Silver Or Lead Vs. Live Free And Starve Essay Example

Everyone sees our world in different shades of different colors. The United States is the worlds most powerful nation, and we have our hand in virtually all projects around the world, we do this to try to better it for the people inhabiting it. Is The United States actually creating a better planet? Is the United States the one causing all the problems?

I will be comparing and contrasting two stories, one is about Columbians who are forced to work in the drug trade business, or take a bullet and die, while the other story is about how the United states wanting to pass a bill in the United States that would put a halt to all trade tied with countries that endorse child labor. These two issues are very similar while at the same time they differ from one another, and how here in the united states we are trying to fix these situations, but might not be able to fix or solve anything. These two articles are very similar in the fact that the U. S. s involved and trying to better and change certain ways of living for people over seas. In Silver or Lead, the united states is trying to pass a bill that stated, “The United States would no longer permit the import of goods from factories were forced or indentured child labor used(Divakaruni 442). ” While in the second article, Silver or Lead, The U. S. sends billions on dollars to aid Columbia, but the money meant for the aid of the citizens, for the people that need aid, is being used in funding their militia, and the production of drugs that will be later flowed into the untied states, and other parts of the world.

A similarity among both of these stories is that if the United States is tries to ‘fix’ the situation it will all end up backfiring on us and becoming a bigger issue than in the beginning. In the story Live Free or Starve, many children are being employed and paid for the work that they are doing. Without these jobs they would have no money and wouldn’t have what is need to survive. “But is this bill, which, if it passes the Senate and is signed by President Clinton, will lead to the unemployment of almost a million children” (Divakaruni 443).

If such bill were to be passed, millions of children would be left without jobs, and without a check at the end of the week, meaning that they would have no money to pay for food, no money to stay alive, they would just starve. In Silver or Lead a story about a drug war, there is no light at the end of the tunnel signifying and end to all the unnecessary deaths brought on due to the violence that is tie with drug trafficking. All that is happening is more, and more money is being made, while more holes are being filled with the murdered bodies of people caught in the crossfires of this drug war.

Nothing is working to stop this war. The consequences of the U. S. trying to help out these countries rise from ruins only seems to be causing more problems, causing more deaths, and more heart ache. A difference between Silver or Lead and Live Free and Starve, is how our government affects each of these countries overall. In the story Live Free and Starve The United States government is trying to pass a bill that would ultimately make us stop trading with companies over seas that hire children to make products used in the U.

S. This would have an impact on children very severally, they would lose work hours, and possibly their entire jobs, which would force them onto the streets, force millions of kids to live on the streets. These kids have no other means of work, they have no families to shelter and feed them, they would just end up starving, and dying on the streets that they so much hoped to be off of, and instead to be working and making money to survive. In Silver or Lead the U. S. unds and arms foreign countries to stop the rebel forces in drug wars. “Entire villages get caught in the crossfire between paramilitaries and rebels. In the past ten years, over 35,000 civilians have lost their lives in the conflict and hundreds of thousands have been forced from their homes” (Carpanter, 215). All this help we seems to be giving them appears to only be causing one thing, which is death, death of thousands of civilians. The last similarity is that in each story there was a narrated story within the story.

In Live Free and Starve the author refers to a you boy she had met named Nimai, “Nimai’s parents were too poor to feed their several children, and while his older brothers were already working in the fields and earning their keep, Nimai was to frail to do so (Divakaruni, 443). Her mother took him in, and provided him with work, so that he could pay for his necessities and survive. How if an anti-child-labor law were to be in place, it would have effected them, and she would not have been able to provide such work for him.

In Silver or Lead the author talks about Eric and Miguel, two young boys caught in the middle of a drug war. A young American, Eric, who does drugs, and Miguel a young Columbian who doesn’t do drugs, but who has to live everyday in the middle of the worlds largest producer of cocaine. “ Eric and Miguel represent opposite poles in what the United States government refers to as the “war on drugs. ” Miguel’s home is where it starts. In his little village, drug protection is the only possible way of life. Eric’s home is where it ends.

In his suburban paradise, the stress of homework and ex-girlfriends requires weekend breaks for drugs” (Javdani, 448). Lastly, the United States should sit down and think things through, if they are indeed going to go forth and try to make things better, than they need to come up with better bills that would benefit those young kids over seas working in factories. The US needs to stop focusing of other countries where drugs are being made, and focus on our boarders, and instead of sending money over to those countries mass producing drugs, they need to focus on putting an end to the drug flow into our nation.

Our nation might think its doing whats best for our country while trying to help out others, but are they doing either? These problems may someday be fixed and created into something good, something good that everybody can benefit from, The U. S. is trying to be the ones to help, but sometimes you just need to let things unwind by themselves and just work on your own persona, and try to make yourself a better person, that is what needs to be done to the U. S. , we need to strengthen and better ourselves before we go out to better the rest of the world.

Doublespeak And Propoganda

Doublespeak is a part of everyday life. Turning on the television, commercials and advertisements bombard households with doublespeak. Advertisers use doublespeak in the way of euphemisms, color, bold words, jargon, gobbledygook and inflated language. Doublespeak is a non-stop flow of phrases to manipulate consumer’s basic emotions and get certain reactions. For example, oxiclean advertisements use a form of propaganda called “weasel words”; phrases like “new and improved”, “acts fast” and “like magic” make the product seem better than others.

Using the phrase “acts fast” implies this product is faster than others. But what exactly does that mean? Does the product run fast, cook fast, drive fast? Advertisers don’t say what exactly the product does. Consumers just assume the product that “acts faster” is the best product. This oxiclean advertisement uses inflated language to mislead consumers. Inflated language is making ordinary seem extraordinary. To make everyday things seem impressive. Another example of propaganda more specifically card stacking is pharmaceutical commercials.

The advertisements highlight all the wonderful benefits of the drug using a soothing, sophisticated voice. Then at the end of the commercial there is a quick run through of the negative side effects: vomiting, headache, soreness, etc. using the same pleasant voice. The negative aspects are deemphasized while viewers are still left with an overall positive impression. This form of propaganda uses distorted phrases which would be the quickness of the side effects of the drugs. Lastly, the propaganda and doublespeak techniques of politics.

The wordplay of the political world has changed. Taxes has become known as revenue this doublespeak is a euphemism. Taxes has had a negative connotation and recently in the presidential election the euphemism revenue has appeared. Politicians are universally known for deceiving the public and misleading with propaganda especially in the presidential race. Slandering is no foe to politicians. They like to mislead using jargon and “weasel words” such as left wing or right wing. Left wing is a politician or citizen who is more liberal for gay rights and pro-choice.

And right wing is a politician or citizen who is looking for lower taxes or “revenue” usually upper class and shoots down gay rights. The use of doublespeak and propaganda surrounds every aspect of society, from government to television ads. Wordplay and misleading statements entice consumers to believe their products or visions are what society should chose. Advertisements catch the eye of consumers by using euphemisms, color, bold words, jargon, gobbledygook and inflated language. Doublespeak is a non-stop flow of phrases to manipulate consumer’s basic emotions and get certain reactions.

Comparison/Contrast Between Barack Obama And John F. Kennedy

Presidents Kennedy and Obama were both men who changed the world when they become won the Presidency. While these men are quite similar, they are also very different. Their voices in the inaugural addresses that they both delivered are very influential. There are four factors to consider in comparing and contrasting the inaugural address of both presidents. The aforementioned factors include historical perspective, manner of presentation, content, and as well as influence to the people and existing conditions.

The first point is the comparison and contrast of both speeches in accordance with historical perspective. Simply put, the inaugural address of each government leader is influenced by historical factors at the time it was delivered before the public. In case of John F. Kennedy, the speech was given when the country just won the Second World War via brave spirits of American fighters who redeemed freedom through death and agony because of the bloodshed. On the other hand, Barack Obama delivered his speech amidst economic crisis that the country is facing with hopes of getting over it.

In the first, the country is beset with economic problems that caused tremendous trials and difficulties. That is the reason why the tenor of Kennedy’s speech is focused on world unity against tyranny while the speech of Obama is geared more on economic progress within the country. The second point of this paper focuses more on the manner of presentation of both inaugural addresses. They both had different focus. In the speech, Kennedy focused on announcing his foreign policy agenda to different nations. While Obama put forward different and concrete measures in view of different existing problem.

On the other hand, it was Kennedy who stressed that people should not think on what the government could do to the people but what the people could contribute to the country (Eidenmuller, 2001, p. 1). The content of the inaugural speeches of both Presidents is the third point to be discussed in this paper. As heirs of the first revolution, Kennedy mentioned that Americans are willing to pay whatever it may be, just to advance the interest of liberty and freedom (Eidenmuller, 2001, p. 1). On the other hand, Obama mentioned that the country cannot flourish long once it gives special treatment only the prosperous (Phillips, 2009, p. ). Lastly, both speeches are influential and delivered in accordance with existing conditions of time. President John F. Kennedy is aware of the effects of war and tyranny which posed threat to the nation prior to his rise to power. His speech is focused on the way every American give example to other citizens of the world that doing the right thing is better than sowing hatred and inhumane values. The speech of President Barack Obama, he is more concerned of the economy and of eliminating government programs that does not work for the benefit of the people.

Finally, both speeches deserve to be remembered even up to this time, and the generation to come because their words are product of raw realizations and commitment to serve the American nation with honor and gratitude.

Works Cited

Eidenmuller, Michael E. “John F. Kennedy: Inaugural Address”. 2001. American Rhetoric. Retrieved July 11, 2009 www. bartleby. com/124/pres56. html Phillips, Macon. “President Barack Obama’s Inaugural Address”. 21 January 2009 < http://www. whitehouse. gov/blog/inaugural-address/. >

error: Content is protected !!