was a little interesting “I have often observed how little young ladies are interested by books of a serious stamp, though written solely for their benefit. ” I predict that Mr. Collins will eventually leave the Bennett alone hopefully. Chapters 16-18: We got introduced to Mr. Hickman. I honestly think that he’s lying about the stuff he’s saying as soon as he started talking about Mr.
Dairy I kind of sensed that he’s a liar we will just have to wait and see. Here is a quote he said about Mr. Dairy “The world is blinded by his fortune and consequence, or frightened by his high and imposing manners, and sees him only as he chooses to be seen. ” Like know the stuff he’s saying is true, but wonder if this guy is lying or not. I predict that Mr. Hickman will eventually get caught. And Is Elizabeth going to like Mr. Dairy even after what Mr. Hickman said? Chapters 19-21 was really shocked to see how persistent Mr.
Collins was I mean obviously Elizabeth doesn’t like him and will never ever marry him I don’t understand why he keeps on insisting. Do predict that Mr. Collins will end up doing something really hurtful or mean to the Bennett family if Elizabeth doesn’t marry him, we will just have to wait and see. Also am wondering what will Mr. Bindle do after they move and will he actually marry Jane? Chapters 22-27: Reading these chapters was a little weird which was why decided to just pep reading, lots of things happened super fast.
But it turns out that my prediction about Mr. Collins was wrong it was really weird how he just ended up proposing to Charlotte and giving up on Elizabeth since the first time he sounded so persistent it didn’t make any sense, I also felt pretty sad for Jane but I do predict that there is an explanation on why Mr. Bindle left, and they might even meet and possibly get married again. Also wonder if Mr. Collins will kick the Bennett after Mr. Bennett dies I’m just getting more excited about the book.
Chapters 28-33: What am noticing in the relationship between Elizabeth and Dairy is that they both sort of like each other but also hate each other at the same time, it will be clear as the story progresses. I also liked this quote by Elizabeth “You mean to frighten me, Mr. Dairy, by coming in all this state to hear me? But I will not be alarmed though your sister does play so well. There is a stubbornness about me that never can bear to be frightened at the will of others.
My courage always rises with every attempt to intimidate me. ” she literally lists all the characteristics that she has. Now my only question would e is that how will Elizabeth confront Mr. Dairy on why he provoked Mr. Benignly against Jane? And if she will even confront him at the first place. Chap terse 34-36: feel pretty bad for Mr. Dairy, which wasn’t the same feeling at the begging of the story, the way Elizabeth confronted him was really bad, and obviously she has made a mistake and now she’s regretting it.
This is going to be a long quote but think it’s worth it “From the very beginning ? from the first moment, I may almost say ? of my acquaintance with you, your manners, impressing me with the fullest belief of your arrogance, your conceit, and our selfish disdain of the feelings of others, were such as to form that groundwork of disapprobation on which succeeding events have built so immovTABLE a dislike; and had not known you a month before I felt that you were the last man in the world whom I could ever be prevailed on to marry. Chapters 37-42: These past chapters weren’t very exciting. But I noticed a thing about Elizabeth and her sister and that is even though they are both sad and depressed they also are hopeful at the same time. I really hate this quote by Elizabeth “l, who have prided myself on my discernment! I, who have valued yeses on my abilities! Who have often disdained the generous candor of my sister, and gratified my vanity in useless or blamTABLE distrust. ” Like it’s really irritating to see her judge Mr.
Dairy like that from the begging of the story and now she regrets it all.. I predict that she will apologize sooner or later and they might even eventually get married we will have to wait and see. Chapters 43-48: am feeling pretty happy for Elizabeth looks like things are getting better and like I predicated her relationship with Mr. Dairy is stronger. I really hate this quote by her mother “And now here’s Mr. Bennett gone away, and I know he will fight Hickman, wherever he meets him; and then he will be killed, and what is to become of us all?
The Collisions will turn us out before he is cold in his grave, and if you are not kind to us, brother, I do not know what we shall do. ” Like the fact that she just says he will die and they will lose the house without even caring about her husband just makes me real mad. Predict that they will find Lydia for the next chapters and I also want to know if Mr. Dairy will still be interested in Elizabeth after the whole Lydia and Hickman situation. Chapters 49-57 Just like predicted Mr.
Bennett did find both, and man I feel pretty irritated how they had to pay Hickman just to marry Lydia.. I kind of felt lost when Lady Catherine told Elizabeth this “A report of a most alarming nature reached me two days ago. Was told that not only your sister was on the point of being most advantageously married, but that you, that Miss Elizabeth Bennett, would in all likelihood be soon afterwards united to my nephew ? my own nephew ? Mr. Dairy. ” Like what is she trying to tell Elizabeth that sings lucky that Mr. Dairy likes her or is telling her to back off?
I predict that Mr. Dairy will actually marry Elizabeth just like I predicted about Mr. Benignly I will finish the book tomorrow can’t wait.. Chapters 58-61 : definitely expected what was going to happen through this book and from the first chapter that read I just predicted that Elizabeth is going to eventually get married with Mr. Dairy and her sister will eventually get married with Mr. Benignly, even though this was a long book I still enjoyed it a lot. Started off a little slow but got matter the more I read of it. But I still enjoyed Lord of the Flies better.
Strategic Analysis Of Ford Motors Company
Company Profile Ford Motor Company was founded in 1903 by automotive and industrial pioneer Henry Ford in Dearborn, Michigan. Being first to implement a moving assembly line for automotive manufacturing, Ford was able to more efficiently mass produce their products than their competitors. In 1908 the Model T was introduced and went on to sell over 15 million vehicles, firmly establishing Ford as the major player in the early automotive industry with 50% market share by the 1920s. The company went public 1956 and since then has grown to be a significant presence in the global automotive market.
Financial ratios are useful indicators of a firm’s performance and financial situation (Friedlob & Schleifer, 2003). Ratios can be used to analyze trends and to compare a firm’s financials to other firms. Although there is an abundant amount of ratios, we will only be looking at the ones that are most important when analyzing Ford Motors activities and results for the last 3years. Profitability Ratios Based on the results(See Appendix 1), the recession has really taken its toll on Ford motors.
The general decline in nits profitability ratios suggest that the company has not been performing well in recent times. In actual fact, the company’s financial conditions began to decline since 2005 which was even before the recession. The negative earnings per share (EPS), profit margin, return on assets raises an alarm. The low profitability is also responsible for the low fixed and total assets turnover ratios. Return on equity however shows a slight improvement which can also be a result of the recent re-engineering process by the company. Liquidity Ratios
The company’s Current ratio is low but not alarming (see financial statement in Appendix 1), the general expectation is for current assets to cover current liabilities at company’s quick ratio of 1. 26 is quite good as it suggests that the company will be able to meet its urgent current liabilities as they fall due even without having to dispose of inventories. Inventory turnover appears to have been steady within the same range over the last 5 years and receivables turnover poses no problem. The company is relatively liquid despite its low profitability Solvency Ratios
The company’s low profitability(See Apendix 1) also poses a problem in the Times interest earned as there is a possibility that the company might not be able to generate enough profits to meet up with repayment of interests on loans. This could be an issue as failure to repay interest and/or capital leaves the company vulnerable to bankruptcy procedure by its creditors. The trend over the last 3 years also shows a serious decline in some years. The company also appears to be highly geared from the other solvency ratios and this goes further to confirm initial worries.
The company needs to address its profitability problems urgently so as to remain competitive and achieve meaningful growth in the immediate future. This will require a lot and some of the ways I have identified are explained below: Operating expenses and other expenses are on the high side and there is need to try and achieve a reduction to improve profitability. The company should conduct an intensive process audit to identify and eradicate unnecessary processes. This will help to reduce labour hour and eliminate wastage during production.
Managing Operational Management in the Global Market Business today operates in a global environment (Agarwal, 2004). This environment forces companies, regardless of location or primary market base, are now expected to consider the rest of the world in their competitive strategy analysis. Porter (1986) also asserted that firms cannot isolate themselves from or ignore external factors such as economic trends, competitive situations or technology innovation in other countries, especially if some of their competitors are competing or are located in those countries.
Global organizations face a complex set of challenges characterized by diversity both inside and outside the organization (Maznevski et al, 2007; p2). Prior to the economic crisis of 2007, Ford has become one of the most globalized of the automakers with research and design facilities as well as manufacturers and marketing operations around the world (Albaum et al, 2004;p). With its advantages in low costing, high volume, and availability of parts for service, it was able to rapidly expand its market (Leontiades 2000; p22-23). External Environment Challenges
Economic Environment Doole and Lowe (2008) emphasizes how important it is for Global managers to understand the economic development in countries where it wants to expand to and how they impact on the overall strategy of the Firm (Doole &Lowe, 2008;pp 12-13). This knowledge is important at a world level in terms of the world trading infrastructure such as world institutions and trade agreements developed to foster international trade, at a regional level in terms of regional trade integration and at a country/market level (Doole &Lowe, 2008; pp 12-13). ) Technological Challenges A peculiar trend which was prevalent in the last decade, besides globalization, was a limited number of producers which emerged due to diversity among products and uniformity across national markets (Agarwal, 2004). Amid global conditions that amount to an economic and industry crisis, the world’s auto-makers still consider innovation and technology to be the most important trend over the next five years.
Fuel efficiency improvements, alternative fuel technologies and environmental pressures are considered the three most influential trends that managers needs to focus on to combat operational challenges (Kpmg Global Auto Executive Survey, 2009; p27-28) d) Political and Macroeconomics Challenges According to Stuger-Noguez (2002), political uncertainties include all possible changes in economic policies in either side of the border. Agarwal (2004) explains how getting hit with unexpected or unreasonable currency devaluations in the foreign countries in which they operate is a nightmare for global operations managers.
Managing exposure to changes in nominal and real exchange rates is a task which the global operations manager must master. Doole & Lowe (2008) affirmed that politics is intrinsically linked to a government’s attitude to business and the freedom within which it allows firms to operate. Doole & Lowe noted that unstable political regimes exposes foreign businesses to a variety of risks that they would generally not face in the home market therefore posing sometimes difficult challenges. Going Global In a recent paper (Alexander & Korine, 2008) asserts that economic lobalization has come to be viewed by some as the best hope for world stability, and others as the greatest threat. Columbus (2003) also maintained that “economic globalization has become an unavoidable reality which all companies must accept”. Alexander & Korine(2008) found that going global is a trend that almost everyone acknowledges that businesses of all types must embrace yet, even as companies are being told that the future lies in globalization, some are still severely punished for their international moves.
Gluckler (2005) also contended that globalization has gone from the purview of the largest multinationals to an imperative for mid-size and even small companies. For many, going global is not a future growth strategy, but rather a near-term survival mechanism . Companies today operate in a very competitive global marketplace. Relentless cost pressure combined with a flood of new market entrants, lowered trade barriers, and stagnant or overcrowded home markets have forced companies of all sizes to push the global envelope (Gluckler, 2005).
But as Spulber (2007) stated the question for companies is not whether to tap the global market but when? Spulber claims that the global market is not just about a matter of challenging competition, but global markets representing a wide array of opportunities (2007:4). Whilst another researcher Giddens (2000) cited in Blossfeld(2007) found that for companies enjoying local successes, going global is a tough call with tremendous pressure to join the first-to-market frenzy and dive into all the interesting technical infrastructure that goes with a full globalization initiative.
A report by Deloitte (2005), also agrees that it is sometimes the smaller companies and suppliers that often face the daunting prospect of “go global or go away. ” The review claimed that the extended global enterprise requires new ways of structuring and managing operations. Successful global deployment can lead to significant rewards, but achieving them also involves grappling with unfamiliar risks (Deloitte, 2005). Ford’s decision to open foreign operations was driven by several factors.
Ford’s marketing-seeking strategy in foreign locations was as a result of the company’s goal to expand sales, which it derived from the mass production rationale ( Studer-Noguez,2002, p50). Ford also preferred exporting cars and parts from the parent company to foreign markets to manufacturing abroad, so as to avoid such investment risks as political changes, different work cultures, and currency adjustments. Ford was also willing to open small assembly plants, as they did not have major cost disadvantages owing to the labour-intensive character of assembly (Doz ,1980:75).
Wilkins & Hill (1964:361) cited in Studer-Noguez(2002) explained that Ford’s risk minimizing strategy provided access to markets without having to incur and huge financial costs and risks from establishing manufacturing operations unless a significant demand for their vehicles was guaranteed. After establishing operations in different countries, Ford uses first-mover, location, internalization, and knowledge advantages there to compete with its rival automakers (Wilkins&Hill: 1964).
STAKEHOLDER OR SHAREHOLDERS? Due to the effects of Globalization, there has been an increased need for firms to incorporate the concerns and needs of stakeholder groups within the organization’s strategic outlook or otherwise risk losing societal legitimacy (Werther&Chandler, 2006; pp25-54). Although recognizing that profits are necessary for any business to survive, it is also important to note that for profit organizations are only able to obtain those profits because of the society(Kotler &Lee,2005,p).
According to the KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2005, there has been a dramatic change in the type of Corporate responsibility (CR) reporting, which has changed from purely environmental reporting up until 1999, to sustainability reporting(social, environmental & economic), and which has now become mainstream among large companies. Werther & Chandler (2006) defines Corporate Social Responsibility as the “activities undertaken by businesses that enhance their value in the community and society and thus benefit their reputation and brand”.
While, Hopkins (2001) views CSR as “concern with treating the stakeholders of the firm ethically or in a responsible manner ‘Ethically or responsible’ means treating stakeholders in a manner deemed acceptable” (p. 17). A commonly invoked justification of CSR is in the idea of multiple stakeholders: employees, suppliers, creditors, consumers, and regulatory authorities in corporations of which shareholders form only one group (Werther & Chandler, 2006,p26). Such opinions, however, contradict the traditional view of the orporation as a vehicle to create value for shareholders (Friedman, 1970). This view implies that corporate managers’ fiduciary duty is solely to further the interests of shareholders – under the assumption that other stakeholders’ interests are taken care of and protected by laws and regulations with which companies have to comply in their pursuit of profit(Vogel,2005; p13). Burdening companies with other objectives beyond profit maximization within confines of the law would adversely affect their efficiency and thus diminish social welfare – hence the famous dictum of Polishchuk 2009) L.
Corporate Social Responsibility vs. Government Regulation: Institutional Analysis with an Application to Russia. 2009. LIA Working Paper Series, WP10/2009/01, 24 p. Milton Friedman (1970) that “the social responsibility of business is to increase its profits”. Modern interpretations of CSR reconciles these seemingly contradictory positions by concluding that socially responsible behaviour is in companies’ ultimate self-interest – it allows corporations “to do well by doing good”(Kotler & Lee, 2005;p 1-2). This could be of two types.
The first, known as “free lunch” is a direct “coincidence of wants”, when actions that companies take in pursuit of their immediate business objectives cause positive externalities and thus just happen to be in other stakeholders’ interests as well (Polishchuk, 2009). However, Consumers are more knowledgeable today about climate change, in due time that the concept of sustainability will unite concepts such as social good and environmental stewardship with the goal of financial gain (Estes,2009 ;p15) Reconciling the Stakeholder and Shareholder Needs The recent past has reinforced two fundamental beliefs.
The first is that the business of business is precisely to maximize its shareholder value by increasing its intrinsic value. The second is that maximizing value involves managing both performance in the short term and the company’s long-term health (Dobbs, 2005). The more shareholder value a company creates in an effectively regulated market, the better the company serves all its stakeholders (Dobbs 2005). He further argued that the wider stakeholder benefits of managing for long-term-value creation: the companies that created the most shareholder value over the past 15 years also created the ost employment and invested the most in R (Dobbs 2005). Ford Motor has long held the view that to be successful it also needs to be environmentally and socially responsible (Sustainability Report, 2009). This vision of sustainability was further emphasised by Bill Ford in 2005. Mr Ford identified that sustainability was going to be a long term strategic priority and there was a clear business case for reducing resource use and developing innovative “green” and safer products and technologies. Ford’s approach to corporate social responsibility (CSR) was first communicated in its inaugural corporate citizenship report in 1999 .
In the report, Ford started to explore the issue of transparency, accountability and sustainable development. Since then Ford has recognised that corporate citizenship was becoming more associated with the narrower focus of philanthropy and not the business issue of sustainability. Ford now has adopted a more integrated approach to CSR and renamed its CSR 2004/05 report “Our Route to Sustainability”. As William Ford (2009) stated in Ford’s Corporate Sustainability Report “Our economic and environmental goals are aligned. In fact, we believe that the best way for us to be more profitable is to make our business and products more sustainable. Recommended Strategic Priorities Positioning Ford as a market leader in both product and service quality. In my opinion, the focus should be placed on upgrading its supply chain management. As a market leader, Ford’s supply chain ought not to stop at being fast or cost-effective but should be responsive enough to respond to any change in the markets, be it change in supply or demand or unexpected market change. Ford Motor’s SCM should also be able to advance as political changes occur, economic progress, technological advances and globalization trends restructure markets.
Also putting into consideration, different supply chain designs for its different product lines. In the wake of the financial crisis, low-cost or high speed supply chains are not flexible enough to respond to the different and unknown effects of globalization. The automobile industry is survival of the fittest and most innovative. Ford also needs to optimize its supply chain to align the interests of all the firms in its supply chain with its own. Because each player make the most out of its own interests, and therefore optimizes the supply chain’s performance. The second priority concerns product innovation.
The product plan should be broadened even beyond the Electric/Hybrid cars. The simple fact is that Ford, with its high-cost infrastructure, burdensome union contracts, and short-sighted focus on pushing gas-guzzling SUVs, is on the verge of losing its fresh ideas which Henry Ford was known for. More nimble competitors from China, Japan—even South Korea—are eating Ford’s lunch in emerging markets and in the United States. The bottom line is that car buyers, wherever they live, now want a reliable, low-cost, fuel-efficient vehicle and they don’t care where it’s made.
That’s why the Japanese companies sales in the United States keeps rising while Ford—the home team—saw U. S. sales decline. Ford’s turnaround must also include pushing more of its IT, manufacturing, and support operations into other markets that promise big growth. Beyond India, there is Eastern Europe, Africa and China. Also centralizing help-desk operations in countries where they want to set up production wouldn’t just make economic sense; it would be a smart marketing move. Consumers are more likely to buy a car the company is indigenous.
Ford’s extensive operations in Canada are part of the reason it has great brand loyalty there and that’s why Canadians don’t see Ford as a “foreign” automaker, even though it is (Stugner- Noguez, 2002). BIBLIOGRAPHY Agarwal, S. V. (2004), Globalization and its effect on Supply Chain Management. Materials Management Review, No. 17 [online]. Available from: http://www. iimm. org/knowledge_bank/1_globalisation-and-its-effect-scm. htm [accessed 9 November, 2009] Alexander, M & Korine, H(2008) When You Shouldn’t Go Global. Harvard Business Review, [online].
Available from http://hbr. harvardbusiness. org/2008/12/when-you-shouldnt-go-global/ar/1# [Accessed 09 November, 2009] Albaum, G. S. , Duerr, E. & Strandskov, J. (2004) International marketing and export management ,pp,England, Addison Wesley Article 13 and CBI  Ford Investing in renewable energy generation on its operational site, reducing greenhouse gas emissions. – CSR Case Study Series, [online] Available from: http://www. article13. com/A13_ContentList. asp? strAction=GetPublication=1336 [accessed 10 November 2009] Blossfeld, H. , Klijzing, E. & Mills, M. ) Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society Globalization, Uncertainty and Youth in Society: The Losers in a Globalizing World. 1ed,p. New York. Routledge Columbus, F. (2003) Asian Economic and Political Issues, Volume 8, p35, Nova Science. Deloitte (2005) Deloitte looks at global industry trends in the automotive industry and the effects on South Africa. Prepared by Deloitte, South Africa. Available from: http://www. deloitte. com/assets/Dcom-SouthAfrica/LocalAssets/Documents/ZA_Industries_Manufacturing_yearbook. pdf [accessed 6 November, 2009] Dobbs, R. 2005) Managing value and performance: Maximizing the value of companies means attending not only to their short-term performance but also to their long-term health. McKinsey Quarterly. [Online] Available from: https://www. mckinseyquarterly. com/ghost. aspx? ID=/Corporate_Finance/Valuation/Managing_value_and_performance_1595# [accessed 26 October, 2009] Doole, I. & Lowe, R. (2008) International Marketing Strategy: Analysis, Development And Implementation, 5thed, USA. Cengage Learning EMEA Doz, Y. L. & Prahalad, C. K. (1980) How MNCs cope with host government interventionI, p. 75.
Boston, Harvard Business Review, [online] Available from http://nla. gov. au/nla. cat-vn1912856. [Accessed on November 2, 2009] Estes, J. (2009)Smart Green: How to Implement Sustainable Business Practices in Any Industry – and Make Money, p 15, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons Ford Motor Company(2009) Available from www. ford. com/go/sustainability [accessed 6 November, 2009] Ford Motor History. http://www. conceptcarz. com/view/makeHistory/50,17272/Ford_History. aspx Accessed 11 November, 2009 Friedlob,T. G. & Schleifer, L. L. F. (2003) Essentials of financial analysis, p 1, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons Friedman, M. 1970). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. New York Times Magazine, 32-33, pp. 122-126. Giddens, A. (2000). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. pp. New York: Routledge Glu? ckler, J. (2005) A relational assessment of international market entry in management consulting. Journal of Economic Geography, Vol 6 , pp. 369–393. UK. Oxford University Press Hopkins, M. (2007) Corporate social responsibility and international development: is business the solution?. p17. UK. Earthscan ? Koontz, H. & Weihrich, H. (2007) Essentials Of Management, 7th ed, p58,McGraw-Hill, Kotler,P. Lee, N. (2005) Corporate social responsibility: doing the most good for your company and your cause, p 3. New Jersey, John Wiley . KPMG LLP. Sustainability Services (2005) International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting. Prepared by KPMG LLP. US. 27 June [online] Available from: http://investingforthesoul. com/ar/KPMG-World-Survey-on-Corporate-Social-Responsibility-Reporting. htm Accessed 10 November, 2009 KPMG Advisory (2009) Momentum: Global-auto-executive-survey-2009. Prepared by KPMG Advisory. US [online] Available from http://www. kpmg. om/Global/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesAndPublications/Pages/Momentum-Global-auto-executive-survey-2009. aspx [accessed 19 October, 2009] Leontiades, J. (2000) Multinational Corporate Strategy: Planning for World Markets, pp 22. FREE PRESS Rowman & Littlefield Steger,U. , Amann,W. & Maznevski, M. (2007)Managing Complexity in Global Organizations, p 4. England. John Wiley & Sons Spulber, D. (2007) Global Competitive Strategy, pp4-10. USA, Cambridge University Press. Studer-Noguez, I. (2002) Ford and the global strategies of multinationals: the North American auto Industry, pp 23-50. London, Routledge.
Porter, E. M. (1986) Competition in Global Industries, p. 287. Boston, Harvard Business School Press Polishchuk, L. (2009) Corporate Social Responsibility vs. Government Regulation: Institutional Analysis with an Application to Russia. LIA Working Paper Series, WP10/2009/01,. [online] Available from: http://extranet. isnie. org/uploads/isnie2009/polishchuk. doc [Accessed 12 November, 2009] Vogel, D. (2005) The market for virtue: the potential and limits of corporate social responsibility, pp. 13-17. USA, Brookings Institution. Werther B. W. & Chandler, D. (2006) Strategic corporate
The Main Difference Between Prejudice And Racism Tatum
Summer Reading Assignment Section A The Main Characters: Elizabeth Bennett: Lezzy is the main character in the story. She lives with her parents and four sisters in London. According to her dad she is the smartest and wisest one among her sisters. Her mother treated her in a tough way because she didn’t accept to marry Mr. Collins since she believes that you should marry for love, not money. She likes to read, and has a lot of general knowledge and this is one of the main things that attracted of Mr.. Dairy, other than her beauty and manners.
Dairy: Is one of the main characters, he first appears as Mr.. Bentleys friend, indicating his social status and is wealth. At the begging, Dairy seems mean, and proud of his social status, that’s why he refuses to dance and to talk with Elizabeth. And even hurts her by talking about her family’s behavior. However in the course of the story, we realize that they are a perfect math, he is attracted by her Intelligence and information in addition to her beauty, what makes him brake his promise in marrying Lady Catharine De Burgh’s daughter. Itch proves to Elizabeth that he is worthy of her love and that she had missed judged him. Settings: In the 19th century, since The story is written in 1813, but we don’t know exactly when. It takes place in England, a place called Longhorn. Summary: The novel pride and Prejudice, takes place in England, in the 19th century. The protagonist of the Story is Elizabeth Bent. She lives modestly with her parents and five single sisters, Jane, Mary, Lydia and Kitty. Their father Mr..
Bennett is calm man in contrary to her husband Mrs. Bennett, a woman that is all surface and no substance. She wishes to see her daughters married to suitable rich men without looking at their happiness Jane is the eldest daughter, she is dutiful, and respectful and calm and she is the antagonist best friend. Kitty was a tall girl with a sense of humor, she was her mother’s favorite. Mary likes music and spend her day reading. Finally, Lydia, the youngest of the girls and is described as “untamed, unabashed, wild, noisy, and fearless” The novel starts when Mrs..
Bennett is informing her family that Mr.. Bindle, a wealthy and single man, is moving into Interfiled Park, and he will be at the ball. So the entire family is excited and they attend the ball to meet him. Mr. Bindle arrives with his sister Caroline, and his friend Mr.. Dairy. Mr.. Bindle was attracted to Jane, and asks her to dance, while his friend Mr.. Dairy stays away unattached by this activity. After the ball, Jane was invited to Interfiled, where she catches a cold and has to stay for a couple of days. So Lezzy had join the Bindle to nurse her sister.
While there Elizabeth meets Mr. Dairy and this time he chats with her. After their return, Mr.. Collins visited the Bennett Family, hoping to find a wife. He is a relative slightly rich and works for the noble Lady Catherine De Brought. He was attracted to the antagonist who doesn’t accept him. So he ecocide to marry her friend Charlotte. Later Elizabeth meets Mr.. Hickman an officer, that talks to her about Mr. -Dairy and the way he treated him, because when Mr.. Darers father died he left him money, that Dairy didn’t accept to give him, because of his jealousy.
Elizabethan attraction to Mr. Hickman, increase her dislike of Mr. Dairy. Then Mr.. Bindle leaves to London, as Elizabeth is sure that Mr.. Dairy and Caroline (Mr.. Bangle’s sister) are trying to separate them. And this is proven when Jane receives a letter from Caroline saying that Mr.. Bindle doesn’t love her, and has no interest in marrying her. In the spring, Elizabeth visits Charlotte and Mr. Collins in Kent. She is invited to Risings Park, home of Lady Catherine De Burgh, Dairy’s aunt; coincidentally, Dairy also arrives to visit.
Elizabeth meets Darers cousin, they talk about how he had convinced a friend on not marrying a girl he loves. Elizabeth rightly assumes that it is Mr. Bindle, and her dislike of Dairy deepens. Later Dairy proposes to Lezzy and confesses that he loves her -but at the same time he talks about her family and social position. But of course Lezzy doesn’t accept his proposal since he insulted her family, and ruined Cane’s relationship with Mr. Bindle, and finally the way he treated Mr.. Hickman. Mr. Dairy, shocked, and furious and exposes the truth about Mr..
Hickman. Later Elizabeth finds a latter from Me-Dairy he explained that he treats Mr.. Wigwam in this awful way because he broke Georgian, and that he thinks that Jane doesn’t love Bindle the way he loves her. And that keeps her wondering if she misjudged him. Months later, Elizabeth and her aunt and uncle Gardener visit Pimpernel, Dairy’s home. Meets his sister, and at this moment Lezzy finally knew that she loved him. They receive the news that Mr.. Hickman and her younger sister kitty have runoff. But Mr.. Dairy intervened and helped finding them.
A marriage was necessary to clean the family’s reputation thus the uncle pays the man money to marry her and Mr. Dairy take charge of wedding expenses. Shortly after Mr.. Bindle shows up, and proposes to Jane, and immediately accepts. Lady Catherine De Burgh pays an unexpected visit to Longhorn, Because she heard a rumors that Elizabeth will marry Mr. Dairy. Lady Catherine wants Mr.. Dairy to marry her daughter (his cousin) Anne De Burgh and thinks Elizabeth will ruin everything. Elizabeth refuses her demands. Lady Catherine leaves promising that the marriage can never take place Dairy returns to Longhorn.