The Rise In Divorces And Remarriages Free Sample

In the recent past, issues that families have encountered have been changing throughout time as the nature of their families evolves. Divorce and remarriage bring with them new challenges for individuals. For instance, certain lengthy domestic concerns, including abuse, continue to put a burden on today’s homes’ success and wellbeing. Also, the rise in divorces and remarriages can be associated with many factors, such as financial problems. Individuals who get married without a solid financial foundation are quite likely to get divorced and, in later years, remarry again.

There are various reasons why remarriages end in divorce more often than first marriages. For example, anyone who gets into a second marriage is likely to come with problems of the first marriage. When people remarry, they frequently transfer toxic relationship behaviors as well as mistrust concerns from their previous marriage into the partnership, which can destroy it. Equally, vulnerability is often a critical concern in a new marriage. Failing to share one’s deepest feelings, ideas, and desires may put a relation at threat by removing the connection and trust. Besides, the Ex-Factor is also a major cause of divorce in new marriages. Individuals tend to look for specific qualities before getting married. For instance, one may find it difficult to sustain a new marriage if the personality of the other partner does not match that of the one from the earlier relationship, hence leading to divorce.

Lastly, not being realistic is a major problem for remarried couples. Most people do not acknowledge that their first marriage is no longer a viable and they should not let the previous relationship hurt the new union. Most of the previous behaviors will remain, thus making one’s instinct to leave the new marriage. Similarly, money is always a concern with marriages, due to partner upkeep payments, individuals may end the relationship due to financial strains.

Aspects Of Communications Technology

Communication is the most crucial detail of building personal relationships, which is vital for the existence of a family. Sometimes, family members are far from each other, but they need to discuss an important issue immediately. In this case, technology can help solve this problem. The technology industry brought many innovations to human society, including ways of communicating. This paper states different strategies for using technology to communicate with families.

Communications technology can be described as wireless Internet and mobile devices that people can use to transmit information. Also, they can be expressed as radio, landline telephones, and live broadcasts (Pratt, 2019). Applications such as Skype, Discord, Google meet, etc., are most often used on personal computers. They provide the opportunity to hold a conference or conversation with many users (from 2 to 100, depending on the application) in one session. They can be helpful for the family, as they provide a good quality of communication and the opportunity to communicate with all family members simultaneously. However, the obvious disadvantage is that for this method of communication, a personal computer is needed, which may not always be nearby.

The telephone communication can also serve as a good way of communication. Still, it is not always relevant since there may be roaming or a lack of a network abroad. instead of this method, a family can use messengers (Facebook, Instagram, Telegram, and so on). They are easily installed on a mobile device and support audio and video calls and chat correspondence. Moreover, it is possible to send pictures, videos, and other media files with the help of messengers.

Nevertheless, I would like students to discuss each communication method’s positive and negative sides as they described in their initial posts. They can ask each other questions, clarify or supplement any information that they own and know how to apply. Discussing these issues will be a good ground for reflection and a wonderful experience that can be shared with other people and used in everyday life.

Reference

Pratt, M. K. (2019). ICT (information and communications technology, or technologies). SearchCIO.

Analysis Of Divine Command Theory

The Divine Command Theory (DCT) posits that a thing is good because God orders it to be done or wicked because God prohibits it from being done. Thus, to declare that loving our neighbors is good is linguistically equal to arguing that God compels us to love our neighbors. Similarly, it is wrong to kill because God forbids it. Someone may oppose DCT right away on the basis that good and evil become subjective to God’s discretion. Morality is essentially a will to dominance if good and evil are completely determined by God’s will.

The counterpoint to DCT is the claim that the foundation of morality exists outside of God and is not subject to His whim. Plato employs this method in his conversation with Euthyphro. “Is an activity morally good because God demands it [DCT], or does God command it because it is morally good?” asks the Euthyphro Dilemma (Moreland & Craig, 2017). One can be tempted to reject DCT and instead base morality on anything other than God. However, claiming that God demands something since it is morally right undermines God’s sovereignty and autonomy. If an external principle, in this case, the objective foundation of morality, exists apart from God, God is compelled to follow it, and so He is not sovereign. Furthermore, God’s morality is contingent on His obedience to this external norm; hence, His independence is jeopardized.

As a result, we’re trapped on the horns of a dilemma. Neither option is acceptable to the Christian worldview. God is neither arbitrary in His moral deeds, nor is He bound by some external moral norm that guides His decisions (Moreland & Craig, 2017). In the first situation, we may claim that God is not good, and in the second, God is not God. At this point, it’s clear why some reject Christianity and choose moral relativism as their “standard,” except that the Bible paints a different image of morality and illustrates that the Euthyphro Problem is a false dilemma. The traditional Christian approach to the Euthyphro Dilemma is to find goodness in the character of God. This resolves the first horn of the issue since God does not decide what is good and what is bad at random. Rather, it is in God’s nature to do good, and God never goes against His essence.

Reference

Moreland, J., & Craig, W. (2017). Philosophical foundations for a Christian worldview (p. 672). InterVarsity Press.

error: Content is protected !!