Setting In Tess Of The D’Urbervilles Analysis Sample Paper

Discuss the importance of setting in the novel you have studied “Tess of the D’Urbervilles”, by Thomas Hardy, is set in the years of 1880 to 1890, in Wessex, which is in the southwest of England. Settings in the novel, such as Talbothays, Flintcombe-Ash, Sandbourne and Stonehenge are important because they help us to understand the main character, Tess D’Urberville. In the novel, Tess D’Urberville and the setting she is in, mirror each other. This allows the reader to have an understanding of what Tess’s feeling and emotions are at the time.

After the death of her baby, Tess leaves her hometown of Marlott to work at Talbothays, a dairy farm. Talbothays is a “placid valley”, which Tess uses as an opportunity to forget about her baby and Alec. “The sense of being amid new scenes where there were no invidious eyes upon her, sent her spirits wonderfully”. By moving to Talbothays, Tess is given a fresh start in her life. The dairy farm is lush, “green” and fertile. The sun was always shining in “dazzling brilliancy”, “blooming young women”, and milkers always singing “a cheerful ballad” in the farm, and this happy vibe on the farm reflected in Tess as well.

It was obvious that throughout the many places Tess travelled to, Talbothays was where she had been the most happiest. Tess had “never in her recent life been so happy as she was now” and “her hopes, rose higher and higher”. Only positive things happened to Tess at Talbothays. The setting of Talbothays, a “happy green tract of land”, also reflected Tess as a person. On the farm crops were cultivated, grown and were harvested. Like the plants and crops, Tess too grew up on the farm.

A young Tess came to the farm, put her past and mistakes behind her, matured and became a woman, with opportunities and her life ahead of her. This is shown in pathetic fallacy, when Hardy writes “the sapling which has rooted down to poisonous stratum on the spot of its sowings had been transplanted to a deeper soil”. Tess is being compared to the “sapling”, and the “deeper soil” may refer to her freedom at Talbothays or new opportunities. Tess was “no longer the milkmaid, but a visionary essence of woman”. Hardy uses the setting surroundings of Tess at the time and combines escriptions which reflect around Tess’ feelings during that stage in her life. Like Talbothays, the setting of Flintcombe-Ash mirrored Tess’ feelings and emotions. However, Tess’ experience at Flintcombe-Ash, a “barren” region, was horrible and unpleasant compared to Talbothays. The air at the farm was “dry and cold”, “there were few trees” and the farm had “stubborn soil”. The Flintcombe-Ash farm was a “starve acre place”, “uncared for” and the field was a “desolate drab” whereas Talbothays which was so lush and full of “rich agriculture”.

The farm’s dreadful setting reflected Tess’ feelings and emotions. She was upset often and cried about her husband who had left her. As a worker at Flintcombe-Ash, Tess “has to serve” the “red tyrant” steam threshing machinery and turn the “inexorable wheels”. Tess “was so tired” from working “hour after hour”, where she worked like a servant, feeding the “despotic demand” of the machinery. Flintcombe-Ash reflected the harshness of the work and the desolation of Tess’ life. Only negative things happened to Tess during her work experience at Flintcombe-Ash.

Beware Of The Dog Analysis

Beware of the Dog is a 1944 World War II story by Roald Dahl. It is about Peter Williamson, a Spitfire pilot, who is flying home injured after a dogfight when he begins to feel light-headed, decides to bail out of his plane over the English Channel. He then wakes up in hospital; his injuries are treated, and he is told he is in Brighton. However, he soon begins to notice that the hospital is not quite as it should be. The water is hard, and he remembers from his schooldays that water in Brighton is soft. He also hears the sounds of Junkers 88s flying overhead, when in England the German bombers would be quickly shot down.

Finally, he looks out of the window and sees a sign which says ‘Garde Au Chien’ – French for ‘Beware of the Dog’, and he realizes that he is in France. Shortly after this, the nurse tells him that someone from the Royal Air Force is here to see him. However, knowing he is in France, and a prisoner of war, Peter refuses to tell the man anything more than his name, rank and number. This story will be analyzed according to Gerard Genette, a French literary theorist, associated in particular with the theory of structuralism taking into account the concepts of Genettes narratology.

The first concept is order, it has to do with the structure of the narration of the story or the plot and this refers to flash-backs and flash-forwards. Genette, argues that there are two kinds of plots: complex and simple. Beware of the dog has a complex plot because it has flashbacks which refers to the memory, and past event. It is like saying something that happened in the past. On the other hand, it also has flash-forwards which reveal events that will occur in the future (Wikipedia). As an example of flash-forward in Be aware of the dog could be: “ I’ll be there in half an hour.

When I land I shall taxi in and switch off my engine and I shall say, help me to get out, will you. I shall make my voice sound ordinary and natural and none of them will take any notice. Then I shall say, someone help me to get out. I can’t do it alone because I’ve lost one of my legs. They’ll all laugh and think that I’m joking, and I shall say, all right, come and have a look, you unbelieving bastards. Then Yorky will climb up onto the wing and look inside. He’ll probably be sick because of all the blood and the mess. I shall laugh and say, for God’s sake, help me out. An example of flash-back could be: “Then he saw the sun shining on the engine cowling of his machine. He saw the rivets in the metal, and he remembered where he was. He realized that he was no longer feeling good; that he was sick and giddy”, One day, when it was white, he put out a hand and he touched something. He took it between his fingers and crumpled it. For a time he lay there, idly letting the tips of his fingers play with the thing which they had touched. Then slowly he opened his eyes, looked down at his hand, and saw that he was holding something which was white.

It was the edge of a sheet. He knew it was a sheet because he could see the texture of the material and the stitchings on the hem. He screwed up his eyes, and opened them again quickly. This time he saw the room. He saw the bed in which he was lying; he saw the grey walls and the door and the green curtains over the window. There were some roses on the table by his bed. The second concept to analyze is frequency that is “The separation between an event and its narration which allows several possibilities.”

  1. An event can occur once and be narrated once (singular).
  2. An event can occur many times and be narrated once (iterative).
  3. An event can occur once and be narrated n times (repetitive).

An event can occur many times and be narrated n times (multiple). In Beware of the dog, the author uses the following frequencies: Singular because some events are told once and once, it means telling every time what is happening. It also includes multiple frequency because the nurse enters many times to the room. Last, it is repetitive because one of the events is told many times; I think it is a short idea with repetitive words.

For example: …On one side he saw the sun; on the other he saw the whiteness of the clouds, and as he fell, as he somersaulted in the air, the white clouds chased the sun and the sun chased the clouds. They chased each other in a small circle; they ran faster and faster, and there was the sun and the clouds and the clouds and the sun, and the clouds came nearer until suddenly there was no longer any sun, but only a great whiteness. The whole world was white, and there was nothing in it. It was so white that sometimes it looked black, and after a time it was either white or black, but mostly it was white.

He watched it as it turned from white to black, and then back to white again, and the white stayed for a long time, but the black lasted only for a few seconds. He got into the habit of going to sleep during the white periods, and of waking up just in time to see the world when it was black. But the black was very quick. Sometimes it was only a flash, like someone switching off the light, and switching it on again at once, and so whenever it was white, he dozed off. The third concept deals with Duration, it describes the rhythm and pacing of the story time. The separation between an event and its narration means that there is discourse time and narrative time. These are the two main elements of duration.” According to Genette Beware of the dog has a narrative time about 3 to 4 days. All this time passed during the time he were in the airplane, (hours) then, the 3 days he were in the hospital and the other time I suppose the time employed to rescue him. The last concept is mood, “ Genette said narrative mood is dependent on the ‘distance’ and ‘perspective’ of the narrator, and like music, narrative mood has predominant patterns.

It is related to voice” Beware of the dog?s point of view is third person. For instance: As he fell he opened his eyes, because he knew that he must not pass out before he had pulled the cord. On one side he saw the sun; on the other he saw the whiteness of the clouds, and as he fell, as he somersaulted in the air, the white clouds chased the sun and the sun chased the clouds. They chased each other in a small circle; they ran faster and faster, and there was the sun and the clouds and the clouds and the sun, and the clouds came nearer until suddenly there was no longer any sun, but only a great whiteness.

Rhetorical Analysis “Why I Hate Britney”

1. The purpose of this argument is for the writer, Nisey Williams, to state why she does not want to bring a child into a sex filled culture of so called “idols” like Britney Spears. She helps to achieve the argument that parents really need to be more aware of what enters our children’s minds. Williams gives evidence that these music icons are selling sex instead of music though the revealing clothing that they wear. 2. Mostly parents and people considering having children are the audience of this article.

She states, “The main argument against those like me who bash Britney is that it’s up to parents – not celebrities – to teach their children morals and appropriate behavior. ” 3. Nisey uses mostly the appeal of Logos and Ethos. She states many facts and evidence that Britney among other singers who are very “sexual” in their dress are changing the ways the children today want to dress. One example speaks of clothing designers from Wal-Mart to Unlimited are working side by side with the entertainment industry to mimic the clothing worn by performers like Britney.

She also uses different quotes from several internet sites about the changes in how tweens want to dress. 4. The genre has small bits of humor but I sense more angst towards the way our younger generation is becoming more sexualized. For example, on page 276 Nisey states, “There is a growing group of sexualized, so-called entertainers who seem to be multiplying lie roaches. ” Nisey goes on to make her point by saying, “Britney’s marketing management is pimping her and she’s without the dignity or strength to step off the street corner and hail a cab from Lolita Lane to Respectable Road. ” She shows seriousness through her sense of humor.

Nisey Williams, a senior at UT Austin is making the argument. She hopes to become a High School English teacher one day. The ethos that she makes is mostly towards the character of Britney. She states that these type of “female artists sell their bodies in order to sell their music. ” She also uses direct quotes from Britney in her In Style interview. Britney says the reason why she bares all is, “I’m a girl! Why not? ” Nisey goes on to say in a sarcastic manner, “Great message for the kiddies. ” 6. Since Nisey is majoring in Cultural Anthropology, she most likely has strong knowledge in the subject she is writing about here.

She uses an example that was given to her by a co-worker. She states, “One of my co-workers said she had such a difficult time school shopping for her thirteen year old daughter that she ended up taking her to Academy for wind-suits, free flowing T-shirts, and soccer shorts. ” 7. Several facts are used to make her argument. One was an August 14th taping of Good Morning America, entitled “From Oshkosh to Oh My Gosh. ” The show divided the children by sex and had them watch a J-Lo video. The girls used the word “sexy” numerous times while their parents sat in shock because they had no idea the word was such a big part of their vocabulary.

Nisey also uses a quote from Diane Levin, an education professor who has studied the effects of media on children’s development for over 20 years. Levin states, “The kind of increased sexual images that children are seeing parallel with when they get a little older. They start becoming sexually active earlier. ” 8. Her claims are mostly to strike a nerve with parents for the facts that children want to dress more provocative today. Nisey takes an interview from a Milwaukee article, “One mother reports that her daughter threw a fit in the department store when she refused to buy her thongs.

The mother was completely baffled by her child’s reactions until the 12 year old admitted that the other girls in the locker room teased her for wearing bikini underwear instead of thongs. ” 9. The contexts deal with the social and cultural changes these young girls are facing when it comes to fitting in. Britney and other sexually charged pop stars are setting bad examples with their clothing and behavior and parents should not allow singers such as her to become role models for their children. 10. She drew me in with her first paragraph on why she chooses not to have children.

At first I thought it was going to be a very funny article. I was happy to see the shift that the article took as the serious evidence was presented. This is a matter that more parents need to take more seriously. 11. Her language is very blunt and straight to the point but also contains an abundance of sarcasm. Although this is a topic that has always been important to me, she really had a way to make it of more importance. In Britney’s interview with In Style she says she “has no patience for those who criticize her skin-baring…why not? ” Nisey replies with sarcasm, “Great message for the kiddies Brit. ”

error: Content is protected !!