Professional Footballer Hugo Sanchez Marquez Free Writing Sample

Hugo Sanchez is a highly esteemed individual in the realm of soccer, having accomplished extraordinary feats that have garnered acknowledgment from fans in both Mexico and Spain. He rose to prominence as one of the trailblazers among Mexican players who achieved success in Europe, notably playing for Atletico Madrid and Rayo Vallecano in the Spanish league. Additionally, he proudly represented Mexico during the 1976 summer Olympics.

Hugo Sanchez Marquez, hailing from Mexico City, gained recognition for his remarkable abilities. He showcased his talent as a young footballer by joining the youth squads of the Mexican national team and engaging in more than 80 international matches before reaching 18 years old and becoming eligible for a professional agreement. Simultaneously, he earned great respect as a member of the Pumas youth club and took immense pride in representing his nation.

During his time in the Primera Division, he surpassed Zarra’s previous record by scoring 234 goals in 347 matches. The majority of these impressive scores were achieved while playing for Real Madrid, where he won four consecutive Pichichi titles as the top goal scorer in Spain. Because of this, he earned the affectionate nickname “Nino de Oro” or “golden boy”.

Hugo, once a player in Mexico, had to prove himself in Europe after being acquired by Madrid from the UNAM Pumas in 1981. However, his initial days in Spain were difficult as it took him two years to fully adjust to the new country and playing style. Eventually, he managed to regain the same level of performance that had made him an exceptional goalkeeper in Mexico.

He was the coach of Mexico’s national soccer team during the qualifying rounds of the 1978 and 1994 World Cups, as well as participating in the 1986 World Cup held in Mexico. This particular World Cup did not have a qualification stage. He also scored the first goal, guaranteeing a spot in the 2010 World Cup. However, he was later fired from his coaching role because they did not qualify for Beijing.

Atlante Futbol Club, also referred to as Atlante, is a professional football club located in Mexico.

What Is Corruption?

Corruption is a scourge that has badly affected the quality of governance, state of the economy and social justice available to the people. Corruption is defined as the misuse of entrusted power for private gains. It is of different types. It is petty, grand and political.

The petty corruption is usually linked with the lower salary employees and generally considered as facilitating payments, whereas, the grand corruption is associated with the high level bureaucracy. However, the political corruption as name indicates is related to the politician. They usually involve in this type corruption in order to maintain their status quo. The corruption varies in the rate of its presence; therefore in this regard the incidence of corruption may be rare, widespread or systemic.

The rare corruption is easy to identify and control than widespread. Whereas, the systemic corruption becomes a way of life and it is very difficult to overcome. The corruption is universal; however, its existence varies in rate of occurrence. Since the inception of Pakistan, the country has witnessed of the rampant corruption.

Many governments in general and the governments in decade of 1990 in particular has become the victim of the widespread corruption and corrupt practices. In a recent survey conducted by the Transparency International, Pakistan ranks lowered from 42th most corrupt country to 34th country in the world. Islam explicitly condemns the existence of corruption in every form. Hazart Muhammad (PBUH) declared that; “Damned is the bribe giver (or corruptor)-the bribe taker (the corrupted) and he who goes between them”.

Quaid-i- Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah has strongly condemned the presence of corruption. He avowed a strict action against such mal practices and their doer. The root causes of the rampant corruption in the country are lack of effective accountability, poor performance on the part of respective institutions, unchecked and unlimited power of feudal.

Compare And Contrast Martin Luther And John Calvin

Martin Luther and John Calvin were both very important leaders of the ProtestantReformation. Although they were both against the Roman Catholic Church, they brought aboutMartin Luther founded the group that are today known as Lutherans. He was ordaineda priest in 1507.

He dealt with questions dealing with the structure of the church and with itsmoral values. These questions were important in Luther’s eyes, but the most important was howto find favor with God. Luther tried to pray, fast, and repent, but he never felt self-satisfaction. He eventually concluded that God’s love was not a prize or a reward to be earned or won, but agift to be accepted.

Luther further concluded that until man stops trying to achieve God’s favorthrough his own achievements he cannot truly understand God’s grace. Luther also had the ideathat one did not need a priest to talk to God, he believed that one could pray and repent withoutthe help of anyone else. This was the idea for which Luther became famous. In 1517, Luther was involved in a controversy which involved indulgences.

Indulgenceswere the idea that a person could donate money to a worthy cause in exchange for forgivenessof their sins. Luther opposed this idea and stated his beliefs in his Ninety-Five Thesis, which heposted on the castle door in Wittenberg, Germany. In 1519, Luther had a debate in Leipzig with Johann Eck, a Roman Catholic theologian. During this debate, Luther denied the supremacy of the Pope and stated that church councilsIn 1521, Luther was excommunicated by Pope Leo X.

Luther was then ordered toappear before a council which demanded that he retract his teachings. Luther intern stated thatunless he was inspired to do so by scripture he would not “since it is neither safe nor right to goPossible the most important contribution of Luther to society was his translation of theBible into German. This made it possible for those who were not fluent in Greek to study theWord of God. Luther also wrote another influential work, Small Catechism of 1529, whichwas also known as the layman’s Bible.

It summarized Christian beliefs into clear, simplelanguage and told how they should live. During the Reformation, Luther discovered that he had founded a new church. Hecomplained that his name should not be given to a group whose name should only be taken fromChrist; but Lutherans still believe in the doctrines he originated. John Calvin teachings were especially influential in Switzerland, England, Scotland, andcolonial North America.

Calvin’s followers in France were known as the Huguenots, and inEngland they were know as the Puritans. During the Reformation, the people were insisting that anyone, not just the hierarchy, beinvolved in political and religious policy making. This inspired Calvin’s teachings. The Calvinistsdeveloped political theories that supported constitutional government, representativegovernment, the right of people to change their government, and the separation of civil andchurch government.

The Calvanists originally intended these ideas to apply to the aristocracy,but democracy eventually arose in England and America. Calvin’s basic religious beliefs were the superiority of faith over good works, universalpriesthood of all believers, and the Bible as the basis of all Christian teachings. The concept ofuniversal priesthood was that all believers were considered priests. This was unlike the RomanCatholic Church which had various ranks of priests.

Calvin also believed that men could only be saved by the grace of God. He believedthat only the Elect would be saved and that no one knew who the Elect were. He also believedin Predestination, which is the idea that your entire life is already planned for you. Many of Calvin’s ideas were controversial, but he improved the morals of the Churchdrastically.

Calvin developed the pattern of church government that is today known asMartin Luther and John Calvin achieved great results, but went about it in different ways. Luther was more concerned with his own spirituality, and therefore set an example by changinghimself. Calvin on the other hand, was more concerned with changing society and thegovernment. They both believed in being saved through God’s grace, but Calvin believed inPredestination and the Elect.

Martin Luther and John Calvin were both key assets Protestant

error: Content is protected !!