Thoughtz On Budget Speech Essay Example For College

The past disadvantaged have found appreciation through redistribution in South Africa but is it growing or destroying the country. Redistribution is recognised as the transfer of wealth, income or property from some individuals to others caused by the social mechanism such as tax laws and monetary policy. Redistribution is crucial in South Africa because in the past years before 1994 black people were disadvantaged because the government did not allocate appropriate resources to the as the country was under apartheid laws, So the new government voted into parliament in 1994 introduced policies such as the black economic empowerment which empowered black people to be given a chance in their jobs so that they can also be executives and be entrepreneurs in their workplace. Redistribution is one of the important policies since 1994 that the government emphisised on, this essay is going to explain the advantages and disadvantages of redistribution in South Africa. Many people this policy has destroyed the country as people are lazy to do anything by themselves.
Importance of Redistribution
Redistribution has encouraged many black people to depend on themselves as it gives them opportunities to get out of poverty.

Redistribution is important in a country because it is good for both the poor and the rich according to (Norman, T. 2008) because of economic ineffiency goods are produced for both the rich and the poor, as the rich can only get rich by using the poor as they are the ones that are willing to work and buy the products that they produce, you will never see a rich person working for another rich person as they do not see the need to work because of this the poor society in South Africa is now protected by laws that forces the rich to pay a certain income at a certain time in exchange with the labour of the poor person. Redistribution of wealth is good because it contributes to stability and peace this is proven in South Africa during the apartheid.

Violence In Society

It’s a scary world today! Growing up used to be less traumatic just a few decades ago. Children back then worried about such things as a flat tire on their Schwinns and hoped that their teacher wouldn’t give too much homework.

How life has changed. A 1994 poll found more than half the children questioned said they were afraid of violent crime against them or a family member. Are these kids just paranoid, or is there a real problem?

Well, it turns out this is not some irrational fear based upon a false perception of danger. Life has indeed become more violent and more dangerous for children. Consider the following statistics: One in six youths between the ages of 10 and 17 has seen or knows someone who has been shot. The estimated number of child abuse victims increased 40 percent between 1985 and 1991. Children under 18 were 244 percent more likely to be killed by guns in 1993 than they were in 1986. Violent crime has increased by more than 560 percent since 1960.

The innocence of childhood has been replaced by the very real threat of violence. Kids in school try to avoid fights in the hall, walk home in fear, and sometimes sleep in bathtubs in order to protect themselves from stray bullets fired during drive-by shootings.

Even families living in so-called “safe” neighborhoods are concerned. They may feel safe today, but there is always a reminder that violence can intrude at any moment. Polly Klaas and her family no doubt felt safe in Petaluma, California. But on October 1, 1993, she was abducted from her suburban home during a sleepover with two friends. If she can be abducted and murdered, so can nearly any other child.

A child’s exposure to violence is pervasive. Children see violence in their schools, their neighborhoods, and their homes. The daily news is rife with reports of child molestations and abductions. War in foreign lands along with daily reports of murder, rape, and robberies also heighten a child’s perception of potential.

A Leader And His Congregation

The church I go to every week in Pine Hill is growing. It is home to numerous wonderful individuals who are deeply connected spiritually. They are like a family whom you can confide in, sharing your life challenges, and receiving guidance and support from them. Our pastor is an affectionate individual who genuinely strives to assist others to the best of his ability. He exudes warmth and comfort, resembling a large teddy bear. Nonetheless, being a pastor necessitates certain responsibilities and qualifications.

Speaking of a good pastor, it is expected that he or she adheres to divine laws and demonstrates such adherence in a way that is evident to the congregation. Moreover, a good pastor should possess traits such as a benevolent and compassionate nature, as well as demonstrate strong leadership within the church. Although my pastor possesses the aforementioned qualities, he lacks the necessary skills to effectively lead. According to the definition of “leader,” which refers to someone who directs, commands, or guides others or a collective activity, it is safe to say that my pastor falls short of meeting these criteria.

Despite my admiration for my pastor, he predominantly fulfills the role of a teacher within the congregation rather than providing the necessary leadership. It is crucial for the strength of the congregation to have an effective leader. Nevertheless, I want to emphasize that overall, it is an exceptional church that I thoroughly enjoy attending and contributing to in various ways.

Each week at church, I am deeply moved by the love shown to me. However, I think the church could be even better if two things were to occur. Firstly, we should recognize the importance of having a new pastor who can provide guidance and not just instruction. Alternatively, we could discuss our concerns with the current pastor and give him a chance to enhance his leadership abilities. If he successfully transforms into a stronger leader, we may decide to support him and become his disciples.

If the congregation collaborates to deal with this matter, I am confident that the church members will gain benefits. By selecting a more competent leader, a larger number of individuals might be introduced to Jesus Christ and witness their lives being influenced in ways that surpass understanding. Nevertheless, those who do not actively pursue a new pastor may eventually realize that they have Jesus in their hearts but lack the capacity to lead others towards Him. Alternatively, they may never get the chance to encounter Jesus or receive the numerous blessings He bestows.

Given the popularity of this pastor, it may prove challenging to find unanimous agreement with my perspective. The church elders attest, “the pastor is a man of God, evident in his daily life; he is both an upstanding individual and a proficient leader.” Meanwhile, the worship team acknowledges that while he may lack certain leadership capabilities, he remains a devout man of God, and they advocate for a pastor of his caliber.

In both cases, each party acknowledges or implies their lack of leadership skills, indicating that this is evident to others as well as myself. Consequently, if we fail to identify a leader for this church, the children, who represent its future, will not be guided to actively follow or embody Christ’s teachings. As a result, this church will gradually diminish until it resembles its state in 1990 – merely another unnoticed church as people casually drive or walk past it.

error: Content is protected !!