Texting While Driving Essay Essay Example

My chosen topic for my argument paper is distractions while driving, specifically the law against texting while driving. I understand that there are various distractions while driving, but I am particularly concerned about the ban on texting. I understand why this legislation exists as texting takes attention away from the road. Furthermore, I have noticed that teenagers nowadays tend to prefer texting over making phone calls. Personally, I would opt for making phone calls as it seems easier to communicate your message and move forward.

Teenagers now exchange an average of 2,899 text messages per month while driving, which poses a significant risk. This danger is not limited to teenagers alone. A recent study discovered that truck drivers who engage in texting are 23 times more likely to be involved in a crash or near-crash situation compared to those who do not get distracted. The act of dialing while driving is even more dangerous. Another study found that texting diverts a driver’s attention from the road for approximately 4 seconds on average – this is enough time to travel the length of a football field at a speed of 55 miles per hour.

Despite these findings, one cannot help but question why texting receives so much focus when there are numerous other distractions on the road such as fast food restaurants. People do not simply visit Burger King or McDonald’s solely for taking their food home; they order food with the intention of eating it while driving.

Is it safe to drive with one hand on the wheel while eating a burger or is it a potential distraction that can lead to an accident? What about turning your attention away from the road to change the radio station? There are various activities we engage in while driving that can be highly distracting. For instance, female drivers often take their eyes off the road to apply makeup using the rearview mirror. It is my belief that there should be regulations addressing all forms of distractions, not solely texting while driving. How many more accidents must occur before these concerns are taken seriously?

The implementation of laws has the potential to significantly decrease the occurrence of dangerous behaviors, like eating a hamburger while driving. Although laws cannot entirely prevent individuals from doing as they please, they can encourage people to reconsider engaging in such actions. Therefore, I am in favor of enacting this law, which should not only focus on texting and driving but also cover other risky behaviors. Instead of restricting hands-free phones to new and expensive cars exclusively, all vehicles should have this feature installed to promote safer driving. We should not be held accountable for the growing influence of technology in our lives; rather, regulations on the availability of technology provided to us should be considered instead of penalizing us for utilizing easily accessible tools.

In my perspective, I desire for my audience to comprehend and relate to the message I am attempting to convey. Overall, I believe it is beneficial to enforce this law as any effort to hinder distractions is acceptable in my opinion. Nevertheless, I also suggest taking into account other factors that contribute to accidents and implementing laws addressing them as well. However, regardless of the regulations in place, individuals will inevitably discover methods to engage in prohibited activities while driving. Consequently, I perceive this situation as an opportunity to introduce future supplementary laws.

Calculate The Window Of Vulnerability

To resolve the issue of the window of vulnerability (WOVE), we would need to get the patch from Microsoft. According to Microsoft, it will take up to 3 days for the patch to be available. Then, we would need additional time to download and test the patch to make sure that this is what is needed to fix the security breach on the SMB server. After doing the testing, the IT department would need time to install the patch onto the servers and deploy to the client computers.

This will take 2 days to do, depending on the IT staff, if they work on weekends will determine the completion date. Meaning, if they will work on the weekend, then the deployment to all computers and servers will be done by that Sunday. If not, then it will be the following Tuesday. So, the time that is needed would be a week. To recap, the security breach was reported on a Friday. On Monday, looked on Microsoft’s website to see when the patch would be released, and t indicated that it would take 3 days for it to be available.

Counting Monday, 3 days would be, Wednesday. Depending on the time that the patch is released on Wednesday, would need an additional 2 days to download and test the patch before deploying, if early Wednesday, then Thursday to test. But if it comes late Wednesday, then it would take Thursday and Friday to test. Then that would leave the weekend, if the IT staff would work on the weekend. But if not, then it is going to restart on Monday and complete on Tuesday.

Genetic Effects Of Radiation

The nuclear age begins with the Second World War, 50 years after this historic event, two new cities have risen from the atomic ashes of this catastrophic war. In one of these cities, Chernobyl, ten years after the nuclear explosion, entire populations have been abandoned around the destroyed reactor, to escape the contaminated water and food produced in the once-rich soil.

In the same period since World War II, most tropical forests were destroyed. A dramatic decline in plant and animal species was found. Anthropologists recorded a global catastrophe so enormous that it will probably not be surpassed throughout history.

There is still a question as to human survival beyond the global spread of Chernobyl vaporized plutonium. This relates not only to an elemental plastic tag, but also to genetic effects, which are much more difficult to test. Genetic defects, cancer, leukemia, and fertility problems will be likely consequences.

The variety of impacts on the immune system are also difficult to predict. However, the nuclear industry safely assumes that the public will not associate illness with contamination. Many continue to say that the 31 people who died fighting the fire at Chernobyl were the only victims of radiation. Fourteen years ago, the inhabitants of Ukraine, especially those north of kyiv, the capital of this former Soviet republic, began to experience the unimaginable: a reactor at the Chernobyl nuclear plant exploded.

The disaster, the result of human error, happened so quickly that there was no time to avoid it or run from danger. The Soviet authorities were slow to react and warn the population about the risks. The most common birth-defects in animals are the absence of one or more extremities, deformation of the skull or spine, absence of eyes, overgrowth of the eyelids, lack of hair, exposed internal organs, or absence of an anus.

The visits of various commissions have not yet resulted in any final conclusion or evaluation of these animal deformities. the question remains, “What will happen tomorrow?” As a step toward an assessment of the effects of the radio-ecological situation on living creatures, Belarusian scientists have studied specimens of plants and wild animals within the contaminated zone and compared their physiology and behavior with those on control specimens in special experimental areas outside the 30- km Zone.

The genetic effects of radiation on the chromatin apparatus of plants were revealed in a study of the frequency of mitotic anomalies in the seedlings of various types of barley rye and wheat grown at an experimental station in the Khoiniki region. It was established that different strains reacted differently to radioactive contamination.

The cesium-134/7 content of rye and wheat grains grown in Khoiniki was an order of magnitude higher than that of grain grown in Minsk province, while there was little difference in the case of barley. An analysis of chromosomal aberrations year by year has shown that the frequency of mitotic anomalies in plants grown in the contaminated zone in 1987 was little different from the frequency observed in ecologically clean areas. In 1988, however, in all types of plants under observation there was a noticeable rise in the frequency

of chromosomal aberrations. Signs of degeneration and destruction have also been noted in the pancreas, leading to increased permeability of the blood vessels, leucocyte infiltration, changes in the vessel walls, and the abnormal growth of connective tissue. At the same time, the immune system has been significantly damaged, as is shown by a change in the number of differentiated B-lymphocytes in the bone marrow, the reduction of polyferation, the differentiation and migration of T-lymphocytes, a disequilibrium of the proportions among thymocytes, etc.

Damage to the structure and function of the membranes of the lymphocytes is evident, as is damage to the peripheral hormonal action machanisms and to the system of peroxide oxidation of lipids, along with an increased level of wasteproducts in the blood and an accompanying drop in the activity of the antioxidant systems. There are marked changes in the function of the cell genome, etc.

We challenge the “nuclear professionals” to stand on equal ground with the victims. The victims are very much alone, and much of the public is looking the other way. Getting Americans to look at Chernobyl requires awareness of the emotional impact including denial. The need to be impartial often renders people aloof. A climate of insensitivity is fed by competition while the cold cutting edge works best with a forced sense of well-being, while the balance of truth is undermined by accusations of false fears.

 

error: Content is protected !!