The Head In Edward Nugent’s Hand Sample Paper

In this written assignment I will write a synopsis for the first three chapters of the book The Head in Edward Nugent’s Hand. The first chapter was about Ossomocomuck. In 1584 Phillip Amadas, Arthur Barlowe, and other men’s reached the Outer Banks. The Indians did not consider their land as the new world and English travelers enter an environment ruled as a prevailed. The Carolina Outer Banks was a world of water. Indians leaders show their high status through clothing, body orientation, and manner.

The Wingina’s discussed among themselves about the encounter of newcomers and the dramatic changes in Ossomocomuck. The Wingina’s people had their own creation myths that are passed on through generations. The Indians Pomeiooc houses were made of small poles and use mats that covered the house providing ventilation. The Algonquian warrior painted themselves for battles and their weapons were arrows. Englishmen could not understand that women’s worked was on the village and agriculture fields while men hunted and fought.

The Wingina’s people had different death rituals according to the individuals ranking. The ritual was a reason to survive the world with spiritual power. The second chapter was about Granganimeo. The Indians did not how to approached newcomers because they did not know if there were enemies or allies. Europeans interest about the North America had grown remarkably. The leader of a small group of Jesuit missionaries was Don Luis. The Jesuits first interaction with the Indian was respectful but they were pushy, intolerant, and the priest depended on them for food.

Then Don Luis led his people to murder the priest and Menendez learned about what was going on. He came with help by attacking Don Luis people. In 1584 Sir Walter Ralegh was send by Queen Elizabeth I to search for any New World lands that was owned by Christians. They realize if they assist the Indians they could get them to compromise with the profit, empire, and Christianity. In 1586 Barlowe describe the arrival at the Roanoke. The Villalobos attack them and ate thirty-eight Englishmen. A few Indians saw newcomers as threats and acted aggressive to protect their community.

Algonquians had a different concept about the newcomers. So when they saw newcomers landing they send three Indians to observe them. Wingina’s scout interacted with the English. He reported back that the encounter with the English was friendly. He also reported that he had saw technology that he could not comprehend and a sustainable amount of weapons. Besides their strange language they exchanged gifts and hope for an alliance in the future. The third chapter was about Wingina. Ralegh’s adviser suggested that the expedition should contain a larger force.

Developed a plan for a two pronged assaulted. Algonquians view the activities of the Europeans and sent emissaries to learn about these allies and the strength of the people that came along with him. Two Indians men came along the journey were Manteo and Wanchese. Wanchese started notice the bad intention English had and need to informed the Wingina about the dangers of the newcomers. Manteo and Wanchase sailed along with Harriot, John, White, Lane, and Grenville. There was an accident as they sail. Grenville’s flagship was so burse that all the food that was on the ship spoiled.

This left them with food for only twenty days. Wanchese left and no Indians wanted to help Arundell to find him. Monteo started to want to act as newcomer. Amanda’s went back to Aquascogoc to demand for a silver cup he believes they stole but they did not know what he was talking about. This made him angry and decides to attack. The Indians heard about the attack and learned that the English had the ability to do enormous danger to anyone who offended them. The newcomers decided to take Indians back to America and believe they could improve their ways.

Analysis Of Midsummer Night’s Dream

Analysis in A Midsummer Night’s Dream “O, I am out of breath in this fond chase! ” (Act 2 vs. 81) Figurative language is created using allusion, alliteration, metaphor, simile and personification. A simple definition of figurative language is language that is used in a special way to create a special effect. Shakespeare uses figurative language as he speaks with metaphors, similes, and personification in A Midsummer Night’s Dream “O, I am out of breath in this fond chase! ” (Act 2 vs. 81) This writing technique sets Shakespeare apart from other writers.

Although it may be confusing for teenagers to read, it started a new era of writing. Shakespeare’s elaborate writing style helps him prove his point more clearly. Shakespeare’s use of figurative language such as similes and metaphors supports his message that love is the most powerful emotion. Similes enrich description by comparing two seemingly unlike things using ‘like’ or ‘as. ‘ He used similes like a baker uses raisins, sprinkling them throughout his text to make it sweeter and richer. . For example in A Midsummer Night’s Dream, (In line 7) “No, no, I am as ugly as a bear”, Helena is comparing herself ugly as a bear.

Also, (In line 9-10) “Therefore no marvel though Demetrius Do, as a monster fly my presence thus”. Recognizing when his characters are speaking figuratively helps in understanding the poem. A metaphor is a figure of speech in which an object is described by comparing it to something else. For example in A Midsummer Night’s Dream, “The more my prayer, the lesser is my grace. Happy is Hermia, wheresoe’er she lies; For she hath blessed and attractive eyes. ” (In lines 2-4) Shakespeare is comparing more prayer to lesser grace and happy to hermia. Shakespeare uses metaphors to allow the audience to create a better understanding of the text.

It also involves the viewers in a sense, giving them a chance to relate to the familiar object. Shakespeare’s use of figurative language such as similes and metaphors supports his message about a dream that discussing different feelings is the most powerful emotion. Although it may be a hard writing technique to follow, it clearly proves his point. The descriptions written in set his style apart from other writers. Shakespeare’s elaborate use of comparing people and objects makes the play an important marker in the development of teen writing.

Text Questions About Questioned Document

Review Questions

1. What is a questioned document? Describe at least one example of something that might be a questioned document. A questioned document is any written or typed document that’s authenticity has been brought into question. A question document could be a will, drivers license, check, or painting that is suspected of being forged.

2. What is an exemplar? What are the best types of exemplars? An exemplar is an sample of typed or written documents that have been authenticated. Exemplars are used to compare to the questioned document. The best types of exemplars are those that are as close to the questioned document as possible. For example, if the questioned document is written on notebook paper, examiners would prefer if the exemplar is also written on notebook paper.

3. What are natural variations? Describe how these may happen. Natural variations are small differences in a persons handwriting that appear in any repetitious samples of writing. We all have these natural variations in our hand writing, and these may happen becase as people unconscious write their writing will not stay the exact same and take on natural variations.

4. How are stamped signatures different from written signatures? Stamped signatures generally have thick lines that lack things written signatures have, like varying width of the lines and darker spots with greater indentation where 2 lines intersect. (Such the cross of a “t” or “x.”)

5. What are some of the typescript machines that document examiners may have to investigate? Choose one of these machines and describe what document examiners may look for when comparing the machine to a questioned document. Some of the typescript machines that document examiners may have to investigate are printed documents from type writers, printers, or photocopiers. When examining a document created by a type writers examiners may compare exemplars from possible type writers the questioned document may have came from, or if they have the type writer itself they may examine the ribbon that saves impressions of anything the device had typed.

Critical Thinking Questions

1. Why are questioned documents important in forensic science? What is one example of a situation where a questioned document might be an important part of a criminal case? Question documents are important in forensic science because they can hold evidence to prove someone guilt or innocence. A question document could be an important part of a criminal case if it links a suspect to a crime. Using receipts you can prove someone was somewhere at a specific time, or examiners can prove who wrote the label on package that contained a bomb.

2. What are some of the ways that a document examiner might try to match a questioned document to a specific typewriter? What aspects might they look at? One aspect a document examiner might look at when trying to match a questioned document to a type writer is unique variations the type writer create after use, wear, and tear. They also may examine the ribbon that contains imprints of what is typed, or create exemplars to compare to the questioned document.

3. Imagine that you have been asked to determine whether a signature on a check is authentic or a forgery. What steps would you take in doing this? What aspects would you examine? I would first examine the check before comparing it to exemplars of signatures from the owner of the check. I would examine how much pressure the writer applies, the unique aspects of the style of writing, and then compare it to that of the exemplar. 4. Imagine that you have been asked to determine whether a will written fifty years ago is authentic or a modern-day forgery. How would you go about doing this? What aspects would you examine to help you make your determination? I would examine the ink and paper to see how old the document is, possibly using light to examine the ink or administering tests to examine the chemical compounds of the ink and paper. This could prove that the will is a forgery if the ink or paper is too modern. I would also examine the style of writing, because writing styles change throughout time.

5. A law enforcement agent is in charge of getting a writing sample from an uncooperative suspect. The agent puts the suspect in a comfortable room and has the person choose from a bunch of pencils and ink pens. The agent takes the questioned document and dictates the information to the suspect, having the suspect write down what she says as she reads from the questioned document. After several paragraphs, the agent stops and has the suspect rewrite the material two more times. What did the agent do wrong in this situation? What did the agent do right? I think the agent did everything correct. They made the suspect write things from the questioned document which will make it easier to compare, and by making them rewrite the material they ensure that the suspect is not disguising their hand writing.

error: Content is protected !!