Tv Talk Shows – Jerry Springer And Oprah Winfrey Free Writing Sample

Compare and ContrastIn the world of entertainment, TV talk shows have undoubtedly flooded every inch of space on daytime television. Many of us have seen and heard the often recycled topics found on such shows as Jerry Springer and Oprah Winfrey. And anyone who watches talk shows on a regular basis knows that each one varies in style and format. One might enjoy watching the sometimes trashy subject matter found on Jerry Springer, while someone else might prefer the more serious and light hearted feel of the Oprah Winfrey show. But no two shows are more profoundly opposite in content. Jerry Springer could easily be considered the king of trash talk. The topics on his show are as shocking as they get. For example, the show takes the ever common talk show themes of love, lust, sex, sexuality, adultery, cheating, guilt, hate, conflict and morality to a different level. In a vintage Springer show, one finds women who cheated on their boyfriends and are ready to confess. But the boyfriends are in for a bigger surprise. As it turns out that all the women haven’t been secretly seeing other guys, but seeing other women, who also happen to be waiting backstage. Another episode tells of a John Wayne Bobbit type case, but with a more twisted plot. A male cuts off his own manhood because he claimed that his homosexual neighbor was stalking him. Shocking, indeed, but the list of talk material goes on from dangerous love triangles, broken homes, pregnant strippers, teenage prostitutes, adult film stars, devil worshippers and the ever popular talk show regulars, the members of the Ku Klux Klan. Clearly, the Jerry Springer show is a display and exploitation of societies mora catastrophes, yet people are willing to eat up the intriguing predicaments of other peoples lives.

Oprah Winfrey was once a follower of the trash TV format, but her long running popular TV talk show has since been reformed. Like Jerry Springer, the Oprah Winfrey show takes talk TV to its extreme, but Oprah goes in the opposite direction. Oprah is probably the most immaculate talk show there is. It is unlikely that you will find guest on Oprah that have committed adultery, have sold their souls to the devil, or are part of a racist hate group. Instead, the show focuses on the improvement of society and an individuals quality of life. Topics range from teaching your children responsibility, managing your work week, proper etiquette, getting to know your neighbors and entertaining interviews with celebrities. Not many talk shows are interested in taking time to teach children right from wrong, or give techniques to get along with people better, but it seems that the Oprah shows top priority is to educate first, and then entertain. Compared to Oprah, the Jerry Springer show looks like toxic waste being dumped on society. Still, there are times when Jerry Springer has made an effort to help the troubled people on his show. The most notable is when he has helped extremely obese people get to the hospital and help them turn their lives around. The entire process is still taped for its entertainment value, but at least something good came out of it. Jerry also ends every show with a final word. He makes a small speech that sums up the entire moral of the show. Hopefully, this is the part where most people will learn something very valuable.

Even if Oprah is as squeaky clean as it is, the show is not for everyone. The shows main target audience that are working middle-class Americans. A vast majority of these people usually have the time, money, and stability to deal with life’s tougher problems. Jerry Springer, on the other hand, has more of an association with the young adults of society. These are your 18 -21 year-olds whose main troubles in life involve love, relationship, sex, pregnancy, money, peers and influence. They are the ones who see some value and lessons to be learned underneath the show’s exploitation.

While these two talk shows are as different as night and day, both have ruled the talk show circuit for many years now. Each one caters to a different audience while both have a strong following from legions of fans. Ironically, both could also be considered pioneers in the talk show world. Jerry Springer’s crude and vulgar topics may be looked down upon, but no other talk show comes close to the raw exposure of its guest. Oprah Winfrey was able to break away and create a unique and highly successful talk show. Even as these to talk shows stand on opposite sides of the spectrum, both have managed to stand alone to their highest extremes and are considered the best at what they are.

English Essays

Capote Vs. Krakauer Comparison Essay

The most important thing any writer can do is to give their characters a feel ofdimension to make them seem real. Although Capote and Krakauer do that in verydifferent ways in In Cold Blood and Into Thin Air, they both reached the same end result:characters you believe. They give them thoughts, faces and personalities. They dontportray everyone as flawless, they display the faults and the little quirks. They give themlife through words, making these stories believable. Despite the fact both incidentshappened years before each book was written, the use of detailed facts and personalityprofiles make each story seem incredibly realistic. But while Capote chooses to write anentirely objective piece, Krakauer relies heavily on personal opinion and experience,creating two very distinct frames of mind and causing the reader too see the characters ineach book very differently.

In 1959 the Clutter family was murdered in a tiny Kansas town called Holcomb.

Six years later Truman Capote wrote a very detailed book about the whole case, from theday of the murder to the court case prosecuting the two murderers, Dick and Perry.

Although he wasnt there when the four murders happened, through word choice,description and characterization he creates an accurate portrait of the many intense eventssurrounding such a tragic story.

In comparison, in 1996 esteemed climber Rob Hall led an expedition ofmoderately experienced climbers attempting to climb Mt. Everest, only to result indisaster and the loss of nine peoples lives. Jon Krakauer was a member of thatexpedition, and wrote a piece about the misadventure for Outside magazine. Feeling therewas more to be said, soon after he wrote a book. Krakauer takes a similar approach asCapote, yet inserting more opinions and less of a feeling of objectiveness to hischaracters. This is most likely since Krakauer was living Everest first hand, as opposed toCapote who put himself into the environment years later, picking up details here and thereinstead of relying solely on memory and friends. One of Capotes greatest strengths is to create thought for his characters, making italmost appear as if he knows what they are thinking.

All summer Perry undulated between half-awake stupors and stickly, sweat-drenchedsleep. Voices roared through his head; one voice persistently asked him, Where is Jesus? Where? And once he woke up shouting, The bird is Jesus! The Bird is Jesus! (381)This selection almost creates a feeling that Capote is talking about himself as opposed toa man he never met. Although this type of detail may seem unimportant to the overallstory, it creates an amazing sense of believability. That ability is one of the main reasonsCapotes book is so believable. By seeing Perry suffer through his horrible nightmares itseasier to believe his character. It makes him very real and lifelike to the readers.

Krakauer also gives voice to his characters, yet his interpretation of them seems tobe constantly influenced by his own opinions of their personality and actions.

Stuart Hutchinson, thirty-four, attired in a Ren and Stimpy tee shirt, was a cerebral,somewhat wonkish Canadian cardiologist on leave from a research fellowship. (37)By implying that he pictured Hutchinson as wonkish (i.e. behavior seen as crazy,humorous, or amusingly perverse) he is putting an idea in the readers head whichotherwise might not have been there. It is Krakauer stating his view on the mansbehavior that provides a different tone, basing that on the fact that other people on theexpedition may not have felt the same way.

One area in which both authors excel is description. Both stories have a sense ofreality, with all the fabulous description of scenery it is easier to picture what ishappening. For Capote, it wasnt hard to get people to relate to a small town in theMidwest.

At one end of the town stands a dark old stucco structure, the roof of whichsupports an electric sign –DANCE– but the dancing has ceased and the advertisement has beendark for several years. (13)That is a sight which many people have seen in one form or another in their lives,making it even easier to understand the town of Holcomb and its small population. Krakauer has a harder task, trying to relate readers to being on Mt. Everest,something very few people have ever done. To make up for that fact, he uses great detailto help create a picture in his readers mind.

Cinders, coarse gravel, and granite boulders covered much of the ice, but every now andthen the trail would cross a patch of bare glacier- a translucent, frozen medium that glistens likepolished onyx. (58)Although Capote and Krakauer each have a different style, different opinions anddifferent ways of making the truth story like, both are wonderful storytellers and havecreated great examples of true stories.

BibliographyWorks CitedCapote, Truman. In Cold Blood. New York: Random House Publishing, 1966.

Krakauer, Jon. Into Thin Air. New York: Villard Books, 1997

Analysis Of Movie “Boondock Saints”

The Boondock Saints film illustrates various causes and explanations for social deviance. One instance of this is depicted in the Subjective view of deviance through a Constructionist Theory. The Subjectivist viewpoint posits that a deviant individual is a conscious, emotional, and cognitive subject and that one ought to comprehend that person’s experience. According to the Constructionist outlook, deviants actively seek significance in their deviant actions. In the movie, the brothers are searching for meaning in their acts of killing. They perceive themselves as being on a divine mission and believe they will be safeguarded and blessed for their actions. The brothers in the film offer an intriguing case study on mass murder. Although they don’t murder everyone simultaneously and in the same location, their approach resembles that of a cult. They consider themselves entrusted by God to eliminate all criminals in Boston, akin to certain cults’ beliefs. Furthermore, most of their homicides are planned in advance.

According to the theory of Subculture of Violence, the murder committed by these brothers can be mainly attributed to their social standing and incapacity to break free from lower social classes. This theory suggests that individuals who are less privileged or impoverished have a higher tendency to partake in violent acts such as murder and rape due to social inequality. Poverty is seen as the underlying cause behind this violence in these instances. Rather than directing their aggression towards much wealthier individuals, the brothers focus on those with more authority, including those accountable for generating and sustaining poverty among other people.

Lastly, the actions of the brothers can be seen as acts of terrorism, but they are not directed towards the public. Instead, their targets are criminals and potential criminals. Here, terrorism refers to using violence against a government to force it into taking a particular action. In this case, the mafia family and all those involved in criminal activities represent the government within the city. The brothers’ objective is to send a powerful message to individuals involved in murder, rape, extortion, and other illegal acts: “Stop your activities immediately.”

error: Content is protected !!