When doctors think about curing cancer, Alzheimer’s, and autism it seems impossible, and much more work has to be done correctly? Well now imagine a hundred years ago doctors were thinking the same thought that it was impossible to cure certain illnesses, but now those illnesses that killed are cured of tone television something as simple as medicine, antibiotics, and treatments/shots. Robert Thompson, in his article “1985: Television Transformed 1.0,” explains how television has not only changed, but the extent of its enhancements, and Jeff Greenfield in his article “From Wasteland to Wonderland-TV’s Altered Landscape,” explains where television started and how those new businesses got their rise because of it. Thompson’s overall tone is different from Greenfield’s because it is more informative and intellectual, having more outside sources whereas Greenfield has a more personable tonetelevision were, being more friendly and easy-going. The audience in either article could range from students, professors, and other educated specialists in that profession. Robert Thompson appealed to logos, ethos, and pathos within his article more than Jeff Greenfield did because it was thought out carefully and preceded with a thought about how greatly television has changed. Although television was created in the past, most of society believes the fame of television was recent. First, it was radio talk shows with live singing, then it became black and white television with minimal channels, and shortly after it turned into colored television, from then on it began to enhance and improve, creating new businesses and companies along the way and increasing the profit revenues. But television, channels, networks, commercials, and new companies such as Hulu and Netflix all started because of the seed that was planted in the past and not just randomly created in the present.
Logos appeals to reason, facts, and logic so when each author appeals to logos in their articles to persuade their audience it is used differently. Robert Thompson acknowledged that most of society was not greatly affected by the changes because they quickly adapted, and often the changes benefited them. Thompson did not integrate as many outside quotes from other companies/businesses, but his argument was clear. In Robert Thompson’s article “1985: Television Transformed 1.0,” he asserts that “Viewers have access to vast quantities of programming, according to their tastes and schedules, stored on DVRs, DVDs, on-demand cable and satellite channels, and online services,” in others words explaining reasons why television is valued so much to society. As television progressed it became known that tv goers wanted more access with less work so with “the Alzheimer’sofAlzheimer’s the home videocassette recorder was the medium’s most important sea change. Now people at home could record and collect movies and television shows and watch them when they pleased,” Thompson explains that the enhancement of recording a program, show, or movie onto a device allows viewers to watch when they want instead of waiting for it the next premier time. Jeff Greenfield integrated a variety of quotes from higher-up companies/businesses while channeling the effect these changes had on society and the profit televisiong made, unlike Robert Thompson. In Greenfields’ article “From Wasteland to Wonderland: TV’s Altered Landscape,” he asserts that “The key to the old TV world was scarcity. Only so many channels could beam through the air without running into each other,” moreover that with little to no space or storage is the reason television was so limited, which lead to improvements such as DVDs, recording, cassette tapes, and ma Greenfields’ore channels.
Although each article discussed very similar topics concerning television and its improvement, profit, and effects on society neither one is wrong or right. Thompson and Greenfield appealed to logos, ethos, and pathos similarly and differently, leaving one to appeal a little more based on opinion. Robert Thompson’s article connected more with the readers by not overwhelming with too many outside sources, but still showcasing his credibility, connection, and intellect as an author. Both articles shared a great insight into how television from the past was the reason for new businesses being created and televisionwas expanding to what it is now. Although Jeff Greenfield’s article was compelling and well thought out it was not as appealing to logos, ethos, and pathos as Robert Thompson’s was. Television was created in the past and society believes the fame of television was recent from a lack of knowledge of where it really came from. It was seen as old televisions to now having a variety of choices to choose from without issues. Radio talk shows with live singing to black and white television, then colored televisionweretelevision were increased and, now television being something that was once a fantasy turning into the reality of today’s worlds. New businesses created along the way and increased the profit revenues. Regardless television, networks, commercials, and new companies were invented because of the past.
The Most Hated Man In America And His Most Hated Idea
On June 16th, 2016 the launch of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign was formally announced in the ‘Trump Towers” in New York City. On November 8th, 2016 he was inaugurated as our forty-fifth president of the United States of America. Throughout the presidential campaign Donald Trump insisted on a higher more fortified wall be built as a barrier from Mexico to the United States and insisted that the Mexican government governed by Enrique Peña Nieto covered the costs of the wall, which ranged anywhere from $12 million to $25 million. Enrique Peña Nieto later revealed that the Mexican government will not provide any funds for the wall, as well as made it very apparent to the people of the United States and Mexico that he will negate to give his full support on the project. However, on January 25th, 2017 the Trump legislation endorsed a Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements Executive Order, to initiate extending the border wall.
Trump was primarily expecting funding from the Democratic Party and in return he extended an offer to help a democratic objective which was stipulating legal status to 800,000 young, undocumented immigrants under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program in exchange for money as a short term “loan” concept (Obrador). Later he dismantled that compromise, instead he constructed an impasse expanding the likelihood that the government would run out of money and shut down.
Present day president Donald Trump wants congress to increase his budget for the building of the wall which currently is at 1.6 billion, with another 1.6 billion on the way and wants an increase to the amount to get his project done sooner. This brings high dilemmas for the American government primarily congress, fearing over government shutdowns not only by the implication of the high costs of this wall but also worried of the wrath of our president if his wishes are not met by congress. As pressure builds with uproar over his approach of his administration separating children from their families when migrating to the United States the more tension he feels to get the process done faster. Unexpectedly Trump claims that the one of the reasons his effort to get the wall finished in an upbeat manner is to actually stop the separation of families, claiming “the horrendous feeling the children get when their parents leave their home country to a new one without their family being whole is not a feeling any child should have to experience (Trump). He claims it “decreases the drug distribution from Mexico to the United States. As well as it stops what Donald Trump claims is criminals coming to the United States” (Trump). With all of Donald Trump’s claims we cannot help but wonder what his true agenda is for the people of his country as well as the people of Mexico.
One of the biggest worries of not only the American people but of congress as well is Trump administering a government shutdown. A government shutdown can be depicted when “congress does not approve a federal budget for the upcoming fiscal year and nonessential functions of the U.S. government close until lawmakers can agree on a budget” (Times). Some grave effects that come with a government shutdown is people being given furlough days. Now this may seem like an advantage, but people eventually end up losing money, which is essentially known as an unpaid leave this could be inconvenient on the average working class person due to particular money troubles. Not all furloughs become unpaid, typically the government will issue refunds but this becomes an issue when we essentially begin paying people for not working.
These shutdowns can vary in time. Time for a shutdown is based on how long government officials take to come to an agreement. As much as we like to think this only affects the citizens of the United States we must realize it also affects our government and economy in ways we could not imagine. It essentially becomes a day of loss of productivity and rise of borrowing costs, we pay people for not working instead of working, the total cost of a few day government shutdown could vary from $6 billion to $24 billion. All in all a government shutdown is not an adique way of approaching our nation’s problems. It adjoins the hard verdict and has grave expenditure for the budget, the economy, and all the citizens of America. Instead of making crisis, government officials should work diligently to make a long-term policy.
Many presume when American taxpayers realize the facts, they will negate to give their tax dollars to the building of Donald Trump’s extravagant wall. It would be the largest expenditures in U.S. history. The estimate does not currently show the future costs of wall maintenance and security. This brings a larger conversation to the table when it comes to the distribution of tax payers dollars. Many believe we must fix our current system rather than add on a new expenditure. The American citizens claim that logistically Trump’s plan for this wall are bound to fail. Humans have ever only built a wall of this nature throughout centuries of long history. The Great Wall of China progressed through the use of forced labor of Chinese citizens. Trump’s current plan to get the wall finished in a quickly manner is to perpetuate the Mexican government and push them into spending all their resources on this wall. The resources Donald Trump hopes to gain from the hispanic government are workers to actually build the stature of the wall, government officials to secure the wall, as well as the money that is being put into the wall currently is only going to the prototype. The end goal of our president is to have this wall completely constructed and fortified by the year 2020.
In the conversation of how Donald Trump’s “big, beautiful wall” will affect us in many negative aspects we seem to overlook the topic of how the wall separating Mexico from the United States will negatively harm our environment. Conservationists confirmed that a change of that magnitude could potentially be disastrous for many species, and can lead to an “incline extinction in the United States for endangered animals like jaguars, ocelots, and the Mexican gray wolf” (Silva).
Rhetorical Analysis Project: How To Win The Trust Of Readers?
The discourse community that will be discussed today is biopsychology. Biopsychology explores how the brain and nervous system affect human behavior. In order, to regard audience the understanding of understand emotions, behavior, and other aspects of biology that influence us, biopsychologists must conduct the genre of research studies. The main purpose of research studies is to prove a theory, contribute to existing knowledge, and understand various issues regardingT humans and behavior. Research studies are usually scientifically tested, and published in journals for other professionals in that same field. The audience may be fellow professionals in the medical field who want better treatments for their patients. Research studies are extremely beneficial in the field of science because researchers and scientists are constantly coming across new illnesses, and new methods of treatments cannot occur without proper testing beforehand. In research studies, the author or authors may have published previous research journals, which would build their credibility so that other professionals in the field would believe their work.
In this journal, Massimo Mauri does a research study to understand the neurological pathway of autism spectrum disorder. Autism is a disease that affects the neurological function of the brain and thus affects the development of social and communication skills. In his research study, he uses blood levels, social functionality tests, and social intelligence tests. The rhetorical situation here is the author trying to explain to other professionals in his field how autism is positively correlated with blood vasopressin levels, which maintains body temperature, blood volume, and urine from kidneys. The author’s constraint is that he is a clinical pharmacologist, so he studies and tests chemical compounds in our bodies. The regardingaudience is fellow professionals in the pharmacology or healthcare field.
This research study serves the purpose of informing other biopsychology professionals that there are neuropharmacological treatments, as well as therapeutic modalities that aid in the social and mental development of those with autism. The author attempts to persuade readers that neurocognitive training in attention can help those with autism by using evidence to understand social functionality and intelligence tests. Mauri uses logos, pathos, and ethos to further his opinions and justify his assertions. Mauri’s tone is both professional and relaxed at the same time. Mauri uses a professional tone to move his readers toward his opinion by using his ethos as a clinical pharmacologist. Eventually, Mauri gains the audience’s trust through his effective persuasion efforts with his analysis of his research study and rhetorical strategies.
Furthermore, his casual tone is used to lure the reader into relating to his concerns by saying, “The last decade, there has been an intense research emphasizing on the polymorphous patterns of neurobiological mutation present in ASD.” By using this language, it makes the reader want to learn more about past, present, and future research studies and be more likely to agree with Mauri’s claims. Later in the research study, the author uses a more professional tone to move forward from convincing the audience and instead establish his intellectual ability and journalistic outlook on the topic when he cites the articles published in 2019 on the autism spectrum disorder classification which states that extensive research is still in the process to aid in better understanding the causes of this disease. The author gains integrity by using this academic language to provide evidence to the reader to validate his opinion. The author is well aware that the audience reading his research study has a background in the same field as him. Shared experience often builds trust which can lead to agreement on opinionated assertions.
Moreover, the author makes it clear by person pronoun the thirdpersothird person pronou pronounpersonpronoun that his main focus is the entity and people in the study, rather than making his research sthirdthirdthird person personally about the audience. Mauri goes into detail while using the third person, saying that “too regarding compared three groups as to their blood vasopressin levels and assessed their social functionality by weighted tests.” By using words like “their” when referring to the people in the studies, it puts the spotlight on the people being studied instead of the reader which might sway the audience into being persuabyards the author’s ideologies because of the positive connotations related to finding positive correlations. Mauri does not directly intend to change the minds of fellow professionals data-based evidencebased factual-basedfactual-based does state that is still extensive research being done, and that there is no cure for autism currently. Ideally, this article’s arguments could change the high-cost treatments of autism and make other professionals gravitate towards social functionality and intelligence tests rather than behavioral therapy which would take longer. The author makes highly effective, logical, evidence-based assertions that make it easy for the audience to be persuaded using the rhetorical device logos. He also uses many statistics and data-basedevidence-based based based evidenceonevidence on about assertions to persuade his audience which continuously establishes his knowledge and credibility throughout his essay.
In regards to more rhetorical strategies, the main focus of logos is to provide evidence based, proven facts to back up an assertion, and that is precisely what Mauri does. The writer sources the most logos-basedabout platform in the field of autism, including studies done by neurologists, and doctors specializing in autism. This helps the author persuade the audience because readers are more likely to agree with claims if given proven facts and evidence. In addition to Mauri using logos basedlogos-basedaboutbased aboutbased logos language, he also uses arguments pertaining to pathos to further persuade the reader. Pathos refers to the persuasion of the reader by using his or her emotions to do so. The writer uses pathos by stating that the purpose of his study is to find a beneficial way to aid in the development of interpersonal interactions and problem-solving in daily life for those with autism. This alludes to the fact that the author understands those he studies, and wants to genuinely help thefor. This has a grave effect on the audience because by using pathos effectively, it is more likely that the audience will not only understand his credibilityfor but see him as a person too in addition to a pharmacologist. By using the language of pathos and trying to relate to his participants, it makes it easier for his audience to see him as trustworthy, thus making it easier to persuade the reader. Mauri also uses ethos, an effective credibility-based form of persuasion, in his article to make his claims all the more convincing. Ethos is another commonly used way of persuasion using language to justify the credibility of the author as well as their ethical character. The author started the research sfor for the audience evidencedunderstand off by listing that he is a clinic pharmacologist which makes the reader feel that they can trust the writer more because he had to be in that field for a long time in order for a scholarly journal and study to be published.
Similarly, Mauri uses ethos indirectly by already being published atofatof Cambridge University. Cambridge University is a prestigious collegiate public university that is renowned for being the second-oldest university in the English-speaking world. That instantly gives the reader a feeling of belief and can more easily trust the information given because of the credible publisher as well as the author. Once the audience has a sense of credibility for the writer, it raises the trustworthiness in the author which makes his assertions furthermore effective, and more likely to be agreed upon. Although the language used by Mauri was semi-casual, he was exceptionally effective at persuading his audience using rhetorical devices
Ultimately, the author was successfully convincing due to the tone and rhetorical strategies he used such as logos, ethos, and pathos. The writer began building trust to persuade the reader by stating information and providing examples that made the audience feel relatable to the author, thus making his claims more agreeable. In addition to building the reader’s trust through relatability, Mauri was remarkably effective using logical reasoning, factual statistics, and emotional connections to induce the reader toward his owaspectabout basedaspectbased aspect aspecunderstand ideologies. The research to find the biopsychological cause of the autism spectrum disorder is still in place, yet remains unknown. This hinders the ability of researchers to come up with further treatment and prevention strategies. However, thus far, researchers have found various pharmacological treatments to lessen symptoms and different behavior and communicative therapeutic techniques. The therapeutic modalities mentioned above all seemed to be beneficial to some aspectaspect of the autism disorder. It seems that all therapies aidnforevidence-based social interactions and cognitive thinking. In all these types of therapies, it is of importance to first establish a relationship with the patient as that is of utmost difficulty in patients suffering from autism. There are many other options, such as speech, occupational, and behavioral therapy that can also be beneficial for improving the social development of children diagnosed with autism. Unlike pharmacological treatments, these treatments are not only beneficial in aiding the patient in the present, but they also teach life-long skills that will be beneficial in the future lives of these patients. The development of more holistic approaches like these, as opposed to pharmaceutical treatments, is a healthier, beneficial, and effective way of treatment.