The Adam Style: Approach To Interior Elements Free Writing Sample


Architecture aside, Adam was also famous for his interior designs. His approach to interior spaces had several characteristic features. He used all interior elements in conjuncture instead of relying on several specific ones and stressed adaptability over uniformity.

Main body

Careful arrangement of all the elements of interior design into a coherent composition, as opposed to overreliance on some of them, was pivotal for Adam’s style. Nothing escaped his attention: from decorations of ceilings and walls through furniture, mantles to commissioned works of art – everything served his artistic vision (Malnar and Vodvarka, p. 121). The creative arrangement of all these components is responsible for the “rich and lively interior” characteristic of Adam’s works (Malnar and Vodvarka, p. 120). This willingness to create interiors rich in detail, yet having no emphasis on any particular element, defines Adam’s distinctive place in the history of interior design.

Another characteristic feature of Adam’s style as an interior designer was his adaptability and distaste for bland uniformity. When decorating Williams Wynn House – one of the townhouses of London – Adam had to work with irregular and confined spaces, but regarded this circumstance not as a limitation, but as a challenge (Malnar and Vodvarka, p. 121). He stressed that even small premises have the potential for ingenious interior design: “where variety and grandeur.. cannot be obtained, we should be satisfied with a justness of proportion and an elegance of style” (Malnar and Vodvarka, p. 121). This principle was the extension of his general belief that “a single set of parameters” could never suffice for every conceivable situation. Instead of such stylistic uniformity, Adam insisted on adapting the interior design to every particular space.


To put it short, Adam’s approach to interior design stressed the adaptability and careful arrangement of all the elements. From ceiling decorations to artworks, all components of the interior complemented each other, with none being too overbearing. Adam also maintained that interior design should adapt to the premises instead of trying to use the same uniform schemes again and again.


Malnar, Joy M., and Frank Vodvarka. The Interior Dimension: A Theoretical Approach to Enclosed Space. Wiley, 1991.

How Globalization Affects Governance?

Nowadays the phenomenon of globalization can be described as a dominating power behind major political, business, and sociological developments all around the world. From day to day global economy, politics and culture become more and more autocratic in every land. The process of globalization inevitably affects governance all over the world. In the following paper, the peculiarities of the process of affecting governance by globalization will be addressed in detail. Overall, after the evaluation of facts, it can be stated that under the influence of globalization, the transition of power from national governments to global formations takes place, the opportunities for non-governmental governance increase, and convergence in forms of control is observed.

First of all, speaking about the way globalization affects governance, it is important to note that it causes transition of power from national governments to global formations. Especially, within the period of the past few years the phenomenon of the ‘virtualization of states’ can be seen. Some prominent political analysts make their prognosis regarding the future of virtualization of governments by stating that in twenty years, most governments of the world will offer their major services online. Besides, these political analysts state that very soon power will become concentrated in the hands of leaders of global formations rather than local states. In this vein, the most remarkable point is that even today, much power already belongs to global organizations. For example, according to Kahler and Lake, “the state’s monopoly of familiar governance functions is ending, as governance migrates up to supranational organizations; down to newly empowered regions, provinces, and municipalities; and laterally to such private actors as multinational firms and transnational non-governmental organizations (NGOs)” (1). In these conditions, national governments face a twofold effect, when they both are pushed to guarantee a higher level of democracy to their citizens, and still, are limited in the opportunities for pursuing their local interests. The way this tendency affects lives of common citizens can be seen in the example of global trade unions such as WTO and IMF. In the 2010s, people in the most diversified territories of the world were already exposed to the undesirable consequences of globalizing economical markets. The main problems caused by it were unemployment and deregulation. However, it should be noted that deregulation is rather an ambiguous concept as many specialists strive to prove its positive impact on the Anglo-Saxon capitalism, and many economical critiques express their negative position regarding it using providing evidence to the fact that the economically weak states become harmed as a consequence of external and internal deregulation. In addition, the inhabitants of many countries collide with the raise of prices for certain goods, and their reduction for the other ones. As a result, local economies are weakened, but global corporations win unexampled profits. The other negative consequence of this phenomenon is in lowering the standard of living for citizens of states that have entered global trade and political alliances.

Next, globalization increases the opportunities for non-governmental governance. With industrialization and modernization, societies become more complex, which offers additional power to non-governmental institutions such as business corporations, social organizations, and environmental protection organizations. Market-based governance fosters the development of the global community by means of introducing a number of important policies such as promoting technological innovations, accelerating new sales strategies, establishing new taxation regulations, and providing more convenient conditions for global businesses. The increasing spread and legitimacy of market-based systems for exchange and distribution between the countries and inside them is the power that not only stands behind the speeding up of the process of globalization, but it is also the power that controls lives of millions of people in the world including their job opportunities and economic welfare. Social organizations pass from state level to a globalized one with the purpose of affecting global society by progressive democratic ideas. Environmental protection organizations strive to promote their values in every land all around the globe to prevent the harmful effects of global industrialization and modernization such as global warming, the change of climate, and environmental pollution. The increase of power accumulation by non-governmental organizations supports the idea that very soon the face of the world may considerably change as the transition of authority from states to global organizations of different levels and different spheres of influence will take place (Kahler and Lake 10).

Finally, under the influence of globalization, convergence in forms of control in different countries of the world takes place. This means that political institutions in different nations start adopting similar policies, regulating their work, and for that reason, they appear to be more or less the same in their working strategies and concepts in the most diversified cultures of the world. This tendency is seen as a threat to the well-being of national states in the world by numerous specialists. The following comment by Kahler and Lake explains the reasons why convergence is evaluated as a dangerous development in modern global politics:

Critics of globalization contend that competitive economic pressures will produce institutional and policy homogeneity over time in a direction favored by the most mobile factors of production—footloose capital. It is further assumed that these most mobile capitalists will prefer lax regulation and less government intervention. In this view, the welfare state is placed at risk, and governments are no longer free to adopt policies that respond to the needs of their societies (Kahler and Lake 12).

Thus, global convergence in forms of control is seen as a consequence of globalization that is capable of changing human society to the unexampled state.

In conclusion, it should be stated that as a result of the process of globalization, the shift in the common concept of authority distribution takes place. In this vein, the very idea of governance undergoes significant changes due to the transition of power from nation states to global organizations; the tendency to offer more authority to non-governmental institutions; and convergence in forms of control in different countries of the world. People in many lands come to believe in the model, which can be described by the motto “governing is better together”, which is explained by the fact that they observe the increase in the level of democracy in numerous countries and significant improvements in the financial situation in states with a weak economy. However, political and economical critiques are not so positive regarding the outcomes of globalization for governance in the world. They explain their position by stating that in case the situation with political convergence will continue to develop, human society will undergo unexampled changes, and the notion of state, as it has been perceived for centuries, will become a matter of the past.

Works Cited

Kahler, Miles and David Lake. Governance in a Global Economy, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2003. Print.

Kant’s Moral Philosophy And Judge Patrick’s Final Decision

Kant’s moral philosophy falls under deontological ethical theories. The theories in this group hold that “the rightness or wrongness of actions does not depend on their consequences but on whether they fulfill our duty” (Walla 731). Kant argued that events such as lying, theft, and murder were morally wrong even in instances where they resulted in happiness (qtd. in Walla 731). One must engage in actions that do not violate the rights and goals of other people. Kant trusted in the existence of an absolute law of morality, which he termed as the categorical imperative. In the film Gone Baby Gone, Judge Patrick is faced with the dilemma of deciding between doing what is ethically correct and what is good. This essay will use Kant’s moral philosophy to critic the final judgment that the judge made.

Patrick encounters challenges in passing a judgment after Jack Doyle (Morgan Freeman) admits to kidnapping Amanda McCready to rescue her from her drunkard mother. Jack believed that Amanda would have suffered if left under the care of her mother because the latter had no time for anybody (Gone Baby Gone). The only way that he could have helped was by taking the child away from its mother. The conversation between Patrick and Jack supports Kant’s opinion of “treating all human beings as ends in themselves and never as merely means to ends” (Walla 734). The judge questioned the morality of Jack’s actions. Even though the intention was to rescue Amanda from her irresponsible mother, he did not have the right to decide the fate of the mother and her child. The judge failed to understand how one can take a child away to save it from its own mother. Based on Kant’s moral viewpoint, a child belongs to its mother (Walla 735). It is wrong to separate a kid from the mother no matter the circumstances. Patrick acknowledged that Amanda would have suffered if left under the care of her mother. However, he refused to treat Helene (Amanda’s mother) as a means to an end.

The judge opted to do what was right and gave Amanda back to her mother. His decision was unpopular with many people who equated the move to condemn the child. His character defeated common sense when he consciously decided that Amanda belonged with her mother, knowing very well that Jack would have been a better custodian of the girl than Helene. If Patrick had decided to give Amanda to Jack, he would have set a wrong precedence. His actions would have amounted to promoting and accommodating a universal rule that would have legalized snatching, stealing, and separating children from their parents whenever people felt that the kids were not being raised in the right manner. Such a move would have resulted in parents going through a lot of pain. Take for instance a situation where a couple separates due to irreconcilable differences and one of them is unemployed. It would have meant that the unemployed party had to surrender the custodian of the child since they could not raise it well. Such a decision would not have been correct, especially where a mother had to give away her child due to financial hardships.

The judgment made by Patrick underscored the importance of doing what is right even if it is unpopular. The judge highlighted the importance of treating people as ends to a course and not as means. The film helped people to understand the ethical theme of decision-making and to discern what their duties entail. The judgment meant that if faced with a dilemma of choosing between what is ethically correct and what is good, the former should take precedence.

Works Cited

Gone Baby Gone. Directed by Ben Affleck, performance by Casey Affleck and Michelle Monaghan, The Ladd Company, 2007.

Walla, Alice Pinheiro. “Kant’s Moral Theory and Demandingness.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol. 18, no. 4, 2015, pp. 731-743.

error: Content is protected !!