Recommendation For Future Strategy For Cyclone Sample Essay


After studying Cyclone’s product portfolio using the GE/McKinsey Matrix, it is clear that the business battles in a highly competitive sector with a client base that comprises primarily mountain bike riders. It is highly suggested that Cyclone implements a strategy of digital transformation to improve the likelihood of its organization successfully implementing a dynamic marketing strategy in the future. The plan will make utilization of digital technologies and capabilities to enhance interactions with consumers, make simpler business processes, and drive growth (Hunsaker and Knowles, 2020). The suggestions that follow provide an overview of the “what,” “why,” and “how” elements involved in putting the digital transformation strategy into practice.

Recommendation 1: Implement a “Try Before You Buy” Strategy


Cyclone Corporation ought to invest in digital platforms and technology that enable shoppers to virtually test-ride their motorcycles before purchasing. Such could motivate a greater number of individuals to buy Cyclone bikes. This might be attained via simulations in virtual reality (VR) or experiences in augmented reality (AR), both of which offer a thrilling and realistic experience of riding a bike (Hunsaker and Knowles, 2020).


Cyclone company may solve the typical hurdle of clients being incapable of physically testing motorcycles by giving a “try before you buy” choice. This method boosts the buyer’s experience, fosters trust, and improves the chances of conversion. It additionally fits in with the increasing popularity of online buying and the demand for individualized experiences (Azcoitia and Laoutaris, 2022).


Cyclone can develop a smartphone application or a platform on the internet that permits buyers to virtually test ride, numerous bike models. The software may simulate various terrains, amend bike settings, and present real-time feedback on effectiveness. Cyclone may monitor KPIs like client interaction, conversion rate, and client satisfaction ratings to gauge success (Ngoc and Nogalski, 2022).

Recommendation 2: Repurpose Sales Staff for Digital Sales Channels


Cyclone ought to retrain and empower its sales team with the digital capabilities essential for successful operation in online sales platforms. This involves directives in digital marketing, e-commerce sites, and customer relationship management (CRM) software.


As the organization welcomes digital transformation, sales representatives’ responsibilities could shift from conventional face-to-face contacts to online sales and support. Repurposing salespeople for online platforms guarantee they continue to make a difference to the business’s success while keeping up with shifting client preferences and market realities.


Cyclone can set up workshops to educate salespeople on digital marketing techniques, social media management, and online customer involvement. The business should also provide them with access to crucial digital tools and information. Success may be judged by the repurposed sales personnel’s success in digital avenues, client feedback on their service quality, and their capacity to adjust to the online environment (Azcoitia and Laoutaris, 2022).

Recommendation 3: Enhance Digital Systems and Capabilities


Cyclone has to put money into updating its digital infrastructure to help the business’s digital transformation efforts thrive. Integrating customer relationship management (CRM) systems, boosting the accessibility and performance of internet pages, and creating effective e-commerce sites all fall under this classification (Ngoc and Nogalski, 2022).


A solid digital infrastructure is a necessity for a productive digital evolution. It makes it easy to do business via the Internet without any hitches, offers excellent service to buyers, and makes intelligent choices according to collected data. Cyclone may better satisfy the requirements of its clients and acquire an edge in the market by broadening its digital infrastructure and capabilities (Hunsaker and Knowles, 2020).


Cyclone may collaborate with e-commerce platform vendors to set up an easy-to-use and safe online shop. The website for the business must additionally be optimized for speed, mobile friendliness, and straightforward navigation. Integrating a CRM system can consolidate client information, facilitate tailored marketing efforts, and stronger customer relationship management. Metrics, including online sales expansion, conversion rates, website traffic, and customer feedback, might be utilized for evaluating success (Azcoitia and Laoutaris, 2022).

Recommendation 4: Optimize Distribution and Warehousing Processes


Cyclone would benefit significantly from integrating digital technology into its distribution and storage activities. This involves the application of data analytics for demand forecasting and supply chain efficiency, as well as the launching inventory control systems and warehouse automation technological advances (Ngoc and Nogalski, 2022).


Implementing digital technology in distribution and storage can greatly enhance both processes. Cyclone might lower inventory holding expenses, boost inventory visibility, and guarantee on-time order fulfillment by introducing an inventory control system. Robotics and additional automated picking systems could significantly enhance effectiveness and precision in the warehouse setting. Cyclone might gain from maximizing inventory levels and making well-informed supply chain choices by using the information presented by data analytics (Jelonek et al., 2022).


Cyclone should invest in inventory control software that interfaces with its website for e-commerce and other technological advances. This enables real-time inventory surveillance, automated reorder points and swift order processing. To put solutions relevant to its specifications, a company may investigate collaborations with logistics firms that excel in warehouse automation technology (Ngoc and Nogalski, 2022). Moreover, employing data analytics technologies and hiring data analysts might help Cyclone assess past sales data, trends in the market, and consumer tastes to predict demand while controlling inventory levels (Jelonek et al., 2022). This recommendation’s key success measures are quicker order fulfillment, reduced stock holding expenses, and enhanced demand forecasting reliability.

Implementation Timetable

1-2 – Comprehensively analyze client preferences, market trends, and competition initiatives.

– Design a thorough digital transformation tactics plan containing objectives and milestones.

3-4 -Commence work on the “Try Before You Buy” mobile app or web-based site.

-Discover and collaborate with platforms for e-commerce vendors to create an online shop.

-Launch digital marketing, social media management, and online interaction with clients training courses for sales personnel.

5-6 -Test and enhance the “Try Before You Buy” system based on consumer feedback.

-Establish the online shop while maintaining client experience, mobile responsiveness, and security in mind.

-Establish a client relationship management (CRM) system to consolidate client data and facilitate tailored marketing efforts.

7-8 -Regularly track and evaluate KPIs for the “Try Before You Buy” platforms, like consumer engagement, conversion rates, and client satisfaction ratings.

-From sales results and client feedback, analyze the success of the repurposed sales force in online platforms.

-Enhance the accessibility and effectiveness of the website according to user data and comments.

9-10 – Check out collaborations with logistics firms for warehouse automation approaches.

-Integrate inventory control software with the e-commerce system.

-Implement data analytics innovations for demand forecasting and supply chain enhancement by hiring data analysts or collaborating with data analytics enterprises.

11-12 -Conduct periodic assessments of the efficiency of the digital transformation plan.

-Make changes and enhancements in response to market shifts, consumer input, and technological advancements.

-Track crucial success indicators: online sales expansion, inventory holding expenses conversion rates, website traffic, order fulfillment pace, and demand forecasting consistency.

Ongoing -Keep ahead of the rivals by exploring new technological advances and trends.

-Evaluate and revise the plan for digital transformation to adjust to changing customer demands and market realities.

-Establish a digital innovation and cooperation culture inside the firm to generate continuous growth.


By embracing digital transformation into Cyclone’s future marketing plans, the organization might enhance client experiences, boost its operational effectiveness, and obtain a competitive advantage in the market. Adopting a “try before you buy” technique, repurposing sales personnel for digital channels, upgrading digital systems and resources, and simplifying distribution and warehouse processes are all key components of this change. Regular assessment of vital measures and regular review of the strategy’s performance guarantee long-term success and flexibility to market shifts.


Azcoitia, S.A. and Laoutaris, N., 2022, December. Try Before You Buy: A practical data purchasing algorithm for real-world data Marketplaces. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Data Economy (pp. 27-33).

Hunsaker, B.T. and Knowles, J., 2020. The Essence of Strategy Is Now How to Change. MIT Sloan Management Review.

Jelonek, D., Tien, N.H., Dao, M.T.H. and Minh, D.T., 2022. Comparative analysis of the business strategy of Vietnamese real estate developers: the use of Hoffer matrix. International journal of multidisciplinary research and growth evaluation3(1), pp.197-204.

Ngoc, N.M. and Nogalski, B., 2022. Business strategy analysis for Dat Xanh real estate group the application of McKinsey matrix.

Revenge In Doctorow’s Ragtime And Shakespeare’s Hamlet Essay Example For College


The theme of vengeance is powerful and can potentially stir up strong emotions in readers. E.L. Doctorow’s “Ragtime” and William Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” deal with a vengeance. The complex reasons for seeking revenge and whether or not it is in the protagonists’ best interests are explored in these books. Doctorow’s “Ragtime,” which takes place in the Big Apple, tells the story of a wealthy family whose characters’ destinies are inextricably intertwined. The protagonist, a black pianist named Coalhouse Walker Jr., is out for retribution against the white authorities he holds responsible for the injustice done to him and his community. Similarly, Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” is a tragedy about Hamlet, a Danish prince, and his search for vengeance following his father’s death. Both individuals’ stories show the risks and justifications of seeking revenge, although being motivated by entirely different situations. Coalhouse’s mission is inspired by his belief in social justice; the authorities are to blame for the horrific treatment he and his family have received, but they refuse to acknowledge this. On the other side, Hamlet’s actions are motivated by his loyalty and sense of duty to his father. Both stories feature protagonists whose actions are motivated by a desire for vengeance. However, their efforts’ efficacy and outcomes are being questioned. The retribution cycle resulting from seeking revenge is often even more destructive than the original wrongdoing. This article will analyze the characters’ motivations for revenge and how those acts benefited or hurt them. Pursuing vengeance often backfires, causing more harm to the protagonists and their allies than good.

Hamlet and Laertes’s Situations

The protagonist, Hamlet, considers taking revenge for his father’s death; however, he realizes the tragedy that would unfold and tries to change his mind. Shakespeare portrays Hamlet as uninterested in retaliation. The author places ideas into Hamlet’s head, intending to demonstrate to the reader that Hamlet thinks revenge is wrong. The play shows Hamlet thinking that taking revenge is wrong and that he should avoid it at all costs. Hamlet, as portrayed by Shakespeare, worries that taking revenge may turn him into a monster (Kastan 113). However, Hamlet views taking revenge as equivalent to not taking revenge since both adoptions could later haunt him. He worries that taking retribution will tarnish his status while remaining silent will disqualify him as a legitimate candidate for the throne of Denmark. Polonius’s son Laertes seeks revenge as well. Despite facing several challenges, the ultimately challenges Hamlet, the man responsible for his father’s death. Hamlet’s retribution is justified based on different perspectives and the events leading up to the revenge.

Justification for Revenge in Hamlet

Hamlet’s growing certainty in this matter demonstrates the validity of his retribution mission. He thinks about how hurtful it would be to his reputation and heritage if he took revenge first (Kastan 117). Nonetheless, he understands that neglecting to avenge his father is equivalent to supporting the deed of the person who murdered King Hamlet, even though revenge itself is a crime. Hamlet’s internal reflections show that if he does not exact retribution for his father’s death, it will open the door for anybody in the kingdom to kill anyone they choose without fear of retaliation. He claims he must “do this same villain send To heaven” because he is his father’s sole son (Shakespeare, Act 3, 83). His argument exposes his need to repay evil with evil. So Hamlet seeks to function as a court of law that metes out punishments to communicate that certain crimes carry severe repercussions. Skulsky states, ” From a Christian point of view, Hamlet’s goal in not severing Claudius’ neck at his prie-dieu is more grievous than Laertes’ pledge to slash the throat of the church” (Skulsky 79).

Hamlet’s quest for vengeance is justified, given his obligation to honor his father’s ghost. The spirit of Hamlet’s father orders him to avenge his “foul and most unnatural murder” (Shakespeare, Act 1, line 31). Hamlet convinces himself that vengeance might be a healing process (Kastan 112). If he does not exact his vengeance, he will lose face as the prince of Denmark in his eyes. Hamlet tells the ghost of his father that if he does not get retribution, he will end up as a “rogue and peasant slave” (Shakespeare, Act 2, 577). The accusation suggests Hamlet’s inability to forgive and forget without retaliation. He fears that his father’s killer will force him to become enslaved if he does not exact retribution. Hamlet’s terror justifies vengeance since he knows that tragedy will strike his life if he does not act. The prince has every right to follow the ghost’s orders and exact revenge on Claudius for killing King Hamlet.

Considering that Polonius did not deserve to die at the hands of Hamlet, Laertes’ desire for vengeance is warranted. Laertes returns from France determined to see that justice is served after learning of his father’s death. He knows that if he fails to exact vengeance for his father’s death, Hamlet will be emboldened to continue this bloody campaign against the established order in Denmark. Hamlet’s pretentious madness, which he employs to kill others accidentally, justifies Laertes’ goal of revenge. Shakespeare develops Laertes and Hamlet’s friendship in a way that explains Laertes’s rage over his father’s murder. After Hamlet murders Polonius, he and Laertes, who had been pals until then, become enemies. Despite seeing Claudius praying, Hamlet does not kill him, demonstrating his reluctance to carry out the revenge (Kastan 111). Laertes concludes that Hamlet may have murdered his father on purpose based on this speculation. He claims he has no choice but to renounce his loyalty to Hamlet and exact a bloody vengeance on his father. Shakespeare quotes him as saying, “I will be revenged and will not juggle with allegiance” (Act 4, 149). Those statements suggest that Laertes has good reason to defy his old buddy Hamlet because Hamlet did not prove his loyalty by killing his father.

Coalhouse Walker

Coalhouse is subjected to persistent bias and injustice in his current condition. He struggles to provide for his family despite being routinely discriminated against and given fewer chances than others. The journalists that covered him made this point clear when they wrote about him, calling him ” the ironies of a grinning negro with a tidy mustache, an entirely joyful and straightforward physiognomy…. A murderer’s grin” (Doctorow 83). Coalhouse’s racial identity is a persistent barrier to his achievement, and this phrase exemplifies the daily struggle he must wage to overcome the prejudice he encounters.

As Coalhouse’s resentment and rage intensify, he exacts vengeance on his tormentors. His decision to resort to violence to achieve justice is divisive among the novel’s protagonists and antagonists. One such instance is when he launches an assault on the firehouse where the firefighters who wrecked his car are employed. Coalhouse is out for payback here after being insulted and having his car vandalized. His declaration, “If these requirements are not met, I will keep on murdering firemen and torch fire stations until they are,” makes this abundantly evident (Doctorow 78). Coalhouse’s willingness to resort to such severe measures demonstrates how far his desire for revenge has gone.

Justification for Coalhouse’s Revenge

Although Coalhouse’s experiences with prejudice and unfairness are undoubtedly understandable, his choice to seek retaliation is not justifiable. Doctorow portrays Coalhouse’s activities as a spiral toward violence and anarchy, culminating in his demise. Coalhouse loses sight of the repercussions of his acts as he is overwhelmed by his fury and the need for revenge. As he writes in one of the letters, “I will destroy the entire city if need be” (Doctorow 78). As a result of Coalhouse’s acts, many innocent people have lost their lives. Many innocent people are killed as Coalhouse sets fire to the fire station to get the Fire Chief to agree to his demands. Of the four bodies found, the narrator claims that two were killed not by the flames or the blast but by buckshot (Doctorow 76). Coalhouse proceeded to shoot everybody who made it out of the blaze alive. Coalhouse’s actions have devastating repercussions, and they can never be justified, no matter how unfairly he was treated.

Moreover, Coalhouse’s violent actions accomplish nothing to solve the racial discrimination and social unfairness he faces. What he is doing is contributing to the ongoing cycle of violence and further dividing black and white Americans. Coalhouse’s arrogance and pride drive his destructive behavior, as evidenced by his insistence that a particular car be returned to its former condition and his refusal to accept any other car. “Would you defend this savage? Father asks. Can he really place the responsibility for Sarah’s death on anybody else? Anything to make him swallow his niggering pride” (Doctorow 78). This demonstrates that Coalhouse’s preoccupation with a symbol of prestige and power is driving his revenge rather than any actual wrongdoing. Coalhouse’s activities do not lead to the desired outcome of justice as the narrative unfolds. Instead, they have stoked tensions and fueled prejudice against black people. The narrator explains that the cops claim that the black man made a break for freedom in the brightly lit roadway. More likely, he was aware that a sudden turn of the head, a lowering of the hands, or a smile would be all it took to end his life (Doctorow 111). This demonstrates that Coalhouse’s activities have worsened the situation for himself and his community rather than improving it.

Consequences of the Revenge

The conventional expectation that a son must wreak retribution on his father at whatever cost, along with Hamlet’s deep love for his father, motivate him to murder Claudius. After his father’s death, Hamlet looks to his father for guidance and comfort in ways he never did before. Hamlet’s resolve to exact retribution imprisons him, causing him to forsake his reasoning. However, Hamlet’s interpretation of the ghost’s desire to kill Claudius is not the ghost’s genuine request. Despite his father’s admonition, he abuses his mother because of all this: “Taint not thy mind, nor let thy soul contrive/Against you mother aught – leave her to heaven” (Shakespeare, Act 1, 90).

Coalhouse’s vengeance, on the other hand, has increased racial tensions in the city, which is a significant effect. Racism and bigotry against African Americans spiked as a direct result of the violence that followed his conduct. Father’s observation that “the newspapers began to report an increase in racial disturbances throughout the city” indicates this trend in the text. All social ills were attributed to black people. Arrests were made “at will” by police and community watch groups (Doctorow 114). Coalhouse and his loved ones will suffer directly from his revenge. His loved ones are left to grieve when he sacrifices himself in the name of justice. Sarah’s brother and those who stood by him have been scarred.


It has been argued that retribution is not justified because of the tragedies that accompany each of Hamlet’s revenge missions. For instance, when chasing after Claudius, Hamlet murders Polonius, the father of one of his friends (Kastan 119). Hamlet’s assassination attempt, headed by Laertes, ends tragically when he is murdered in a duel. However, the justifications given by vengeful people are often convincing. Hamlet’s plot for vengeance is understandable, given Claudius’s danger to his plans to become king. Besides, Laertes’ revenge expedition is warranted because of the need to end Hamlet’s killing rampage.

An opposing viewpoint in Ragtime argues that Coalhouse’s vengeance was warranted. Some readers may interpret Coalhouse’s actions as a reaction to the institutionalized racism and discrimination he faces. According to this interpretation, his vengeance is a form of defiance against his oppressors. The narrator claims, for instance, that one hundred African-Americans were lynched annually. One hundred miners were killed in the fire. A hundred kids were cut up” (Doctorow 15). One of the many injustices Coalhouse endures throughout the novel is this overt display of prejudice and contempt. It is easy to see why he would conclude that violence is the only option to achieve the recognition and redress he seeks. Coalhouse’s retaliation may not be morally or legally justifiable, but it can be understood as a reaction to the systematic racism and oppression he faces. Doctorow subtly implies this through a conversation between Coalhouse and his father: “I do not know of one, Father answered. But any lawyer who cares about doing the right thing would do” (Doctorow 66). Many underrepresented groups feel this way because they have been denied justice and equality.


In conclusion, Coalhouse Walker’s act of vengeance in E. L. Doctorow’s Ragtime was not warranted because it only served to hasten his mortality and provoke greater bloodshed. On the other side, Shakespeare’s Hamlet allows for the possibility of justification for the vengeance sought by Laertes and Hamlet. Nonetheless, lessons about the perils and fallout of vengeance can be gleaned from both stories. Revenge as a topic emphasizes the importance of justice and the risks associated with its pursuit. This issue is significant because it reflects the nuanced character of human beings and the ethical weight of our acts. The onus is on us, the readers, to analyze the themes explored in these works and our relationship to vengeance. Seeking revenge should not be done lightly; one must weigh the benefits against the costs. The texts recommend exercising prudence and clarity of intent when considering revenge because of its complexity and possible destructiveness.

Works Cited

E.L. Doctorow. Ragtime. Random House, 2010,

Kastan, David Scot. “‘His Semblable Is His Mirror’: ‘Hamlet’ and the Imitation of Revenge .” Proquest, 1987,

Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. 1992,

Skulsky, Harold. “Revenge, Honor, and Conscience in ‘Hamlet.’” PMLA, vol. 85, no. 1, Modern Language Association, 1970, pp. 78–87,

Comparative Textual Analysis Free Essay


Literature often acts as а deep mirror that reflects the complex weave of the human experience, giving us important insights into the complexities of life and death. “To an Athlete Dying Young” by A. Е. Hausman and “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell are great examples of this literary analysis. These writing gemstones all deal with life and death, but from different points of view and in different settings. In addition, “To an Athlete Dying Young” is an emotionally charged poem on the untimely death of а famous athlete. This creative work, written by A. Е. Housman reflects on the transient nature of fame and the fleeting brightness of youth. Housman digs into the deep effect of death on one’s permanent legacy via vivid imagery and mellifluous language. Counter to this, “Shooting an Elephant” is an autobiographical essay precisely produced by George Orwell at the height of British colonialism. Orwell’s gripping story recalls his firsthand experience as а police officer stationed in Burma, revealing the moral problem he faces when forced to end the life of an elephant.

The treatment of “life” and “death” in these works is diverse. “To An Athlete Dying Young” delves into the fleeting nature of life’s achievements and the fleeting nature of fame. Housman’s lyrical ability invites readers to reflect on the unavoidable passage of time and the eventual futility of worldly efforts. Contrary to this, “Shooting an Elephant” addresses the moral quandaries surrounding life and death. Orwell’s novel dives into the repressive nature of imperialism and its influence on the oppressed and the oppressor, showing the ethical quandaries faced by those caught up in power structures (Orwell). In addition, the importance of analyzing the handling of “life” or “death” in the context of the Modern period lies in the era’s distinguishing features. The Modern period, which lasted from the late 1800s to the early 1900s, saw dramatic changes in culture, global dynamics and technology. It was a period of rapid urbanization, industrialization, and a challenge to traditional values. In addition, these cultural shifts resulted in fresh ideas on life, death, and the human condition. We obtain deeper insights into the Modern period’s preoccupations, concerns, and evolving paradigms by considering how these texts treat the themes of “life” or “death” within the framework of the Modern era.

Through an exploration of “To An Athlete Dying Young” by А. E. Housman and “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell, this essay will compare and contrast the treatment of “life” and “death” in the two texts, analyzing their reflections on the Modern era’s perspectives on mortality, fame, power, and ethical dilemmas. By delving into these works, we gain а deeper understanding of how literature engages with the complexities of life and death within а specific historical and cultural context.

Comparison/Contrast of the Treatment of  “Life”.

In “To An Athlete Dying Young,” by A. E. Housman, he talks about life and how it is always changing. The poem is about how a famous athlete died too soon. It thinks about fleeting success and how death changes a person’s legacy. Housman uses vivid images and beautiful language in the poem to show what life is all about. In addition, the theme of life in “To An Athlete Dying Young” is linked to the ideas of youth and short-lived fame. Housman praises the athlete’s success during his prime, focusing on how much the people of the town love and respect him (“Poetry Foundation”). The poem shows that youth is short-lived and worldly success is temporary. Housman’s imagery, such as “shoulder-high we bring you home”, gives a sense of power and celebration, capturing the energy and joy of life. However, Significant shifts in perspective on life’s value occurred in the Modern period. Rapid social transformations brought on by industrialization and urbanization have tested traditional values and highlighted the transience of life. Housman’s poem, written at the turn of the last century, captures this evolution of worldview (“Poetry Foundation”). The portrayal of life as a fleeting moment of triumph is consistent with the Modern era’s preoccupation with eternity and the fragility of the human condition. The poem expresses the desire for enduring recognition in a world where everything is always shifting.

In “Shooting an Elephant,” George Orwell’s paper talks about how empire and the use of power make life complicated. The story is about Orwell’s time as a police officer in Burma, where he has to decide whether or not to shoot an elephant because of his morals. Orwell shows the battles and confusing feelings that come with life through vivid images and reflective thoughts. “To An Athlete Dying Young” and Orwell’s content show two different ways of looking at life. In “Shooting an Elephant,” the weight of power and social standards is shown to make life hard. Orwell struggles with his role as a tool of imperial power. He is torn between his morals and his push to act as his job requires. The accounts of the elephant’s life, its pain, and the moral repercussions of Orwell’s actions show how life, power, and duty all work together in complicated ways (Orwell). In addition, the presentation of life in the Modern period was affected by rising dissatisfaction with conventional institutions and the questioning of existing power structures. Orwell’s article reflects this evolving viewpoint by questioning conventional concepts of authority and the repercussions of power. The picture of life in “Shooting an Elephant” corresponds to the Modern era’s obsession with the ethical difficulties of human existence and the moral quandaries individuals encounter when confronted with systems of power.

Moreover, “To An Athlete Dying Young” and “Shooting an Elephant” reflect on modern living from opposite perspectives. Despite their diversity, these works have similarities in how they depict life. Both emphasize the transient aspect of existence and the influence of external circumstances on individual lives. In “To An Athlete Dying Young,” the athlete’s accomplishment and subsequent death demonstrate the fleeting nature of worldly achievements. Similarly, in “Shooting an Elephant,” Orwell’s tale delves into the complexity of existence in the setting of imperial authority, highlighting the challenges of individuals entangled in repressive institutions. However, the two texts have opposing ideas on life. “To An Athlete Dying Young” highlights the joy of life’s accomplishments and the desire for long-term recognition. However, “Shooting an Elephant” digs into the difficulties and moral quandaries that often accompany life, particularly when power is exercised. The former is concerned with the individual’s transient moments of glory, whereas the latter is concerned with the larger societal repercussions and conflicts between personal ethics and societal standards.

The two works’ opposing viewpoints on life reflect the wider issues and concerns of the Modern age. The era was defined by despair and questioning established norms and beliefs. The description of life in “To An Athlete Dying Young” resonates with the Modern era’s obsession with transience, expressing the fragility and impermanence of human existence. On the other side, “Shooting an Elephant” highlights the era’s investigation of power relations and the challenges of negotiating moral choices in repressive regimes. In addition, how these similarities and differences affect the Modern age is very important. Both authors give information about the existential fears and moral problems people had during this time of change. By looking at these literary works, we can learn more about the changes in culture, society, and philosophy that changed the way people thought about life and death in the Modern age.

Comparison/Contrast of the Treatment of  “Death”

To An Athlete Dying Young” by A. E. Housman looks at death and mortality through the viewpoint of an athlete who dies too soon. The poem talks about how short-lived life’s successes are and how death changes a person’s memory. Housman uses different themes and ideas about death to make people think and feel like time is passing. In addition, In the poem, Housman looks at the idea that death is a way to keep the glory of youth. The athlete’s early death is shown to ensure that the people of his town will always remember him at the peak of his success. The theme of death gets mixed up with ideas about fame and keeping up a good image in the face of death. The way Housman uses ideas in the poem adds to how it shows death. For example, lines like “And silence sounds no worse than cheers” and “And early though the laurel grows” (“Housman stanza 3”) make you think of the athlete’s endless rest and the lack of applause that used to come with his victories. The illustrations show how the poet thought about how life changes and how death can change things. Moreover, the poem’s views on death align with how people think about death in the modern age. During the Modern age, people became less happy with traditional ideals, and death became a subject of serious thought. The way death is shown in “To an Athlete Dying Young” shows how the modern world is fascinated by how short life is and how people want to leave a lasting mark on the world even though they will die.

On the other hand, in “Shooting an Elephant,” by George Orwell, death is dealt with а differently. The essay examines what happened because of the narrator’s actions and what it morally means to be а part of а system that hurts people. In the text, death is shown as а result of how power works and how destructive an empire is. Besides, Orwell gives а detailed account of how an elephant is killed, which leads to its death. The way the elephant’s death is shown is а metaphor for how brutal and dehumanizing it is to be in power. The essay discusses the narrator’s mixed feelings and stresses the weight of duty and the results of his choices. The way “Shooting an Elephant” talks about death shows how people in the modern era think about the effects of repressive systems and the moral choices people have to make in them (Orwell). Orwell’s thoughts on death align with the larger worries of the time about the abuse of power and how it affects people.

In comparing the treatment of death in “To An Athlete Dying Young” and “Shooting an Elephant,” certain similarities and differences emerge. Both works talk about how death is a part of life and how it affects people. They show how temporary life’s successes are and how vulnerable people are in the face of death. In “To An Athlete Dying Young,” the author thinks about how death can be a changing force that keeps the athlete’s glory, while in “Shooting an Elephant,” he thinks about how power dynamics and unjust systems can lead to death. However, these works’ viewpoints on death differ. “To An Athlete Dying Young” considers death as a way to immortalize glory and preserve the athlete’s youth. In contrast, “Shooting an Elephant” sees mortality as a result of power’s destructive nature, bringing attention to the ethical ramifications of engaging in repressive institutions (Orwell).

The effects of these similarities and differences are important in the modern age. During the Modern age, people think a lot about themselves and question long-held ideas and processes. The way death is talked about in both works shows how much this time was focused on death and the complexity of the human situation. Moreover, the depiction of death in “To An Athlete Dying Young” corresponds to the Modern era’s obsession with the transience of life and the yearning for long-term recognition. It reflects the existential fears of a society in transition when established norms and certainties are being questioned. The poem’s reflection on death as a method of maintaining youth and power connects with the Modern era’s examination of identity and the quest for immortality in the face of impermanence.

On the other hand, “Shooting an Elephant” shows how people in the modern era are becoming less happy with repressive systems and the results of being a part of them (Orwell). The way death is talked about in the essay shows how destructive power can be and how people stuck in oррressive systems face moral problems. It asks readers to think about the moral consequences of actions that cause death and how that affects both the person who did the action and the person who died. Moreover, the differences and similarities in how these two texts talk about death show how different people in the Modern era think about death. They show how the people of the time were interested in change, identity, power relations, and moral responsibilities.


The comparison and contrast of “life” and “death” treatment in “To An Athlete Dying Young” and “Shooting an Elephant” give unique insights into the Modern era’s thoughts on mortality, the human condition, and larger cultural and philosophical shifts of the period. These works remind us of the fleeting nature of life’s accomplishments, the ethical complexity inherent in power interactions, and the ongoing problems of identity and legacy. “To An Athlete Dying Young” and “Shooting an Elephant” are two independent but related depictions of death in the Modern age. Housman’s poetry considers death as a method of preserving glory and addressing the transience of life; Orwell’s article investigates death as a result of power relations and the moral quandaries that individuals face inside repressive institutions. By studying these two texts, we acquire a better grasp of the Modern era’s contemplation of mortality, questioning of established ideas, and examining the ethical difficulties inherent in the human experience.

Work cited.

Housman, A. E. “To an athlete dying young.” A Shropshire lad (1896): 24-25.

Poetry Foundation. “To an Athlete Dying Young.” Poetry Foundation, 2019,

Orwell, George. “The Orwell Foundation.” The Orwell Prize, 1936,